Season 9 Preview / Bardstown Bourbon Company Silver Oak
In this special Season Nine Preview, we’re excited to dive into a new theme: Modern Classics.
This season, we’ll explore films from the last 20 years and ask the important question: Do they belong in the 21st-century canon?
From Oppenheimer to Everything Everywhere All at Once, we’re covering the best cinema has offered in recent decades. Join us as we dissect these films, their cultural impact, and why they’ve earned a place in our modern-day classics list.
This episode also includes a detailed review of Bardstown Bourbon Company Collaborative Series Silver Oak Bourbon—a whiskey you won’t want to miss.
Film & Whiskey Instagram
Film & Whiskey Twitter
Email us!
For more episodes and engaging content, visit Film & Whiskey's website at www.filmwhiskey.com.
--- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/filmwhiskey/support00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:02,920
Hey there whiskey lovers, You
ever wonder what happens when
2
00:00:02,920 --> 00:00:06,120
you mix Kentucky Derby winners,
legendary bourbon masterminds?
3
00:00:06,120 --> 00:00:09,720
In a dash of bold ambition you
get Blackwood Distilling Co, a
4
00:00:09,720 --> 00:00:13,760
premium brand born from the wild
65 to one odds victory of
5
00:00:13,760 --> 00:00:18,600
Country House in the 2019 Derby.
They have crafted luxury toasted
6
00:00:18,600 --> 00:00:21,440
bourbon and America's first
triple barreled toasted ride
7
00:00:21,440 --> 00:00:24,840
that'll knock your socks off in
the most delicious way possible.
8
00:00:25,200 --> 00:00:28,520
Picture this 7 to 9 year old
Kentucky Bourbon.
9
00:00:28,880 --> 00:00:32,920
Think deep creamy vibes, soft
barrel spices, and that smooth
10
00:00:32,920 --> 00:00:36,400
as velvet warmth kissed by a
hint of vanilla from Kentucky's
11
00:00:36,400 --> 00:00:38,840
golden era.
And that's just the bourbon.
12
00:00:39,320 --> 00:00:42,920
If rye's more your thing like it
is for me, how about a five to
13
00:00:42,920 --> 00:00:45,800
seven-year old Indiana rye
triple barreled and toasted
14
00:00:45,800 --> 00:00:50,040
barrels that blend spice, dark
fruits, mint and A dash of white
15
00:00:50,040 --> 00:00:52,560
pepper.
It's basically a liquid holiday
16
00:00:52,560 --> 00:00:56,520
wrapped in oak and fire.
Batches are continuously rolling
17
00:00:56,520 --> 00:00:59,600
out in states all across the
Union, so if you want in on
18
00:00:59,600 --> 00:01:02,640
luxury, head to
blackwooddistillingco.com to get
19
00:01:02,640 --> 00:01:06,120
yourself some Blackwood Toasted
Bourbon and Toasted Rye.
20
00:01:06,480 --> 00:01:10,960
Cheers to the good stuff.
Today on the Film and Whiskey
21
00:01:10,960 --> 00:01:14,880
podcast, we are looking at the
Season 9 movie lineup.
22
00:01:15,360 --> 00:01:19,560
And we will be reviewing
Bardstown Bourbon Company,
23
00:01:19,840 --> 00:01:24,920
Silver Oak.
This is the Film and Whiskey
24
00:01:24,920 --> 00:01:44,680
podcast.
Hey everybody, welcome into the
25
00:01:44,680 --> 00:01:47,280
Film and Whiskey Podcast.
I'm Bob Book.
26
00:01:47,800 --> 00:01:51,120
I'm Brad G.
And one last time before Season
27
00:01:51,120 --> 00:01:54,520
9, we are coming at you with a
special bonus episode.
28
00:01:55,160 --> 00:02:00,200
Bonus.
Episode I never know if this is
29
00:02:00,200 --> 00:02:04,280
the kick off of season 9 or if
this is like the very last entry
30
00:02:04,280 --> 00:02:07,520
in season 8.
I, I feel like it's a kick off
31
00:02:07,520 --> 00:02:08,639
of season 9.
All right, well.
32
00:02:08,639 --> 00:02:11,520
Welcome to Season 9, folks.
Yeah, let's go we.
33
00:02:11,560 --> 00:02:15,080
Freaking did it, man.
We've made it to season #9 Brad.
34
00:02:15,880 --> 00:02:18,480
We have.
We've made it beyond the Elite
35
00:02:18,480 --> 00:02:22,120
8, if you will.
We're just slowly filling out
36
00:02:22,120 --> 00:02:24,640
the bracket.
The bracket of seasons that
37
00:02:24,640 --> 00:02:28,200
should be like if we ever get to
a season 32, we should just put
38
00:02:28,200 --> 00:02:32,200
every season into a bracket.
Yeah, that that would be a great
39
00:02:32,200 --> 00:02:34,000
idea.
Have everybody vote on their
40
00:02:34,000 --> 00:02:37,800
favorite season.
So with that said, how have you
41
00:02:37,800 --> 00:02:40,560
liked these last few seasons
like season 5?
42
00:02:40,560 --> 00:02:43,240
I think we should be like where
we start with this thought
43
00:02:43,240 --> 00:02:44,600
experiment.
That was the one where we each
44
00:02:44,600 --> 00:02:47,960
picked like 16 movies for the
other person to watch.
45
00:02:48,280 --> 00:02:50,880
I like that season a lot.
Then six and seven we did our
46
00:02:50,880 --> 00:02:54,080
director miniseries, and last
season we did the highest
47
00:02:54,080 --> 00:02:58,520
grossing film in North America
for 32 consecutive years.
48
00:02:59,160 --> 00:03:03,400
I think it's been a really
interesting few years or seasons
49
00:03:03,440 --> 00:03:05,720
in the history of the Film
Whiskey podcast.
50
00:03:06,440 --> 00:03:10,240
I think it was really fun to
switch things up, pick some
51
00:03:10,240 --> 00:03:13,560
movies that we just loved,
Instant classics like
52
00:03:13,560 --> 00:03:18,320
Elizabethtown.
I mean just a plethora of
53
00:03:18,320 --> 00:03:21,280
wonderful movies.
I still love Elizabethtown.
54
00:03:21,440 --> 00:03:24,800
It's it's terrible.
It's terrible in ways that are
55
00:03:24,800 --> 00:03:28,680
like, like angering like.
This does not cohere.
56
00:03:28,880 --> 00:03:33,360
This makes no sense.
In the same way that Chef fits
57
00:03:33,360 --> 00:03:40,640
in that that 2012 to 15 genre of
like kids explaining social
58
00:03:40,640 --> 00:03:43,440
media to their parents,
Elizabethtown.
59
00:03:43,440 --> 00:03:48,480
I will give it its credit.
It captures the late night phone
60
00:03:48,480 --> 00:03:52,480
conversation in the early 2000s
perfectly.
61
00:03:52,880 --> 00:03:55,840
And it's like one of the last
times that could happen 'cause
62
00:03:55,840 --> 00:03:56,440
now it.
Would just.
63
00:03:56,440 --> 00:03:59,040
We've talked too much.
We've talked too much about it.
64
00:03:59,040 --> 00:04:00,920
All right, fine, fine.
What we're saying is
65
00:04:00,920 --> 00:04:03,800
Elizabethtown is the highlight
of the last Four Seasons of our
66
00:04:03,800 --> 00:04:06,040
podcast.
Easily I I think.
67
00:04:06,160 --> 00:04:09,040
I think the director seasons
were super fun.
68
00:04:09,400 --> 00:04:14,120
It felt more like a cinephile
exploration of movie history,
69
00:04:14,440 --> 00:04:18,240
which was fun for two seasons.
Last season was a blast, man.
70
00:04:19,160 --> 00:04:22,240
It was a blast.
And yet, Brad, as I look at the
71
00:04:22,240 --> 00:04:26,080
download numbers for our podcast
over the last few seasons, you
72
00:04:26,080 --> 00:04:29,720
would think that those movies
would be more well known among
73
00:04:29,720 --> 00:04:33,480
the general population and
therefore theoretically get more
74
00:04:33,480 --> 00:04:35,840
listens.
But I think people who have
75
00:04:35,840 --> 00:04:40,160
tuned into our podcast want us
to be reviewing more classics.
76
00:04:40,160 --> 00:04:43,000
I think they they have latched
onto the conceit of the podcast,
77
00:04:43,000 --> 00:04:47,680
which is me, the classic film
lover, introducing my friend to
78
00:04:47,680 --> 00:04:50,400
classic movies.
And when we're doing like Sister
79
00:04:50,400 --> 00:04:54,080
Act, I don't think people are as
jazzed about that.
80
00:04:54,920 --> 00:04:57,920
I don't know man.
True Lies that is a modern
81
00:04:57,920 --> 00:04:59,240
class.
That movie is a freaking
82
00:04:59,240 --> 00:05:00,840
classic.
I don't care what anybody says.
83
00:05:03,240 --> 00:05:06,480
Well, this year we're going to
be moving from tanks bursting
84
00:05:06,480 --> 00:05:14,160
out of walls into a exploration
of what does it mean for a movie
85
00:05:14,160 --> 00:05:18,160
to not just be a classic, but a
modern classic.
86
00:05:18,640 --> 00:05:20,600
This is something that we've
been talking about for years and
87
00:05:20,600 --> 00:05:22,480
years.
I have frequently bring up this
88
00:05:22,480 --> 00:05:25,800
thing that TNT used to do, like
every Saturday night they have a
89
00:05:25,800 --> 00:05:28,840
movie and it was called the TNT
Modern Classics.
90
00:05:29,240 --> 00:05:32,240
And it was just like whatever
Warner Brothers movie was out
91
00:05:32,240 --> 00:05:34,320
that they wanted you to see.
They put it on as a modern
92
00:05:34,320 --> 00:05:38,440
classic, but we've talked a lot
about what are the criteria that
93
00:05:38,440 --> 00:05:41,360
have to be met for a movie to be
considered a classic.
94
00:05:41,680 --> 00:05:46,280
There's usually some alchemy of
either box office success or
95
00:05:46,280 --> 00:05:50,960
critical success or Oscar gold
that goes into it, or a
96
00:05:50,960 --> 00:05:53,280
combination of the three.
Sometimes the movie is a
97
00:05:53,280 --> 00:05:55,480
complete flop and then it gets
picked up later on.
98
00:05:55,480 --> 00:05:58,680
But usually it's because critics
were championing in in the early
99
00:05:58,680 --> 00:06:01,320
going.
And so we want to look back at
100
00:06:01,320 --> 00:06:04,520
the last 20 years.
We're going to cap it at 2005.
101
00:06:04,520 --> 00:06:10,680
We'll do 2005 to 2020, three, 24
and kind of present some films
102
00:06:10,840 --> 00:06:14,480
to the general population here
and ask the question, does this
103
00:06:14,480 --> 00:06:17,200
movie deserve to be considered a
modern classic?
104
00:06:17,400 --> 00:06:20,560
Should it be added to the 21st
century Canon?
105
00:06:21,120 --> 00:06:24,000
Now, Brad, we should say before
we go too far, we've already
106
00:06:24,000 --> 00:06:25,640
done.
I just had the number pulled up
107
00:06:26,160 --> 00:06:31,760
like 63 or 64 movies on this
podcast that would fall into
108
00:06:31,840 --> 00:06:34,520
this criteria, like movies from
the last 20 years.
109
00:06:35,120 --> 00:06:42,080
So a lot. 2004 to 2024. 20I I
started in 2005 S 2005 to 2024
110
00:06:42,280 --> 00:06:45,720
we've already done 67.
I'm sorry, 63 or 64 of these
111
00:06:45,720 --> 00:06:47,720
movies.
We could do multiple brackets
112
00:06:47,720 --> 00:06:52,320
with just these movies, but so a
lot of the ones that are already
113
00:06:52,320 --> 00:06:56,880
considered part of the 21st
century Canon, we reviewed
114
00:06:56,880 --> 00:07:00,120
already like we've done The Dark
Knight, we've done, you know,
115
00:07:00,840 --> 00:07:03,400
Social Network and Brokeback
Mountain, and like all these
116
00:07:03,400 --> 00:07:06,520
movies have been reviewed.
So we're not suggesting.
117
00:07:06,520 --> 00:07:10,720
And we know that Green Book
comes out on top.
118
00:07:10,720 --> 00:07:14,200
Yeah, Green Book and
Elizabethtown are the top 2
119
00:07:14,200 --> 00:07:18,360
seeds.
That we did have some
120
00:07:18,360 --> 00:07:22,160
qualifications for the movies we
selected this season, right?
121
00:07:22,720 --> 00:07:26,320
And it's not necessarily that
they checked all of these boxes.
122
00:07:26,320 --> 00:07:29,320
In fact, I think one or two of
these didn't check any of them.
123
00:07:29,560 --> 00:07:33,760
Yes.
But in general we are looking at
124
00:07:33,760 --> 00:07:37,880
4 main categories of Is this
something this movie
125
00:07:37,880 --> 00:07:39,800
accomplished?
Well, before you say what they
126
00:07:39,800 --> 00:07:42,720
are like, do you agree with what
I did here?
127
00:07:43,040 --> 00:07:45,680
Like I I put these into a
spreadsheet, I basically just
128
00:07:45,680 --> 00:07:49,160
arbitrarily chose 4 categories
that I thought would be good
129
00:07:49,160 --> 00:07:52,080
measures for what should be
considered.
130
00:07:52,200 --> 00:07:54,480
Do you think these are four good
ones or did I miss something?
131
00:07:55,440 --> 00:07:58,480
I think they're good ones, yeah.
I think you kind of checked the
132
00:07:59,720 --> 00:08:07,200
popularity box, the critics box
along with like, is it something
133
00:08:07,200 --> 00:08:12,320
that will AP, Is it something
that will appeal to audiences
134
00:08:12,360 --> 00:08:15,640
over the long term?
Cool.
135
00:08:15,760 --> 00:08:18,080
Well, I guess let's go ahead and
reveal what the four categories
136
00:08:18,080 --> 00:08:22,600
are, Brad.
So the first category is, was
137
00:08:22,600 --> 00:08:25,360
this movie nominated for Best
Picture?
138
00:08:26,640 --> 00:08:29,400
Yeah, I thought about doing
like, was this nominated for an
139
00:08:29,400 --> 00:08:32,000
Oscar in general?
But then I would have had to
140
00:08:32,000 --> 00:08:34,559
capture a whole bunch of movies
on this list.
141
00:08:34,640 --> 00:08:37,240
You know, I basically just
listed out every movie that
142
00:08:37,240 --> 00:08:39,600
qualified for every single
category and then narrowed it
143
00:08:39,600 --> 00:08:42,120
down from there.
And I think that like, yes,
144
00:08:42,120 --> 00:08:46,120
sometimes the Oscar nominations,
they they snub something that
145
00:08:46,120 --> 00:08:47,920
really should have been
considered a best picture
146
00:08:47,920 --> 00:08:50,160
contender.
This happened with If Beale
147
00:08:50,160 --> 00:08:52,280
Street to Talk, a movie that I
think really should have been
148
00:08:52,280 --> 00:08:55,760
nominated.
But in general, if it's not
149
00:08:55,760 --> 00:08:57,880
going to be a Best Picture
nominee, but we're still going
150
00:08:57,880 --> 00:09:00,320
to talk about it this year, then
that means it it hit one of the
151
00:09:00,320 --> 00:09:02,440
other categories.
So I didn't think that was like
152
00:09:02,640 --> 00:09:04,800
the end all be all.
Yeah.
153
00:09:04,800 --> 00:09:07,720
What's our next category, Bob?
Well, going the popularity route
154
00:09:07,720 --> 00:09:11,280
is this movie in the IMDb Top
250.
155
00:09:11,920 --> 00:09:14,760
Now again, IMDb is always
weighted a little more
156
00:09:14,760 --> 00:09:19,040
frequently towards the recent
film, and so old movies suffer a
157
00:09:19,040 --> 00:09:20,440
lot.
But we're only going back 20
158
00:09:20,440 --> 00:09:22,680
years.
So a movie hasn't, you know, it
159
00:09:22,680 --> 00:09:26,360
doesn't have to have the staying
power of like Casablanca to
160
00:09:26,360 --> 00:09:30,200
still be kicking around the
bottom tier of the IMDb Top 250.
161
00:09:30,840 --> 00:09:32,320
Yeah.
And and we're not necessarily
162
00:09:32,320 --> 00:09:37,040
worried here with is it a top 50
movie or a 200 to 250 just
163
00:09:37,360 --> 00:09:40,960
didn't make the top 250 list.
And then staying in that realm
164
00:09:40,960 --> 00:09:47,200
of popularity, did the film a
crew $100 million at the
165
00:09:47,200 --> 00:09:51,400
domestic box office.
What was this popular enough in
166
00:09:51,400 --> 00:09:54,960
the United States of America to
make a decent amount of money?
167
00:09:54,960 --> 00:09:57,440
Right.
At $100 million, you know, it's
168
00:09:57,440 --> 00:10:01,320
nothing to sneeze at obviously,
but like in the era of MCU
169
00:10:01,320 --> 00:10:06,160
movies where it stops making
$600 million domestic, 100 mil
170
00:10:06,160 --> 00:10:09,600
doesn't seem like a big number.
But then you look at some of the
171
00:10:09,720 --> 00:10:12,840
some of the movies that came out
that were really small movies
172
00:10:12,840 --> 00:10:15,960
and got like an Oscar bump.
I'm pretty sure a movie like The
173
00:10:15,960 --> 00:10:20,520
King's Speech actually did clear
100 mil at the United States box
174
00:10:20,520 --> 00:10:22,080
office or something close to
that.
175
00:10:22,640 --> 00:10:26,040
And like then you start
realizing, oh, that's a huge hit
176
00:10:26,040 --> 00:10:29,480
for a movie of that size.
So I think 100 mil is a good
177
00:10:29,480 --> 00:10:34,200
place to set this for kind of
general if not popularity, just
178
00:10:34,200 --> 00:10:39,280
general knowledge of a movie.
Yeah, I mean, even a movie that
179
00:10:39,280 --> 00:10:44,960
might not be the most popular,
but like Wonka a year ago made
180
00:10:44,960 --> 00:10:49,920
133 million here in the US.
So I made half a billion dollars
181
00:10:49,920 --> 00:10:52,040
worldwide.
That's wild.
182
00:10:52,040 --> 00:10:53,280
It's a.
Really good movie.
183
00:10:53,400 --> 00:10:55,040
Man.
It is.
184
00:10:55,080 --> 00:11:00,000
It is a book family favorite.
My 4 year old family friendly,
185
00:11:00,000 --> 00:11:04,840
obsessed with Wonka.
Look at you go Timothy Chalamet.
186
00:11:05,160 --> 00:11:08,040
He's killing it, dude.
And that takes us to our last
187
00:11:08,040 --> 00:11:10,200
category.
Is this film part of the
188
00:11:10,200 --> 00:11:14,480
Letterboxed Top 250 now?
We have not done Letterboxed
189
00:11:14,480 --> 00:11:16,840
stuff on this podcast much
because it.
190
00:11:16,840 --> 00:11:19,880
Is like we're about to if you
could take.
191
00:11:19,880 --> 00:11:24,720
IMDb and say how can I make this
more insufferable?
192
00:11:25,360 --> 00:11:28,520
It would be letterbox.
Letterbox 8 years ago Bob was
193
00:11:28,520 --> 00:11:30,480
like.
You love Letterbox.
194
00:11:30,480 --> 00:11:33,040
No, So here's the thing.
I don't use Letterbox that
195
00:11:33,040 --> 00:11:35,720
frequently.
Like I, I log my movies and I
196
00:11:35,720 --> 00:11:39,520
give them a score, but I don't
write reviews on Letterbox like
197
00:11:39,520 --> 00:11:42,480
Letterbox is, is if you could
mash up IMDb and Twitter.
198
00:11:43,080 --> 00:11:46,040
It's like people saying really
pithy things and trying to get
199
00:11:46,040 --> 00:11:49,200
the cleverest take on a movie
and then everybody upvotes that
200
00:11:49,200 --> 00:11:52,120
review.
And so it's like, it is it is
201
00:11:52,120 --> 00:11:56,160
catching the the snobbishness of
film Twitter mashed up with the
202
00:11:56,160 --> 00:11:59,880
user functionality of IMDb.
However, I do think it's a good
203
00:11:59,880 --> 00:12:03,920
metric here because it is kind
of capturing the like the film
204
00:12:03,920 --> 00:12:06,760
nerd side of things.
If it's a snobbier side of
205
00:12:06,800 --> 00:12:09,520
things, if it's a movie that the
Snooty people like and it's a
206
00:12:09,520 --> 00:12:13,360
movie that the average Joes over
on IMDb like, that tells me it's
207
00:12:13,360 --> 00:12:16,000
a pretty good movie.
Yeah, 100%.
208
00:12:16,000 --> 00:12:19,360
I, I think that this is a good
metric.
209
00:12:19,360 --> 00:12:22,400
Like we have 4 categories and
we're not going to talk for each
210
00:12:22,400 --> 00:12:24,280
movie about what categories they
hit.
211
00:12:24,520 --> 00:12:26,560
Are we about?
Absolutely not.
212
00:12:27,080 --> 00:12:29,000
Yeah.
So essentially you just have to
213
00:12:29,000 --> 00:12:33,320
trust us that almost all of
these movies scored well in at
214
00:12:33,320 --> 00:12:38,800
least one of these categories.
Now there were about 6, about 9
215
00:12:38,800 --> 00:12:43,920
or 10 that hit at least three of
the four categories, and they
216
00:12:43,920 --> 00:12:45,920
would be movies that you
recognize.
217
00:12:46,000 --> 00:12:49,320
For sure.
And there was one movie to rule
218
00:12:49,320 --> 00:12:51,640
them all, Brad.
One movie that hit all four
219
00:12:51,640 --> 00:12:53,880
categories.
And it is perhaps the most
220
00:12:53,880 --> 00:12:55,880
recent film on this list as
well.
221
00:12:55,880 --> 00:12:58,360
Or darn near it.
It's a movie that came out just
222
00:12:58,360 --> 00:13:03,240
last year, swept the Oscars, is
on the IMDb top 250, grossed a
223
00:13:03,240 --> 00:13:05,760
whole bunch of money.
Letterboxed Bros love it.
224
00:13:06,080 --> 00:13:10,440
It is the Christopher Nolan film
Oppenheimer, and that is what we
225
00:13:10,440 --> 00:13:14,360
are kicking off Season 9 with.
Yeah, dude.
226
00:13:14,360 --> 00:13:20,040
I waited about a year after it
came out to finally watch it,
227
00:13:20,680 --> 00:13:25,400
mostly just to piss you off.
Yeah, I saw this movie at least
228
00:13:25,400 --> 00:13:29,720
five times in theaters, Brad.
Yeah, which is like 15 hours of
229
00:13:29,720 --> 00:13:32,080
your time, and that's just
sitting in the theater.
230
00:13:32,080 --> 00:13:35,360
Not driving there.
There are worse ways to spend 15
231
00:13:35,360 --> 00:13:37,920
hours.
That movie freaking slaps.
232
00:13:37,920 --> 00:13:41,920
Brad yeah, no, that Oppenheimer
is incredible.
233
00:13:42,000 --> 00:13:45,800
It is going to get a very high
score from both Bob and I, and
234
00:13:45,800 --> 00:13:48,440
I'm so jacked to start the
season off with that.
235
00:13:48,800 --> 00:13:53,280
After Oppenheimer, we're going
to jump back 12 years to watch a
236
00:13:53,280 --> 00:13:58,080
little film called The Help.
The help a movie that the film
237
00:13:58,080 --> 00:14:02,120
Twitter does not like the Help,
but the general population does.
238
00:14:02,120 --> 00:14:05,560
It made a whole bunch of money.
I'm pretty sure it's on the IMDb
239
00:14:05,560 --> 00:14:09,040
top 250 still and it was
nominated for best picture.
240
00:14:09,240 --> 00:14:12,720
So depending on where it's at on
IMDb, it I think it might have
241
00:14:12,720 --> 00:14:13,800
hit three of the four.
Brad.
242
00:14:14,440 --> 00:14:16,680
Yeah.
All right, after that, we're
243
00:14:16,680 --> 00:14:19,640
jumping into a movie that I
guess we should say I'm, we're
244
00:14:19,640 --> 00:14:21,400
swinging into a movie.
Hey.
245
00:14:22,040 --> 00:14:25,800
I was pretty cool on the first
time I saw it, but that everyone
246
00:14:25,800 --> 00:14:30,720
seems to love 2018's Spider Man
Into the Spider verse.
247
00:14:31,000 --> 00:14:33,480
Brad, have you seen any of the
spider verse movies yet?
248
00:14:34,000 --> 00:14:37,080
I have not.
I tried to get Haley to watch it
249
00:14:37,080 --> 00:14:42,120
with me at some point and the
preview was like so flashy and
250
00:14:42,120 --> 00:14:45,280
she was like that just looks
like way too much going on.
251
00:14:45,320 --> 00:14:47,880
I am uninterested it.
Is the only time in my life the
252
00:14:47,880 --> 00:14:52,920
last 10 minutes of that movie
where I had legitimate sensory
253
00:14:52,920 --> 00:14:57,600
overload where I was like this
my life this might trigger a
254
00:14:57,600 --> 00:15:02,000
seizure like it was disorienting
and IA lot of people loved it
255
00:15:02,000 --> 00:15:05,360
but I I couldn't do it man.
Would you say it's the animated
256
00:15:05,360 --> 00:15:07,320
version of a Terrence Malick
Just.
257
00:15:07,680 --> 00:15:08,920
Flying through.
Not even.
258
00:15:08,920 --> 00:15:11,560
Not even remotely.
Terrence Malick moves very
259
00:15:11,560 --> 00:15:12,920
slowly.
This movie does not.
260
00:15:15,480 --> 00:15:19,000
Well, following Spider Man into
the spider verse, I'm really
261
00:15:19,000 --> 00:15:22,960
excited for this.
I feel like 2019 was a really
262
00:15:22,960 --> 00:15:28,480
incredible year for film and I
only was able to see a few of
263
00:15:28,480 --> 00:15:31,720
the movies that I'm still
wanting to come back around to,
264
00:15:31,720 --> 00:15:35,400
and one of those will be Ford V
Ferrari.
265
00:15:36,320 --> 00:15:40,240
Ford versus Ferrari is the
ultimate dad movie.
266
00:15:40,840 --> 00:15:42,920
I mean, it's like it's a buddy
comedy.
267
00:15:43,040 --> 00:15:45,080
It's about getting stuff done
together.
268
00:15:45,200 --> 00:15:48,920
It's about America versus the
world and cars go vroom like it
269
00:15:48,920 --> 00:15:51,960
is.
And it has Matt Damon.
270
00:15:51,960 --> 00:15:53,920
And it's such, such a good
movie, dude.
271
00:15:54,040 --> 00:15:57,040
Are we just going to land on our
Let's make it a double with Top
272
00:15:57,040 --> 00:15:58,640
Gun Maverick?
We might as well.
273
00:15:58,920 --> 00:16:02,280
That like those that would be
the ultimate dad movie combo.
274
00:16:03,000 --> 00:16:05,400
I'm already going to Ding at a
point, though, because it falls
275
00:16:05,400 --> 00:16:07,360
victim to this thing that
they've been doing with movie
276
00:16:07,360 --> 00:16:09,480
titles lately.
That really pisses me off that
277
00:16:09,720 --> 00:16:13,720
they put AV instead of AVS when
they mean versus.
278
00:16:14,240 --> 00:16:16,480
And when it's just V, it's like
a court case.
279
00:16:16,480 --> 00:16:20,640
So you think that Ford V Ferrari
is like Ford is the cooling
280
00:16:20,640 --> 00:16:24,400
Cerrari in court?
Yeah, it's not that like Batman
281
00:16:24,400 --> 00:16:26,600
V Superman.
That sounds like the lamest
282
00:16:26,600 --> 00:16:32,440
court case of all time.
It turns out lamest movie of all
283
00:16:32,440 --> 00:16:34,360
time.
We should have gotten the
284
00:16:34,360 --> 00:16:38,800
courtroom version.
After Ford versus Ferrari, we
285
00:16:38,800 --> 00:16:43,000
are going back five more years
to 2014, to a movie that caught
286
00:16:43,000 --> 00:16:46,640
on like wildfire.
I remember seeing it at the
287
00:16:46,640 --> 00:16:49,760
local indie movie theater in
Cleveland because it wasn't
288
00:16:49,760 --> 00:16:52,320
playing anywhere else and it had
gotten really good reviews out
289
00:16:52,320 --> 00:16:55,480
of the festivals.
And it's a movie called
290
00:16:55,480 --> 00:16:59,960
Whiplash.
Once that movie hit the the
291
00:16:59,960 --> 00:17:02,360
mainstream, it just freaking
took off.
292
00:17:02,360 --> 00:17:04,640
But it was so funny to me
because I saw it.
293
00:17:04,640 --> 00:17:07,280
I posted about it, you know, on
Facebook or something after I
294
00:17:07,280 --> 00:17:09,839
saw it and no one else had heard
of this movie.
295
00:17:09,839 --> 00:17:11,680
And I was like, this is the best
movie I've seen all year.
296
00:17:11,680 --> 00:17:15,400
This movie is incredible.
I'm so glad that it's caught on.
297
00:17:15,640 --> 00:17:18,359
But also it's one of those ones
where I'm like, you didn't see
298
00:17:18,359 --> 00:17:20,599
this movie in theaters.
Like I hear people saying that
299
00:17:20,599 --> 00:17:22,119
now.
And I'm like, no, you didn't.
300
00:17:23,280 --> 00:17:25,040
I was the only one there.
I looked around.
301
00:17:25,040 --> 00:17:28,240
You weren't there.
Bob There were years and years,
302
00:17:28,600 --> 00:17:32,200
if any faithful listeners
remember guest host in like
303
00:17:32,200 --> 00:17:36,200
episodes 3 and 4.
Jordan, he's a great friend of
304
00:17:36,200 --> 00:17:39,000
mine.
And for years he tried to get me
305
00:17:39,000 --> 00:17:41,480
to watch Whiplash.
Like it would be like anytime we
306
00:17:41,480 --> 00:17:44,000
had a movie night with friends,
he'd be like anybody up for
307
00:17:44,000 --> 00:17:47,120
Whiplash.
And I would inevitably every
308
00:17:47,120 --> 00:17:50,320
single time be like, oh, that's
the one with JK Rowling in it,
309
00:17:50,320 --> 00:17:55,920
right?
And he would just, like, sigh at
310
00:17:55,920 --> 00:17:59,480
me in resignation that honestly
the way you kind of do, Bob.
311
00:17:59,520 --> 00:18:02,080
Yeah, we have a lot in common.
Jordan didn't.
312
00:18:03,280 --> 00:18:05,400
I you really do.
Let's bring Jordan back for that
313
00:18:05,400 --> 00:18:07,880
episode.
Oh, that's a great idea.
314
00:18:07,920 --> 00:18:09,600
Let's get him on.
You should ask him if he's
315
00:18:09,600 --> 00:18:11,280
willing to join us nine seasons
later.
316
00:18:11,800 --> 00:18:15,160
I'm sure he will.
All right, well, we're
317
00:18:15,160 --> 00:18:18,680
revisiting the year 2019 after
that to look at the Best picture
318
00:18:18,680 --> 00:18:21,760
winner of that year, a surprise
Best Picture winner, but a
319
00:18:21,760 --> 00:18:24,480
deserving 1, the Korean film
Parasite.
320
00:18:25,440 --> 00:18:30,600
This is another movie that like
everybody loves now, but it took
321
00:18:30,600 --> 00:18:33,120
a minute for this to catch on in
the in the consciousness.
322
00:18:33,400 --> 00:18:36,160
It reminds me a lot of
Everything Everywhere All at
323
00:18:36,160 --> 00:18:39,480
Once, how that was a really
small movie and word of mouth
324
00:18:39,480 --> 00:18:42,080
just kind of took it off.
And then by the time you got to
325
00:18:42,080 --> 00:18:46,360
the Oscars, it had a really
dedicated following of people
326
00:18:46,360 --> 00:18:48,960
who've been pushing for it.
That movie picked up momentum at
327
00:18:48,960 --> 00:18:50,960
the at the right time to win its
Oscars.
328
00:18:51,320 --> 00:18:53,680
And I feel like it's really
cemented itself as one of the
329
00:18:53,680 --> 00:18:55,320
best movies of the decade since
then.
330
00:18:55,320 --> 00:18:57,240
I.
Don't know if you know this Bob,
331
00:18:57,240 --> 00:19:01,280
but I own it.
Do you really Blu-ray as a one
332
00:19:01,280 --> 00:19:03,240
of the Criterion Collections?
Have you watched it?
333
00:19:04,440 --> 00:19:06,240
I no, I just randomly bought it
Bob.
334
00:19:06,280 --> 00:19:08,960
Well I mean sometimes you you
bought 7 samurai before you
335
00:19:08,960 --> 00:19:10,680
watch that.
That is true.
336
00:19:10,680 --> 00:19:15,080
I did do that.
Yes, I did watch Parasite.
337
00:19:15,080 --> 00:19:18,960
I actually watched it the same
week that you and I watched
338
00:19:19,000 --> 00:19:22,520
Memento together.
Oh gosh, that actually sounds
339
00:19:22,520 --> 00:19:25,520
like a decent pairing because
they're both just like really
340
00:19:25,520 --> 00:19:28,840
twisted movies.
Yeah, I also watched Bicycle
341
00:19:28,840 --> 00:19:31,520
Thieves that week.
It it was a momentous week for
342
00:19:31,520 --> 00:19:35,080
my film watching.
My gosh, that's like B week for
343
00:19:35,080 --> 00:19:39,880
you man.
I've never recovered a movie
344
00:19:39,880 --> 00:19:45,400
that has recovered and recovered
the franchise in a lot of ways.
345
00:19:45,960 --> 00:19:49,760
Skyfall from 2012 is our next
movie.
346
00:19:50,080 --> 00:19:52,200
Can I just say I'm so pumped
about this season.
347
00:19:52,320 --> 00:19:55,560
We're going back-to-back to back
Ford V Ferrari whiplash,
348
00:19:55,560 --> 00:19:58,040
Parasite Skyfall.
Like what a freaking line up.
349
00:19:58,240 --> 00:20:00,640
What a dude's rule season this
is going to be.
350
00:20:01,800 --> 00:20:05,360
And following Skyfall, we have
Dune Part 2.
351
00:20:05,440 --> 00:20:10,400
Dune Part 2 are only to this
point 2024 entry for this
352
00:20:10,400 --> 00:20:12,240
season.
I'm very excited because
353
00:20:12,600 --> 00:20:15,920
Oppenheimer was the only film
that checked all four boxes.
354
00:20:16,320 --> 00:20:20,520
Dune checked like 3 1/2 boxes.
It has not yet been nominated
355
00:20:20,520 --> 00:20:22,960
for Best Picture.
It's pretty much a lock to
356
00:20:23,040 --> 00:20:25,400
though.
So Oppenheimer and Dune 2 are
357
00:20:25,400 --> 00:20:29,000
the only two movies that will
have had that distinction and I
358
00:20:29,000 --> 00:20:30,480
think we'll probably be hitting
it.
359
00:20:30,920 --> 00:20:34,000
Well, let's see like mid to late
November.
360
00:20:34,000 --> 00:20:37,760
So right as award season is
starting to ramp up, I wondered
361
00:20:37,760 --> 00:20:40,480
about pushing this till later in
award season.
362
00:20:40,840 --> 00:20:44,000
But if if something else kind of
comes up and steals its Thunder
363
00:20:44,000 --> 00:20:45,880
and it doesn't end up winning
the Oscar, that could really
364
00:20:45,880 --> 00:20:48,360
backfire.
So I'm glad we have it where we
365
00:20:48,360 --> 00:20:51,360
do here, Brad.
Yeah, I'm, I'm really excited
366
00:20:51,360 --> 00:20:53,600
for it.
I am really excited for the next
367
00:20:53,600 --> 00:20:56,280
film, one that you've been
trying to get me to watch for a
368
00:20:56,280 --> 00:21:02,000
long time. 2007 Zodiac.
It is my favorite David Fincher
369
00:21:02,000 --> 00:21:03,480
movie.
I think it's the best thing he's
370
00:21:03,480 --> 00:21:05,560
ever done.
It is just like it's a
371
00:21:05,560 --> 00:21:07,720
procedural.
It's like dudes working at a
372
00:21:07,720 --> 00:21:10,680
newspaper.
So it's very much in the vein of
373
00:21:10,680 --> 00:21:13,640
like Spotlight or All the
President's Men.
374
00:21:14,000 --> 00:21:16,760
High and low.
No, that's like, well, kind of
375
00:21:16,760 --> 00:21:17,880
like high and low.
That's more of like an
376
00:21:17,880 --> 00:21:21,160
investigation.
But yeah, like, it's just guys
377
00:21:21,160 --> 00:21:24,000
who work at a newspaper who are
tracking a serial killer.
378
00:21:24,320 --> 00:21:28,040
It is infused with so much
dread, and it really captures
379
00:21:28,040 --> 00:21:30,720
the sense of panic that San
Francisco was in by the Zodiac
380
00:21:30,720 --> 00:21:33,360
Killer.
Just a freaking fantastic movie.
381
00:21:33,360 --> 00:21:34,720
Man.
I cannot wait to watch that.
382
00:21:35,800 --> 00:21:41,840
Yeah, I am super excited for our
movie following that La La Land
383
00:21:41,840 --> 00:21:45,680
from 2016.
Bob, this is a movie I saw in
384
00:21:45,680 --> 00:21:49,800
theaters absolutely loved.
I watched it about a year ago.
385
00:21:50,640 --> 00:21:52,920
Dude, I cried almost this entire
movie.
386
00:21:54,200 --> 00:21:56,720
OK cool.
It's so good.
387
00:21:56,720 --> 00:21:59,240
It's a good movie.
I like it.
388
00:21:59,240 --> 00:22:02,240
It's always been a movie for me
that's like, oh, this is like
389
00:22:02,240 --> 00:22:05,120
hinting at greatness, but it's
from the same guy that made
390
00:22:05,120 --> 00:22:08,000
Whiplash and Whiplash is like
legitimately great.
391
00:22:08,560 --> 00:22:12,280
And so La La Land always felt
like the slightest let down to
392
00:22:12,280 --> 00:22:15,400
me, even though it's gorgeous
and really well made and like
393
00:22:15,400 --> 00:22:19,920
well crafted, it's always just
felt like you're not whiplash,
394
00:22:20,880 --> 00:22:23,360
you know what I mean?
You're going to hold that
395
00:22:23,360 --> 00:22:25,880
against this movie, against Ryan
Gosling?
396
00:22:26,680 --> 00:22:29,600
I sure am, Brad.
And that takes us to a movie
397
00:22:29,600 --> 00:22:33,000
that I don't think we've ever
even mentioned maybe once on the
398
00:22:33,000 --> 00:22:35,280
show.
It's called District 9.
399
00:22:35,280 --> 00:22:36,640
It was nominated for best
picture.
400
00:22:36,640 --> 00:22:39,240
It's our first, well, I guess
Dune Part 2.
401
00:22:39,240 --> 00:22:42,520
But aside from Dune, it's our
first real sci-fi film.
402
00:22:43,080 --> 00:22:45,640
And it's it's hard sci-fi, man.
Like it.
403
00:22:45,640 --> 00:22:50,560
It's aliens who have become
colonized on Earth by the humans
404
00:22:50,560 --> 00:22:54,440
and forced to live in basically
like a ghetto in South Africa.
405
00:22:54,680 --> 00:22:59,720
And their attempts to partner up
with some humans and get done it
406
00:22:59,720 --> 00:23:03,200
is way more than that.
But it is just at at a basic
407
00:23:03,200 --> 00:23:05,360
level.
It's like, what if aliens were
408
00:23:05,360 --> 00:23:07,600
the stars of a James Cameron
action movie?
409
00:23:08,000 --> 00:23:11,040
And there you go.
I'm super excited, man.
410
00:23:11,040 --> 00:23:12,680
Yeah.
Do you feel like it pairs up
411
00:23:12,680 --> 00:23:16,400
with the following week's movie?
I think anything can pair up
412
00:23:16,400 --> 00:23:17,960
with this movie if you really
wanted to.
413
00:23:18,280 --> 00:23:24,000
We're talking about 2015's Mad
Max Fury Rd. a movie that the
414
00:23:24,000 --> 00:23:29,000
critics just love, man.
Like, this is by far the most
415
00:23:29,000 --> 00:23:33,160
loved action film of the last
10-15 years, even more than like
416
00:23:33,160 --> 00:23:36,360
Top Gun Maverick.
I I like it a lot.
417
00:23:36,360 --> 00:23:38,840
I think there's a lot to
appreciate here.
418
00:23:39,000 --> 00:23:41,720
I'm interested to see what you
think, because I don't think
419
00:23:41,720 --> 00:23:43,320
you've ever seen a Mad Max
movie, have you?
420
00:23:44,000 --> 00:23:48,160
I have never seen any Mad Max
films, not the 80s, not the
421
00:23:48,160 --> 00:23:51,400
modern versions.
I feel low.
422
00:23:51,600 --> 00:23:56,680
I feel though like I have been
hearing about this movie from
423
00:23:56,680 --> 00:23:59,960
the moment it came out and
people just never stop talking
424
00:23:59,960 --> 00:24:02,000
about it.
Yeah, Yep, yeah, it's a big
425
00:24:02,000 --> 00:24:04,720
letterbox movie because it's
insufferable, all right?
426
00:24:04,760 --> 00:24:07,480
After that, we are going back to
2019 yet again.
427
00:24:07,480 --> 00:24:09,680
What a freaking year 2019 was,
dude.
428
00:24:09,680 --> 00:24:14,000
I dude, I'm telling you, man, I
feel like like something in the
429
00:24:14,000 --> 00:24:17,320
air knew what was coming and
they were like, guys, we got to
430
00:24:17,320 --> 00:24:19,000
get these movies, get out.
Get them out now.
431
00:24:20,800 --> 00:24:22,320
Yeah.
Something literally in the air.
432
00:24:22,720 --> 00:24:28,040
OK, so we're looking at 2019's
1917, the second Sam Mendes
433
00:24:28,040 --> 00:24:32,120
movie on our docket for this
season after Skyfall and one of
434
00:24:32,120 --> 00:24:35,240
his best movies and a movie that
was, like, in pole position to
435
00:24:35,240 --> 00:24:38,680
win the Oscar until Parasite
kind of swooped in at the last
436
00:24:38,680 --> 00:24:41,120
second.
I really loved this movie in the
437
00:24:41,120 --> 00:24:43,240
theater.
And I hyped it up to you for a
438
00:24:43,240 --> 00:24:45,960
long time and you watched it at
your house and then you were
439
00:24:45,960 --> 00:24:50,160
like, and I'm like, yeah, dude,
it's like a real time movie that
440
00:24:50,160 --> 00:24:52,760
takes place in war.
Like you got to see that in the
441
00:24:52,760 --> 00:24:55,320
theater.
So I'm I'm interested to see how
442
00:24:55,320 --> 00:24:56,840
it holds.
Go ahead, go ahead.
443
00:24:57,320 --> 00:25:00,200
I'm pretty sure I saw that in in
theaters.
444
00:25:00,200 --> 00:25:02,120
Did you really?
Yeah.
445
00:25:02,120 --> 00:25:04,880
I thought you saw it like on
like you rented it.
446
00:25:04,880 --> 00:25:09,760
Or something on my cell phone.
Yes, on your old Nokia phone.
447
00:25:10,200 --> 00:25:13,160
Did you just say I rented it?
No, it's rented it.
448
00:25:13,680 --> 00:25:16,560
Rent.
I thought you were mixing up red
449
00:25:16,560 --> 00:25:20,640
box and Reddit.
Yeah, don't watch movies on
450
00:25:20,640 --> 00:25:23,800
Reddit, folks.
All right, let's get through
451
00:25:23,800 --> 00:25:25,760
these last couple movies and
then we'll drink our whiskey
452
00:25:26,160 --> 00:25:28,680
after that.
We're going to 2015 to watch 2
453
00:25:28,680 --> 00:25:31,760
films back-to-back.
The Big Short, which is a fun,
454
00:25:31,760 --> 00:25:34,440
fun movie from a director that
has fallen out of fashion with
455
00:25:34,440 --> 00:25:38,080
the critics about the housing
crash in 2008.
456
00:25:38,480 --> 00:25:41,480
Who's the director?
Adam McKay, the the comedy
457
00:25:41,480 --> 00:25:42,600
director.
Yeah, yeah.
458
00:25:42,680 --> 00:25:45,720
Now we're following that up with
Pixar's Inside Out.
459
00:25:46,160 --> 00:25:49,520
And quite frankly, I've seen
Inside Out two like three Times
460
00:25:49,520 --> 00:25:52,240
Now, Brad and I like it better
than Inside Out.
461
00:25:52,240 --> 00:25:53,160
One.
Who was going to say it?
462
00:25:54,240 --> 00:26:00,400
Hot takes with Bob and finishing
up our first 16 films.
463
00:26:00,720 --> 00:26:03,520
We are going to Bob's personal
choice.
464
00:26:03,680 --> 00:26:06,120
This was a hand picked
selection.
465
00:26:06,800 --> 00:26:10,960
Past Lives, 2023.
Past Lives maybe the least seen
466
00:26:10,960 --> 00:26:15,280
movie on this list.
My I mean, even after I
467
00:26:15,280 --> 00:26:18,800
acknowledge that Oppenheimer is
like the most deserving Best
468
00:26:18,800 --> 00:26:21,720
Picture winner of all time, I
still think Past Lives is a
469
00:26:21,720 --> 00:26:24,000
better movie than I like.
It's still my number one from
470
00:26:24,000 --> 00:26:25,760
last year, and Oppenheimer is
like 1A.
471
00:26:26,280 --> 00:26:31,240
But Past Lives will forever be a
part of me from here on out.
472
00:26:31,240 --> 00:26:33,440
It's I.
I describe it to you as Brief
473
00:26:33,440 --> 00:26:38,760
Encounter for the 21st Century,
and man, I can't wait to Yeah.
474
00:26:39,480 --> 00:26:43,440
No dude, I watched it on an
airplane flying out to Colorado.
475
00:26:43,800 --> 00:26:46,600
Absolutely loved it.
Was slightly distracted by the
476
00:26:46,600 --> 00:26:48,600
person in front of me watching
Barbie.
477
00:26:49,600 --> 00:26:54,320
I would occasionally look at
Barbie and be like, wow, I
478
00:26:54,320 --> 00:26:56,120
really don't think I want to
watch that movie.
479
00:26:56,400 --> 00:27:00,480
You don't believe me?
All right, my dude.
480
00:27:00,480 --> 00:27:03,800
Well, let's get to this
Bardstown Bourbon Company,
481
00:27:03,800 --> 00:27:05,440
Silver Oak.
What do you say?
482
00:27:05,640 --> 00:27:07,120
That sounds great, man.
Let's get to it.
483
00:27:09,520 --> 00:27:12,320
This episode is brought to you
by Blackwood Distilling.
484
00:27:12,360 --> 00:27:15,280
You know, at Film and Whiskey,
we love a good underdog story.
485
00:27:15,280 --> 00:27:18,000
Well, let me tell you about
Blackwood Distilling.
486
00:27:18,360 --> 00:27:21,680
This all started when Guinness
McFadden took a long shot and
487
00:27:21,680 --> 00:27:25,840
won the Kentucky Derby with
Country House at 65 to one odds
488
00:27:25,840 --> 00:27:28,720
back in 2019.
He turned that victory into
489
00:27:28,720 --> 00:27:31,680
Blackwood Distilling with a
little help from the Justin's at
490
00:27:31,680 --> 00:27:35,120
Justin's House of Bourbon and
together they've made something
491
00:27:35,120 --> 00:27:37,520
special.
Luxury toasted bourbon and the
492
00:27:37,520 --> 00:27:41,600
first ever triple barreled
toasted Rye, both at barrel
493
00:27:41,600 --> 00:27:44,360
strength.
We're talking about deep, rich
494
00:27:44,360 --> 00:27:48,000
flavors, creamy bodies and that
classic Kentucky warmth.
495
00:27:48,200 --> 00:27:50,640
If you're a bourbon or a rye
guy, you're going to want to
496
00:27:50,640 --> 00:27:53,560
check out Blackwood.
Batch 4 of their bourbon and
497
00:27:53,560 --> 00:27:57,080
Batch 3 of the rye are hitting
shelves in Kentucky, Florida,
498
00:27:57,440 --> 00:28:00,280
Texas, Washington and Wyoming
right now.
499
00:28:00,560 --> 00:28:02,640
More states come in soon, so
head over to
500
00:28:02,760 --> 00:28:07,160
blackwooddistillingco.com.
That's Blackwood Distilling
501
00:28:07,160 --> 00:28:10,720
co.com.
Hit that shop button and get
502
00:28:10,720 --> 00:28:13,040
your hands on a bottle.
Thanks, Blackwood.
503
00:28:17,560 --> 00:28:20,000
All right, so today we're
checking out Bardstown Bourbon
504
00:28:20,000 --> 00:28:22,480
Company collaborative series
Silver Oak.
505
00:28:22,840 --> 00:28:25,040
This is a blend of straight
bourbon whiskey that's finished
506
00:28:25,040 --> 00:28:29,440
in Cabernet barrels from the
Silver Oak Winery in California.
507
00:28:30,280 --> 00:28:33,600
They have a lot of copy on their
website about just how cool and
508
00:28:33,600 --> 00:28:37,280
how great Silver Oak is.
But for our purposes, Brad, this
509
00:28:37,280 --> 00:28:41,960
is a blend of 123456 different
whiskeys originating from
510
00:28:41,960 --> 00:28:45,040
Kentucky, Tennessee, Indiana,
and Georgia.
511
00:28:45,400 --> 00:28:47,720
The oldest in this blend is 14
years old.
512
00:28:47,720 --> 00:28:50,880
The youngest is 9 years old.
There's a variety of mash bills
513
00:28:50,880 --> 00:28:53,080
going on here.
If you'd like us, if you'd like
514
00:28:53,080 --> 00:28:56,120
to break down the entire thing,
you can find the blend and all
515
00:28:56,120 --> 00:28:58,680
of its proportions on the
Bardstown Bourbon Company's
516
00:28:58,680 --> 00:29:01,600
website.
But Brad, we have a task ahead
517
00:29:01,600 --> 00:29:04,680
of us which is determining how
good is this thing?
518
00:29:04,800 --> 00:29:07,400
And crucially, how does it
compare to the Bardstown Bourbon
519
00:29:07,400 --> 00:29:09,240
Company we just had a couple
weeks ago?
520
00:29:09,920 --> 00:29:13,480
Because that was darn good.
Yeah, it really was.
521
00:29:14,040 --> 00:29:17,560
We have a good history with wine
finished.
522
00:29:18,080 --> 00:29:20,960
Specifically I Is this a Cab
solve finished?
523
00:29:21,480 --> 00:29:23,320
Yeah.
So specifically with Cab solve
524
00:29:23,320 --> 00:29:26,400
the.
The reason we fell in love with
525
00:29:26,400 --> 00:29:29,360
Bard Sound Bourbon Company was
their Pfeiffer Pavet.
526
00:29:29,800 --> 00:29:33,920
Now we were informed by friend
of show David Thomas Tao a few
527
00:29:33,920 --> 00:29:39,480
weeks ago that that has a little
bit of a controversial history
528
00:29:39,480 --> 00:29:42,120
within the world of whiskey
tasters.
529
00:29:42,120 --> 00:29:44,480
Some people loved it, some
people didn't love it.
530
00:29:45,000 --> 00:29:50,320
I'm really excited to try this
new iteration of a Cab SOB
531
00:29:50,320 --> 00:29:54,080
finished Barn Sound product.
I should say it doesn't say cab
532
00:29:54,080 --> 00:29:56,080
SOB, it just says Cabernet
barrels.
533
00:29:56,080 --> 00:29:58,000
So I don't know, Maybe, maybe
not.
534
00:29:58,000 --> 00:30:00,640
We'll see.
But I do know that I have taken
535
00:30:00,640 --> 00:30:03,440
notes on this thing and I'm also
drinking it again live just to
536
00:30:03,440 --> 00:30:05,840
try to confirm that I wasn't
going crazy the first time.
537
00:30:06,400 --> 00:30:09,880
Brad on the nose.
This thing is just rich deep
538
00:30:10,080 --> 00:30:13,600
caramel and brown sugar,
especially brown sugar like I I
539
00:30:13,600 --> 00:30:16,720
underlined brown sugar.
Lots of molasses for me.
540
00:30:16,920 --> 00:30:19,600
A lot of black pepper on the
nose when I first popped this
541
00:30:20,240 --> 00:30:22,400
and honestly not a lot of grape
influence.
542
00:30:22,640 --> 00:30:27,480
Like I didn't get a ton of wine
character on this, but more of
543
00:30:27,480 --> 00:30:30,560
like really rich, decadent
bourbon notes.
544
00:30:30,840 --> 00:30:34,320
It kind of reminded me of that
Nomad Outland whiskey and how
545
00:30:34,880 --> 00:30:40,280
that that was like if you took
Scotch and just made it 50 times
546
00:30:40,280 --> 00:30:43,360
sweeter.
It almost feels like the wine
547
00:30:43,360 --> 00:30:45,760
finish here did the same thing
with the bourbons they were
548
00:30:45,760 --> 00:30:47,240
using.
I don't know, Bob.
549
00:30:47,240 --> 00:30:53,920
I for me, I feel like this has a
really strong Sherry note on the
550
00:30:53,920 --> 00:30:57,600
on the nose for me.
And then it gets really like
551
00:30:57,600 --> 00:31:00,280
Christmas spicy.
Like there's cinnamon and
552
00:31:00,280 --> 00:31:02,320
nutmeg.
I feel like there's like almost
553
00:31:02,320 --> 00:31:05,240
a candied almond type of vibe
going on.
554
00:31:05,480 --> 00:31:08,080
And, and I won't disagree with
you, there is caramel.
555
00:31:08,080 --> 00:31:12,040
There is like really deep dark
brown sugar molasses, so that
556
00:31:12,040 --> 00:31:16,320
like yeah, that is 100% there.
But but for me, that Sherry
557
00:31:16,320 --> 00:31:19,880
really comes through to give it
those grape characteristics.
558
00:31:20,440 --> 00:31:22,280
Yeah, I would give us an 8 out
of 10 on the nose.
559
00:31:22,280 --> 00:31:24,600
I don't know if you put scores
to your notes here, Brad.
560
00:31:24,600 --> 00:31:27,400
Yeah, I I actually said the same
thing. 8 out of 10.
561
00:31:27,520 --> 00:31:31,040
I'm also at an 8 on the taste.
I just said the taste is like a
562
00:31:31,040 --> 00:31:34,120
very dark bourbon and then I put
in quotes like I was, I was
563
00:31:34,240 --> 00:31:37,680
workshopping names like Bourbon
Noir and Bourbon Midnight.
564
00:31:39,560 --> 00:31:42,720
It just reminds me of like
bourbon at night time.
565
00:31:42,880 --> 00:31:44,120
I don't know how else to explain
it.
566
00:31:44,120 --> 00:31:46,960
There's a lot of brown sugar,
there's a little bit of plum,
567
00:31:46,960 --> 00:31:49,720
and I got quite a bit of Raisin
on this as well, which is
568
00:31:49,720 --> 00:31:52,760
something that we tasted on that
high wheat with David Thomas Tao
569
00:31:52,760 --> 00:31:56,200
a couple weeks ago as well.
There's a tiny bit of Cabernet
570
00:31:56,200 --> 00:32:00,280
here at the end, but I think
mostly where that finish is
571
00:32:00,360 --> 00:32:05,120
taking on some somebody here is
in imparting that oak influence
572
00:32:05,320 --> 00:32:07,400
because it's like a a little bit
tannic for me.
573
00:32:07,400 --> 00:32:11,560
It got quite a bit, I don't know
if I would call it bitter, but
574
00:32:11,560 --> 00:32:14,560
it was like that toasted oak
kind of flavor right on the back
575
00:32:14,560 --> 00:32:16,040
of my palate when I went to
swallow.
576
00:32:16,360 --> 00:32:18,720
I like this a lot, but I think
I'm just going to stick in an 8
577
00:32:18,720 --> 00:32:22,640
out of 10.
I am with you on the score 8 out
578
00:32:22,640 --> 00:32:26,160
of 10.
I think that the what I
579
00:32:26,160 --> 00:32:29,040
interpreted as Sherry almost
turned into like a cherry
580
00:32:29,040 --> 00:32:32,440
cordial for me.
There's caramel, there's brown
581
00:32:32,440 --> 00:32:35,280
sugar, vanilla becomes much more
prominent.
582
00:32:36,000 --> 00:32:39,800
It almost reminded me of like a
really dark rich toffee.
583
00:32:40,440 --> 00:32:42,840
I I'm a really big fan of this
Bob.
584
00:32:42,840 --> 00:32:45,520
Man, we are in really different
places in what we're picking up
585
00:32:45,520 --> 00:32:48,320
on this on the finish.
I said that this almost reminded
586
00:32:48,320 --> 00:32:49,920
me of like a really dusty
bourbon.
587
00:32:49,960 --> 00:32:54,000
Not a not a dusty like an old
bourbon, but sometimes we have
588
00:32:54,600 --> 00:32:56,880
tasting notes where we're like,
oh, this reminds us of like an
589
00:32:56,880 --> 00:32:59,440
old dusty barn or like sawdust
or something like that.
590
00:32:59,760 --> 00:33:02,960
I got that a little bit on the
finish here, which is something
591
00:33:02,960 --> 00:33:05,960
that I was trying to pinpoint.
Which distillery does that for
592
00:33:05,960 --> 00:33:07,440
us?
Is it Heaven Hill products?
593
00:33:07,440 --> 00:33:11,320
Is it like 4 Roses products?
I think it's Heaven Hill and if
594
00:33:11,320 --> 00:33:13,920
I'm look, I'm looking at the
blend here, I suspect there's
595
00:33:13,920 --> 00:33:17,240
some Heaven Hill distillate in
this blend, so maybe that's what
596
00:33:17,240 --> 00:33:20,280
I'm picking up.
I think the fruitiest part of
597
00:33:20,280 --> 00:33:22,120
the experience was the finish
here.
598
00:33:22,400 --> 00:33:25,080
But again, there's a little bit
of slight bitterness from that
599
00:33:25,080 --> 00:33:27,880
sour oak, that toasted oak
flavor that I don't like.
600
00:33:27,880 --> 00:33:31,120
A lot of times I'm going to come
down to a 7 1/2 on the finished
601
00:33:31,120 --> 00:33:34,160
bread.
I actually think this is where
602
00:33:34,160 --> 00:33:35,840
we're finally splitting ways,
Bob.
603
00:33:36,160 --> 00:33:39,360
I think this is an 8 1/2 on the
finish at like all of the
604
00:33:39,360 --> 00:33:45,160
flavors I enjoyed on the 1st 2
portions of this whiskey just
605
00:33:45,160 --> 00:33:49,480
felt like they they warmed and
they became a little more rich
606
00:33:49,480 --> 00:33:51,040
and a little more deep on the
finish.
607
00:33:51,520 --> 00:33:55,080
I think that the nutmeg and
cinnamon notes came back around
608
00:33:55,080 --> 00:33:58,000
from the nose.
I think the toffee turned into
609
00:33:58,000 --> 00:34:02,920
like a really nice soft
butterscotch and the oakiness
610
00:34:02,920 --> 00:34:06,560
did come through in the finish
in a really nice way to balance
611
00:34:06,560 --> 00:34:10,080
out how things were moving in a
sweeter direction for me.
612
00:34:10,719 --> 00:34:14,679
I really like this finish a lot.
What was your score?
613
00:34:15,760 --> 00:34:19,159
8 1/2. 8 1/2 All right, on
balance, here's what I wrote
614
00:34:19,159 --> 00:34:21,960
down.
As all Bardstown Bourbon Company
615
00:34:21,960 --> 00:34:25,840
whiskeys tend to be, this is
really solid and I, I feel like
616
00:34:25,840 --> 00:34:27,719
I kind of have to grade on a
curve a little bit with
617
00:34:27,719 --> 00:34:29,320
Bardstown because everything's
good.
618
00:34:29,360 --> 00:34:32,679
Like we the worst whiskey from
them I've had is still like a 7
619
00:34:32,679 --> 00:34:37,199
out of 10 in on my scale, and I
think that this is really well
620
00:34:37,199 --> 00:34:40,159
balanced.
It's probably the most bourbon Y
621
00:34:40,199 --> 00:34:43,800
of their finished bourbons that
I've had in a long time, meaning
622
00:34:43,800 --> 00:34:46,719
that I didn't get a lot of the
wine finish on this.
623
00:34:46,719 --> 00:34:49,560
It just kind of tasted like a
bourbon that had some parts of
624
00:34:49,560 --> 00:34:52,120
it amplified by whatever they
were finishing in.
625
00:34:52,360 --> 00:34:55,000
I wish there was a little more
wine character to this, but
626
00:34:55,000 --> 00:34:56,280
overall I think it's still
really good.
627
00:34:56,280 --> 00:34:58,240
I'm going to give it a 7 1/2 on
balance.
628
00:34:58,760 --> 00:35:00,680
I think it's an 8 1/2 On
balance, Bob.
629
00:35:01,360 --> 00:35:08,160
There is a beautiful complexity
of flavors here that it's not an
630
00:35:08,160 --> 00:35:11,000
overwhelming amount of
complexity, but it takes the
631
00:35:11,000 --> 00:35:15,720
flavors it has, mixes them
together beautifully and gives
632
00:35:15,720 --> 00:35:17,960
you a really great drinking
experience.
633
00:35:18,600 --> 00:35:20,360
All right, that takes us to
value.
634
00:35:20,640 --> 00:35:22,800
This is one of their more
expensive offerings, Brad, this
635
00:35:22,800 --> 00:35:27,040
is $160.00 MSRP.
They've been doing some of their
636
00:35:27,040 --> 00:35:29,640
collaboration series or
collaborative series at this
637
00:35:29,640 --> 00:35:34,000
price point, which is like, it's
not unfortunate, it's just a
638
00:35:34,000 --> 00:35:36,360
tougher sell to the average
consumer.
639
00:35:36,840 --> 00:35:39,840
So you not only have to say, OK,
is this a really good product,
640
00:35:40,600 --> 00:35:44,040
would you pay 160 for this?
And could you feasibly convince
641
00:35:44,040 --> 00:35:46,000
someone else to pay 160 for
this?
642
00:35:46,440 --> 00:35:48,600
I think that's where I'm going
to pull back on the reins a
643
00:35:48,600 --> 00:35:50,680
little bit here, Brad.
I think this is only about a 5
644
00:35:50,680 --> 00:35:54,440
out of 10 on value.
And it's because I've had other
645
00:35:54,440 --> 00:35:57,400
things at this very price point
from Bardstown that I like
646
00:35:57,400 --> 00:36:00,600
better than this.
Now, is this on its own a
647
00:36:00,600 --> 00:36:03,720
$160.00 whiskey?
Yeah, I think it's absolutely
648
00:36:03,720 --> 00:36:05,720
worth the like.
I don't think it's overpriced at
649
00:36:05,720 --> 00:36:07,680
all.
It's a justifiable price for
650
00:36:07,680 --> 00:36:09,240
what they're doing and what
you're getting.
651
00:36:09,640 --> 00:36:14,200
But among their bourbons priced
at this point, it's not my
652
00:36:14,200 --> 00:36:15,600
favorite.
So I'm just going to give it a 5
653
00:36:15,600 --> 00:36:18,320
here.
Would you say that the Amroot
654
00:36:18,320 --> 00:36:22,600
collaboration is is kind of the?
Oh, it's like leaps and bounds,
655
00:36:22,600 --> 00:36:24,520
Yeah, for sure.
And I think the five for Pavit
656
00:36:24,520 --> 00:36:27,080
when they were first selling it
was like 120.
657
00:36:27,680 --> 00:36:30,680
So I, I don't even know, like I,
I feel like I still might take
658
00:36:30,680 --> 00:36:32,040
the Pfeiffer Pavot over this
bread.
659
00:36:32,920 --> 00:36:35,720
I think I would too.
I think this is a good value.
660
00:36:35,720 --> 00:36:40,360
I, I came out a little higher on
my flavor scores than you did,
661
00:36:40,800 --> 00:36:44,520
but I'm, I'm kind of with you.
I would give this a 6 1/2 on
662
00:36:44,520 --> 00:36:46,960
value.
I think it's worth it.
663
00:36:46,960 --> 00:36:50,920
But for me, like 7 out of 10 on
value is when I start to go, OK,
664
00:36:50,920 --> 00:36:55,640
this is this is a good bottle of
whiskey at the price point.
665
00:36:56,360 --> 00:37:03,280
It's just below that for me.
I am coming out to a 39.5 out of
666
00:37:03,280 --> 00:37:06,040
50.
I'm at a 36 out of 50, so we
667
00:37:06,040 --> 00:37:08,080
weren't as far apart as we were
making it sound.
668
00:37:08,360 --> 00:37:15,280
That takes us to a 75.5 out of
100 or a 37.75 out of 50.
669
00:37:15,560 --> 00:37:17,800
This is well into the territory
where we would start
670
00:37:17,800 --> 00:37:19,760
recommending that you try or
buy.
671
00:37:20,120 --> 00:37:23,440
It doesn't quite hit the 40 out
of 50 mark where it may becomes
672
00:37:23,440 --> 00:37:25,400
a no brainer recommendation from
us.
673
00:37:25,880 --> 00:37:29,840
So it's definitely a thumbs up.
Brad, in what form would you
674
00:37:29,840 --> 00:37:32,800
recommend getting this?
Is it worth a pour?
675
00:37:32,800 --> 00:37:34,200
Is it worth a bottle?
What would you?
676
00:37:34,200 --> 00:37:39,120
What would you do?
I would say I mean it you know
677
00:37:39,160 --> 00:37:40,920
that always depends on where
you're at.
678
00:37:40,920 --> 00:37:43,320
I would say this is worth
splitting with a friend.
679
00:37:44,280 --> 00:37:47,320
I like.
I would say drop 80 bucks each,
680
00:37:47,800 --> 00:37:51,400
enjoy a bottle with a friend if
you're in that level of like,
681
00:37:51,760 --> 00:37:54,080
yes I want to enjoy some fine
whiskey.
682
00:37:54,080 --> 00:37:55,800
I want to have a good night with
a friend.
683
00:37:56,720 --> 00:37:58,200
I think this might be worth
that.
684
00:37:58,840 --> 00:38:01,920
All right, so there you have it.
We we really like this whiskey.
685
00:38:02,000 --> 00:38:05,080
This is not a huge spoiler
coming from Bardstown Bourbon
686
00:38:05,080 --> 00:38:06,840
Company.
They continue to do great
687
00:38:06,840 --> 00:38:08,880
things.
I don't understand how they can
688
00:38:08,880 --> 00:38:11,480
do so much.
Like honestly, they're, they
689
00:38:11,480 --> 00:38:14,840
just, they turn on the money
machine and stuff comes out man.
690
00:38:15,000 --> 00:38:17,560
They they're doing a lot at
Bardstown Bourbon Company.
691
00:38:18,120 --> 00:38:21,440
Yeah, if you've never been down
there, please make your way down
692
00:38:21,440 --> 00:38:26,000
to Bardstown, KY Check out the
distillery, do a tour, eat some
693
00:38:26,000 --> 00:38:30,160
food there.
It is an incredible experience
694
00:38:30,400 --> 00:38:33,360
that you will never regret.
All right, man, what do you say
695
00:38:33,360 --> 00:38:35,920
we reveal the last half of
Season 9?
696
00:38:36,920 --> 00:38:45,360
Let's get to it.
All right, Bob, we have 16 more
697
00:38:45,360 --> 00:38:48,040
movies.
I think what I want to do is I'm
698
00:38:48,040 --> 00:38:51,520
going to reveal 4 at a time and
you're going to just give me
699
00:38:51,520 --> 00:38:56,760
your like three word summary for
each, all right?
700
00:38:56,760 --> 00:39:01,280
Yep, All right. 2019's Once Upon
a Time in Hollywood, 2015's
701
00:39:01,280 --> 00:39:04,880
Creed, 2022's Everything
Everywhere All at Once and
702
00:39:04,880 --> 00:39:08,760
2019's Joker.
Once Upon a time in Hollywood.
703
00:39:09,320 --> 00:39:13,200
Need to revisit.
I was really cool on it the
704
00:39:13,200 --> 00:39:17,040
first time.
Yeah, Creed all time.
705
00:39:17,960 --> 00:39:19,920
This is one word sports movie
classic.
706
00:39:22,840 --> 00:39:25,720
Everything ever, all at once.
Doesn't hold up.
707
00:39:26,800 --> 00:39:30,240
Oh, that's a hot take.
It's a good movie, but like,
708
00:39:30,280 --> 00:39:32,480
it's not going to age well.
I watched it a second time and I
709
00:39:32,480 --> 00:39:35,800
was like, Oh yeah, 10 years from
now, we're going to be like, we,
710
00:39:35,800 --> 00:39:37,280
we were caught up in the hype on
this one.
711
00:39:39,000 --> 00:39:41,080
All right, and your favorite
movie of the season?
712
00:39:41,080 --> 00:39:46,080
Joker.
Folia, adieu, adieu.
713
00:39:48,560 --> 00:39:54,600
All right, here's your 4, Brad.
2012's Argo, 2013's The Wolf of
714
00:39:54,600 --> 00:40:02,600
Wall Street, 2015's Spotlight,
and 2014's Her Argo.
715
00:40:02,600 --> 00:40:04,480
I'm going to say got to get him
out.
716
00:40:06,920 --> 00:40:09,000
Do you get it?
Yeah, that was a Brad explains.
717
00:40:09,000 --> 00:40:15,200
I like it.
That's what we should institute
718
00:40:15,200 --> 00:40:17,320
this.
This season is one second, Brad
719
00:40:17,320 --> 00:40:22,240
explains.
I'm thinking of it to the tune
720
00:40:22,320 --> 00:40:26,240
of of Pokémon.
Got to get him out, got to get
721
00:40:26,240 --> 00:40:32,160
him out.
Wolf of Wall Street got to take
722
00:40:32,160 --> 00:40:34,440
some Quaaludes.
Candle in ass.
723
00:40:38,040 --> 00:40:45,080
Spotlight no clue and her got to
talk to some Scarlett Johansson
724
00:40:45,080 --> 00:40:48,800
man she is incredible.
What a voice.
725
00:40:50,400 --> 00:40:54,760
I I can see, I can see why my
guy Joaquin was was getting
726
00:40:54,760 --> 00:40:56,720
horny for his computer.
That's all I'm saying, right?
727
00:40:56,720 --> 00:40:59,800
You know, Yeah, understandable
predicament to be in.
728
00:41:00,640 --> 00:41:05,360
All right, your 4 movies are
2019's JoJo Rabbit, 2013's
729
00:41:05,360 --> 00:41:11,400
Prisoners, 2007's Ratatouille,
and 2011's Moneyball.
730
00:41:12,720 --> 00:41:16,280
JoJo Rabbit, this is more than 3
words.
731
00:41:16,280 --> 00:41:19,200
Why do people hate this?
People hate that movie.
732
00:41:19,200 --> 00:41:21,920
Oh dude, like film Twitter and
letterbox.
733
00:41:21,920 --> 00:41:24,200
They hate JoJo Rabbit.
They hate it.
734
00:41:24,640 --> 00:41:27,480
They don't like Jewish Hitler.
They don't like Jewish Hitler.
735
00:41:27,840 --> 00:41:30,280
What the heck, man?
Prisoners.
736
00:41:31,280 --> 00:41:36,120
Denny's best film Question mark.
Denny Who?
737
00:41:36,840 --> 00:41:39,840
Denny Villeneuve.
Villeneuve.
738
00:41:40,120 --> 00:41:42,960
Or, as we say in the States,
Dennis Villanova.
739
00:41:45,480 --> 00:41:47,280
Like the College?
Yeah, yeah.
740
00:41:48,520 --> 00:41:52,440
All right, Ratatouille.
I mean, one of Pixar's best.
741
00:41:52,480 --> 00:41:57,400
It's just, it's so good.
And then Moneyball all time.
742
00:41:57,400 --> 00:41:59,160
This is one word sports movie
classic.
743
00:42:01,280 --> 00:42:02,920
Yeah, it's weird, Bob.
You had two of those.
744
00:42:03,360 --> 00:42:05,640
I know.
All right, Brad, and then to
745
00:42:05,640 --> 00:42:09,240
round out the season, we've got
a couple very recent ones here,
746
00:42:09,480 --> 00:42:13,880
2023's The Holdovers, then
thrown it back to 2010 for How
747
00:42:13,880 --> 00:42:17,320
to Train Your Dragon, throwing
it all the way forward on the
748
00:42:17,320 --> 00:42:21,160
dragon theme, we're going with
Godzilla -1 and then we're going
749
00:42:21,160 --> 00:42:24,160
to round things out with 2014's
John Wick.
750
00:42:25,880 --> 00:42:29,040
The Holdovers This might be the
hottest take of the entire
751
00:42:29,040 --> 00:42:31,600
episode, so I'm glad you guys
have stuck around for this
752
00:42:32,520 --> 00:42:37,800
better Dead Poets Society.
How do you move on?
753
00:42:37,800 --> 00:42:41,760
Hold on.
I I reserve the right for us to
754
00:42:41,760 --> 00:42:46,040
call an audible and throw this
back in the schedule around
755
00:42:46,040 --> 00:42:49,520
Christmas time because it's a
Christmas movie like.
756
00:42:50,200 --> 00:42:52,240
Oh, 100.
Percent like I I feel like doing
757
00:42:52,240 --> 00:42:54,400
this in May is not going to be
helpful to anybody.
758
00:42:54,400 --> 00:42:56,520
You know what I mean?
Yeah, I know if you if you want
759
00:42:56,520 --> 00:42:59,000
to push that back, I am a OK
with All right, cool.
760
00:43:00,640 --> 00:43:05,360
How to Train Your Dragon,
perhaps the best non Pixar
761
00:43:05,360 --> 00:43:08,440
animated film.
Yeah, that was a long 3 words.
762
00:43:08,960 --> 00:43:14,280
It was Godzilla -1 Godzilla go
boom.
763
00:43:15,200 --> 00:43:16,880
Yep.
John Wick.
764
00:43:17,560 --> 00:43:18,040
Pew.
Pew.
765
00:43:18,040 --> 00:43:22,760
Pew.
I'm going to love these, Brad
766
00:43:22,760 --> 00:43:26,520
explains man.
Going to be a good time, Bob.
767
00:43:26,680 --> 00:43:27,760
All right, folks, there you have
it.
768
00:43:27,760 --> 00:43:30,400
There's our Season 9 lineup.
We will be pairing these with
769
00:43:30,400 --> 00:43:32,880
whiskey during the episodes.
And we want to say thank you,
770
00:43:32,920 --> 00:43:36,840
first of all, to our friend Zach
Johnston, former writer at
771
00:43:36,840 --> 00:43:39,200
Uprox, who got rid of a whole
bunch of whiskey when he
772
00:43:39,200 --> 00:43:42,360
recently moved and gave us
bunches and bunches of it.
773
00:43:42,560 --> 00:43:45,040
So all of the whiskeys we're
drinking this season, I believe
774
00:43:45,040 --> 00:43:48,760
except one, we're provided by
our friend Zach, a lot of these
775
00:43:48,760 --> 00:43:52,160
whiskeys are very pricey.
They are unattainable even by
776
00:43:52,160 --> 00:43:53,640
us.
And so we're going to be talking
777
00:43:53,640 --> 00:43:55,720
about how pricey they are
usually.
778
00:43:55,800 --> 00:43:57,480
That they're modern classics,
Bob.
779
00:43:57,840 --> 00:44:01,400
Well, usually we're like the
value guys, but this this
780
00:44:01,400 --> 00:44:03,920
season, we're like the guys in
tuxedos with our pinkies up.
781
00:44:04,520 --> 00:44:07,000
Where Where Parks and Rec treat
yourself.
782
00:44:07,360 --> 00:44:08,720
I'm looking at one of them right
now.
783
00:44:08,720 --> 00:44:13,640
It's the McAllen 31 year Brad
and you and I have to find a way
784
00:44:13,640 --> 00:44:17,160
to split 50 MLS of it so.
I was going to say that is
785
00:44:17,160 --> 00:44:20,280
almost as old as us, Bob.
Oh my gosh, almost.
786
00:44:20,280 --> 00:44:21,960
That's how old we are, man.
That's how.
787
00:44:22,120 --> 00:44:24,840
Old we are like, jeez, that
whiskey's so old so that it's
788
00:44:24,840 --> 00:44:27,720
not even as old as as we are.
Oh man.
789
00:44:28,000 --> 00:44:30,560
All right, guys, we want to know
what you think of our lineup.
790
00:44:30,560 --> 00:44:33,520
You can let us know which film
you are most looking forward to
791
00:44:33,520 --> 00:44:36,520
by talking to us on any one of
our social media platforms.
792
00:44:36,760 --> 00:44:40,600
You can find us on Facebook,
Twitter, Instagram, Tiktok and
793
00:44:40,600 --> 00:44:44,640
YouTube at Film Whiskey.
Or you can join the conversation
794
00:44:44,640 --> 00:44:47,520
on Discord.
We will be posting this year's
795
00:44:48,000 --> 00:44:50,360
lineup and having a conversation
about it.
796
00:44:50,360 --> 00:44:53,880
So if you want to join that
conversation, you can find a
797
00:44:53,880 --> 00:44:55,880
link at the end of every single
one of our show.
798
00:44:55,880 --> 00:44:58,160
Notes, but until then, I'm Bob
Book.
799
00:44:58,600 --> 00:45:01,200
I'm Brad G.
And we'll see you next time.
800
00:45:03,360 --> 00:45:03,600
Music.