Oscars 2025 Recap / Filmland Spirits Quadraforce
Bob is joined by Oscars expert Daniel Joyaux to break down the 2025 Academy Awards, both the telecast and the awarded films. How will newly-crowned Best Picture Anora be remembered? Which films didn’t get the love they deserved? Then, Bob and Brad catch up with Troy Bolotnick from Filmland Spirits and taste their new four-grain bourbon, Quadraforce.
Film & Whiskey Instagram
Film & Whiskey Twitter
Email us!
For more episodes and engaging content, visit Film & Whiskey's website at www.filmwhiskey.com.
00:00:01,520 --> 00:00:05,280
On today's Film and Whiskey, we
are recapping the 2025 Oscars.
2
00:00:05,280 --> 00:00:08,119
They just wrapped up and I'm
joining you pretty much live
3
00:00:08,119 --> 00:00:09,800
here.
Then we're going to throw over
4
00:00:09,800 --> 00:00:12,760
to an interview with our friends
at Film Land Spirits.
5
00:00:12,920 --> 00:00:15,000
That's all ahead on Film and
Whiskey.
6
00:00:34,840 --> 00:00:37,360
Well, hey everybody, welcome
into the film and Whiskey
7
00:00:37,360 --> 00:00:39,000
podcast.
I'm Bob Book.
8
00:00:39,280 --> 00:00:42,280
I'm flying solo tonight because
my Co host does not care about
9
00:00:42,280 --> 00:00:44,960
the Academy Awards and he does
care about sleeping.
10
00:00:45,160 --> 00:00:49,000
So what I did in his stead is I
brought in our chief Oscars
11
00:00:49,000 --> 00:00:51,800
expert for the second time this
ox Oscars season.
12
00:00:52,040 --> 00:00:54,600
It's our friend Daniels.
YO, we're going to break down
13
00:00:54,800 --> 00:00:58,880
this entire awards telecast.
It just wrapped up, I guess, 10
14
00:00:58,880 --> 00:01:01,120
minutes ago.
So we collected our thoughts a
15
00:01:01,120 --> 00:01:04,040
little bit and we're going to
spoil what we thought of this
16
00:01:04,040 --> 00:01:05,560
whole thing.
Daniel, how you doing tonight
17
00:01:05,560 --> 00:01:07,680
man?
I am good, thank you for having
18
00:01:07,720 --> 00:01:10,280
me.
OK, so let me let me preview
19
00:01:10,280 --> 00:01:13,760
this a little bit by I want to
say thank you for an article you
20
00:01:13,760 --> 00:01:16,760
wrote the other day for, I
believe, Rodger Ebert breaking
21
00:01:16,760 --> 00:01:19,960
down the mathematical chances
and probabilities of our best
22
00:01:19,960 --> 00:01:22,800
picture race.
So going into this tonight,
23
00:01:22,840 --> 00:01:26,800
Enora was pretty much the the
odds on favorite the front
24
00:01:26,800 --> 00:01:29,840
runner for the award.
I guess what I'd like to start
25
00:01:29,840 --> 00:01:34,320
by saying is I am surprised the
extent to which everything kind
26
00:01:34,320 --> 00:01:37,840
of ended up coalescing around
Enora this this Oscar season.
27
00:01:38,120 --> 00:01:40,040
I figured it would win best
picture.
28
00:01:40,520 --> 00:01:43,000
I don't know if I would have
pegged it to win all five of the
29
00:01:43,000 --> 00:01:45,560
Oscars at 1:00 tonight.
Yeah, I agree.
30
00:01:45,600 --> 00:01:50,000
I you know, the, the biggest
difference between the
31
00:01:50,000 --> 00:01:54,960
nominations and the winners, I
think are what gets nominated is
32
00:01:54,960 --> 00:01:56,840
primarily a question of what
people watch.
33
00:01:57,920 --> 00:02:01,120
What wins is primarily a
question of what people love.
34
00:02:01,880 --> 00:02:04,520
And there are a lot of times
where films rack up a lot of
35
00:02:04,520 --> 00:02:06,360
nominations and not a lot of
wins.
36
00:02:07,880 --> 00:02:11,280
There are also a lot of times
where films rack up 345
37
00:02:11,280 --> 00:02:14,240
nominations and sweep their
categories.
38
00:02:15,800 --> 00:02:18,760
You know, we saw the last few
years Scorsese films like The
39
00:02:18,760 --> 00:02:22,640
Irishman and Killer Slaughter
Moon get a lot of nominations
40
00:02:22,640 --> 00:02:25,920
and win nothing.
We saw Amelia Perez go 2 for 13
41
00:02:25,920 --> 00:02:28,000
tonight.
And Inora, on the other hand,
42
00:02:28,000 --> 00:02:32,480
win 5 for six.
So there's a lot of temptation
43
00:02:32,480 --> 00:02:36,280
when the nominations come out to
feel like, oh, we can tell based
44
00:02:36,280 --> 00:02:38,080
on these numbers what voters
love.
45
00:02:38,480 --> 00:02:41,920
And a lot of times you can't.
I I don't mean to speculate too
46
00:02:41,920 --> 00:02:45,120
much here, but when you came on
last, the nominations had just
47
00:02:45,120 --> 00:02:49,520
been announced and Carlos Sofia
Gascon had not yet torpedoed the
48
00:02:49,520 --> 00:02:53,240
entire film that she was in.
So folks, if you are not
49
00:02:53,240 --> 00:02:56,840
familiar with the ongoing drama
behind Amelia Perez, it's star
50
00:02:57,440 --> 00:03:01,200
Carlos Sofia Gascon.
There was a number of
51
00:03:01,200 --> 00:03:05,080
incriminating tweets dredged up
against her, which she doubled
52
00:03:05,080 --> 00:03:08,120
down on repeatedly and then paid
for her own disastrous press
53
00:03:08,120 --> 00:03:11,960
conference, essentially tanking
her chances at winning Oscars.
54
00:03:11,960 --> 00:03:16,920
And somehow Zoe Saldana and the
songwriters survived the the
55
00:03:16,920 --> 00:03:19,560
scorched earth policy that she
went on here.
56
00:03:19,960 --> 00:03:22,560
I guess, Daniel, what I am.
What I am wondering though is
57
00:03:23,760 --> 00:03:26,880
once Amelia Perez was kind of
out of the picture, I think
58
00:03:26,880 --> 00:03:31,080
everyone locked in on a Nora.
If that hadn't happened, do you
59
00:03:31,080 --> 00:03:35,320
still think Anora comes away as
the winner here because Amelia
60
00:03:35,320 --> 00:03:39,680
Perez was already so divisive?
I, I do something we talked
61
00:03:39,680 --> 00:03:42,280
about when the nominations came
out and I and I said on that
62
00:03:42,280 --> 00:03:45,400
podcast and like you said, this
is, this is before the Amelia
63
00:03:45,400 --> 00:03:48,120
Perez controversies.
I had said in the last podcast
64
00:03:48,520 --> 00:03:51,880
that I did not think Amelia
Perez, the brutalist and wicked
65
00:03:51,880 --> 00:03:53,120
could win.
And I thought the winner would
66
00:03:53,120 --> 00:03:56,640
be 1 of either a Nora Conclave
or complete unknown.
67
00:03:57,120 --> 00:04:00,560
Because in the preferential
ballot, once you get past the
68
00:04:00,560 --> 00:04:02,720
early eliminations, the films
that just don't have a lot of
69
00:04:02,720 --> 00:04:06,520
support and you get into the
heavyweights, at that point,
70
00:04:06,520 --> 00:04:11,600
you're deep enough in voters
ballots that getting last place
71
00:04:11,600 --> 00:04:15,440
votes really matters.
Because once you go deep in
72
00:04:15,440 --> 00:04:19,680
ballots and 6th place votes and
7th place votes turn into first
73
00:04:19,680 --> 00:04:23,280
place votes, at that point it
really is a competition of, OK,
74
00:04:23,280 --> 00:04:26,160
what films are going to be 9th
and 10th on the most number of
75
00:04:26,160 --> 00:04:27,440
ballots?
Those are the films that can't
76
00:04:27,440 --> 00:04:29,120
win.
And that's why I've thought all
77
00:04:29,120 --> 00:04:33,200
along that Amelia Perez, Wicked
and the Brutalist could never
78
00:04:33,200 --> 00:04:35,560
seriously win Best Picture,
because those are the three
79
00:04:35,560 --> 00:04:37,520
films that were most likely to
appear at the bottom of the most
80
00:04:37,520 --> 00:04:39,520
ballots.
So how'd you do tonight?
81
00:04:39,520 --> 00:04:42,840
I went 14 of 23.
It was not a not a banner night
82
00:04:42,840 --> 00:04:46,920
for me.
Yeah, I went 15 of 23.
83
00:04:46,920 --> 00:04:49,240
I was doing really well for a
while and then I missed several
84
00:04:49,240 --> 00:04:52,720
of the top categories because I
had Demi Moore, Timothy Chalamet
85
00:04:52,720 --> 00:04:55,400
and Brady Corbett, all Brady
Corbett, all winning.
86
00:04:55,840 --> 00:04:59,440
So I would had only missed 6
until I'm sorry, I'd only missed
87
00:04:59,440 --> 00:05:03,160
5 until it got to the to the
last few categories and I missed
88
00:05:03,160 --> 00:05:06,640
three more.
I was getting the growing sense
89
00:05:06,640 --> 00:05:10,600
over the last week that the
brutalist had been perceived by
90
00:05:10,600 --> 00:05:13,000
the Academy at large as a little
bit pretentious.
91
00:05:13,240 --> 00:05:15,560
And so I didn't pick Brady
Corbett to win and director, I
92
00:05:15,560 --> 00:05:17,280
picked Shawn Baker, and I got
that one right.
93
00:05:17,600 --> 00:05:21,000
But I did pick both Timothy
Chalamet and Demi Moore.
94
00:05:21,000 --> 00:05:24,840
I got swayed by the last
Chalamet win, and the guy has
95
00:05:24,840 --> 00:05:26,840
been running such an incredible
campaign.
96
00:05:27,160 --> 00:05:31,800
And I really did think that the
youthfulness of the new Oscar
97
00:05:31,800 --> 00:05:34,440
voting makeup would swing
things.
98
00:05:34,440 --> 00:05:39,000
Timmy's win like this was a
truly new type of Oscar campaign
99
00:05:39,000 --> 00:05:42,680
that hit a level of virality
online I don't think we've ever
100
00:05:42,680 --> 00:05:44,560
seen.
It might be my favorite Oscar
101
00:05:44,560 --> 00:05:47,400
campaign I've ever seen.
I don't even love the movie, and
102
00:05:47,400 --> 00:05:49,040
I really didn't love the
performance that much.
103
00:05:49,040 --> 00:05:50,680
But I was really pulling for
Timmy here.
104
00:05:51,000 --> 00:05:54,880
And when they called Adrian
Brody's name, I like Adrian
105
00:05:54,880 --> 00:05:56,480
Brody and I liked the
performance.
106
00:05:56,840 --> 00:05:59,800
It felt a little bit
anticlimactic to me, I'm not
107
00:05:59,800 --> 00:06:04,120
going to lie.
Yeah, I would be curious for any
108
00:06:04,120 --> 00:06:09,360
voter that voted for Rami Malek
in 2018, but not for Timothy
109
00:06:09,360 --> 00:06:11,800
Chalmet this year.
So just explain.
110
00:06:11,800 --> 00:06:14,520
And I, I'm not, I don't say that
in like a combative way, like,
111
00:06:14,560 --> 00:06:17,880
oh, you're an idiot.
Like, I'm just genuinely curious
112
00:06:17,920 --> 00:06:22,000
for them to say what it is about
Rami Malek's performance that
113
00:06:22,000 --> 00:06:24,640
worked for them and Timothy
Chalmet's performance that
114
00:06:24,920 --> 00:06:26,360
didn't.
And, you know, it's all
115
00:06:26,360 --> 00:06:28,040
circumstantial.
Like, maybe their answer is just
116
00:06:28,040 --> 00:06:30,840
that no one in Rami Malek's here
was as good as Adrian Brody and
117
00:06:30,840 --> 00:06:32,640
the Brutalist.
And that's a perfectly valid
118
00:06:32,640 --> 00:06:36,080
answer.
But it does feel like Rami Malek
119
00:06:36,080 --> 00:06:39,440
got credit for doing something
that Shalomay didn't, which is
120
00:06:39,440 --> 00:06:42,080
confusing me, especially because
Rami Malek wasn't singing in
121
00:06:42,080 --> 00:06:44,120
Boogie and Rhapsody and Shalomay
was.
122
00:06:44,520 --> 00:06:46,360
And I know you can make the
point like, oh, Dylan's not a
123
00:06:46,360 --> 00:06:49,640
good singer, so it's easy to,
you know, mimic his bad singing.
124
00:06:49,640 --> 00:06:52,840
But I felt like Shalomay
channeled Dylan in a way that
125
00:06:52,840 --> 00:06:54,840
Rami Malek was just kind of
doing cosplay.
126
00:06:55,480 --> 00:06:59,360
And so I'm really interested in,
in what voters see the
127
00:06:59,360 --> 00:07:01,400
difference as because I, I kind
of don't get it.
128
00:07:02,200 --> 00:07:04,800
Yeah, I think it was the lack of
prosthetic teeth, really.
129
00:07:04,800 --> 00:07:07,280
If if they'd given him a nice
pair of chompers, it would have
130
00:07:07,600 --> 00:07:09,080
tipped him over the edge here, I
think.
131
00:07:09,680 --> 00:07:13,360
No, but it's a similar thing
with the Demi Moore Mikey
132
00:07:13,360 --> 00:07:16,480
Madison Award.
So Mikey Madison wins in what
133
00:07:16,480 --> 00:07:19,520
you were calling a 5050 race.
I really thought that was the
134
00:07:19,520 --> 00:07:22,080
shocker of the night.
I think everyone that I've been
135
00:07:22,080 --> 00:07:24,960
talking to was like, look to me,
basically swept all the
136
00:07:24,960 --> 00:07:29,440
precursors and I don't know if
it was just like where I was
137
00:07:29,440 --> 00:07:32,280
looking at the TV screen when
they had the five tiles up, but
138
00:07:32,280 --> 00:07:36,080
I was locked in on Demi Moore.
You could tell the shock when
139
00:07:36,080 --> 00:07:38,320
they did not call her name and
she didn't do anything
140
00:07:38,320 --> 00:07:41,200
disrespectful.
And she kind of nodded politely
141
00:07:41,200 --> 00:07:42,640
and then, you know, gave
applause.
142
00:07:43,040 --> 00:07:45,760
I thought that room was shocked
and I was definitely shocked
143
00:07:45,760 --> 00:07:48,000
when they called her name.
I thought Moore was a very
144
00:07:48,000 --> 00:07:50,960
graceful loser.
I I think that, and this is one
145
00:07:50,960 --> 00:07:53,800
of the just fun things about
watching the Oscars, if you can
146
00:07:53,800 --> 00:07:57,160
see when the momentum changes in
the room throughout the course
147
00:07:57,160 --> 00:08:01,160
of the night, You know, Enora
won a few awards earlier in the
148
00:08:01,160 --> 00:08:03,880
evening that were kind of
considered toss up races, both
149
00:08:03,880 --> 00:08:06,120
editing and original screenplay.
Editing.
150
00:08:06,120 --> 00:08:08,720
It was considered kind of a toss
up weather between Enora and
151
00:08:08,720 --> 00:08:12,160
Conclave and original screenplay
was considered pretty 5050
152
00:08:12,160 --> 00:08:16,160
between Enora and a real pain.
And when Enora won both of
153
00:08:16,160 --> 00:08:21,560
those, I felt like you could
tell that how much people love
154
00:08:21,560 --> 00:08:23,000
that movie.
And that's when I first started
155
00:08:23,000 --> 00:08:25,440
to really think I, I kind of bet
Mikey Madison is going to win
156
00:08:25,440 --> 00:08:26,920
this.
And I had predicted doing more,
157
00:08:26,920 --> 00:08:29,000
but I felt like by the middle of
the show that it was going to be
158
00:08:29,000 --> 00:08:33,039
Mikey Madison's.
And I actually just looked up a
159
00:08:33,039 --> 00:08:36,200
really interesting stat earlier
that had never even occurred to
160
00:08:36,200 --> 00:08:39,120
me until this afternoon.
And then I ran out of time to
161
00:08:39,120 --> 00:08:40,960
look it up until after the
Oscars were over.
162
00:08:40,960 --> 00:08:45,360
And then I looked up really
quickly in terms of films that
163
00:08:45,360 --> 00:08:47,920
the title of the film is just a
character's name.
164
00:08:48,720 --> 00:08:52,120
So not a film with a character
in the title, but also other
165
00:08:52,120 --> 00:08:54,040
words like All About Eve or
Lawrence of Arabia.
166
00:08:54,600 --> 00:08:59,640
Not a film where it's a
character's sort of ceremonial
167
00:08:59,640 --> 00:09:02,520
title, like The Godfather or On
the Dais or Dances With Wolves,
168
00:09:02,960 --> 00:09:06,360
but just films that are a
character's name that win Best
169
00:09:06,360 --> 00:09:08,800
picture.
There have been eight such
170
00:09:08,880 --> 00:09:12,560
instances.
I'm sorry, 9 instances in an all
171
00:09:12,560 --> 00:09:15,200
but 2.
But the person who played that
172
00:09:15,200 --> 00:09:17,080
character has also won the lead
acting Oscar.
173
00:09:17,880 --> 00:09:22,040
One of the exceptions for Gigi,
the lead wasn't even nominated.
174
00:09:22,640 --> 00:09:26,720
So the only time a lead has ever
lost the Oscar for playing the
175
00:09:26,720 --> 00:09:29,680
titular character of Best
Picture winner was Albert Finney
176
00:09:29,680 --> 00:09:32,560
for Tom Jones in 1963.
Interesting.
177
00:09:32,560 --> 00:09:34,960
But there are many other
examples of that person winning,
178
00:09:34,960 --> 00:09:40,000
from Oppenheimer, Forrest Gump,
Annie Hall, Patton, Ben Hur,
179
00:09:40,160 --> 00:09:44,160
Marty and Hamlet in 1948.
That's crazy.
180
00:09:44,280 --> 00:09:46,760
What a stat.
So This is why we bring you on.
181
00:09:46,760 --> 00:09:50,560
This is like the ESPN stats and
and facts level analysis we need
182
00:09:50,560 --> 00:09:52,440
here man.
Well, it just makes you think
183
00:09:52,440 --> 00:09:55,760
that when a movie is called
Annie Hall, or when a movie is
184
00:09:55,760 --> 00:09:58,400
called Oppenheimer and you're
voting for that movie is the
185
00:09:58,400 --> 00:10:00,280
best movie of the year.
And then you have the option of
186
00:10:00,400 --> 00:10:02,440
who gives the best performance
of the year and you already
187
00:10:02,440 --> 00:10:04,320
think Oppenheimer is the best
movie of the year, or Annie Hall
188
00:10:04,320 --> 00:10:05,880
is the best movie of the year,
or Forrest Gump is the best
189
00:10:05,880 --> 00:10:07,760
movie of the year.
You're probably just eliminating
190
00:10:07,760 --> 00:10:09,720
to think, well, the guy that
played Forrest Gump must be the
191
00:10:09,720 --> 00:10:12,160
best performance, but the guy
that played Ben Hur must also be
192
00:10:12,160 --> 00:10:14,480
the best performance if I think
that's the best movie and it's
193
00:10:14,480 --> 00:10:17,720
called Ben Hur.
Yeah, and like, once again,
194
00:10:17,720 --> 00:10:22,360
justice for Timothy Chalamet for
ignoring being ignored last year
195
00:10:22,360 --> 00:10:23,640
for Wonka.
That's what I'm going to say.
196
00:10:23,920 --> 00:10:26,200
You could have had it again last
year and we didn't.
197
00:10:26,200 --> 00:10:28,720
Thanks a lot, Killian.
Sadly, I don't think Wonka was
198
00:10:28,720 --> 00:10:32,040
going to be the best picture
juggernaut that that's that
199
00:10:32,040 --> 00:10:35,040
depends upon.
All right, Daniel, I got a let's
200
00:10:35,040 --> 00:10:37,800
zoom out a little bit from the
ceremony itself or from the
201
00:10:37,800 --> 00:10:41,360
awards themselves.
We talked a little bit your last
202
00:10:41,360 --> 00:10:43,560
time here about what kind of a
movie year it was.
203
00:10:43,560 --> 00:10:46,080
And I know that there's been a
lot of division even amongst
204
00:10:46,080 --> 00:10:48,320
critics as to what kind of a
movie year it was.
205
00:10:48,840 --> 00:10:51,280
I'm I'm on the side that this
was a little bit of a thinner
206
00:10:51,280 --> 00:10:53,960
year for movies that I think are
going to stand the test of time.
207
00:10:54,200 --> 00:10:55,840
Not that the films themselves
were bad.
208
00:10:56,160 --> 00:10:58,320
They just feel kind of of the
moments, and I don't know if
209
00:10:58,320 --> 00:11:00,920
it's going to be one that we
remember years down the road.
210
00:11:01,480 --> 00:11:04,760
Brad and I were recording an
episode on a movie from 2011
211
00:11:04,760 --> 00:11:08,240
today, and when I looked at
those 2012 Oscars, that was a
212
00:11:08,360 --> 00:11:12,600
rough group of nominees.
You had The Tree of Life and
213
00:11:12,600 --> 00:11:14,520
Moneyball, and that was pretty
much it.
214
00:11:14,920 --> 00:11:18,640
And they didn't win anything.
And so I'm looking at these
215
00:11:19,160 --> 00:11:22,480
winners now, and I think that
when you have a year where it's
216
00:11:22,480 --> 00:11:25,280
like a thinner crop, if you pick
the right movies, no one really
217
00:11:25,280 --> 00:11:26,800
remembers that the crop was
thin.
218
00:11:27,360 --> 00:11:30,960
Now that we see the winners,
what do you think we're going to
219
00:11:30,960 --> 00:11:33,680
think of this batch of films
5-10 years out from now?
220
00:11:34,920 --> 00:11:36,880
I think for the most part, it's
a good batch.
221
00:11:36,920 --> 00:11:42,880
You know, when the nominations
came out, the extreme over
222
00:11:42,880 --> 00:11:48,240
performance of Amelia Perez I
think made it seem like voters
223
00:11:48,800 --> 00:11:51,160
felt like they had no other
choices in it there.
224
00:11:51,240 --> 00:11:53,560
It wasn't a good problem movies.
But then when you look at the
225
00:11:53,560 --> 00:12:00,720
winners, Inora won five Oscars,
The Brutalist won three, the
226
00:12:00,720 --> 00:12:03,320
substance 11.
I'm still here 11.
227
00:12:06,200 --> 00:12:09,960
Dune won a few.
Yep, I think Dune and Wicked
228
00:12:09,960 --> 00:12:12,040
both won two I think was my
tally.
229
00:12:12,320 --> 00:12:16,600
Yeah, yeah, Conclave won the
award that I think it probably
230
00:12:16,600 --> 00:12:19,160
deserved to win.
I believe eight of the 10 best
231
00:12:19,160 --> 00:12:21,680
picture nominees won Oscars.
The only two that didn't were A
232
00:12:21,680 --> 00:12:24,920
Complete Unknown and Nickel
Boys, which are both in my top
233
00:12:24,920 --> 00:12:26,280
five of the year.
But you know, what do I know?
234
00:12:27,560 --> 00:12:30,200
I do think looking at the
results, it looks like a pretty
235
00:12:30,200 --> 00:12:33,720
good year.
And I, I've been thrilled with
236
00:12:33,720 --> 00:12:36,240
the craft results in the last
few years that, you know, you
237
00:12:36,240 --> 00:12:40,000
used to see films go on just
kind of tear through the crafts
238
00:12:40,000 --> 00:12:42,400
and just go on sweeps the last
years.
239
00:12:42,400 --> 00:12:45,520
I feel like every craft
category, The Academy Is really
240
00:12:45,600 --> 00:12:50,680
judged on its own merits.
And I think almost all the craft
241
00:12:50,680 --> 00:12:54,480
winners are pretty deserving.
So if you are like an average
242
00:12:54,480 --> 00:12:57,600
Joe, you know, most people don't
see the number of films that you
243
00:12:57,600 --> 00:12:59,640
and I do, and you see even more
than I do.
244
00:13:00,120 --> 00:13:02,240
You're looking at this list of
winners and you're trying to
245
00:13:02,240 --> 00:13:04,720
decide, OK, I guess I should
watch a Nora because it just won
246
00:13:04,720 --> 00:13:07,000
five of them.
What's a movie that really
247
00:13:07,040 --> 00:13:09,120
didn't, I don't want to say that
it got snubbed.
248
00:13:09,120 --> 00:13:12,240
I don't like that word.
But like, either didn't win as
249
00:13:12,240 --> 00:13:14,560
many awards as you would have
liked it to or didn't win any
250
00:13:14,560 --> 00:13:17,840
awards that you think people
really need to seek out because
251
00:13:17,840 --> 00:13:20,800
it's it's getting buried by its
lack of recognition here.
252
00:13:22,000 --> 00:13:24,680
Yeah, there are a few.
I there are three movies that I
253
00:13:24,680 --> 00:13:26,800
really, really loved in the past
year that got no Oscar
254
00:13:26,800 --> 00:13:31,240
nominations, Furiosa, Hitman and
Saturday Night.
255
00:13:32,760 --> 00:13:36,000
Furiosa, I think is especially
strange that it's not here
256
00:13:36,360 --> 00:13:42,200
because if people remember back
in 2016, Mad Max Fury Rd. nearly
257
00:13:42,200 --> 00:13:44,160
swept the craft Oscars that
year.
258
00:13:46,640 --> 00:13:51,000
And Furiosa looks and sounds
every bit as good and all of a
259
00:13:51,000 --> 00:13:54,560
sudden because it more or less
failed the box office, it was
260
00:13:54,560 --> 00:13:57,840
deemed non Oscar worthy.
I think that's really weird.
261
00:13:59,320 --> 00:14:02,120
Hitman Glenn Powell gave one of
my favorite performances of the
262
00:14:02,120 --> 00:14:03,200
year.
I think everyone should watch
263
00:14:03,200 --> 00:14:06,000
Hitman, it's on Netflix,
fantastic Richard Linklater
264
00:14:06,000 --> 00:14:08,680
film.
And Saturday Night is another
265
00:14:08,680 --> 00:14:10,960
weird 1.
You know, that didn't do very
266
00:14:10,960 --> 00:14:12,920
good box office and I think that
killed a lot of its award
267
00:14:12,920 --> 00:14:14,640
chances.
It also got savaged by some
268
00:14:14,640 --> 00:14:18,160
critics, but I feel like what a
lot of critics didn't like about
269
00:14:18,160 --> 00:14:22,920
it was the point of view of the
director.
270
00:14:23,400 --> 00:14:24,840
Yeah, exactly.
The director and the point of
271
00:14:24,840 --> 00:14:28,040
view of the story.
But man, the editing in that
272
00:14:28,040 --> 00:14:32,040
film, the casting, like, there's
some really impressive work
273
00:14:32,040 --> 00:14:34,840
happening in that film.
I think it really was deserving
274
00:14:34,840 --> 00:14:37,680
of an editing Oscar nomination.
And I also thought Jon Batiste's
275
00:14:38,200 --> 00:14:40,480
kinetic score of the movie
should have been nominated.
276
00:14:41,760 --> 00:14:44,400
I thought Cooper Hoffman gave
one of the best like 5 minute
277
00:14:44,400 --> 00:14:46,960
performances of the year.
That just a really, really good.
278
00:14:46,960 --> 00:14:49,360
Thing for me in that movie and
man, I saw someone and I
279
00:14:49,360 --> 00:14:52,480
apologize and I don't remember
who who said this, but I saw
280
00:14:52,480 --> 00:14:55,440
someone on Twitter a few months
back when Saturday Night was in
281
00:14:55,440 --> 00:15:00,560
theaters do a screen capture of
Cooper Hoffman with.
282
00:15:00,560 --> 00:15:02,440
His hand on his hip.
Yeah, I saw the.
283
00:15:02,440 --> 00:15:05,040
Scene he was he was yelling at
Gabriel LaBelle in the stairs
284
00:15:05,080 --> 00:15:07,200
and he was holding his hand up
like this.
285
00:15:07,480 --> 00:15:10,000
And someone pointed out that the
way he's holding his hand, you
286
00:15:10,000 --> 00:15:13,880
can literally see his dad that
he like holds his hand to sort
287
00:15:13,880 --> 00:15:15,720
of yell at someone in the exact
same way.
288
00:15:15,720 --> 00:15:18,520
And it was so cool that someone
pointed that out because as soon
289
00:15:18,520 --> 00:15:22,400
as they say like, Yep, I see it.
You know, it's, it's funny, this
290
00:15:22,400 --> 00:15:25,840
is one of those years for me
that I saw everything that was
291
00:15:25,840 --> 00:15:27,840
supposed to be the big Oscar
movies.
292
00:15:27,840 --> 00:15:31,520
And then, you know, like most
years anymore, 70% of those went
293
00:15:31,520 --> 00:15:33,880
nowhere and didn't get any Oscar
nominations.
294
00:15:34,240 --> 00:15:36,800
And then I had to play catch up
after the nominations were
295
00:15:36,800 --> 00:15:39,640
announced because I had, you
know, put a lot of these on the
296
00:15:39,640 --> 00:15:42,520
back burner.
I just got around to seeing, I'm
297
00:15:42,520 --> 00:15:46,720
still here about a month ago and
it has not left my memory since
298
00:15:46,720 --> 00:15:48,160
then.
I think I'd honestly is my
299
00:15:48,160 --> 00:15:50,760
number one film of the year.
It just worked on me like
300
00:15:50,760 --> 00:15:53,680
gangbusters.
I really loved Jesse Eisenberg's
301
00:15:53,760 --> 00:15:56,000
film a real pain.
I'm, I was shocked that that
302
00:15:56,000 --> 00:15:57,520
didn't make the cut for best
picture.
303
00:15:58,360 --> 00:16:01,640
And you know, I was just on a
plane with somebody this past
304
00:16:01,840 --> 00:16:06,000
this past week and like looking
up the row, a ton of people were
305
00:16:06,000 --> 00:16:08,280
watching that on an airplane.
I don't know what that says
306
00:16:08,280 --> 00:16:11,680
about it's watchability, but it
was the film of choice on the
307
00:16:11,680 --> 00:16:15,440
flight to Las Vegas last week.
I I would highly recommend
308
00:16:15,440 --> 00:16:17,800
people seeking that out.
And then as you said, Nickel
309
00:16:17,800 --> 00:16:21,400
Boys seems to be kind of the
critics consensus for the best
310
00:16:21,400 --> 00:16:24,800
film of the of the year and it
really just never generated the
311
00:16:24,800 --> 00:16:26,920
kind of buzz that you would
expect for something that had
312
00:16:26,920 --> 00:16:29,160
that much of a groundswell of
critics behind it.
313
00:16:29,600 --> 00:16:32,880
Yeah, Nickel Boys was fantastic.
I really think the the
314
00:16:34,680 --> 00:16:36,800
distributor behind that, and I
apologize, I don't remember who
315
00:16:36,800 --> 00:16:39,080
it is, also that I really think
they screwed up its release.
316
00:16:39,560 --> 00:16:47,360
Yeah, for a film that is that
much of A non crowd pleaser, you
317
00:16:47,360 --> 00:16:49,840
have to build buzz in a
different way.
318
00:16:50,280 --> 00:16:52,760
And I thought they really messed
up by not sending it to Toronto.
319
00:16:52,760 --> 00:16:55,400
The only festival it played was
Telluride, which is super
320
00:16:55,400 --> 00:16:57,520
exclusive.
There aren't that many critics
321
00:16:57,520 --> 00:17:00,280
there, so you don't get to build
the reputation film in the way
322
00:17:00,280 --> 00:17:03,600
you do.
If it had opened in Toronto and
323
00:17:03,600 --> 00:17:06,680
then it opened in theaters so
late that it didn't have the
324
00:17:06,680 --> 00:17:08,760
opportunity to build a
groundswell.
325
00:17:09,640 --> 00:17:13,079
Well, and here we are a year out
from the premiere of Dune Part
326
00:17:13,079 --> 00:17:16,599
2, and I'm still wondering why
Warner Brothers.
327
00:17:16,599 --> 00:17:19,079
I know that they're probably in
some sort of financial dire
328
00:17:19,079 --> 00:17:22,480
straits and they really needed
due to in that first quarter of
329
00:17:22,480 --> 00:17:26,000
2024.
But someone was posting today
330
00:17:26,000 --> 00:17:28,600
like if this had premiered in
September, I think it would have
331
00:17:28,600 --> 00:17:31,640
swept everything.
And I don't know if I disagree
332
00:17:31,640 --> 00:17:33,920
with that.
It really was kind of the
333
00:17:34,160 --> 00:17:36,720
juggernaut of the first half of
the year.
334
00:17:37,080 --> 00:17:40,720
And it seems weird that a movie
that big, that had that much
335
00:17:40,720 --> 00:17:45,080
public support and two really
prominent young actors in it
336
00:17:45,760 --> 00:17:48,000
fell as flat as it did here on
Oscar night.
337
00:17:48,800 --> 00:17:51,880
Yeah, I mean, it won two awards.
I think it was, I saw Sean
338
00:17:51,880 --> 00:17:55,480
Tennessee of The Ringer tweet
that it actually won the same 2
339
00:17:55,480 --> 00:17:59,360
awards as the middle Lord of the
Rings film, which was an
340
00:17:59,360 --> 00:18:01,560
interesting point.
And I think where Sean was sort
341
00:18:01,560 --> 00:18:05,120
of going with that is the second
Lord of the Rings film won these
342
00:18:05,120 --> 00:18:07,640
two Oscars and then third one
won everything.
343
00:18:07,880 --> 00:18:10,520
And maybe that's what will also
happen with Dune.
344
00:18:12,960 --> 00:18:15,880
Which I I'm not sure if we can
transpose that one to one
345
00:18:15,880 --> 00:18:18,200
though, 'cause things are about
to get real weird in the Dune
346
00:18:18,200 --> 00:18:20,600
universe here.
Yeah, I don't know if the Oscar
347
00:18:20,600 --> 00:18:22,120
voters are ready for that.
Yeah.
348
00:18:22,240 --> 00:18:25,600
And there's so much temptation
to think, you know, anytime
349
00:18:25,600 --> 00:18:29,280
there's a series of movies that,
oh, maybe Oscars voters will
350
00:18:29,280 --> 00:18:32,160
give it the The Lord of the
Rings treatment and just wait
351
00:18:32,160 --> 00:18:34,200
till the end.
And people forget that.
352
00:18:34,520 --> 00:18:37,440
I mean, first of all, that was a
very different Academy that was
353
00:18:37,800 --> 00:18:40,440
half the size in an extremely
different makeup.
354
00:18:41,360 --> 00:18:44,360
That was also, you know, Lord of
the Rings.
355
00:18:44,360 --> 00:18:46,720
It was the first time any films
had ever been made that way.
356
00:18:47,840 --> 00:18:54,280
So thinking that the Academy
will just sort of go on the same
357
00:18:54,280 --> 00:18:57,320
behavioral path as as strange
logic to me.
358
00:18:58,080 --> 00:19:00,760
All right, Daniel, let's let's
do just a quick little lightning
359
00:19:00,760 --> 00:19:02,560
round here.
What are the moments from this
360
00:19:02,560 --> 00:19:05,880
telecast itself, whether it was
something Conan did or some
361
00:19:05,880 --> 00:19:08,720
other presenter's bit, a speech
that you really liked?
362
00:19:08,960 --> 00:19:10,920
What do you think of the moments
that are going to stand out from
363
00:19:10,920 --> 00:19:14,360
this telecast, that are going to
be played in clips packages for
364
00:19:14,360 --> 00:19:17,360
the years to come?
I thought Conan did a great job.
365
00:19:18,400 --> 00:19:24,240
Definitely him.
The the Wasting Time song I
366
00:19:24,240 --> 00:19:26,280
thought was brilliant.
I want one of those Conan hair
367
00:19:26,280 --> 00:19:28,120
hats that all the backup dancers
were wearing.
368
00:19:31,480 --> 00:19:35,640
Speeches, man.
I thought Sean Baker said a lot
369
00:19:35,640 --> 00:19:39,280
of great things.
I, you know, I don't have a lot
370
00:19:39,280 --> 00:19:42,520
of faith that the powers to be
will listen to the things that
371
00:19:42,520 --> 00:19:45,120
he said, but hope springs
eternal.
372
00:19:45,120 --> 00:19:50,040
I mean, you know, maybe, oh, I
thought the speech that the film
373
00:19:50,040 --> 00:19:55,280
makers of No other Land gave was
really powerful when the Israeli
374
00:19:55,360 --> 00:20:00,680
winner for the film said of his
Palestinian colleague, you know,
375
00:20:00,760 --> 00:20:03,640
I look at him and I see my
brother, I thought that was
376
00:20:03,640 --> 00:20:06,280
extremely powerful.
And it's really sad that no
377
00:20:06,280 --> 00:20:09,680
distributor will pick that film
up because they're too afraid of
378
00:20:09,680 --> 00:20:12,000
backlash.
I don't know when I'll ever get
379
00:20:12,000 --> 00:20:14,040
the chance to see that movie.
Honestly, yeah, same.
380
00:20:14,040 --> 00:20:16,720
I mean, there's clearly money to
be made from a distributor
381
00:20:16,720 --> 00:20:19,640
hating that movie, but who
knows?
382
00:20:19,640 --> 00:20:23,080
I mean, you know, I'm sure it'll
line up on Canopy or something
383
00:20:23,080 --> 00:20:26,200
like that and a more academic
streaming service, but.
384
00:20:26,320 --> 00:20:30,160
Exactly.
I think people love a really
385
00:20:30,160 --> 00:20:33,680
easy to digest Oscar's clip too.
You know, I'm thinking of like
386
00:20:33,680 --> 00:20:36,120
Cuba Gooding Junior jumping up
and down on stage.
387
00:20:36,920 --> 00:20:39,920
And I think for me, the moment
that kind of hit that this year
388
00:20:39,920 --> 00:20:43,000
in terms of the speeches was
that first one by Kieran Culkin.
389
00:20:43,280 --> 00:20:47,120
It was very rambly.
But then he hit on the the story
390
00:20:47,120 --> 00:20:50,280
about, you know, let's get
cracking on those kids.
391
00:20:50,480 --> 00:20:53,160
I really do think that's going
to be a pull quote that we're
392
00:20:53,160 --> 00:20:55,920
going to hear for years and
years and years down the road.
393
00:20:56,200 --> 00:20:59,000
Yeah, he was great.
That that was a really great way
394
00:20:59,000 --> 00:21:02,200
to kick it off.
So one thing about the show that
395
00:21:02,200 --> 00:21:03,680
I saw a lot of people get wrong
on Twitter.
396
00:21:03,680 --> 00:21:06,480
So like I said, I just want to
use this opportunity to say I
397
00:21:06,480 --> 00:21:09,760
saw a ton of people on Twitter
suggested that James Bond
398
00:21:09,760 --> 00:21:13,960
montage was just bought and paid
for by Jeff Bezos.
399
00:21:15,280 --> 00:21:18,600
Not true at all.
That was in the works before the
400
00:21:18,600 --> 00:21:22,800
Amazon news and the reason they
did it is because the long time
401
00:21:22,800 --> 00:21:25,920
Bond producers have been given
an honorary Oscar earlier this
402
00:21:25,920 --> 00:21:28,080
year.
That was the impetus for the
403
00:21:28,080 --> 00:21:31,040
Bond tribute because Barbara
Broccoli and Michael G Wilson
404
00:21:31,240 --> 00:21:33,800
were honorary Oscar recipients
of the Governor's Awards a few
405
00:21:33,800 --> 00:21:36,120
months ago.
Which they did a horrible job of
406
00:21:36,120 --> 00:21:39,200
communicating on the broadcast.
Yeah, So I just want to dispel
407
00:21:39,200 --> 00:21:41,360
that rumor.
And I mean, the Bond news only
408
00:21:41,360 --> 00:21:44,960
broke, I think a week ago.
You know when something happens
409
00:21:44,960 --> 00:21:47,120
a week before the Oscars?
You can.
410
00:21:47,960 --> 00:21:50,240
That's enough time to get Morgan
Freeman on the stage and say a
411
00:21:50,240 --> 00:21:51,560
few nice words about Gene
Hackman.
412
00:21:51,840 --> 00:21:55,920
That is not enough time to
organize an elaborate song and
413
00:21:55,920 --> 00:21:59,360
dance number with dozens of
people and three different
414
00:21:59,360 --> 00:22:01,320
singers.
You can't do that in a week.
415
00:22:01,760 --> 00:22:04,920
Now I will say I still think
that it was a pretty good
416
00:22:04,920 --> 00:22:06,960
telecast.
This telecast is just always
417
00:22:06,960 --> 00:22:09,680
gonna have bloat.
And I don't necessarily think
418
00:22:09,680 --> 00:22:11,600
that cutting the runtime is the
solution.
419
00:22:11,600 --> 00:22:13,080
That's obviously never been your
solution.
420
00:22:13,080 --> 00:22:15,840
We've talked about this before,
but it just the way they
421
00:22:15,840 --> 00:22:19,920
allocate time throughout the
telecast is still infuriating to
422
00:22:19,920 --> 00:22:22,640
me sometimes.
And the James Bond tribute going
423
00:22:22,640 --> 00:22:26,880
for like 9 1/2 minutes when no
awards were being presented and
424
00:22:26,880 --> 00:22:30,920
then having to make up that time
by cutting off multiple award
425
00:22:30,920 --> 00:22:33,280
recipients from being able to
speak it.
426
00:22:33,560 --> 00:22:35,680
It gets under my skin every
single year.
427
00:22:35,720 --> 00:22:38,680
I don't care if you got to put
each of the four people that win
428
00:22:38,680 --> 00:22:41,920
an Oscar on a 15 second timer to
make sure they hit a minute.
429
00:22:42,200 --> 00:22:44,800
Like, you got to let all of them
at least say thank you before
430
00:22:44,800 --> 00:22:47,440
you usher them off the stage.
Yeah, I was really upset.
431
00:22:47,440 --> 00:22:49,640
I think it was when Dune won for
best sound.
432
00:22:49,680 --> 00:22:52,480
There were three winners.
The 1st 2 got to speak and the
433
00:22:52,480 --> 00:22:56,160
third guy was cut off.
I think it's OK to cut off
434
00:22:56,160 --> 00:22:59,240
someone who has been speaking
and just kind of won't shut up.
435
00:22:59,720 --> 00:23:02,960
It is not OK to cut off someone
who hasn't even gotten to speak
436
00:23:02,960 --> 00:23:05,080
yet.
That's just not OK.
437
00:23:05,320 --> 00:23:08,400
And that do sound guy really got
a raw deal.
438
00:23:08,400 --> 00:23:12,400
And I wish you know, I remember
it was in 2007, the year that
439
00:23:12,400 --> 00:23:17,600
once won best original song and
the guy Glenn Hansard was able
440
00:23:17,600 --> 00:23:19,800
to speak.
And then the the woman
441
00:23:19,960 --> 00:23:21,520
Marquette, her globa was cut
off.
442
00:23:21,920 --> 00:23:25,600
And then later in the show, Jon
Stewart brought her back out on
443
00:23:25,600 --> 00:23:29,440
stage so she could so she could
speak because it was just not OK
444
00:23:29,440 --> 00:23:30,960
that she was cut off.
She didn't get to say anything
445
00:23:31,480 --> 00:23:34,120
and I wish that Conan had done
that tonight with the Dune sound
446
00:23:34,120 --> 00:23:36,720
guy that, you know, clearly
wanted to speak and just wasn't
447
00:23:37,520 --> 00:23:39,040
allowed to.
Yeah.
448
00:23:39,360 --> 00:23:41,000
All right, let's wrap things up
here today, man.
449
00:23:41,280 --> 00:23:43,960
It sounds like it was a pretty
successful Oscars telecast for
450
00:23:43,960 --> 00:23:46,440
the both of us, even if we
didn't pick all of the winners
451
00:23:46,440 --> 00:23:49,120
correctly.
If you have to pick one movie
452
00:23:49,400 --> 00:23:53,000
that you think we will still be
talking about as a society and
453
00:23:53,280 --> 00:23:57,360
then maybe another movie as a
group of film critics or film
454
00:23:57,360 --> 00:24:00,800
lovers, what are the films that
we will remember from this year
455
00:24:00,800 --> 00:24:03,680
and are they the ones that were
honored tonight?
456
00:24:05,040 --> 00:24:08,440
Yeah, they are 'cause I honestly
think the two films that will be
457
00:24:08,440 --> 00:24:10,800
remembered most from this year
are Nora and The Brutalist.
458
00:24:12,760 --> 00:24:14,760
Nora is far and away my favorite
film of the year.
459
00:24:14,760 --> 00:24:17,000
And I thought that the second I
saw it in Toronto back in
460
00:24:17,000 --> 00:24:20,600
September, I mean, one of my
friends actually just texted me
461
00:24:20,600 --> 00:24:24,160
an image of the of me raving
about a Nora to him on September
462
00:24:24,160 --> 00:24:28,880
7th.
And, you know, when I saw Nora
463
00:24:28,880 --> 00:24:31,800
in Toronto, I think we had hopes
that like, OK, this movie won
464
00:24:31,800 --> 00:24:33,960
the Palm Door and it's playing
like gangbusters in Toronto.
465
00:24:34,280 --> 00:24:36,040
We had hopes that it might be
one of the 10 Best picture
466
00:24:36,040 --> 00:24:37,880
nominees.
I don't think anyone thought
467
00:24:37,880 --> 00:24:39,440
then that this was going to be
the film to beat.
468
00:24:42,200 --> 00:24:44,160
So Indora winning five Oscars
tonight.
469
00:24:44,160 --> 00:24:47,600
I, I, I don't think any of those
are narrative wins.
470
00:24:47,600 --> 00:24:49,480
I think those are just purely
merit.
471
00:24:49,480 --> 00:24:51,920
Like this is the film that
people like the best.
472
00:24:52,200 --> 00:24:55,560
And I, for whatever my one
opinion is worth, I think it
473
00:24:55,560 --> 00:24:58,520
really is that good.
And then the brutalist.
474
00:24:58,520 --> 00:25:02,680
You know, I'm one of the people
who doesn't think the final 40
475
00:25:02,680 --> 00:25:05,480
minutes or so of the movie hold
together in the way that I wish
476
00:25:05,480 --> 00:25:06,680
it did.
But.
477
00:25:07,400 --> 00:25:11,000
I still think that that movie is
quite an achievement, and that's
478
00:25:11,000 --> 00:25:17,640
one that I feel like cinephiles
and film school people will
479
00:25:17,640 --> 00:25:21,200
really talk about it, remember
for years and years to come.
480
00:25:21,640 --> 00:25:25,040
And there will be people citing
the brutal as 20 years from now
481
00:25:25,040 --> 00:25:26,680
as the reason they wanted to
become a filmmaker.
482
00:25:27,920 --> 00:25:30,760
Daniel Zwayo, I can't thank you
enough for joining me at 11:30
483
00:25:30,760 --> 00:25:32,920
at night.
Where can people find you as you
484
00:25:32,920 --> 00:25:35,240
start to prognosticate about
next year's Oscars?
485
00:25:36,800 --> 00:25:39,840
Well, I have a big piece for The
Ringer that's in the works and
486
00:25:39,840 --> 00:25:41,440
should post toward the end of
next week.
487
00:25:43,040 --> 00:25:44,840
I don't know how much I can
spoil it.
488
00:25:44,840 --> 00:25:48,960
It is not about this year's
Oscars, but it is about it is
489
00:25:48,960 --> 00:25:52,720
sort of about the Oscars as a
broader concept.
490
00:25:54,520 --> 00:25:57,880
And that is theoretically going
to post Thursday, if that's
491
00:25:58,040 --> 00:25:59,840
that's the hope, if I can get it
done in time.
492
00:26:01,080 --> 00:26:04,920
And after that, you should find
me on Blue Sky at Third Man
493
00:26:04,920 --> 00:26:07,560
Movies.
You can also, I suppose, find me
494
00:26:07,560 --> 00:26:09,920
on Twitter.
Although one of my goals that
495
00:26:09,920 --> 00:26:11,920
I've been promising my wife for
a long time is that I will
496
00:26:11,920 --> 00:26:15,240
delete my Twitter account a week
from tomorrow.
497
00:26:15,520 --> 00:26:17,160
That I wanted to get through
this Oscar cycle.
498
00:26:17,160 --> 00:26:19,840
And I want to get through my Big
Ringer Project posting.
499
00:26:19,840 --> 00:26:21,880
And then I was going to finally
leave Twitter for good.
500
00:26:21,880 --> 00:26:23,920
So find me on Twitter for the
next week.
501
00:26:24,080 --> 00:26:26,320
After that, find me on Blue Sky.
There you go.
502
00:26:26,640 --> 00:26:29,080
Daniels, Wyo, everybody, Thanks
again for joining us, man.
503
00:26:29,480 --> 00:26:31,520
We're going to throw over to an
interview with our friends from
504
00:26:31,520 --> 00:26:34,560
Film Land Spirits, because what
goes better with the Oscars than
505
00:26:34,560 --> 00:26:36,560
Film Land?
So stay tuned for that one right
506
00:26:36,560 --> 00:26:44,000
after this break.
All right, Brad, that's our wrap
507
00:26:44,000 --> 00:26:46,160
up on the Oscars.
Thanks so much for all of your
508
00:26:46,160 --> 00:26:48,720
input on that.
As always, Brad, really
509
00:26:48,720 --> 00:26:51,720
appreciate.
The insights I have so much to
510
00:26:51,720 --> 00:26:54,200
offer.
I was going to like start
511
00:26:54,200 --> 00:26:57,040
humming pomp and circumstance or
something because I don't
512
00:26:57,040 --> 00:26:58,960
actually know what the song
what.
513
00:26:58,960 --> 00:27:01,160
What's the song that they use to
pull people off?
514
00:27:01,560 --> 00:27:04,280
I don't know, I think they they
play different movie themes to
515
00:27:04,280 --> 00:27:06,600
try to make it feel lighter and
you know what I mean?
516
00:27:07,360 --> 00:27:09,960
Dude, All right, so that's, you
know how you have like a walk up
517
00:27:09,960 --> 00:27:14,760
song for baseball?
What is your theme song you want
518
00:27:14,760 --> 00:27:17,600
played when your Oscar speech
goes on too long?
519
00:27:17,640 --> 00:27:19,000
Oh.
It's got to be the Jurassic
520
00:27:19,000 --> 00:27:21,440
Park.
That's exactly what I was.
521
00:27:21,640 --> 00:27:24,280
Thinking.
Just to like, make me start
522
00:27:24,280 --> 00:27:26,680
marching off the stage in time.
Yeah, that's.
523
00:27:26,680 --> 00:27:29,000
Perfect.
I literally asked that question
524
00:27:29,160 --> 00:27:33,000
with that song in.
Mind, you know me too well, man.
525
00:27:33,360 --> 00:27:35,920
And Brad, if you know me too
well, then you also know that I
526
00:27:35,920 --> 00:27:38,240
can't make it through an episode
without drinking whiskey.
527
00:27:38,440 --> 00:27:41,400
So we're here today catching up
with our friend Troy Belotnik
528
00:27:41,400 --> 00:27:44,320
from Film Land Spirits.
Folks, if you've been listening
529
00:27:44,320 --> 00:27:47,600
to the podcast for any length of
time, then you will remember
530
00:27:47,600 --> 00:27:50,640
that Film Land has been on here,
what, 2-3 Times Now?
531
00:27:50,640 --> 00:27:54,440
We try to have you guys on about
once a year and you came back,
532
00:27:55,040 --> 00:27:58,920
dare I say, Brad, with a pun
here in full force this time
533
00:27:58,920 --> 00:28:01,280
around.
I love it.
534
00:28:01,280 --> 00:28:03,480
Troy, how are you, man?
I'm great guys.
535
00:28:03,480 --> 00:28:05,800
How you doing?
Doing good, Troy.
536
00:28:05,800 --> 00:28:07,120
We're going to kick it off right
away.
537
00:28:07,120 --> 00:28:12,040
What is your get off the stage
after winning an Oscar song?
538
00:28:13,280 --> 00:28:15,920
First, I was going to say the
Raiders theme, but I really
539
00:28:15,920 --> 00:28:17,680
think it's probably Darth
Vader's theme.
540
00:28:18,040 --> 00:28:21,360
Oh, yeah, let's go.
That's a great choice.
541
00:28:21,360 --> 00:28:23,480
Just sounds like someone's going
to creep up behind you if you
542
00:28:23,480 --> 00:28:24,840
don't get off the stage.
Yeah.
543
00:28:26,800 --> 00:28:29,320
So, Troy, catch us up a little
bit on Film LAND.
544
00:28:29,320 --> 00:28:31,280
Like I said, it's been about a
year since we've talked to you
545
00:28:31,280 --> 00:28:34,640
guys.
What is new in Film Land and
546
00:28:34,800 --> 00:28:36,360
what are we going to be sipping
on today?
547
00:28:36,360 --> 00:28:39,000
Because you definitely did send
us both a bottle as well.
548
00:28:39,400 --> 00:28:42,000
Yeah, absolutely.
So new in film land.
549
00:28:42,000 --> 00:28:45,640
I mean, there's amazing new
things happening almost every
550
00:28:45,640 --> 00:28:49,080
day, if not every day.
We are in what you know, most
551
00:28:49,080 --> 00:28:51,920
people would call a growth stage
when you're a startup company.
552
00:28:51,920 --> 00:28:54,680
So we've been on the market
almost 2 1/2 years.
553
00:28:55,320 --> 00:28:58,800
We are adding States and markets
like crazy right now.
554
00:28:59,160 --> 00:29:01,520
So we're as of today, we're up
to 13.
555
00:29:02,360 --> 00:29:04,720
If I come back in September, we
should be over 20.
556
00:29:04,960 --> 00:29:06,680
Wow.
And so it's so it's really
557
00:29:06,680 --> 00:29:08,840
accelerated growth is what's
going on right now.
558
00:29:08,840 --> 00:29:12,400
So we are New York and New
Jersey will come on in March.
559
00:29:14,160 --> 00:29:16,240
That's huge additions, man.
Yeah.
560
00:29:16,680 --> 00:29:22,000
Georgia in April, Pennsylvania
in April or May with a couple of
561
00:29:22,000 --> 00:29:25,320
our products with our rye and
then we're on the verge of going
562
00:29:25,320 --> 00:29:27,680
into states.
You know, no promises, but like
563
00:29:28,280 --> 00:29:35,520
Michigan, Ohio, Florida, Texas,
Missouri, all of them are on the
564
00:29:35,520 --> 00:29:37,320
list and being actively
discussed.
565
00:29:38,040 --> 00:29:39,920
Just just make us a promise,
Troy.
566
00:29:40,720 --> 00:29:45,920
Get into Ohio before Michigan.
Ohio is the white whale.
567
00:29:45,920 --> 00:29:48,800
Everyone knows that.
We're all chasing Ohio here.
568
00:29:49,240 --> 00:29:52,960
Yes, we, we are literally
pursuing both at the same time
569
00:29:52,960 --> 00:29:55,600
and, and you know, I've been
getting fingerprinted a lot.
570
00:29:58,080 --> 00:29:59,040
That's fun.
It is.
571
00:29:59,120 --> 00:30:02,360
I never would have thought of
like that side of the, like the
572
00:30:02,440 --> 00:30:04,840
that element of the business
side.
573
00:30:05,360 --> 00:30:07,800
The compliance is very, we're
not going to bore your
574
00:30:07,800 --> 00:30:10,960
listeners, but the compliance
part, it's very complex and it's
575
00:30:10,960 --> 00:30:12,760
different for every single
state.
576
00:30:12,760 --> 00:30:16,400
And so some states want like ink
fingerprints, others do live
577
00:30:16,400 --> 00:30:19,480
scans, some just you don't want
me to sign a paper.
578
00:30:19,480 --> 00:30:22,600
It's it's really tedious but
fascinating.
579
00:30:22,880 --> 00:30:26,240
Swab your cheek, give blood.
Yeah, it's really the list goes
580
00:30:26,240 --> 00:30:28,720
on.
This is this is nowhere on that
581
00:30:28,720 --> 00:30:32,000
level.
But as an ordained minister, the
582
00:30:32,000 --> 00:30:35,920
state of Ohio requires, it's
very simple, but in order to do
583
00:30:35,920 --> 00:30:38,600
weddings, you just have to like
send in some paperwork and it's
584
00:30:38,600 --> 00:30:42,840
like a $10 fee.
I was living in Kentucky for
585
00:30:42,840 --> 00:30:46,400
grad school and a friend wanted
me to perform their wedding down
586
00:30:46,400 --> 00:30:48,400
there.
And so I called the local like
587
00:30:48,560 --> 00:30:51,320
City Hall and I was like, hey,
I'm just curious, like what I
588
00:30:51,320 --> 00:30:54,120
have to do to get authorized to
do weddings.
589
00:30:54,720 --> 00:30:57,720
And this lady just goes, well,
you, you got yourself a license,
590
00:30:57,720 --> 00:30:59,920
right?
And I was like, yeah, I do.
591
00:30:59,920 --> 00:31:01,560
She goes, ah, you're fine.
Don't worry about.
592
00:31:01,560 --> 00:31:04,480
It I.
Was like, hi, welcome to
593
00:31:04,480 --> 00:31:07,160
Kentucky, I guess.
Even the $10 fee is is asking
594
00:31:07,160 --> 00:31:08,960
too much.
All right guys, So if you
595
00:31:08,960 --> 00:31:11,600
remember anything about Film
Land, we rant and rave about
596
00:31:11,600 --> 00:31:14,960
Film Land all the time because
Brad, for my money, may be the
597
00:31:14,960 --> 00:31:17,720
best custom bottles in the whole
industry.
598
00:31:18,120 --> 00:31:20,360
For.
Like, I mean like first of all,
599
00:31:20,680 --> 00:31:24,760
I love a weighty bottle and this
thing has some heft to it, that
600
00:31:24,760 --> 00:31:26,920
is true, but you.
Can't murder a man with a
601
00:31:26,920 --> 00:31:29,120
bottle.
Like what are you doing?
602
00:31:29,640 --> 00:31:33,040
It's got like the film
perforations along the bottom
603
00:31:33,040 --> 00:31:35,520
here.
Troy, I know that we've made you
604
00:31:35,520 --> 00:31:38,920
talk about these bottles before,
but maybe as a segue into
605
00:31:38,920 --> 00:31:41,400
talking about the specific
bottle we're we're discussing
606
00:31:41,400 --> 00:31:43,200
today, which is called
Quadraforce.
607
00:31:43,600 --> 00:31:46,080
Tell us a little bit about this
blend, but then also, you know,
608
00:31:46,080 --> 00:31:48,880
remind our listeners of the
process that you guys go through
609
00:31:48,960 --> 00:31:50,520
to get these beautiful bottles
made.
610
00:31:50,800 --> 00:31:53,400
Sure.
So we, you know, we start by
611
00:31:53,400 --> 00:31:57,120
creating an original script for
every one of our products and
612
00:31:57,120 --> 00:31:59,520
it's one that pays homage to the
B movies of the mid 20th
613
00:31:59,520 --> 00:32:02,800
century, like robots and
monsters, big over the top
614
00:32:02,800 --> 00:32:06,120
characters and plots.
Then we create a poster for that
615
00:32:06,120 --> 00:32:09,240
script in that mid 20th century
pulp art style.
616
00:32:09,320 --> 00:32:11,200
And we always like to try and
make them bright and very
617
00:32:11,200 --> 00:32:13,640
eye-catching.
And that becomes the label, you
618
00:32:13,640 --> 00:32:15,720
know, and then the rest of the
label has the character
619
00:32:15,720 --> 00:32:18,320
headshots and their BIOS.
And then the other side of the
620
00:32:18,320 --> 00:32:20,560
label, we talk about our
award-winning liquid, like who
621
00:32:20,560 --> 00:32:23,120
we are, what it's made from.
You know, we try and get the
622
00:32:23,120 --> 00:32:26,320
mash bill, the char, the barrel,
as much as we can possibly put
623
00:32:26,320 --> 00:32:28,680
on there, whatever.
We're not limited by any kind of
624
00:32:28,680 --> 00:32:30,520
contractual obligation or
anything.
625
00:32:31,000 --> 00:32:35,200
The bottle itself, which you
have mentioned is custom and the
626
00:32:35,200 --> 00:32:38,240
bottle is meant to be sort of
like the Art Deco movie theater
627
00:32:38,240 --> 00:32:41,800
from like the 30s and 40s where,
you know, the bottle is that
628
00:32:41,800 --> 00:32:46,800
like really cool proscenium.
But that you know, in the in the
629
00:32:46,800 --> 00:32:48,880
movie theater, you're the
proscenium is surrounding the
630
00:32:48,880 --> 00:32:52,160
star, which is the screen in the
movie hours, that proscenium is
631
00:32:52,160 --> 00:32:54,320
surrounding the star, which is
the label and the liquid.
632
00:32:54,720 --> 00:32:57,920
So it's meant to evoke various
aspects of film.
633
00:32:58,240 --> 00:33:01,440
So the closure is a combination
of a film reel and a film can.
634
00:33:02,040 --> 00:33:05,120
And as you mentioned, the bottom
is meant to represent like cells
635
00:33:05,120 --> 00:33:07,560
of film, like the original
Kinetoscope, like the Edison
636
00:33:07,560 --> 00:33:10,640
with the horse running in a
circle and think things like
637
00:33:10,640 --> 00:33:13,520
that.
So now the particular release
638
00:33:13,640 --> 00:33:17,040
that we have here today is
called Quadraforce.
639
00:33:17,240 --> 00:33:18,480
Behold the blend.
Of four.
640
00:33:18,600 --> 00:33:21,640
Sorry.
I just ruined your tagline.
641
00:33:21,920 --> 00:33:24,000
No, that's OK, I'll do it again.
Quadraforce.
642
00:33:24,000 --> 00:33:29,560
Behold, the blend of four.
So Quadraforce was an idea that
643
00:33:29,560 --> 00:33:33,040
I had before Filmland was
Filmland.
644
00:33:33,440 --> 00:33:36,520
When I was coming up with like
Rise of the Robots and all that
645
00:33:36,520 --> 00:33:39,080
kind of thing, I knew one day I
wanted to do this product.
646
00:33:39,080 --> 00:33:41,240
I didn't know what the liquid
was going to be and I didn't
647
00:33:41,240 --> 00:33:43,400
have the full concept, but I
knew it was going to be a
648
00:33:43,400 --> 00:33:47,240
superhero story and I knew it
was going to have multiple
649
00:33:47,240 --> 00:33:50,640
heroes in it.
So what Quadraforce is, it's
650
00:33:50,640 --> 00:33:54,280
technically a blend of straight
bourbon whiskeys and we made it
651
00:33:54,280 --> 00:33:57,840
by combining 4 different
straight bourbon whiskeys
652
00:33:58,120 --> 00:34:01,360
originally distilled in four
different states.
653
00:34:02,040 --> 00:34:05,440
And the result is actually a
four grain weeded bourbon.
654
00:34:06,920 --> 00:34:09,080
So there's literally like when
I'm tasting people on this, I
655
00:34:09,080 --> 00:34:12,239
like to say you have literally
never tasted this bourbon has
656
00:34:12,239 --> 00:34:14,920
never been made before.
There's never been a bourbon
657
00:34:14,920 --> 00:34:16,760
like this before.
There probably will never be one
658
00:34:16,760 --> 00:34:19,480
again because I don't even know
if I can get that liquid again.
659
00:34:19,840 --> 00:34:21,800
But we did that.
We put it together and then what
660
00:34:21,800 --> 00:34:26,080
we did is since Quadraforce is
the story of four heroes, we
661
00:34:26,800 --> 00:34:29,159
created four different versions
of the label.
662
00:34:29,159 --> 00:34:32,080
So it's the same liquid in all
the bottles, but each of the
663
00:34:32,080 --> 00:34:36,480
four labels represents the city
or state of distillation.
664
00:34:36,880 --> 00:34:39,520
And one of the four Quadraforce
heroes are pictured on the
665
00:34:39,520 --> 00:34:41,760
front.
So you have Cali Comet is the
666
00:34:41,760 --> 00:34:44,960
Los Angeles edition, You have
Kentucky Anna's the Louisville
667
00:34:44,960 --> 00:34:48,239
edition, Tennessee Terra is the
Nashville edition.
668
00:34:48,560 --> 00:34:51,560
And then the 4th character is
called Mr. Misteron, and pretty
669
00:34:51,560 --> 00:34:53,280
much everything about him is a
mystery.
670
00:34:53,280 --> 00:34:54,920
We don't know his secret
identity.
671
00:34:55,679 --> 00:34:58,600
We even his powers, they're
constantly changing every time
672
00:34:58,600 --> 00:35:01,600
he tries to use them.
So we don't know his state of
673
00:35:01,600 --> 00:35:03,520
origin or his state of
distillation.
674
00:35:03,840 --> 00:35:07,200
And we're gonna say we, like
you, also don't know where this
675
00:35:07,200 --> 00:35:11,120
whiskey comes from.
I'm not sure if that would be
676
00:35:11,120 --> 00:35:14,720
legal, but no, I know where it
comes from.
677
00:35:15,440 --> 00:35:17,600
But we thought, you know,
certain times we get whiskey and
678
00:35:17,600 --> 00:35:19,360
we're not allowed to say where
it comes from.
679
00:35:19,360 --> 00:35:21,040
It's just it's a contractual
thing.
680
00:35:21,040 --> 00:35:24,200
Some distilleries, they only
want their name on stuff that's
681
00:35:24,280 --> 00:35:26,640
their brand.
So they forbid us from saying
682
00:35:26,640 --> 00:35:28,800
it, which is OK.
So we thought this time, well,
683
00:35:28,800 --> 00:35:31,400
since we can't say where it's
from, why don't we make it part
684
00:35:31,400 --> 00:35:33,560
of the fun?
And so we designed that
685
00:35:33,560 --> 00:35:36,960
character to represent the
mystery bourbon that's in the
686
00:35:36,960 --> 00:35:38,000
blend.
That's awesome.
687
00:35:38,280 --> 00:35:40,920
Is this your guys's first 4
grain whiskey?
688
00:35:41,560 --> 00:35:43,760
Yes, that's exciting.
Yeah.
689
00:35:43,760 --> 00:35:47,040
And we didn't set out to make a
four grain, honestly, we set out
690
00:35:47,040 --> 00:35:51,760
to make this blend of four.
And at the last minute when we
691
00:35:51,760 --> 00:35:54,680
found the California bourbon, it
turned out to be a weeded
692
00:35:54,680 --> 00:35:58,160
bourbon.
And by blending in the weeded
693
00:35:58,160 --> 00:36:00,520
bourbon, it became A4 grain and
a weeded bourbon.
694
00:36:00,960 --> 00:36:03,000
Oh, that's awesome.
Yeah, I mean it, it worked out
695
00:36:03,000 --> 00:36:05,520
very fortuitously for you guys
here.
696
00:36:05,840 --> 00:36:09,680
But I'll also say, Brad, we just
recorded a review last night,
697
00:36:09,680 --> 00:36:14,640
Troy, and I was talking about
how it was a very middle of the
698
00:36:14,640 --> 00:36:16,920
road bourbon.
And I meant that in the best way
699
00:36:16,920 --> 00:36:21,520
possible because I would say for
the last 12 to 18 months, 4 out
700
00:36:21,520 --> 00:36:24,120
of every five bourbons were
being sent now are finished in
701
00:36:24,120 --> 00:36:26,520
something or blended with
something.
702
00:36:26,840 --> 00:36:29,920
And it just, it feels a little
too gimmicky sometimes.
703
00:36:30,280 --> 00:36:34,240
And it is so nice to just put my
nose into this glass right now
704
00:36:34,240 --> 00:36:38,040
and just smell classic weeded
bourbon notes on this.
705
00:36:38,040 --> 00:36:40,880
Brad, I am like in heaven just
nosing this thing.
706
00:36:41,440 --> 00:36:45,600
Yeah, absolutely, man.
I for me, the the wheat comes
707
00:36:45,600 --> 00:36:50,800
through, but there's enough of
the wryness from the the rye
708
00:36:50,800 --> 00:36:56,400
secondary bourbons that like you
get a little bit of that peppery
709
00:36:56,440 --> 00:37:01,240
kind of minty vibe underneath
that like cherry cola that you
710
00:37:01,240 --> 00:37:05,400
get from the wheat.
I like I am highly digging this
711
00:37:05,400 --> 00:37:08,640
mixture.
Specifically, this blend better
712
00:37:08,640 --> 00:37:13,360
with the mixture of of of mash
bills is the.
713
00:37:13,360 --> 00:37:15,920
Word there it is.
You'll find it eventually, man.
714
00:37:16,320 --> 00:37:20,720
So this is clocking in at 94
proof once again, kind of
715
00:37:20,720 --> 00:37:24,320
bucking trends in the industry.
Like it sounds funny to say that
716
00:37:24,320 --> 00:37:27,360
like doing a lower proof bourbon
is bucking trends.
717
00:37:27,640 --> 00:37:30,080
But right now it feels like
everybody's going for something
718
00:37:30,080 --> 00:37:33,000
called foolproof or barrel proof
or cask strength.
719
00:37:33,360 --> 00:37:37,560
And you know, once again, it's
like this is a really enjoyable,
720
00:37:38,000 --> 00:37:40,160
easy to drink.
I I would call it like your
721
00:37:40,160 --> 00:37:43,160
daily drinker, Brad.
You you know, we were introduced
722
00:37:43,160 --> 00:37:47,160
to a term a few months back by a
good friend of show, David
723
00:37:47,160 --> 00:37:50,240
Thomas Tau.
This baby's crushable.
724
00:37:50,240 --> 00:37:54,480
This is a very crushable I.
Could crush this whiskey man
725
00:37:54,480 --> 00:37:56,840
well.
Let's let's go ahead, Troy,
726
00:37:56,840 --> 00:37:58,720
sorry.
I was going to say it has become
727
00:37:59,440 --> 00:38:01,440
my favorite of what we have
done.
728
00:38:02,200 --> 00:38:04,320
And I know that'll, you know,
that varies and obviously it's
729
00:38:04,320 --> 00:38:06,080
it's the latest for us.
So it's.
730
00:38:06,120 --> 00:38:08,680
So I'm not gonna lie, man, I'm
still pretty partial to your
731
00:38:08,680 --> 00:38:11,280
rise of the robots.
Rise of the Robots was good and
732
00:38:11,280 --> 00:38:13,800
that was the first one we tried.
I'm, I think I'm with Troy.
733
00:38:13,880 --> 00:38:15,720
This is the best thing I've had
from you guys so far.
734
00:38:15,720 --> 00:38:17,640
You guys really knocked it out
of the park on this one, man.
735
00:38:17,800 --> 00:38:21,200
It's so unique and so different.
Was a huge risk for us right,
736
00:38:21,200 --> 00:38:25,080
because you can we can blend in
small amounts to create test
737
00:38:25,080 --> 00:38:28,080
batches, but it changes when you
put it all in and when you're
738
00:38:28,080 --> 00:38:31,960
working with you know the same
you know 30 barrels or 10
739
00:38:31,960 --> 00:38:35,560
barrels or 15 or whatever it was
of the same exact liquid you, we
740
00:38:35,560 --> 00:38:38,040
know what moonlight mayhem is
going to taste like when after
741
00:38:38,040 --> 00:38:41,200
we make a test batch right This
we knew what it tasted like in
742
00:38:41,200 --> 00:38:44,160
the beaker but when we when it
came time to blend it all
743
00:38:44,160 --> 00:38:48,160
together it was a huge risk and
it paid off fortunately.
744
00:38:48,520 --> 00:38:50,480
Absolutely.
All right, Well, let's pivot a
745
00:38:50,480 --> 00:38:51,920
little bit away from the
whiskey.
746
00:38:51,920 --> 00:38:54,000
I want to talk a little bit
about movies as we've got the
747
00:38:54,000 --> 00:38:56,760
Film land guy on here.
Now, I know that you're a busy
748
00:38:56,760 --> 00:39:00,720
man, Troy.
So of the nominees this year, of
749
00:39:00,720 --> 00:39:03,200
which we've just discussed, but
we're recording this before the
750
00:39:03,200 --> 00:39:05,840
Oscars, I'm going to give you
the chance to be both
751
00:39:05,840 --> 00:39:08,640
Nostradamus here and to just be
Troy.
752
00:39:09,200 --> 00:39:11,600
What do you think is going to
win Best Picture this year?
753
00:39:12,280 --> 00:39:14,520
And well, first of all, I guess
how many of you seen, have you
754
00:39:14,520 --> 00:39:15,840
seen any of the nominees this
year?
755
00:39:17,120 --> 00:39:20,320
I have seen one of them.
I I am.
756
00:39:20,640 --> 00:39:25,000
I've been extremely busy.
I, I travel more than I'm home
757
00:39:25,000 --> 00:39:29,120
for the business at this time.
And so it is a little tough to
758
00:39:29,120 --> 00:39:33,800
get to the theater ever.
And a lot of the movies that are
759
00:39:33,800 --> 00:39:36,400
up for Best Picture, the ones
I've heard of anyway, you can't
760
00:39:36,400 --> 00:39:37,720
even stream them yet.
Right.
761
00:39:38,440 --> 00:39:41,240
So and, and it's funny, I was
before I came on, I was like,
762
00:39:41,240 --> 00:39:42,640
what are the last movies I've
seen?
763
00:39:42,640 --> 00:39:46,680
So I went to my phone to see the
purchases I made and the most
764
00:39:46,680 --> 00:39:49,360
recent movie I saw was was
Captain America because my son
765
00:39:49,360 --> 00:39:51,640
and I are Marvel nerds and we
always go see them together.
766
00:39:52,080 --> 00:39:54,440
Before that, the last movie I
saw in the theater was
767
00:39:54,440 --> 00:39:59,480
Wolverine, Deadpool, and and
before that the last movie I saw
768
00:39:59,480 --> 00:40:02,080
in the theater was one I talked
to you guys about, which was
769
00:40:02,320 --> 00:40:05,320
Godzilla.
Yeah, oh man.
770
00:40:05,440 --> 00:40:07,680
Yeah.
So that is it for the.
771
00:40:07,680 --> 00:40:09,040
Theater.
And then what's really funny,
772
00:40:09,200 --> 00:40:12,520
you look at my phone and it
shows, oh, I booked tickets to
773
00:40:12,520 --> 00:40:14,120
see June 2.
Cancelled.
774
00:40:14,120 --> 00:40:15,520
I booked it again.
Cancelled.
775
00:40:15,520 --> 00:40:18,640
I booked it again.
Oh, I booked tickets to see a
776
00:40:18,640 --> 00:40:20,760
complete unknown cancel.
Did it again 'cause these are
777
00:40:20,760 --> 00:40:23,480
the movies I really wanted to
see and just every time
778
00:40:23,480 --> 00:40:25,440
something comes up and and I
haven't been able to see it.
779
00:40:25,440 --> 00:40:29,120
So I have seen Dune, although I
cancelled that in the theater
780
00:40:29,120 --> 00:40:31,200
like three times and ended up
streaming it at home.
781
00:40:31,920 --> 00:40:33,680
Dune 2, I should say, and I love
it.
782
00:40:33,680 --> 00:40:36,480
I mean, I love both Dune movies.
I'm a huge fan of them.
783
00:40:37,240 --> 00:40:38,920
As if it makes you feel any
better Troy.
784
00:40:39,080 --> 00:40:43,640
I also have only seen Dune 2 so
I'm.
785
00:40:43,720 --> 00:40:46,200
I'm with you man, life is busy.
Right.
786
00:40:46,560 --> 00:40:49,880
I've heard of a few of the
others, like Amelia Perez and
787
00:40:52,200 --> 00:40:56,160
Wicked, of course, but I haven't
seen any of them.
788
00:40:56,200 --> 00:40:59,040
Obviously, I have not been to
the movies in in quite some
789
00:40:59,040 --> 00:41:00,320
time, except for Captain
America.
790
00:41:00,320 --> 00:41:02,400
Well.
Then maybe, maybe the better way
791
00:41:02,400 --> 00:41:05,080
to do it is whether it was on
streaming or in the theater.
792
00:41:05,200 --> 00:41:08,120
What was your personal favorite
movie of 2024?
793
00:41:09,200 --> 00:41:13,280
Well, it definitely has to be
Dune 2 'cause it's one of the
794
00:41:13,280 --> 00:41:15,360
only few movies that I've
actually seen.
795
00:41:15,880 --> 00:41:18,600
I'd have to go back and think
about what I watched in in
796
00:41:18,600 --> 00:41:21,160
streaming.
But no, I've watched Dune 2
797
00:41:21,160 --> 00:41:23,560
probably like 10 times 'cause
I'll get, you know, I'm on the
798
00:41:23,560 --> 00:41:26,880
plane so much and I'll just turn
it on and watch it again and you
799
00:41:26,880 --> 00:41:29,600
hear and see new things.
In fact, I loved it so much I
800
00:41:29,600 --> 00:41:31,960
read the first two Dune books,
which I'd never read.
801
00:41:32,280 --> 00:41:35,400
Oh wow, I I'm actually in a
similar place.
802
00:41:35,400 --> 00:41:39,120
I haven't started them yet, but
my buddy has all the Dune books
803
00:41:39,200 --> 00:41:41,840
and I'm I'm like, I'm ready.
I think I'm ready.
804
00:41:41,840 --> 00:41:45,120
I'm ready to take the plunge.
Yeah, I'm very concerned about
805
00:41:45,120 --> 00:41:47,440
Dune 3.
Yeah, it's going to get weird.
806
00:41:47,480 --> 00:41:49,960
That's I I haven't read the
books, but all I know is like,
807
00:41:50,040 --> 00:41:53,280
things are about to get real
weird and the Academy should
808
00:41:53,280 --> 00:41:57,280
have awarded Dune 2 when it had
the chance because it's it's
809
00:41:57,280 --> 00:41:59,880
it's hit or miss whether this
one's actually going to be good.
810
00:42:00,320 --> 00:42:02,040
Denny is going to pull it off,
man.
811
00:42:02,320 --> 00:42:04,440
I think so.
Oh ye of little faith.
812
00:42:04,720 --> 00:42:08,000
And, and I really, I wanted to
see the complete unknown so
813
00:42:08,000 --> 00:42:10,120
badly.
I'm a huge Bruce Springsteen fan
814
00:42:10,120 --> 00:42:16,080
and so by extension Dylan fan.
And so I was like, I'm going to
815
00:42:16,080 --> 00:42:18,160
watch it this weekend before I
come on the podcast and it's
816
00:42:18,160 --> 00:42:19,640
just not available to stream
anywhere.
817
00:42:19,720 --> 00:42:22,280
It became available today.
Aw, man.
818
00:42:22,360 --> 00:42:25,120
So I even said to my girlfriend,
I go if I can, I'm going to play
819
00:42:25,120 --> 00:42:27,200
hooky and I'm going to watch it
before and I couldn't do it.
820
00:42:28,560 --> 00:42:31,320
We forgive you, man, because
honestly, when you come up with
821
00:42:31,320 --> 00:42:34,000
something as good as
Quadraforce, all of your efforts
822
00:42:34,000 --> 00:42:36,600
have paid off.
So Troy, first of all, thank you
823
00:42:36,600 --> 00:42:39,160
for sending us these bottles.
Thank you for appearing once
824
00:42:39,160 --> 00:42:41,440
again on our show.
Tell us a little bit more about
825
00:42:41,440 --> 00:42:44,520
what's coming down the Pike for
Film Land and where we can find
826
00:42:44,520 --> 00:42:45,920
you.
Sure.
827
00:42:46,360 --> 00:42:48,960
Well, you can find us at
filmlinespirits.com and we ship
828
00:42:48,960 --> 00:42:52,800
to 46 states from there.
As I mentioned, we're also in 13
829
00:42:52,800 --> 00:42:54,680
states.
So a lot of the West,
830
00:42:54,680 --> 00:43:01,080
California, Washington, Arizona,
Nevada, Kentucky, Kansas, we're
831
00:43:01,080 --> 00:43:02,960
in total wines in all those
states.
832
00:43:02,960 --> 00:43:05,560
We're in Liquor Barn all
throughout Kentucky.
833
00:43:06,200 --> 00:43:10,320
So really, you know, very common
kind of places you can go and
834
00:43:10,320 --> 00:43:13,400
shop in terms of what's coming
down the line.
835
00:43:13,400 --> 00:43:16,200
We have two new products that
are coming this year.
836
00:43:16,640 --> 00:43:18,400
I can't talk about either of
them.
837
00:43:19,360 --> 00:43:22,280
They're both pretty much ready.
But I can't talk about them
838
00:43:22,280 --> 00:43:25,200
because we haven't decided 100%
which one's coming in the spring
839
00:43:25,200 --> 00:43:26,480
and which one's coming in the
fall.
840
00:43:26,960 --> 00:43:29,360
And if I say one or the other,
then my team is going to get
841
00:43:29,360 --> 00:43:32,640
really mad at me that I just
unilaterally made a decision.
842
00:43:33,440 --> 00:43:37,000
But it's, it's I'm very excited.
Both are unique and different
843
00:43:37,000 --> 00:43:40,760
than anything we've done before
in a lot of different ways.
844
00:43:40,760 --> 00:43:43,160
And I'm, I'm super excited for
them.
845
00:43:43,160 --> 00:43:45,560
So one of them is going to be in
the spring and 1:00 will be, you
846
00:43:45,560 --> 00:43:48,640
know, late summer or fall.
Well, thank you again, Troy
847
00:43:48,640 --> 00:43:52,880
Belotnik from Film Land Spirits.
Brad, this wraps up our Oscars
848
00:43:52,880 --> 00:43:58,400
recap 2025.
Man, I'm ready to go to bed.
849
00:43:58,480 --> 00:43:59,560
I'm not going to lie to you,
man.
850
00:43:59,680 --> 00:44:01,560
It's it's a late night for us
folks.
851
00:44:01,560 --> 00:44:04,760
What we're going to do, because
this is a Sunday night posting,
852
00:44:04,760 --> 00:44:07,160
you'll probably hear this on
Monday morning when you wake up.
853
00:44:07,400 --> 00:44:08,720
We're going to take a couple
days off.
854
00:44:08,720 --> 00:44:12,080
Our next new episode will come
out this Wednesday instead of
855
00:44:12,080 --> 00:44:14,040
Tuesday, so tune in for that
one.
856
00:44:14,040 --> 00:44:17,280
But until then, I'm Bob Book.
I'm Brad Gee.
857
00:44:17,520 --> 00:44:18,960
And we'll see you next time.
Film Critic, Oscar Whisperer, Vanity Fair Contributor
Daniel Joyaux writes about movies with the kind of precision usually reserved for costume design nominations. Based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, his bylines have appeared in Vanity Fair, The Ringer, RogerEbert.com, The Verge, and Rotten Tomatoes, where he breaks down awards seasons, auteur obsessions, and everything in between. On Film & Whiskey, Daniel is our go-to Oscars expert—whether he’s sipping Glenlivet through The Last of the Mohicans or tearing apart Argo with an exceptional pour in hand. You’ll find him on Letterboxd obsessing over noir, Hitchcock, and which movies truly deserved Best Picture.