Oct. 1, 2024

Oppenheimer / Old Fitzgerald Bottled in Bond Bourbon feat. Bilge Ebiri

Oppenheimer / Old Fitzgerald Bottled in Bond Bourbon feat. Bilge Ebiri
Oppenheimer / Old Fitzgerald Bottled in Bond Bourbon feat. Bilge Ebiri
Film & Whiskey
Oppenheimer / Old Fitzgerald Bottled in Bond Bourbon feat. Bilge Ebiri

In this highly anticipated episode of Film & Whiskey, Bob and Brad sit down with film critic Bilge Ebiri to review the 2023 cinematic masterpiece Oppenheimer, directed by Christopher Nolan. They delve into the performances, particularly Cillian Murphy’s portrayal of J. Robert Oppenheimer, while examining the film's themes, historical accuracy, and visual spectacle. Alongside this in-depth film discussion, they also review Old Fitzgerald Bottled in Bond, a premium Kentucky bourbon whiskey, exploring its flavor profile, history, and whether it pairs well with the intensity of Oppenheimer.

Is Oppenheimer one of the best films of 2023? Does Old Fitzgerald Bottled in Bond live up to its reputation as one of the top bottled-in-bond bourbons? Listen now to find out!

  • 0:00 - Intro

  • 16:18 - Brad Explains

  • 18:20 - Performances, Themes

  • 43:47 - Old Fitzgerald Bottled in Bond Review

  • 54:8 - Two Facts and a Falsehood

  • 1:01:00 - Final Analysis

  • 1:04:38 - Let's Make it a Double and Final Scores

This episode of Film & Whiskey tackles one of the most critically-acclaimed films of 2023, Oppenheimer, directed by Christopher Nolan. Known for his meticulously crafted films, Nolan delivers an intense historical drama about the creation of the atomic bomb and the moral dilemmas faced by J. Robert Oppenheimer, played by Cillian Murphy. Bob and Brad discuss Oppenheimer’s narrative structure, its powerful performances by a star-studded cast, and how the film addresses themes of scientific responsibility, war, and personal sacrifice.

Cinematography and sound design play pivotal roles in Oppenheimer, creating a visceral experience for viewers. Bob, Brad, and Bilge Ebiri analyze how Oppenheimer stands out from other biopics and how it compares to Nolan’s previous works like Dunkirk. They also explore the film’s critical reception, historical accuracy, and its success at the box office.

Following the film review, Bob and Brad switch gears to taste and review Old Fitzgerald Bottled in Bond Bourbon. This celebrated Kentucky straight bourbon whiskey has been known for its rich flavor profile and balanced complexity, making it a favorite among bourbon enthusiasts. The hosts dive into its tasting notes, including caramel, oak, and vanilla, while discussing its smooth finish and where it ranks among the best bottled-in-bond bourbons available.

Whether you're a film buff or a whiskey lover, this episode promises an insightful blend of cinema and spirits.

Film & Whiskey ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Film & Whiskey ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Facebook⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Film & Whiskey ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Email us⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠!⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Join our Discord server!⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

For more episodes and engaging content, visit Film & Whiskey's website at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠www.filmwhiskey.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.

--- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/filmwhiskey/support

1
00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:05,200
In 2023, director Sir
Christopher Nolan and star

2
00:00:05,200 --> 00:00:08,480
Killian Murphy gave the world a
chilling look at the

3
00:00:08,480 --> 00:00:15,400
conflagration of a world at war.
In 2024 we try a whiskey from

4
00:00:15,400 --> 00:00:19,200
2023.
The film is Oppenheimer.

5
00:00:19,920 --> 00:00:23,880
The whiskey is Old Fitzgerald
Bottled and Bond Fall 2023

6
00:00:23,880 --> 00:00:25,760
release.
And we'll review them both.

7
00:00:26,320 --> 00:00:28,120
This is.
The.

8
00:00:28,120 --> 00:00:30,360
Film and whiskey.
Podcast

9
00:00:48,520 --> 00:00:50,960
Welcome to the Film and Whiskey
podcast, where each week we

10
00:00:50,960 --> 00:00:53,640
review a classic movie and a
glass of whiskey.

11
00:00:53,960 --> 00:00:56,160
I'm Bob Book.
I'm Brad.

12
00:00:56,160 --> 00:00:59,200
G.
And welcome to Season 9.

13
00:00:59,360 --> 00:01:01,840
Of the film and whiskey.
Podcast we freaking did.

14
00:01:01,840 --> 00:01:06,960
It Brad, dude, I am so excited
for this season that like we

15
00:01:06,960 --> 00:01:12,920
have so many incredible movies
on the docket that and we are

16
00:01:12,920 --> 00:01:18,360
just starting off with what are
the best movies I think I've

17
00:01:18,360 --> 00:01:21,600
seen in a long, long time.
I'm really going to resist the

18
00:01:21,600 --> 00:01:25,840
urge to call this movie a banger
because that seems inappropriate

19
00:01:25,840 --> 00:01:27,760
given the subject matter of the
film.

20
00:01:28,200 --> 00:01:31,320
So I'm just going to, I'm just
going to continually refer to it

21
00:01:31,320 --> 00:01:35,080
as like a modern classic, which
fits perfectly with the theme of

22
00:01:35,080 --> 00:01:37,960
this season because what we're
doing this season is we're

23
00:01:37,960 --> 00:01:40,120
looking at films released in the
last 20 years.

24
00:01:40,120 --> 00:01:45,280
So we're going to go 2005 to
2024 and we're asking question,

25
00:01:45,640 --> 00:01:49,560
does this movie belong in the
21st century Canon?

26
00:01:50,160 --> 00:01:53,280
Now, Brad, we've done I think 60
something movies over the course

27
00:01:53,280 --> 00:01:56,040
of our podcast from this time
span already.

28
00:01:56,320 --> 00:01:59,560
So if your favorite film is not
included in this list, either we

29
00:01:59,560 --> 00:02:02,200
just don't care and don't want
to talk about it or we already

30
00:02:02,200 --> 00:02:04,040
have.
We've done the Social Network,

31
00:02:04,040 --> 00:02:08,039
we've done Brokeback Mountain,
we have not done one that I'm

32
00:02:08,039 --> 00:02:11,720
really looking forward to David
Fincher's Zodiac, which will get

33
00:02:11,760 --> 00:02:15,600
a hearty yes from me.
On to that question, Brad.

34
00:02:15,600 --> 00:02:17,960
As you look through the list of
films for this year, this

35
00:02:17,960 --> 00:02:21,400
season, aside from Oppenheimer
obviously, what are you most

36
00:02:21,400 --> 00:02:23,240
looking forward to watching for
the first time?

37
00:02:24,120 --> 00:02:29,160
Man, I am really excited about
Godzilla -1 that one has been

38
00:02:29,160 --> 00:02:34,760
hyped up for me quite a bit.
Whiplash, I I think might be my

39
00:02:34,760 --> 00:02:38,080
season winner.
Just an incredible, incredible

40
00:02:38,080 --> 00:02:41,400
film.
And then there's a few movies

41
00:02:41,400 --> 00:02:44,400
that I'm excited for people to
see that, you know, they might

42
00:02:44,400 --> 00:02:48,280
not have seen Past lives.
I know that's your pick, but I,

43
00:02:48,280 --> 00:02:52,920
I also like that movie a lot.
The Holdovers, incredible movie

44
00:02:52,920 --> 00:02:56,680
that more people need to see.
So yeah, I, I think there's a

45
00:02:56,680 --> 00:03:00,480
lot of great movies and one I,
I'm sure nobody's ever heard of.

46
00:03:00,920 --> 00:03:02,800
We're finishing the season with
John Wick.

47
00:03:03,200 --> 00:03:06,080
It's a it's kind of a little
indie classic that that not many

48
00:03:06,080 --> 00:03:09,600
people know about.
So joining us today to talk

49
00:03:09,600 --> 00:03:12,680
about Oppenheimer, I, I, I
wanted to bury the lead a little

50
00:03:12,680 --> 00:03:15,840
bit, but I can't because I
realized I can't go any further

51
00:03:15,840 --> 00:03:19,200
talking about the film
Oppenheimer without mentioning

52
00:03:19,240 --> 00:03:21,000
the man on the other end of the
line here.

53
00:03:21,240 --> 00:03:25,200
It's our friend and I believe
third time guest now, Bilga

54
00:03:25,200 --> 00:03:28,120
Ibiri.
And I have to say, like we're

55
00:03:28,120 --> 00:03:31,520
talking about modern classic in
films, but like if you could

56
00:03:31,520 --> 00:03:35,560
embody a modern classic in a
person, I think it's Bilga

57
00:03:35,560 --> 00:03:38,040
Ibiri.
Bilga, we've built you up, now

58
00:03:38,040 --> 00:03:39,800
you got to deliver, man.
How are you doing tonight?

59
00:03:40,280 --> 00:03:42,440
I'm good.
I don't know what else to say.

60
00:03:42,440 --> 00:03:43,880
How do I, how do I follow that
up?

61
00:03:43,920 --> 00:03:48,960
A modern classic?
I I feel I don't feel modern

62
00:03:49,600 --> 00:03:53,400
these days.
So so maybe you're accurate.

63
00:03:53,400 --> 00:03:56,480
I don't know if I feel like a
classic, like one of those cars

64
00:03:56,480 --> 00:03:58,480
that's falling apart.
But thank you for that.

65
00:03:58,480 --> 00:04:00,320
Wow, that's very that's very
sweet of you guys.

66
00:04:00,360 --> 00:04:04,560
And yes, it is my third time.
I'm very excited to talk about

67
00:04:05,000 --> 00:04:07,520
this movie.
I was very excited to get the

68
00:04:07,520 --> 00:04:10,440
e-mail when you guys were like,
Hey, this is our our subject and

69
00:04:10,440 --> 00:04:13,040
these are the movies.
And I saw and there was there

70
00:04:13,040 --> 00:04:15,520
were a lot of movies on there.
And I think initially you were

71
00:04:15,520 --> 00:04:18,240
like, just put your name next to
1 and I sent you guys like a

72
00:04:18,240 --> 00:04:21,920
list of seven.
And, and a lot of, I mean, a lot

73
00:04:21,920 --> 00:04:24,240
of films I really love are on
that list of films you're

74
00:04:24,240 --> 00:04:27,600
planning on talking about.
And then I looked at and I was

75
00:04:27,600 --> 00:04:29,520
like, like, who am I kidding?
I'm going to do.

76
00:04:31,400 --> 00:04:33,960
Well, I've got to needle you a
little bit about the subject

77
00:04:33,960 --> 00:04:38,600
here because like last time we
talked to you, we finished our

78
00:04:38,600 --> 00:04:41,800
recording and just chatted a
little bit off mic and you were

79
00:04:41,800 --> 00:04:44,680
telling us that you had just
seen Oppenheimer before pretty

80
00:04:44,680 --> 00:04:47,120
much anyone else.
You were telling us some some

81
00:04:47,120 --> 00:04:49,640
good details about people in the
screening room with you and

82
00:04:49,640 --> 00:04:51,920
their reactions to the end of
the film.

83
00:04:51,920 --> 00:04:55,120
And, and I hadn't, I didn't know
anything about the movie in

84
00:04:55,120 --> 00:04:58,400
terms of like, how's it going to
end appropriate.

85
00:04:58,400 --> 00:05:00,520
I would say those reactions in
retrospect.

86
00:05:00,960 --> 00:05:04,560
But then I start following your
articles coming out on Vulture.

87
00:05:04,560 --> 00:05:08,720
And I believe that you have
bylines on 12 different articles

88
00:05:09,160 --> 00:05:11,800
about the movie Oppenheimer on
the Vulture website now.

89
00:05:12,280 --> 00:05:17,080
So like, quite literally, you
are the subject matter expert on

90
00:05:17,080 --> 00:05:19,680
the film Oppenheimer.
It's like Chris Nolan and then

91
00:05:19,680 --> 00:05:22,360
you.
And so I'm, I'm very grateful

92
00:05:22,360 --> 00:05:24,680
that in lieu of Nolan, we got we
got you today.

93
00:05:25,760 --> 00:05:28,280
In lieu of Sir Christopher Nya.
So is he actually a Sir now?

94
00:05:28,280 --> 00:05:30,320
I don't I I think I missed that.
He's a Sir now.

95
00:05:30,520 --> 00:05:32,680
Is he a Sir?
Everything that I have read

96
00:05:32,680 --> 00:05:36,320
about him recently has him
titled Oh wow OK.

97
00:05:36,600 --> 00:05:37,640
I did.
I thought you were making that

98
00:05:37,640 --> 00:05:39,240
up, Brad.
That's cool.

99
00:05:39,240 --> 00:05:42,040
Yeah.
I, I, I mean, I, I've definitely

100
00:05:42,040 --> 00:05:45,680
written a lot about Oppenheimer.
I would say the person actually,

101
00:05:46,040 --> 00:05:50,280
I, I completely deferred to a, a
colleague of mine who's an even

102
00:05:50,280 --> 00:05:54,760
bigger Oppenheimer head than I
am, Jada Yuan, who I used to

103
00:05:54,760 --> 00:05:59,080
work with at New York magazine,
Vulture, who then moved to

104
00:05:59,840 --> 00:06:02,840
Washington Post.
She wrote a book like she wrote

105
00:06:02,840 --> 00:06:06,000
the making of book about
Oppenheimer, which by the way,

106
00:06:06,000 --> 00:06:09,000
is great.
But I, I will say one thing

107
00:06:09,000 --> 00:06:11,960
about how that happened.
I mean, obviously I, I, I, I saw

108
00:06:11,960 --> 00:06:15,760
Oppenheimer early and I was
working on a, a kind of profile

109
00:06:15,840 --> 00:06:20,400
process feat piece, making a
piece for the magazine.

110
00:06:20,920 --> 00:06:23,720
I was, I watched the film a, a
bunch of times for that.

111
00:06:23,720 --> 00:06:26,120
And I interviewed Nolan and I
interviewed all these people and

112
00:06:26,120 --> 00:06:29,520
I just kept interviewing people
like they were like, who do you,

113
00:06:29,520 --> 00:06:31,560
who do you want?
And I was like, well, I kind of

114
00:06:31,560 --> 00:06:35,960
want everybody because I didn't
quite know initially like what I

115
00:06:35,960 --> 00:06:38,080
was going to need to do.
Because part of the thing with

116
00:06:38,080 --> 00:06:43,400
Nolan is he's so in control of
everything on screen.

117
00:06:43,400 --> 00:06:46,640
And I don't mean that in like a
control freak way, although I'm

118
00:06:46,640 --> 00:06:49,880
sure he is a control freak.
Like he knows, he knows how

119
00:06:49,880 --> 00:06:51,920
stuff works.
He knows how editing works, he

120
00:06:51,920 --> 00:06:55,200
knows how sound works, he knows
how cinematography works.

121
00:06:55,480 --> 00:06:59,040
He understands like the chemical
process of film and stuff like

122
00:06:59,040 --> 00:07:01,160
that.
I mean, he has great people he

123
00:07:01,160 --> 00:07:02,760
works with.
You know, it's not to take

124
00:07:02,760 --> 00:07:06,200
anything away from, you know,
like his editors and his

125
00:07:06,200 --> 00:07:08,280
cinematographers.
But, but when you talk to them,

126
00:07:08,280 --> 00:07:11,000
they're very much like Chris
knows exactly what he's doing,

127
00:07:11,040 --> 00:07:14,000
you know, and, and, and they
love working with him that way

128
00:07:14,000 --> 00:07:16,360
because they don't have to like
reinvent the wheel every time.

129
00:07:18,360 --> 00:07:23,640
But because so much of what's on
screen is just coming directly

130
00:07:23,640 --> 00:07:25,800
from Nolan.
I, I wasn't sure who I needed to

131
00:07:25,800 --> 00:07:26,880
talk to.
So I kind of talked to

132
00:07:26,880 --> 00:07:30,160
everybody.
And then the, the freaking

133
00:07:30,360 --> 00:07:33,320
strikes happened.
Like, because if you remember,

134
00:07:33,320 --> 00:07:35,600
the strikes happened like a,
like, I mean, strikes are

135
00:07:35,600 --> 00:07:39,480
announced like a week before the
film is set to come out.

136
00:07:39,480 --> 00:07:42,320
I mean, there's the the the
Writers Guild strike is, you

137
00:07:42,320 --> 00:07:45,760
know, what was happening, but
you know, the SAG strike

138
00:07:45,760 --> 00:07:48,520
happens.
And as a result, suddenly all

139
00:07:48,520 --> 00:07:52,240
these actors that I talked to
stopped doing press.

140
00:07:52,720 --> 00:07:55,960
And at that point I kind of went
to my editors and I said, well,

141
00:07:55,960 --> 00:07:58,480
you know, I have all these.
Q And as with these people, why

142
00:07:58,480 --> 00:08:02,320
don't we like run these And and,
you know, we had to go to the

143
00:08:02,320 --> 00:08:06,200
actors publicists and get
permission and stuff like that.

144
00:08:06,560 --> 00:08:09,960
But that's sort of why it became
this thing where like suddenly

145
00:08:09,960 --> 00:08:12,200
there were all these interviews
that I've done.

146
00:08:12,640 --> 00:08:15,440
They were all meant for like one
piece and they kind of became

147
00:08:15,440 --> 00:08:18,000
this whole other thing.
And then, of course, I I did do

148
00:08:18,400 --> 00:08:21,200
a separate piece talking about
the ending of the film where

149
00:08:21,200 --> 00:08:23,360
there was a lot of stuff for my
interview with no one that I

150
00:08:23,360 --> 00:08:25,720
wanted to use and that I wanted
to kind of get into.

151
00:08:25,720 --> 00:08:29,520
And then later I did a whole
thing on like the IMAX of it

152
00:08:29,520 --> 00:08:32,000
all.
There was so much, like I talked

153
00:08:32,000 --> 00:08:34,559
to Nolan quite a bit and there
was so much great stuff in there

154
00:08:34,559 --> 00:08:37,080
that I couldn't fit into the
original piece that I was like,

155
00:08:37,080 --> 00:08:39,159
I I just want to turn this into
another article.

156
00:08:40,080 --> 00:08:42,240
And luckily the movie was such a
hit and it was in theaters for

157
00:08:42,240 --> 00:08:45,280
so long that, you know, usually
you don't get that opportunity.

158
00:08:45,280 --> 00:08:48,720
But like when it's like month
4:00 and you're like, hey, I got

159
00:08:48,720 --> 00:08:51,440
another idea for another article
you can do from this other

160
00:08:51,440 --> 00:08:52,880
interview I did.
It's good.

161
00:08:52,880 --> 00:08:55,160
It works out.
Yeah, and, and it's the type of

162
00:08:55,160 --> 00:08:58,760
content that leads to, you know,
a book on Christopher Nolan at

163
00:08:58,760 --> 00:09:01,600
some point, I'm sure.
I'm, I'm sure Bilga likes being

164
00:09:01,600 --> 00:09:03,640
referred to as a, a content
mill.

165
00:09:03,800 --> 00:09:06,320
You know, that's, that's really
what he's going for in his job

166
00:09:06,440 --> 00:09:08,760
at Vulture.
But guys, let's get into talking

167
00:09:08,760 --> 00:09:10,120
about the movie itself.
Now.

168
00:09:10,120 --> 00:09:13,680
Bilga saw this movie in his
words a bunch of times in prep

169
00:09:13,680 --> 00:09:17,480
for the articles.
I mean, roughly how many times

170
00:09:17,480 --> 00:09:24,160
are we talking now, Bilga?
I think I, I in total since it

171
00:09:24,160 --> 00:09:30,760
came out, I've seen the movie I
think like 14 times at the time.

172
00:09:30,760 --> 00:09:33,040
I mean, a lot of it was for that
piece.

173
00:09:33,040 --> 00:09:37,760
So I, I saw it four times over
the course of a month as I was

174
00:09:37,760 --> 00:09:39,880
working on my piece because
there was, there was specific

175
00:09:39,880 --> 00:09:43,440
stuff I was, I wanted to go back
and revisit it for.

176
00:09:43,440 --> 00:09:45,720
And of course, you know, I'm not
going to give you a Screener of

177
00:09:45,720 --> 00:09:48,440
Oppenheimer, you know, so, so it
was kind of like, well, you got

178
00:09:48,440 --> 00:09:51,760
to come into the city and you
got to go, we're screening it in

179
00:09:51,760 --> 00:09:53,600
IMAX.
So you got to go see it here.

180
00:09:53,600 --> 00:09:56,000
And of course they were keeping
it so under wraps that I would

181
00:09:56,000 --> 00:09:59,280
go to these screens and it would
be like me and like one other

182
00:09:59,280 --> 00:10:03,360
person, you know, like, like all
my critic friends were like,

183
00:10:03,360 --> 00:10:05,440
gosh, when the hell are they
going to show Oppenheimer?

184
00:10:05,440 --> 00:10:08,400
Like they, you know, is this
movie terrible?

185
00:10:08,400 --> 00:10:10,040
Like they're not, they're not
screening it.

186
00:10:10,040 --> 00:10:13,000
They're keeping it under wraps.
And I was like, but yeah, it was

187
00:10:13,000 --> 00:10:14,080
weird.
I mean, they were being very

188
00:10:14,080 --> 00:10:15,720
secretive about it.
I mean, I guess it worked out

189
00:10:15,720 --> 00:10:18,080
because the film obviously, you
know, opened huge.

190
00:10:18,080 --> 00:10:20,680
And something similar happened
with Barbie, which was also kept

191
00:10:20,680 --> 00:10:23,440
from critics.
You know, usually when a film is

192
00:10:23,440 --> 00:10:28,120
kept that secret.
People, it's not a good thing.

193
00:10:28,160 --> 00:10:30,000
Yeah, right.
There's there's a reason.

194
00:10:30,440 --> 00:10:35,080
Yeah, and for one bright,
shining moment in July of 2023,

195
00:10:35,760 --> 00:10:38,600
the movies that were being kept
from critics were not disasters.

196
00:10:38,600 --> 00:10:40,200
They were actually quite
wonderful.

197
00:10:40,680 --> 00:10:42,560
So Bill has seen it 14 times,
Brad.

198
00:10:42,560 --> 00:10:45,400
I saw it in theaters five times.
And I watched what?

199
00:10:45,400 --> 00:10:49,160
To say go ahead Bill, that's 42
hours of your life.

200
00:10:51,440 --> 00:10:55,000
How many episodes, how many
seasons of a Real Housewives

201
00:10:55,920 --> 00:10:57,640
thing does that?
Because because, you know, it's

202
00:10:57,640 --> 00:11:00,480
like people say, oh, how can you
watch a movie that many times?

203
00:11:00,480 --> 00:11:04,560
And I'm always like, well, you
know, you watch the worst

204
00:11:04,560 --> 00:11:09,160
fucking TV once, and that's
about the same amount of time

205
00:11:09,160 --> 00:11:10,280
I'd rather be watching.
Yeah.

206
00:11:10,840 --> 00:11:13,720
No, I, I that was not a
derogatory statement.

207
00:11:13,720 --> 00:11:16,720
It was more of a it.
Was more kind of because I've

208
00:11:16,720 --> 00:11:18,280
had this response to.
People.

209
00:11:18,280 --> 00:11:18,920
Sure, sure.
You.

210
00:11:18,960 --> 00:11:20,400
Watch it this many times and I'm
like.

211
00:11:21,480 --> 00:11:22,440
You know, 'cause it's.
Not.

212
00:11:22,680 --> 00:11:24,560
That's, I mean like there really
doesn't need to be more

213
00:11:24,560 --> 00:11:27,520
explanation than that.
Yeah, I was going to say there

214
00:11:27,520 --> 00:11:30,680
are many things you could waste
42 hours on.

215
00:11:30,680 --> 00:11:33,280
I don't think Oppenheimer is one
of those things.

216
00:11:33,480 --> 00:11:35,680
Well, I am.
We're in the rare position of me

217
00:11:35,680 --> 00:11:38,680
being beat out by a guest in
terms of number of times seeing

218
00:11:38,680 --> 00:11:40,680
it.
I saw it in theaters five times,

219
00:11:40,960 --> 00:11:46,280
including once in IMAX and once
in 70mm, which what I got to be

220
00:11:46,280 --> 00:11:49,840
honest, man, the 70 mil print
that I got it, it must have been

221
00:11:49,840 --> 00:11:52,120
struck from multiple 70 mil
prints.

222
00:11:52,720 --> 00:11:56,400
Not, not a great experience.
Not worth the additional $14.00

223
00:11:56,400 --> 00:11:59,360
or whatever it was I paid.
So that was a huge bummer.

224
00:11:59,360 --> 00:12:02,640
But aside from that, a very
rewarding experience.

225
00:12:02,640 --> 00:12:05,360
Brad, this was my sixth time
seeing the movie for this

226
00:12:05,360 --> 00:12:08,440
podcast, and I believe this is
your second time, right?

227
00:12:09,000 --> 00:12:12,480
Yeah, it is my second time and I
would actually be curious now

228
00:12:12,480 --> 00:12:15,400
that we have an actual expert on
the show, not just Bob.

229
00:12:17,720 --> 00:12:22,000
So many people when movies like
this come out, they talk about,

230
00:12:22,000 --> 00:12:25,760
you know, you can see this at
like what, 3-4 different like

231
00:12:25,760 --> 00:12:29,240
quality levels at different
theaters.

232
00:12:29,720 --> 00:12:33,840
Bilga having seen it 14 times, I
would imagine having seen it at

233
00:12:33,840 --> 00:12:37,440
all the different levels you can
watch it at what?

234
00:12:37,440 --> 00:12:44,600
Like what is your take on the
varying levels of, of cinematic

235
00:12:44,600 --> 00:12:46,920
quality?
Like when Dune 2 came out, I had

236
00:12:46,920 --> 00:12:48,400
a lot of friends talking about
this.

237
00:12:48,400 --> 00:12:53,040
Like, yeah, I saw it in the
Dolby plus whatever.

238
00:12:53,040 --> 00:12:57,160
And I also, I also saw an IMAX
and, and regular and, and, and

239
00:12:57,160 --> 00:13:01,760
it just feels like there's a lot
of confusion in, in those realms

240
00:13:01,760 --> 00:13:04,320
on if, if there's actually
higher quality because what Bob

241
00:13:04,320 --> 00:13:07,080
just said, like his print might
not have been the best print.

242
00:13:07,080 --> 00:13:09,680
And so his IMAX experience
wasn't great.

243
00:13:09,920 --> 00:13:14,720
Yeah, it really does in so many
cases depend on the theater

244
00:13:14,720 --> 00:13:20,080
itself for for Oppenheimer, for
me, IMAX 70mm was the way to go.

245
00:13:20,080 --> 00:13:25,000
So IMAX, you know, 15 perf, I
guess it's called, and that's

246
00:13:25,200 --> 00:13:30,440
basically IMAX film.
And then the film, you know, and

247
00:13:30,440 --> 00:13:33,280
it was shot on IMAX.
I remember the vast majority of

248
00:13:33,280 --> 00:13:36,240
the movie was shot on IMAX film.
So you're really, and it was

249
00:13:36,240 --> 00:13:38,360
finished on film.
So you're really kind of

250
00:13:38,360 --> 00:13:44,640
watching it's native, it's
native format in, in IMAX film.

251
00:13:45,200 --> 00:13:47,280
And in fact, part of the reason
why, I mean, after a certain

252
00:13:47,280 --> 00:13:50,640
point, you know, I remember
opening weekend, I went and saw

253
00:13:50,640 --> 00:13:56,920
it in 35mm at my local theater
in Brooklyn, which was the

254
00:13:56,920 --> 00:14:00,320
Nighthawk.
But I also had, I wanted to see

255
00:14:00,320 --> 00:14:05,520
it again in 70mm at Alamo
Drafthouse just to see what what

256
00:14:05,520 --> 00:14:09,280
the vibe was like at that point.
I felt so weirdly invested in

257
00:14:09,280 --> 00:14:10,360
the movie.
I was just like, and also

258
00:14:10,360 --> 00:14:12,880
because I just been in so many
screens where I was like just

259
00:14:12,880 --> 00:14:15,600
me.
That was kind of like, I think

260
00:14:15,600 --> 00:14:18,520
people are going to like this
movie, but I kind of don't know

261
00:14:18,520 --> 00:14:20,280
at this point.
I've been like Oppenheimer

262
00:14:20,280 --> 00:14:23,040
pilled, but I have no idea what
like the average person is going

263
00:14:23,040 --> 00:14:25,720
to think of this movie.
So I went like for that reason

264
00:14:25,720 --> 00:14:28,320
alone.
So stuff like that happens.

265
00:14:28,320 --> 00:14:30,400
It happens all the time.
I mean, that's the thing that

266
00:14:30,400 --> 00:14:35,120
like as Nolan becomes more and
more of a he's not a Luddite.

267
00:14:35,120 --> 00:14:38,840
He's obviously not a Luddite,
But as someone who is kind of

268
00:14:39,640 --> 00:14:43,840
advocating for celluloid and
making a point of releasing his

269
00:14:43,840 --> 00:14:49,360
films on celluloid and because
his films are huge releases,

270
00:14:49,360 --> 00:14:52,960
wide releases.
In some cases, Nighthawk wasn't

271
00:14:52,960 --> 00:14:55,080
one of those cases, because
Nighthawk is a theater that

272
00:14:55,080 --> 00:14:58,680
shows 35 all the time.
But, but in a lot of cases you

273
00:14:58,680 --> 00:15:02,520
have movie theaters that have
just been doing DCPS for years

274
00:15:02,520 --> 00:15:05,640
suddenly have to deal with the
film print and they have to like

275
00:15:05,640 --> 00:15:07,360
get a projectionist who can deal
with it.

276
00:15:07,360 --> 00:15:11,120
And, you know, I, I assume like
pull out a old projector from,

277
00:15:11,160 --> 00:15:13,840
from, from storage or whatever.
I don't know how exactly it

278
00:15:13,840 --> 00:15:18,480
works, But you know, you run
into problems because you know,

279
00:15:18,480 --> 00:15:22,880
that they're not as well versed
in, in how to deal with it.

280
00:15:23,280 --> 00:15:25,360
So that's a thing that, you
know, I think, I mean, it

281
00:15:25,360 --> 00:15:27,840
happened to me when I saw
Interstellar when it first came

282
00:15:27,840 --> 00:15:30,120
out.
You know, it's like saw it

283
00:15:30,240 --> 00:15:34,760
opening weekend in I think 35mm
and it was just like, I don't

284
00:15:34,760 --> 00:15:36,720
even know where it was, but
there was something was wrong

285
00:15:36,720 --> 00:15:40,800
with the projection, you know,
and it was like, you know, at a

286
00:15:40,800 --> 00:15:43,000
regal, you know.
Yeah, man, I.

287
00:15:43,240 --> 00:15:46,400
Had a very similar experience
this summer with the Inside out

288
00:15:46,400 --> 00:15:49,360
two.
Spoiler alert, drive in movie

289
00:15:49,360 --> 00:15:53,000
theater audio not not the best
quality.

290
00:15:53,880 --> 00:15:57,640
So yes, I, I feel your pain.
I do wonder what it's like for

291
00:15:57,640 --> 00:16:01,280
Brad, though, to hear you and I
talk about our preferred format

292
00:16:01,280 --> 00:16:04,320
of what type of film and
projection this should be on

293
00:16:04,320 --> 00:16:08,360
when like my guy is definitely
watching this movie on a laptop

294
00:16:08,360 --> 00:16:10,680
or his phone.
So we, we will see how this

295
00:16:10,680 --> 00:16:13,840
works for Brad, but that means
that it's time for us to get

296
00:16:13,840 --> 00:16:17,160
into our first real segment of
today, which is called Brad

297
00:16:17,160 --> 00:16:20,320
explains Brad's going to.
Give us the movie plots with

298
00:16:20,360 --> 00:16:22,320
only 60 seconds taken on the
clock.

299
00:16:22,440 --> 00:16:25,800
So let's go ahead and do your
take with this little segment

300
00:16:25,840 --> 00:16:29,000
that we call, Brad explains.
Brad Explains is the part of the

301
00:16:29,000 --> 00:16:32,240
podcast where Brad breaks down
the plot of the movie that he

302
00:16:32,240 --> 00:16:34,800
has just seen, often for the
first time.

303
00:16:35,000 --> 00:16:38,160
This is Brad's second time with
Oppenheimer and Brad.

304
00:16:38,160 --> 00:16:43,480
While on paper I think you can
kind of delineate the plot very

305
00:16:43,480 --> 00:16:46,760
easily, this is one of those
rare instances where the movie

306
00:16:46,760 --> 00:16:50,400
is just a hell of a lot more
complicated than the the short

307
00:16:50,400 --> 00:16:53,640
little synopsis can be.
Yeah, 100%.

308
00:16:53,760 --> 00:16:57,960
As with any Christopher Nolan
film, there are multiple

309
00:16:57,960 --> 00:17:01,720
timelines being explored
throughout the film, and that

310
00:17:01,720 --> 00:17:03,920
makes it really easy to
describe.

311
00:17:04,240 --> 00:17:07,119
Just super simple,
straightforward.

312
00:17:07,440 --> 00:17:10,440
Well, you are in the enviable
position of having to do that in

313
00:17:10,440 --> 00:17:12,920
one minute or less.
Folks, if you have not yet seen

314
00:17:12,920 --> 00:17:15,760
Oppenheimer, I cannot suggest
strongly enough that you press

315
00:17:15,760 --> 00:17:19,400
pause here, go watch this three
hour epic of a film and then

316
00:17:19,400 --> 00:17:21,720
come back and join us for the
rest of the episode.

317
00:17:22,119 --> 00:17:24,839
Brad, one minute on the clock
and go.

318
00:17:25,119 --> 00:17:29,440
Oppenheimer is a film that
follows J Robert Oppenheimer as

319
00:17:29,440 --> 00:17:32,480
he moves throughout his life as
a physicist.

320
00:17:32,480 --> 00:17:35,840
It follows him to Europe and
back to the US as he starts a

321
00:17:35,840 --> 00:17:41,120
program at Berkeley and as World
War 2 breaks out he is asked to

322
00:17:41,600 --> 00:17:46,400
head up the Los Alamos Manhattan
Project program to create the

323
00:17:46,400 --> 00:17:53,880
nuclear weapon, the atomic bomb.
It also follows him through a

324
00:17:53,880 --> 00:17:59,160
trial of sorts as his security
clearance is revoked because of

325
00:17:59,160 --> 00:18:04,400
suspected communist activities,
as well as following a man named

326
00:18:04,400 --> 00:18:08,480
Strauss who is trying to be
confirmed to the cabinet of

327
00:18:08,480 --> 00:18:14,960
Eisenhower, I believe, and the
relationships in which have

328
00:18:14,960 --> 00:18:20,120
ruined his opportunities.
Well done, you came in like 5

329
00:18:20,120 --> 00:18:23,320
seconds under time too.
That's that's all I needed,

330
00:18:23,320 --> 00:18:25,640
ma'am.
All right, here's my first

331
00:18:25,640 --> 00:18:28,640
question for both of you guys
and Brad, I'll throw it to you

332
00:18:28,640 --> 00:18:32,800
first.
If you had to put a genre on

333
00:18:32,800 --> 00:18:35,960
this movie, where does this
movie fall?

334
00:18:35,960 --> 00:18:39,200
Because I've heard a lot of
people take a stab at it.

335
00:18:40,120 --> 00:18:43,440
And personally, I don't, I don't
like biopic for this movie.

336
00:18:43,440 --> 00:18:46,960
I don't think that works at all.
You know, I, I've seen people in

337
00:18:46,960 --> 00:18:51,360
print say just historical drama.
I've seen espionage thriller,

338
00:18:51,400 --> 00:18:56,040
I've seen conspiracy thriller.
But like, where are you falling

339
00:18:56,040 --> 00:18:59,920
on Oppenheimer?
Oh, that's, that's a tough one.

340
00:19:00,120 --> 00:19:04,600
I part of me would want to call
it like a moral quandary drama

341
00:19:05,200 --> 00:19:09,240
where the the essence of the
film is asking this question

342
00:19:09,240 --> 00:19:13,720
like, have we destroyed the
world by trying to save the

343
00:19:13,720 --> 00:19:17,000
world?
So I, I think that I don't know

344
00:19:17,000 --> 00:19:19,760
if that's a genre Bill that you
can correct me if I'm wrong, but

345
00:19:19,960 --> 00:19:22,960
moral quandary drama feels
accurate.

346
00:19:23,160 --> 00:19:27,120
I do think that historical drama
makes a lot of sense as well.

347
00:19:28,200 --> 00:19:31,680
Dramatized biopic might be a
good description.

348
00:19:32,320 --> 00:19:36,800
It's a really good question.
In some ways I want to say it's

349
00:19:36,800 --> 00:19:40,960
a proud biopic.
You know, like, it's like biopic

350
00:19:40,960 --> 00:19:44,840
is biopic is a word.
It's become a dirty word, you

351
00:19:44,840 --> 00:19:46,840
know, and it's so funny.
And when you're a critic, very

352
00:19:46,840 --> 00:19:52,560
often you'll get emails from
publicists in advance of a film

353
00:19:52,560 --> 00:19:56,360
saying, you know, please don't
call our movie a biopic.

354
00:19:56,360 --> 00:20:00,760
It is a, you know, historical
drama or is a biographical drama

355
00:20:00,760 --> 00:20:03,200
or.
I remember this was a whole

356
00:20:03,200 --> 00:20:07,080
thing with Maestro where some
people got upset if you called

357
00:20:07,080 --> 00:20:08,920
it a biopic.
It was pretty clear that it was

358
00:20:08,920 --> 00:20:11,960
because Bradley Cooper was
getting upset that people are

359
00:20:11,960 --> 00:20:13,840
calling it a biopic.
Like I don't think the publicist

360
00:20:13,840 --> 00:20:18,680
really cared that much.
But I think, I mean, there's so

361
00:20:18,680 --> 00:20:23,240
many, there's so many ideas in
Oppenheimer that it it really

362
00:20:23,240 --> 00:20:26,400
does fit so many of those like
sub genres.

363
00:20:26,760 --> 00:20:30,280
I think political thriller is a
good one and I think it's

364
00:20:30,280 --> 00:20:34,240
actually one of those one of
those situations where political

365
00:20:34,240 --> 00:20:36,960
to call it a political thriller
is almost a spoiler.

366
00:20:37,400 --> 00:20:41,480
You know, because it does become
and and towards the end really

367
00:20:41,480 --> 00:20:45,320
becomes about, you know, this
dynamic between him and straws

368
00:20:45,320 --> 00:20:49,840
and how that how that fed into
what happened to Oppenheimer

369
00:20:50,120 --> 00:20:51,840
sort of in the back end of his
career.

370
00:20:52,240 --> 00:20:56,880
And and also makes the case that
that's in part because he was

371
00:20:56,880 --> 00:21:01,360
silenced and because he was
sidelined, we never really did

372
00:21:01,360 --> 00:21:04,440
manage to have a proper
conversation about nuclear,

373
00:21:04,680 --> 00:21:08,920
nuclear, nuclear weapons.
So, so, you know, political

374
00:21:08,920 --> 00:21:11,480
thriller works.
You could also say it's kind of

375
00:21:11,480 --> 00:21:14,600
a prequel to every post
apocalyptic movie ever made

376
00:21:14,600 --> 00:21:18,160
because it the movie does
basically end with the the end

377
00:21:18,160 --> 00:21:21,960
of the world.
So, you know, so it's kind of a

378
00:21:21,960 --> 00:21:23,960
science fiction movie in that
sense too, right.

379
00:21:24,240 --> 00:21:27,120
In so many ways, it's it's so
Nolan.

380
00:21:27,320 --> 00:21:29,800
I mean, he's a real artist and
and someone who is very well

381
00:21:29,800 --> 00:21:33,360
versed in film history and
really thinks of himself as

382
00:21:33,360 --> 00:21:35,080
making serious movies, which he
does.

383
00:21:35,320 --> 00:21:37,760
But then he'll take these, you
know, I mean, we take the

384
00:21:37,800 --> 00:21:42,000
superhero movie and turn it into
something very much in line with

385
00:21:42,000 --> 00:21:45,840
his sensibility, which of course
then turned into a thing where

386
00:21:45,840 --> 00:21:49,400
everybody was trying to make
movies like him, superhero

387
00:21:49,400 --> 00:21:52,360
movies like him, and they
couldn't because the sensibility

388
00:21:52,360 --> 00:21:54,280
wasn't actually there.
Like, he came to it, I think

389
00:21:54,280 --> 00:21:57,880
very sincerely.
But then other people came to

390
00:21:57,880 --> 00:22:01,880
it, often very cynically in an
in an effort to ape what he had

391
00:22:01,880 --> 00:22:03,640
done.
And, you know, as a result, what

392
00:22:03,640 --> 00:22:06,240
they did was kind of shallow.
Whereas a film, I think like

393
00:22:07,040 --> 00:22:10,000
Batman Begins or The Dark Knight
or for that matter, the The Dark

394
00:22:10,000 --> 00:22:14,120
Knight Rises are movies that are
you can watch endlessly and find

395
00:22:14,120 --> 00:22:16,280
new things in them and that are
full of ideas.

396
00:22:16,280 --> 00:22:19,200
And I think in that sense, they
they reflect their creator.

397
00:22:19,680 --> 00:22:23,840
And Oppenheimer is kind of like
that, you know, he every moment

398
00:22:23,840 --> 00:22:29,080
of this movie is just filled
with details and ideas and he's

399
00:22:29,080 --> 00:22:31,640
he's following through on all
these different things.

400
00:22:31,640 --> 00:22:34,400
I mean, it feels like a fairly
straightforward historical

401
00:22:34,400 --> 00:22:36,880
drama, even with the sort of
jumping back and forth in time.

402
00:22:37,440 --> 00:22:40,000
But like the stuff that's
happening aesthetically, the

403
00:22:40,000 --> 00:22:43,160
stuff that's happening
sonically, the stuff that's

404
00:22:43,160 --> 00:22:45,800
happening thematically, all
these things are running

405
00:22:45,800 --> 00:22:48,920
throughout the film.
And that's also one of the

406
00:22:48,920 --> 00:22:53,520
reasons why it's such a joy to
watch multiple times, because

407
00:22:53,880 --> 00:22:56,640
every time I watch it, I, I
notice something new, you know,

408
00:22:56,640 --> 00:22:59,960
every time I watch it.
And even now, like my 14th

409
00:22:59,960 --> 00:23:03,560
viewing, I, I, I, I don't
remember what it was, you know,

410
00:23:03,560 --> 00:23:06,720
my, my 14th viewing, but there
was something that I caught for

411
00:23:06,720 --> 00:23:09,080
the first time.
Even then I was like, Hey, I

412
00:23:09,840 --> 00:23:13,120
totally didn't realize they were
also doing this, you know, So

413
00:23:13,120 --> 00:23:15,040
it's, it's great to be able to
do that.

414
00:23:15,600 --> 00:23:18,600
Yeah, 100%.
And I asked this question with

415
00:23:18,600 --> 00:23:20,920
somewhat ulterior motives
because this is kind of my

416
00:23:20,920 --> 00:23:23,760
thesis statement on Oppenheimer
and I want you guys to help me

417
00:23:24,240 --> 00:23:27,360
just kind of lie on your
therapist chair today and figure

418
00:23:27,360 --> 00:23:30,840
out I have wrestled with this
movie for so long, a movie that

419
00:23:30,840 --> 00:23:33,000
I love.
Let me, you know, be clear here

420
00:23:33,480 --> 00:23:36,120
and I'll just kind of spoil
where I'm at score wise.

421
00:23:36,120 --> 00:23:39,200
Now, is this movie a 9 1/2 or
A10?

422
00:23:39,280 --> 00:23:42,680
And that is like, that's the
hardest question to answer for

423
00:23:42,680 --> 00:23:47,080
me because the first time I saw
the film, I was like, wow, this

424
00:23:47,080 --> 00:23:53,400
is a monumental work in the
history of of cinema that I am

425
00:23:53,400 --> 00:23:55,960
99% sure is going to win the the
Oscar.

426
00:23:57,040 --> 00:24:02,680
And also kind of weirdly messy
or seemingly so.

427
00:24:03,600 --> 00:24:08,240
And with each subsequent
viewing, it unlocked for me what

428
00:24:08,240 --> 00:24:10,880
Nolan's intentions were with
including every single

429
00:24:10,880 --> 00:24:14,600
character, every line, every
scene that didn't necessarily

430
00:24:14,600 --> 00:24:17,440
seem like it seemed maybe
tangentially related to what he

431
00:24:17,440 --> 00:24:20,240
was trying to say.
And I've arrived at a place now

432
00:24:20,240 --> 00:24:24,320
where for me, you know, the
first hour is the closest thing

433
00:24:24,320 --> 00:24:27,840
to a traditional biopic.
It's just his young life, him

434
00:24:27,840 --> 00:24:30,400
meeting Kitty and all these
other things.

435
00:24:31,120 --> 00:24:34,680
The third hour of the film is
really the lens through which to

436
00:24:34,680 --> 00:24:36,200
view everything else in the
film.

437
00:24:36,240 --> 00:24:42,480
Everything about his adulterous
nature, his own hubris, his

438
00:24:42,480 --> 00:24:47,080
inability to recognize the
malicious intent in others.

439
00:24:47,400 --> 00:24:51,440
Everything from that first hour
that seems kind of messy is

440
00:24:51,440 --> 00:24:55,520
there because of the third hour,
and it makes a lot more sense.

441
00:24:56,440 --> 00:24:58,800
But Brad, it kind of reminds me
of the conversation we had a

442
00:24:58,800 --> 00:25:03,120
couple years ago with our David
Lean miniseries we did, where we

443
00:25:03,120 --> 00:25:06,080
talked about, you know, Lawrence
of Arabia is the movie that Lean

444
00:25:06,080 --> 00:25:07,600
is always going to be remembered
for.

445
00:25:08,040 --> 00:25:12,560
But it's a much more prickly,
kind of not shaggy, not messy

446
00:25:12,560 --> 00:25:16,160
movie, But he's such a
complicated figure, and you can

447
00:25:16,160 --> 00:25:18,560
never really get your arms
around Lawrence.

448
00:25:19,400 --> 00:25:21,720
Bridge of the River Kwai is a
movie that is like so

449
00:25:21,720 --> 00:25:26,600
streamlined and so perfectly
executed that I, I almost would

450
00:25:26,600 --> 00:25:29,520
recommend that movie to more
people than Lawrence of Arabia.

451
00:25:29,520 --> 00:25:31,880
And I feel like kind of the same
way about Oppenheimer.

452
00:25:32,120 --> 00:25:35,920
He's this complicated figure and
the movie is built around him in

453
00:25:35,920 --> 00:25:40,280
such a way that you can never
quite get your arms all the way

454
00:25:40,280 --> 00:25:41,120
around it.
I don't know.

455
00:25:41,120 --> 00:25:44,080
Does that make sense guys?
Yeah, 100%.

456
00:25:44,120 --> 00:25:48,400
The the depiction of
Oppenheimer, like, it's, it

457
00:25:48,400 --> 00:25:50,880
might sound silly, but the IT
feels like they're trying to

458
00:25:50,880 --> 00:25:54,600
portray him as this enigma
wrapped in a mystery, you know

459
00:25:54,600 --> 00:25:56,440
what I mean?
Like, like, that is the

460
00:25:56,440 --> 00:25:58,880
portrayal that you get
throughout the film of him, that

461
00:25:59,120 --> 00:26:02,800
he's always measuring every
thought, every word, never

462
00:26:02,800 --> 00:26:05,720
letting anyone in.
And it's not until later in the

463
00:26:05,720 --> 00:26:09,840
movie that you finally see a few
moments of candor.

464
00:26:10,240 --> 00:26:13,160
And the two that I'm thinking of
happen, I think both in the

465
00:26:13,160 --> 00:26:17,560
hallway of the security
clearance trial.

466
00:26:17,560 --> 00:26:22,480
That's not a trial.
And, and, and it's when he talks

467
00:26:22,480 --> 00:26:26,200
about he and Kitty's
relationship, like that's the

468
00:26:26,200 --> 00:26:29,640
one of the very few moments
where I feel like you are seeing

469
00:26:29,640 --> 00:26:33,720
the real J Robert Oppenheimer.
And then the second moment and

470
00:26:33,720 --> 00:26:36,320
this one, I I especially want to
hear your guys's thoughts on.

471
00:26:37,760 --> 00:26:43,080
I was so fascinated by the
moment where he just casually is

472
00:26:43,080 --> 00:26:46,960
like, yeah, and, and he didn't
die of a broken heart because he

473
00:26:46,960 --> 00:26:51,200
never found out that his wife
was cheating on him with me.

474
00:26:51,680 --> 00:26:56,840
And the way Killian Murphy
plays, that is different than

475
00:26:56,920 --> 00:27:00,760
every single facial expression
he has for the rest of the film.

476
00:27:01,240 --> 00:27:06,480
And for some reason, that just
stood out to me so deeply

477
00:27:07,000 --> 00:27:10,560
because it feels like one of the
few times where, once again, the

478
00:27:10,560 --> 00:27:14,560
character is being honest about
who he really is.

479
00:27:16,000 --> 00:27:18,840
First of all, Bob, I think
you're absolutely right in this,

480
00:27:18,840 --> 00:27:22,040
but I just wanted to circle back
to something you said which

481
00:27:22,040 --> 00:27:24,280
which sounds tangential, but it
isn't.

482
00:27:25,000 --> 00:27:29,360
You mentioned Lawrence of Arabia
and and I totally agree about

483
00:27:29,360 --> 00:27:30,920
what you said about Lawrence of
Arabia.

484
00:27:31,440 --> 00:27:36,240
One thing that when I, several
years ago, I, I, I, I, I did a

485
00:27:36,240 --> 00:27:40,480
lot of research at the Citizen
Kane, a movie people are

486
00:27:40,480 --> 00:27:43,320
familiar with, but a movie about
what you can kind of spend your

487
00:27:43,320 --> 00:27:46,040
whole life doing research.
But I had done a piece on

488
00:27:46,680 --> 00:27:51,160
Citizen Kane, Citizen Kane's
journey through sort of the, the

489
00:27:51,160 --> 00:27:54,240
20th century Canon and how it
became anointed as like the

490
00:27:54,240 --> 00:27:57,440
greatest movie ever made and why
it sort of stayed there for such

491
00:27:57,440 --> 00:28:00,280
a long time.
And then I wound up like the,

492
00:28:00,320 --> 00:28:03,040
the folks at Criterion had seen
that piece and they asked me to

493
00:28:03,040 --> 00:28:06,560
do the essay for the 4K release
of, for, of Citizen Kane.

494
00:28:06,880 --> 00:28:10,080
So I did kind of took some of
those ideas and expanded them

495
00:28:10,080 --> 00:28:13,000
into kind of a bigger piece.
But one of the things I, I did,

496
00:28:13,000 --> 00:28:15,520
which was really fun was to go
back and look at the sight and

497
00:28:15,520 --> 00:28:21,200
sound surveys, which started in
1952 and, you know, kind of

498
00:28:21,560 --> 00:28:25,720
repeated every 10 years and
1952.

499
00:28:26,680 --> 00:28:29,120
And of course, the sight and
sound survey is where Citizen

500
00:28:29,120 --> 00:28:32,560
Kane became, quote UN quote, the
greatest movie ever made and

501
00:28:32,560 --> 00:28:36,400
sort of held that title and, and
wound up so, you know, being

502
00:28:36,400 --> 00:28:37,760
mentioned in all these other
lists.

503
00:28:37,920 --> 00:28:41,240
But it was kind of there where
it first really emerged as, as,

504
00:28:41,960 --> 00:28:44,560
as what it was.
It was in 1962 when it when it

505
00:28:44,560 --> 00:28:48,560
topped the list in 1952, it was
nowhere to be found on the list,

506
00:28:48,560 --> 00:28:49,840
right?
It was not in the top 10 or

507
00:28:49,840 --> 00:28:52,880
anything like that.
It was, you know, the film had

508
00:28:52,880 --> 00:28:55,640
obviously it had come out, you
know, 11 years earlier.

509
00:28:57,440 --> 00:29:00,960
But Sight and Sound at the time
published some of the individual

510
00:29:00,960 --> 00:29:02,720
lists.
I mean, it later would publish

511
00:29:02,720 --> 00:29:06,760
all the individual lists, but in
the in the 1952 edition, it

512
00:29:06,760 --> 00:29:09,360
actually published some of the
individual lists and a lot of

513
00:29:09,360 --> 00:29:12,760
them were were directors.
And one of the only people who

514
00:29:12,760 --> 00:29:16,360
cited Citizen Kane on their top
ten list, Sight and sound top

515
00:29:16,360 --> 00:29:21,520
ten list was David Lean.
And Citizen Kane is famously a

516
00:29:21,520 --> 00:29:26,240
movie about a subject about
which nobody really knows any

517
00:29:26,240 --> 00:29:28,480
like you're watching it.
I mean, it's almost Cubist.

518
00:29:28,480 --> 00:29:31,200
Like you're watching him.
Everybody kind of has a

519
00:29:31,200 --> 00:29:33,920
different take on who Charles
Foster Kane is.

520
00:29:34,200 --> 00:29:38,160
And by the end of the film, you
still don't really know like it

521
00:29:38,200 --> 00:29:42,120
it like it ends on Rose Rosebud
the sled.

522
00:29:42,520 --> 00:29:47,960
But it's famously kind of a very
postmodern like here's the

523
00:29:47,960 --> 00:29:49,840
explanation.
But wait, that's not really an

524
00:29:49,840 --> 00:29:51,640
explanation.
Like it makes you think, well,

525
00:29:51,840 --> 00:29:55,200
wait, Rosebud really the sled.
And it's like it makes you kind

526
00:29:55,200 --> 00:29:58,640
of go back over the movie and
you realize Wells has kind of

527
00:29:58,800 --> 00:30:01,200
pulled the rug out from under,
under your feet.

528
00:30:01,480 --> 00:30:07,720
And it's you know, it's it's,
it's a film that purports to

529
00:30:07,720 --> 00:30:10,560
explain all this stuff.
But ultimately the the figure at

530
00:30:10,680 --> 00:30:15,120
at its center remains an enigma.
And and I think, and I and I

531
00:30:15,120 --> 00:30:18,240
watch Lawrence of Arabia and I'm
like, this is a movie made by

532
00:30:18,240 --> 00:30:21,480
someone who recognizes that
Susan Kane is one of the

533
00:30:21,480 --> 00:30:25,760
greatest movies ever, you know,
And I think no one.

534
00:30:26,000 --> 00:30:28,640
And Oppenheimer is kind of in
that tradition, right?

535
00:30:28,920 --> 00:30:31,840
Because it is in so many ways,
even though we're watching it

536
00:30:31,840 --> 00:30:34,920
from his perspective, so much of
the film is about how other

537
00:30:34,920 --> 00:30:38,200
people see him and his
interactions with these people

538
00:30:38,200 --> 00:30:41,880
and how each of them sort of
confronts him in different ways

539
00:30:41,880 --> 00:30:43,960
and forces him in different
ways.

540
00:30:43,960 --> 00:30:48,040
And, and he's, you know, in so
many ways, he's so malleable and

541
00:30:48,040 --> 00:30:52,280
he never really reveals what
he's thinking except in certain

542
00:30:52,280 --> 00:30:54,320
moments.
In that, that moment, Brad, that

543
00:30:54,320 --> 00:30:58,080
you you highlighted sort of
towards the end of the film

544
00:30:58,080 --> 00:31:03,560
where they're in the hallway and
Kitty comes to testify on his

545
00:31:03,560 --> 00:31:06,480
behalf.
And the music suddenly, you

546
00:31:06,760 --> 00:31:10,000
know, the music has been so like
atonal violins, sort of violins

547
00:31:10,000 --> 00:31:13,280
playing really, really fast and
kind of going crazy.

548
00:31:13,520 --> 00:31:17,880
And suddenly there's this
beautiful little, almost like a

549
00:31:17,880 --> 00:31:21,880
violin duet, very melodious.
And suddenly for, for one brief

550
00:31:21,880 --> 00:31:24,760
moment, everything is in unison.
As he's saying.

551
00:31:26,680 --> 00:31:28,480
I mean, I can't remember the
exact lines.

552
00:31:28,480 --> 00:31:31,240
I I should?
Oh, it's it's such a great line

553
00:31:32,400 --> 00:31:37,520
only teenagers and fools presume
to know about another person's

554
00:31:37,520 --> 00:31:40,880
relationship, essentially.
What a great lie.

555
00:31:40,880 --> 00:31:42,160
Yeah.
And he says Kitty and I have

556
00:31:42,160 --> 00:31:45,560
been through, you know,
basically the fires of hell

557
00:31:45,560 --> 00:31:48,880
together and and it's a really
great moment.

558
00:31:48,880 --> 00:31:52,120
And it is one of those moments.
I remember, I remember some of

559
00:31:52,120 --> 00:31:55,040
my younger colleagues were were
complaining about that scene and

560
00:31:55,040 --> 00:31:57,840
I was like, some of you haven't
been married for 20 years.

561
00:31:57,840 --> 00:31:58,960
And it shows.
Yeah.

562
00:31:58,960 --> 00:32:03,280
I was like, I was like, that
actually is that was the thing I

563
00:32:03,280 --> 00:32:06,240
think that that last viewing of
the film where it really jumped

564
00:32:06,240 --> 00:32:07,760
out at me.
I was like, wait, is this my

565
00:32:07,760 --> 00:32:10,720
favorite scene in the movie now?
Like suddenly I was like

566
00:32:10,720 --> 00:32:15,520
incredibly moved by that moment.
And yeah.

567
00:32:15,520 --> 00:32:18,120
And it is it is one of those
moments where he kind of locks

568
00:32:18,120 --> 00:32:19,920
in as a human.
Now, of course, what's really

569
00:32:19,920 --> 00:32:22,440
going on or not, There are many
things that are going on.

570
00:32:22,440 --> 00:32:26,640
But one of the things like, I
think one of the reasons why we

571
00:32:26,640 --> 00:32:31,720
never really see him express his
true feelings is because he's

572
00:32:31,720 --> 00:32:34,200
conflicted about like what he's
created.

573
00:32:34,200 --> 00:32:42,200
And he's obviously mortified by
what, what's, you know, this,

574
00:32:42,200 --> 00:32:45,040
this weapon that that he's
basically the father of.

575
00:32:45,040 --> 00:32:47,800
I mean, everybody calls him
that, but he can't really he,

576
00:32:47,880 --> 00:32:52,960
he's never, he never expresses
regret over what happened in

577
00:32:52,960 --> 00:32:56,680
Hiroshima and Nagasaki or for
that matter, the legacy of what

578
00:32:56,680 --> 00:33:00,200
he's created.
So the film sort of has to do

579
00:33:00,200 --> 00:33:03,040
that for us, right?
The film has to sort of formally

580
00:33:03,760 --> 00:33:07,160
embody that regret because he
never really says anything.

581
00:33:07,160 --> 00:33:11,480
And that you know that that
final confrontation in the in

582
00:33:11,480 --> 00:33:13,320
the conference room where you
know the the.

583
00:33:14,320 --> 00:33:16,680
Moral scruples, yeah.
Yeah, I mean, it's it's

584
00:33:16,680 --> 00:33:20,800
basically mimics what happens
during his speech after

585
00:33:20,800 --> 00:33:24,240
Hiroshima.
You know, we're flashing light

586
00:33:24,240 --> 00:33:28,960
comes and, you know, and you got
the you got the meme of being

587
00:33:28,960 --> 00:33:32,240
questioned, which is a great
meme, by the way, just such a

588
00:33:32,240 --> 00:33:35,520
perfect meme.
But but really what's happening

589
00:33:35,520 --> 00:33:38,960
there is he's being confronted.
I mean, those are not the

590
00:33:38,960 --> 00:33:43,080
questions that that, that, that
that lawyer asked them.

591
00:33:43,360 --> 00:33:45,400
Those are the questions he's
asking himself.

592
00:33:45,400 --> 00:33:47,200
Absolutely.
Well, and to your point too

593
00:33:47,200 --> 00:33:51,320
about the character of Kitty,
it's not really revealed until

594
00:33:51,320 --> 00:33:56,040
that final act of the film just
how perceptive she is into his

595
00:33:56,040 --> 00:33:59,800
inner world.
And their very last interaction

596
00:33:59,800 --> 00:34:03,920
in the film with dialogue is
when he comes home basically

597
00:34:03,920 --> 00:34:05,360
after losing his security
clearance.

598
00:34:05,360 --> 00:34:07,320
She's Outback looking at the
house.

599
00:34:07,320 --> 00:34:08,600
They're probably going to have
to give up.

600
00:34:08,600 --> 00:34:11,760
She has tears in her eyes, and
she just wheels around and says,

601
00:34:12,679 --> 00:34:16,120
did you think that if you let
them tar and feather you and

602
00:34:16,120 --> 00:34:18,800
basically turn you into a
martyr, that the world would

603
00:34:18,800 --> 00:34:22,040
forgive what you did?
That's not how it works.

604
00:34:22,040 --> 00:34:26,040
And yet it cuts back to him.
And his tacit admission is like,

605
00:34:26,159 --> 00:34:29,480
well, we'll see.
Like basically saying that's

606
00:34:29,480 --> 00:34:32,639
exactly what I did because I am
so haunted by the actions that I

607
00:34:32,639 --> 00:34:34,120
took.
Yeah.

608
00:34:34,120 --> 00:34:36,440
The whole reason I brought this
up guys is that I, I really do

609
00:34:36,440 --> 00:34:41,520
think that third hour received.
It was so funny to watch film

610
00:34:41,520 --> 00:34:45,760
Twitter for like 2 months after
the movie came out, received so

611
00:34:45,760 --> 00:34:49,520
much shit from people as like
the movie was over at the two

612
00:34:49,520 --> 00:34:51,159
hour mark.
The movie dragged on.

613
00:34:51,159 --> 00:34:52,679
That third hour is so
unnecessary.

614
00:34:53,080 --> 00:34:56,639
And then slowly but but surely
people were like, Oh no, it's

615
00:34:56,639 --> 00:34:58,880
not only just the key to the
whole movie, it's actually the

616
00:34:58,880 --> 00:35:00,800
best hour of the whole movie
too.

617
00:35:01,640 --> 00:35:06,160
And when you start to understand
that his relationship with the

618
00:35:06,160 --> 00:35:09,720
Florence Pew character, his, you
know, associations with his own

619
00:35:10,760 --> 00:35:16,480
party and every little
peccadillo that he had, it comes

620
00:35:16,480 --> 00:35:20,040
back around in the third act.
Because from the very beginning,

621
00:35:20,040 --> 00:35:22,520
it's revealed that the United
States government was aware of

622
00:35:22,520 --> 00:35:24,800
all these things.
And we're pulling these levers

623
00:35:25,200 --> 00:35:30,560
to keep him under their thumb.
I think, you know, for me, I've

624
00:35:30,560 --> 00:35:33,200
always compared it to JFKI.
Know a lot of people compare it

625
00:35:33,200 --> 00:35:36,400
to the film JFK.
I really do still think that's

626
00:35:36,400 --> 00:35:41,440
the best comparison point for
this movie because it truly

627
00:35:41,440 --> 00:35:46,400
focuses everything in on that
kind of conspiratorial aspect

628
00:35:46,920 --> 00:35:51,240
and how honestly what blew me
away this time is how

629
00:35:51,240 --> 00:35:54,720
deceptively simple the point of
the movie ends up being.

630
00:35:55,120 --> 00:35:57,600
Like the name of the book this
movie is based on is American

631
00:35:57,600 --> 00:36:00,440
Prometheus, and at the very
beginning of the film you get

632
00:36:00,440 --> 00:36:03,800
the title card that talks about
Prometheus gave fire and then he

633
00:36:03,800 --> 00:36:05,360
has a reward.
They chained him to a rock for

634
00:36:05,360 --> 00:36:07,840
all eternity.
And then after you've seen the

635
00:36:07,840 --> 00:36:10,880
movie like five times, you're
like, oh, that really is all

636
00:36:10,880 --> 00:36:14,200
this movie's about.
I like you kind of go through

637
00:36:14,200 --> 00:36:16,960
the bell curve of like, no, this
has to be more complicated

638
00:36:16,960 --> 00:36:20,840
because it's a Christopher Nolan
movie and it is a very complex

639
00:36:20,840 --> 00:36:23,480
movie in the way that it's
intricately put together.

640
00:36:23,480 --> 00:36:26,840
But at the end of the day,
that's exactly what the movie's

641
00:36:26,840 --> 00:36:28,680
about.
He he tells it to you up front

642
00:36:28,680 --> 00:36:30,800
and then he shows you exactly
how they did it to him.

643
00:36:31,520 --> 00:36:35,280
The the you, you're absolutely
right.

644
00:36:36,040 --> 00:36:41,760
What is the exact wording of the
Prometheus the Prometheus intro

645
00:36:41,760 --> 00:36:43,760
in the movie?
Do you have it in front of?

646
00:36:44,120 --> 00:36:44,640
You.
I don't.

647
00:36:44,640 --> 00:36:48,840
I don't.
But I, you know, I think it says

648
00:36:48,840 --> 00:36:52,440
something like Prometheus stole
fire from the gods and gave it

649
00:36:52,560 --> 00:36:54,080
to to man or something like
that.

650
00:36:54,160 --> 00:36:57,000
Are you ready?
Prometheus stole fire from the

651
00:36:57,000 --> 00:37:00,080
gods and gave it to man.
For this, he was chained to a

652
00:37:00,080 --> 00:37:06,160
rock and tortured for eternity.
Note the Note the use of passive

653
00:37:06,160 --> 00:37:08,520
tense.
It's the.

654
00:37:08,600 --> 00:37:09,840
It's the.
It's the tense.

655
00:37:10,000 --> 00:37:15,080
It's the, it's the special New
York Times tense, you know, when

656
00:37:15,080 --> 00:37:17,520
talking about distasteful
things.

657
00:37:17,520 --> 00:37:22,640
But in this case, I think what
it really is is for this.

658
00:37:22,640 --> 00:37:26,080
He was chained.
We don't know who chained him.

659
00:37:26,960 --> 00:37:28,440
And the truth is everybody
chained them.

660
00:37:28,600 --> 00:37:31,800
And the truth is also he chained
himself, right?

661
00:37:31,840 --> 00:37:34,920
I mean, in the case of this one,
but not Prometheus, the myth.

662
00:37:34,920 --> 00:37:39,560
But in the case of in the case
of Oppenheimer, he is clearly

663
00:37:39,560 --> 00:37:42,040
torturing himself.
I mean, he is tortured.

664
00:37:42,800 --> 00:37:45,920
And throughout the film, we see
these, you know, these snippets

665
00:37:46,080 --> 00:37:50,240
of, you know, these almost like
experimental scenes of sort of,

666
00:37:50,800 --> 00:37:53,320
I mean, they start off in the
first part of the film as these

667
00:37:53,320 --> 00:37:56,760
experimental little interludes
where we see kind of almost

668
00:37:56,760 --> 00:38:00,680
depictions of the, the quantum
world and the subatomic world.

669
00:38:00,680 --> 00:38:03,720
And these are things that
apparently Nolan knew right away

670
00:38:03,720 --> 00:38:06,080
that he wanted to do these.
And he, you know, like the first

671
00:38:06,080 --> 00:38:10,400
person he went to after his wife
with the script was his visual

672
00:38:10,400 --> 00:38:13,560
effect supervisor.
And he was just like, go out and

673
00:38:13,560 --> 00:38:17,280
create these for me.
And, and it's interesting to

674
00:38:17,280 --> 00:38:20,080
watch how they develop over the
course of the movie because

675
00:38:20,080 --> 00:38:22,400
they, you know, at first
they're, they're, they're

676
00:38:22,400 --> 00:38:25,480
beautiful, they're fascinating.
They're kind of wonderful and,

677
00:38:25,480 --> 00:38:28,920
and surreal and everything.
Over the course of the film,

678
00:38:28,920 --> 00:38:33,120
though, those, they become less
abstract and more really about

679
00:38:33,920 --> 00:38:38,600
destruction, right?
They become like ripples of of

680
00:38:38,960 --> 00:38:41,280
explosions on maps and things
like that.

681
00:38:43,240 --> 00:38:47,760
And so it becomes this more and
more destructive thing and it's

682
00:38:47,760 --> 00:38:50,840
clear that it's it's tormenting
him and the great, you know,

683
00:38:50,840 --> 00:38:53,920
that that great very final scene
of the film with him and

684
00:38:53,920 --> 00:38:56,880
Einstein.
When we think about where that

685
00:38:56,880 --> 00:38:59,200
fits in the timeline, I mean,
obviously that's a great way to

686
00:38:59,200 --> 00:39:01,880
kind of end the movie.
But if you think about it, that

687
00:39:02,000 --> 00:39:05,960
is happening many years earlier.
That's happening on the day he

688
00:39:05,960 --> 00:39:10,640
met straws, right?
And So what it also says,

689
00:39:11,320 --> 00:39:14,240
besides kind of being sort of
this like very scary and sad

690
00:39:14,240 --> 00:39:17,240
note to end it on and to make us
think about what comes next,

691
00:39:17,440 --> 00:39:21,800
what it's really saying is he
had this revelation years ago.

692
00:39:21,880 --> 00:39:25,600
And he's really like, he's been
torturing himself or letting

693
00:39:25,600 --> 00:39:31,600
other people torture him in part
because of a sense of penance

694
00:39:31,920 --> 00:39:35,600
and a sense of shame and a sense
of guilt that he does not really

695
00:39:35,600 --> 00:39:40,040
have the ability to really
properly express and eventually

696
00:39:40,040 --> 00:39:42,680
doesn't have the platform to
express really if he wanted to.

697
00:39:44,280 --> 00:39:47,360
Yeah, I think honestly, watching
at this time and seeing that

698
00:39:47,360 --> 00:39:51,120
very final moment and realizing
where it falls in the timeline,

699
00:39:51,680 --> 00:39:55,120
this is probably the closest
that Nolan has come to

700
00:39:55,120 --> 00:39:58,240
replicating the timeline of
Memento in a movie.

701
00:39:58,560 --> 00:40:02,080
I really do think, 'cause it's
kind of dead center in terms of

702
00:40:02,080 --> 00:40:07,760
the time span of the film and.
He holds that back as his final

703
00:40:07,760 --> 00:40:11,680
reveal for, I mean, obviously
for the impact of what's

704
00:40:11,680 --> 00:40:15,320
haunting Oppenheimer.
But in addition to that, like,

705
00:40:16,120 --> 00:40:18,920
it really helps Brad.
I think it really helps the RDJ

706
00:40:18,920 --> 00:40:22,400
performance quite a bit because
by the end of the movie, he's

707
00:40:22,400 --> 00:40:25,480
just like, it reminded me of our
conversation recently, Brad,

708
00:40:25,480 --> 00:40:29,040
about the Ed Begley character in
12 Angry Men.

709
00:40:29,480 --> 00:40:32,920
And when he's giving his final
like, you don't understand these

710
00:40:32,920 --> 00:40:35,400
people and everyone just kind of
turns away from him.

711
00:40:35,640 --> 00:40:37,960
Because by the end of the movie,
the the Alden Ehrenreich

712
00:40:37,960 --> 00:40:41,280
character is just like I, I have
had it with everything you're

713
00:40:41,280 --> 00:40:44,240
saying about this stupid
interaction with Albert

714
00:40:44,240 --> 00:40:46,240
Einstein.
What if it wasn't even about

715
00:40:46,240 --> 00:40:48,800
you?
And you realize that this man's

716
00:40:48,800 --> 00:40:54,600
own ego and perception of a
slight is what set basically

717
00:40:54,600 --> 00:40:56,560
ruined Oppenheimer's career and
life.

718
00:40:57,600 --> 00:41:01,640
And what was actually being said
between them was something so

719
00:41:01,640 --> 00:41:04,600
much more horrific, so much more
haunting, so much bigger than

720
00:41:04,600 --> 00:41:06,000
anything that he could have
imagined.

721
00:41:06,000 --> 00:41:10,160
But I love that he did kind of
save that as the final reveal.

722
00:41:10,160 --> 00:41:12,920
It's something that obviously
has been implied by the movie

723
00:41:12,920 --> 00:41:17,040
The whole time, but it it's the
John G revelation of the

724
00:41:17,040 --> 00:41:21,120
Oppenheimer narrative.
It's amazing to me that that

725
00:41:21,120 --> 00:41:23,720
people didn't like the last hour
of this movie.

726
00:41:24,320 --> 00:41:27,440
I like, I didn't know that until
you said it, Bob, because the

727
00:41:27,440 --> 00:41:31,560
first time I saw it and this
time around, I feel like that

728
00:41:31,560 --> 00:41:39,120
last hour I I guess I am often a
person who tries to avoid the

729
00:41:39,120 --> 00:41:42,680
Internet as much as possible,
and therefore I often.

730
00:41:43,560 --> 00:41:47,040
Thanks, Bilga.
But what that means is I often

731
00:41:47,040 --> 00:41:49,960
get to go into movies somewhat
blind.

732
00:41:50,360 --> 00:41:54,200
And so for me, I I really didn't
know everything about the movie.

733
00:41:54,200 --> 00:41:56,840
I knew Bilga, that you said
people left it crying.

734
00:41:56,840 --> 00:42:00,640
So I figured it had some sort of
emotional depth to it, but I

735
00:42:00,640 --> 00:42:05,760
didn't know if it was much more
than a exploration of the atomic

736
00:42:05,760 --> 00:42:09,240
bomb and its creation and its
effect on the world.

737
00:42:09,600 --> 00:42:15,040
So for me, we finished the two
hour Marks and I'm like, OK, we

738
00:42:15,040 --> 00:42:18,640
have an hour left of this movie.
Where is Nolan taking me?

739
00:42:19,080 --> 00:42:23,360
And to realize that the entire
first two hours is not just an

740
00:42:23,360 --> 00:42:26,080
exploration of the creation of
the bomb, although it does

741
00:42:26,200 --> 00:42:30,320
accomplish that.
It's really an exploration of

742
00:42:30,520 --> 00:42:37,960
how two men look at the world
and the vast scope in which

743
00:42:38,200 --> 00:42:41,960
Oppenheimer looks at the world
and, and the the layers of

744
00:42:41,960 --> 00:42:46,280
humanity that he will be
affecting by his choices versus

745
00:42:46,280 --> 00:42:49,720
the way that Strauss looks at
the world in such a narrow

746
00:42:49,720 --> 00:42:54,760
minded personal mindset.
Like I, I, I don't know if this

747
00:42:54,760 --> 00:42:58,440
is like super deep or not, but
for Oppenheimer, it feels like

748
00:42:58,440 --> 00:43:02,600
he looks at the world through a
lens that sees every color of

749
00:43:02,600 --> 00:43:06,000
the spectrum and Strauss just
views the world in black and

750
00:43:06,000 --> 00:43:08,080
white.
Everything is about him or not

751
00:43:08,080 --> 00:43:10,440
about him.
It either helps him or doesn't.

752
00:43:10,440 --> 00:43:14,640
And so like, I like the third
hour of this movie completely

753
00:43:14,640 --> 00:43:18,520
gives it all of the importance
and all of the weight and

754
00:43:18,520 --> 00:43:22,040
gravitas that it needed.
Black and white, you say?

755
00:43:24,160 --> 00:43:27,840
Who knew?
Guys, I think this is a perfect

756
00:43:27,840 --> 00:43:30,600
place for us to press pause.
Brad and I are going to go try

757
00:43:30,600 --> 00:43:32,960
some whiskey, and when we come
back, we should talk a little

758
00:43:32,960 --> 00:43:35,040
bit about the performances in
this movie.

759
00:43:35,600 --> 00:43:38,600
We've gone almost an hour now
without talking about Killian

760
00:43:38,600 --> 00:43:42,200
Murphy or RDJ or any of these
phenomenal actors.

761
00:43:42,440 --> 00:43:44,920
So Brad, let's go drink this Old
Fitzgerald and then we'll come

762
00:43:44,920 --> 00:43:46,360
back and join Bilga.
What do you say?

763
00:43:46,960 --> 00:43:55,000
Let's get to it.
All right, so today we are

764
00:43:55,000 --> 00:43:58,760
checking out Old Fitzgerald
Bottled in Bond.

765
00:43:59,400 --> 00:44:01,840
Brad, this is not the first time
we've had Old Fitzgerald

766
00:44:01,840 --> 00:44:04,000
together.
If you recall, we had it on a

767
00:44:04,000 --> 00:44:08,200
bonus episode a long time ago
with our friend Scott Sauer when

768
00:44:08,200 --> 00:44:11,640
we went to visit his bar crafted
cocktail in Wadsworth.

769
00:44:11,640 --> 00:44:14,600
OH, he was just pulling down
stuff for us to try.

770
00:44:14,600 --> 00:44:18,000
I think we did an on air review
of that Old Fitzgerald, but

771
00:44:18,000 --> 00:44:20,640
because it was a bonus episode,
we haven't really given it a

772
00:44:20,640 --> 00:44:25,400
full review and it continues to
be a super popular whiskey.

773
00:44:25,800 --> 00:44:28,360
Now, before I go any further
into my spiel about what this

774
00:44:28,360 --> 00:44:31,880
whiskey is, do you even remember
drinking that Old Fitzgerald?

775
00:44:32,360 --> 00:44:41,120
No, not at all, my friend.
So this is a semi annual release

776
00:44:41,120 --> 00:44:43,680
from Heaven Hill.
It was an old brand that died

777
00:44:43,680 --> 00:44:46,640
off and then they resurrected it
as a super premium brand, which

778
00:44:46,640 --> 00:44:48,480
is really funny because it
didn't used to be a super

779
00:44:48,480 --> 00:44:51,120
premium brand, but hey, that's
this is the world we live in

780
00:44:51,120 --> 00:44:54,000
now.
The first couple releases of Old

781
00:44:54,000 --> 00:44:58,680
Fitzgerald came out at like 10
years old, 17 years old and 19

782
00:44:58,680 --> 00:45:01,680
years old and I don't know if
they just ran out of really well

783
00:45:01,680 --> 00:45:05,120
aged stock, but this one clocks
in at 8 years old, Brad.

784
00:45:05,320 --> 00:45:09,040
So they have dramatically
decreased the age statement on

785
00:45:09,040 --> 00:45:12,040
this bad boy, not necessarily
the price point.

786
00:45:12,280 --> 00:45:18,200
It still retails for $110 MSRP.
Fun fact, you cannot get it for

787
00:45:18,240 --> 00:45:21,000
$110 MSRP.
Nope.

788
00:45:21,800 --> 00:45:25,840
We're drinking the Fall 2023
release, not the 24 that just

789
00:45:25,840 --> 00:45:30,000
came out because we are not on
Heaven Hills distribution list.

790
00:45:30,080 --> 00:45:33,080
Heaven Hill.
Let's come on man, remedy this.

791
00:45:33,080 --> 00:45:35,560
What are you doing?
We had to get this year old

792
00:45:35,560 --> 00:45:37,480
sample from our friend Zach
Johnston.

793
00:45:37,480 --> 00:45:40,040
But you know what?
I'm OK with that because as we

794
00:45:40,040 --> 00:45:43,920
always say on film and whiskey,
we will give a brand one try

795
00:45:43,920 --> 00:45:46,760
because the average consumer
will give a brand one try.

796
00:45:47,200 --> 00:45:50,000
I shouldn't have to drink the
most recent version of this to

797
00:45:50,000 --> 00:45:53,760
know if generally speaking, Old
Fitzgerald is good or bad.

798
00:45:54,840 --> 00:45:56,840
Last thing I'll say about this
and then we can dive in Brad.

799
00:45:56,840 --> 00:46:02,760
The mash bill is 68% corn, 20%
wheat, 12% malted barley, which

800
00:46:02,760 --> 00:46:07,720
is the exact same mash bill that
is used by Luxe Row for the

801
00:46:07,720 --> 00:46:10,640
Rebel line because they used to
source it from Heaven Hill.

802
00:46:10,880 --> 00:46:15,400
So we are essentially drinking 8
year old Rebel bourbon here.

803
00:46:15,480 --> 00:46:19,600
Let's see if it if it stacks up
to our opinion of Rebel as we

804
00:46:19,600 --> 00:46:23,960
dive in, Brad.
Yeah, the the nose on this bad

805
00:46:23,960 --> 00:46:26,280
boy.
Oh my gosh, dude.

806
00:46:26,520 --> 00:46:30,640
It's like a fresh, freshly
opened cherry soda.

807
00:46:31,920 --> 00:46:35,400
There's caramel, there's red
licorice, there's vanilla.

808
00:46:35,680 --> 00:46:38,840
It takes on some really nice
almond notes near the back end.

809
00:46:38,840 --> 00:46:44,160
Once I've given it a few noses.
This is a really nice nose.

810
00:46:44,160 --> 00:46:46,720
I, I really like it a lot.
I'm going to give it an 8 out of

811
00:46:46,720 --> 00:46:48,920
10.
You know what, I was at an 8 as

812
00:46:48,920 --> 00:46:52,000
well, but I think I'm going to
come up on it after hearing your

813
00:46:52,040 --> 00:46:55,080
nosing notes because this is
kind of like a choose your own

814
00:46:55,080 --> 00:46:58,760
adventure novel.
Like I took the path of, oh,

815
00:46:58,760 --> 00:47:00,080
there's something really bright
here.

816
00:47:00,080 --> 00:47:03,280
Let's chase that rabbit trail.
And I got a really nice like

817
00:47:03,280 --> 00:47:07,720
summer fruit bourbon.
I got a ton of Granny Smith

818
00:47:07,720 --> 00:47:10,600
apple when I first poured this
out, like really tart green

819
00:47:10,600 --> 00:47:12,720
apple.
I got some cinnamon stick in

820
00:47:12,720 --> 00:47:15,840
there as well.
But then I, I got notes of Peach

821
00:47:15,840 --> 00:47:18,320
and pear and things I don't
typically get on a bourbon.

822
00:47:18,320 --> 00:47:21,200
And I was like, oh man, a nice
summary bourbon.

823
00:47:21,880 --> 00:47:24,400
And then I heard everything you
said and I was like, oh, there

824
00:47:24,400 --> 00:47:26,240
is almond on this.
This is wild.

825
00:47:26,240 --> 00:47:29,640
So I think this is a much more
complex nose than even I

826
00:47:29,640 --> 00:47:33,640
initially gravitated toward.
I'm going to give this an 8.5

827
00:47:33,640 --> 00:47:37,040
out of 10 on the nose.
When you get into the palate, I

828
00:47:37,040 --> 00:47:41,280
think that that cherry soda,
cherry cola sticks around.

829
00:47:41,560 --> 00:47:45,640
It's very effervescent and
bubbly and there's tons of that

830
00:47:45,640 --> 00:47:48,640
cherry flavor there.
The almond comes through really

831
00:47:48,640 --> 00:47:52,920
strongly for me on the palate
and I think that it almost turns

832
00:47:52,920 --> 00:47:58,160
into like this caramel Y peanut
brittle, little bit of nuttiness

833
00:47:58,160 --> 00:48:01,320
there that I like a lot.
I'm going to come up from my

834
00:48:01,320 --> 00:48:03,840
nose score and give it an 8 1/2
here.

835
00:48:04,720 --> 00:48:05,160
You know what?
Yeah.

836
00:48:05,160 --> 00:48:08,760
Surprisingly for me, it stayed
in that kind of brighter camp.

837
00:48:08,760 --> 00:48:11,680
It reminds me of, like the
bourbon equivalent of an Irish

838
00:48:11,680 --> 00:48:13,440
whiskey.
Tons of.

839
00:48:13,440 --> 00:48:18,800
I get, like, lime zest on this.
I get a lot of Peach and pear,

840
00:48:18,800 --> 00:48:21,840
which I already mentioned.
I think if there's anything

841
00:48:21,840 --> 00:48:24,880
that's really going to Ding it
for me here, number one, it's

842
00:48:24,880 --> 00:48:28,280
pretty thin on the mouthfeel.
Like this is not a very viscous

843
00:48:28,680 --> 00:48:32,520
whiskey at all and at only 8
years old I don't think it's

844
00:48:32,520 --> 00:48:34,800
over oaked.
But the way the oak presents

845
00:48:34,800 --> 00:48:37,960
itself is kind of like when we
when we talk about like that

846
00:48:37,960 --> 00:48:40,880
cigarette ash taste at the very
back of the pallet.

847
00:48:40,880 --> 00:48:44,680
For me it turned that like not
just char but bitter ashy

848
00:48:44,680 --> 00:48:46,880
flavor.
So it I'm going to knock it down

849
00:48:46,880 --> 00:48:52,040
just to 7.5 on the balance on
the finish though, really

850
00:48:52,040 --> 00:48:53,800
pleasant.
I think most of that bitterness

851
00:48:53,800 --> 00:48:56,720
goes away.
It stays just enough to let you

852
00:48:56,720 --> 00:48:59,520
know that there is like a char
element there.

853
00:48:59,840 --> 00:49:03,840
But I keep getting these nice
sweet summer fruit waves kind of

854
00:49:04,080 --> 00:49:06,400
coming back up my palate.
It's really mouth watering

855
00:49:06,400 --> 00:49:08,560
finish and it's medium to long
lasting.

856
00:49:08,800 --> 00:49:10,400
I'll give it an 8 out of 10 on
the finish.

857
00:49:11,920 --> 00:49:15,680
I think the finish is where this
loses some traction for me.

858
00:49:16,120 --> 00:49:19,120
I think that the cherry
continues through, the almonds

859
00:49:19,120 --> 00:49:21,920
are there.
It gets a little bit cinnamony

860
00:49:22,280 --> 00:49:25,920
for me at the end.
But the issue is what you said,

861
00:49:25,920 --> 00:49:29,120
Bob.
It is thin and it does not last

862
00:49:29,120 --> 00:49:32,120
very long.
The, the, the really nice

863
00:49:32,120 --> 00:49:35,480
flavors that we got earlier just
don't stick around for long

864
00:49:35,480 --> 00:49:39,280
enough to for me to enjoy them.
So I, I think I'm going to drop

865
00:49:39,280 --> 00:49:42,760
to a 7 1/2 on the finish and I'm
actually only going to give it a

866
00:49:42,760 --> 00:49:47,760
7 on the balance.
I think that there's not enough

867
00:49:47,760 --> 00:49:51,760
complexity here and it it's a
bit of an up and down

868
00:49:51,760 --> 00:49:57,480
experience, albeit like in the
upper tier of what a whiskey can

869
00:49:57,480 --> 00:49:58,880
do.
So I'm not saying that it's a

870
00:49:58,880 --> 00:50:02,080
poorly made whiskey.
I'm just saying that I I wish

871
00:50:02,080 --> 00:50:04,240
there was a little more going on
here.

872
00:50:04,680 --> 00:50:06,640
Yeah, I'm also going to give it
a 7 on balance.

873
00:50:06,640 --> 00:50:11,880
I think that it's weird
individually the categories are

874
00:50:11,880 --> 00:50:15,120
at like a 7 1/2 or above.
But if you just kind of ask me,

875
00:50:15,120 --> 00:50:18,160
like in general, how do you feel
about this whiskey?

876
00:50:18,520 --> 00:50:21,120
It's good.
Like it's certainly not going to

877
00:50:21,120 --> 00:50:22,880
get a very good value score for
me.

878
00:50:23,160 --> 00:50:26,960
But even besides that, I think
most of the Rebel products we've

879
00:50:26,960 --> 00:50:30,520
had are just generally tastier
than this one is.

880
00:50:31,000 --> 00:50:35,880
And I think that it it can't
decide if it wants to be summary

881
00:50:35,880 --> 00:50:38,640
or autumn autumnal.
It can't decide if it wants to

882
00:50:38,640 --> 00:50:41,440
be like really heavily oaked or
really sweet.

883
00:50:41,480 --> 00:50:44,920
And so it kind of does all of
those things OK, but none of

884
00:50:44,920 --> 00:50:48,200
them really, really well.
So it's a 7 for me.

885
00:50:48,280 --> 00:50:51,440
And that's where things get
really weird because the value

886
00:50:51,440 --> 00:50:57,520
on this is interesting at $110,
MSRPI think this is like a six

887
00:50:57,520 --> 00:51:00,440
out of 10 value.
But if you look for this

888
00:51:00,440 --> 00:51:03,920
specific, what do you want to
call it vintage this, this

889
00:51:03,920 --> 00:51:07,120
release, it's like $400.00 that
it's going for now.

890
00:51:07,760 --> 00:51:09,840
Yeah.
And I was going to say, Bob, you

891
00:51:10,000 --> 00:51:15,040
you can consider old fits bottle
and bond in the luxury realm.

892
00:51:15,320 --> 00:51:19,400
Like the chances of you getting
it at 110 are astronomically

893
00:51:19,400 --> 00:51:21,120
low.
And therefore you're going to

894
00:51:21,120 --> 00:51:24,000
have to get on the secondary and
you're either going to have to

895
00:51:24,000 --> 00:51:28,360
trade some of your premium
whiskeys to get it or just buy

896
00:51:28,360 --> 00:51:31,000
it outright for a lot of money.
Not not that I'm saying we

897
00:51:31,000 --> 00:51:33,560
should trade whiskey that's
illegal to it.

898
00:51:33,560 --> 00:51:36,080
It's bad.
Now I will say though, in in its

899
00:51:36,080 --> 00:51:40,040
defense, I don't think 400 is
the price point we should be

900
00:51:40,040 --> 00:51:43,720
measuring it on because there's
been a year since this came out

901
00:51:43,720 --> 00:51:45,520
for all those bottles to get
snatched up.

902
00:51:45,800 --> 00:51:47,840
I do think it like, let's set it
at 200.

903
00:51:47,840 --> 00:51:51,200
Let's say that you're going to
pay double of what MSRP is to

904
00:51:51,200 --> 00:51:54,480
get your hands on this bottle
even at that price point.

905
00:51:54,960 --> 00:51:57,840
Like there's just no way dude.
This is not worth $200.

906
00:51:58,800 --> 00:52:02,560
Yeah, no, the like I said, we
kind of have the luxury category

907
00:52:02,560 --> 00:52:05,000
for a reason.
Like if you're going to spend

908
00:52:05,000 --> 00:52:08,960
200 plus dollars on a whiskey,
you ought to know what you're

909
00:52:08,960 --> 00:52:12,400
getting into.
And frankly, this just does not

910
00:52:12,760 --> 00:52:16,840
measure up to other luxury
expressions that we've had.

911
00:52:17,240 --> 00:52:19,200
I'll give it a four out of 10.
Yeah, I'm going to give it a

912
00:52:19,200 --> 00:52:20,480
three out of 10.
I like.

913
00:52:20,480 --> 00:52:24,120
I just maybe I could have gotten
caught up in the hype on this a

914
00:52:24,120 --> 00:52:26,480
year ago.
It's not happening today.

915
00:52:26,640 --> 00:52:28,600
It's just not going to
everything.

916
00:52:28,600 --> 00:52:31,920
I'll say it like this,
everything we've had in the last

917
00:52:31,920 --> 00:52:36,080
few months from Bardstown
Bourbon Company which at MSRP is

918
00:52:36,080 --> 00:52:39,640
priced at like 160 and there
really isn't a secondary market

919
00:52:39,640 --> 00:52:42,280
on Bardstown stuff.
Everything we've tried from

920
00:52:42,280 --> 00:52:44,920
Bardstown is better than this.
Fair.

921
00:52:45,800 --> 00:52:49,400
Yeah, I mean, I mean, I mean,
this is this is really good.

922
00:52:49,920 --> 00:52:54,040
You know, my, my final score is
coming to a 35 out of 50, which

923
00:52:54,040 --> 00:52:59,120
means I was at a 31 out of 40
for just the flavor categories.

924
00:52:59,120 --> 00:53:03,680
So I like don't get me wrong,
Old Fitz Bottled and Bond Fall

925
00:53:03,680 --> 00:53:08,160
2023 release is a solid whiskey
that I enjoy drinking.

926
00:53:08,520 --> 00:53:12,680
Is it one that I would pay this
much money for or pay for a pour

927
00:53:12,680 --> 00:53:15,680
of at the bar?
Definitely not.

928
00:53:16,400 --> 00:53:19,280
We picked this match up in part
because it it comes from the

929
00:53:19,280 --> 00:53:22,320
year and general time of release
of our movie, so you could have

930
00:53:22,320 --> 00:53:25,280
been enjoying a nice pour of
this if you snuck it into the

931
00:53:25,280 --> 00:53:26,880
movie theater to watch
Oppenheimer.

932
00:53:27,240 --> 00:53:29,880
I'm not saying I did that by any
stretch of the imagination.

933
00:53:29,960 --> 00:53:33,640
We're just talking about all all
sorts of illicit activities.

934
00:53:33,960 --> 00:53:38,160
Yeah, like you, Brad, I had it
at a 31 out of 40.

935
00:53:38,160 --> 00:53:42,080
It is at a 34 out of 50 for me.
So we're coming to an average of

936
00:53:42,080 --> 00:53:46,320
a 34.5 out of 50 or a 69 out of
100.

937
00:53:46,440 --> 00:53:49,000
Nice.
I do not recommend this.

938
00:53:49,360 --> 00:53:51,920
I think if you really if you
want to celebrate with a pour of

939
00:53:51,920 --> 00:53:56,480
something nice, I understand the
impulse, but I would direct that

940
00:53:56,720 --> 00:54:00,920
impulse to a different bourbon.
Yeah, I, I think I'm with you,

941
00:54:00,920 --> 00:54:03,240
Bob.
If you're able to get a pour of

942
00:54:03,240 --> 00:54:08,680
it from a friend, like it's 100%
worth trying, but sure, spending

943
00:54:08,680 --> 00:54:11,880
your own money on it.
Yeah, that's a tough one.

944
00:54:11,880 --> 00:54:13,240
Yeah.
I just think it's set at a price

945
00:54:13,240 --> 00:54:16,000
point where I I will never
really be able to justify it.

946
00:54:16,360 --> 00:54:18,400
Good whiskey, not worth the
price.

947
00:54:19,080 --> 00:54:22,080
Yep.
Brad, just like the atomic bomb,

948
00:54:22,080 --> 00:54:25,040
honestly, you know, it wasn't
worth the cost.

949
00:54:25,560 --> 00:54:28,360
That's what I'm saying.
What it there is a moral

950
00:54:28,360 --> 00:54:30,240
quandary to drinking this
whiskey?

951
00:54:31,080 --> 00:54:33,960
Yeah.
I mean, that's kind of unlike

952
00:54:33,960 --> 00:54:37,440
the atomic program though.
Like there was no moral quandary

953
00:54:37,440 --> 00:54:39,480
there, no.
No, no, no, no, not at all.

954
00:54:39,640 --> 00:54:41,040
All right, man.
Let's get back into talking

955
00:54:41,040 --> 00:54:42,320
about Oppenheimer.
What do you say?

956
00:54:43,000 --> 00:54:50,120
Let's get to it.
All right, everybody.

957
00:54:50,120 --> 00:54:55,360
That was Old Fitzgerald Bottled
and Bond 2023 fall release.

958
00:54:55,720 --> 00:54:58,720
Bob, That is a long name for a
whiskey.

959
00:54:59,240 --> 00:55:03,120
Yeah, absolutely, man.
In fact, it seems like it goes

960
00:55:03,120 --> 00:55:06,560
pretty well with this three hour
long movie, which ironically

961
00:55:06,560 --> 00:55:08,320
only has one word in the title,
Brad.

962
00:55:08,800 --> 00:55:12,200
But I'm vamping at this point
because I'm I've been trying to

963
00:55:12,200 --> 00:55:15,920
hold off on my excitement, but I
can do it no longer because it

964
00:55:15,920 --> 00:55:19,560
is time for our favorite game
which we play every single week.

965
00:55:20,440 --> 00:55:22,280
We call it 2 facts and a
falsehood, Brad.

966
00:55:23,120 --> 00:55:28,880
Is going to try to stump your
ball 2 are right and what is

967
00:55:29,000 --> 00:55:34,040
wrong 2 facts and a falsehood. 2
Facts and a Falsehood is the

968
00:55:34,040 --> 00:55:37,360
part of the show where Brad
presents me with three items

969
00:55:37,680 --> 00:55:41,200
about the making of this film,
one of which is a complete lie,

970
00:55:41,560 --> 00:55:43,920
and I have to determine which
one that is.

971
00:55:44,440 --> 00:55:46,560
The slate has been wiped clean,
Brad.

972
00:55:46,560 --> 00:55:49,920
We're back to AA0 record right
now.

973
00:55:51,080 --> 00:55:53,680
It's like that time of the year
every year where we hope and

974
00:55:53,680 --> 00:55:56,000
pray that the Cleveland Browns
will not disappoint us.

975
00:55:56,280 --> 00:55:59,800
And it's a glorious time.
Week 1 is always glorious.

976
00:55:59,800 --> 00:56:03,120
Thus far, the Cleveland Browns
look like they're going to win

977
00:56:03,120 --> 00:56:06,400
four or five games, so.
Not looking good, man.

978
00:56:07,640 --> 00:56:09,400
Hopefully I don't follow their
path.

979
00:56:09,400 --> 00:56:10,760
Now, folks, here's how this
works.

980
00:56:11,680 --> 00:56:15,320
If we have a guest on the show,
which we do today, and if I

981
00:56:15,320 --> 00:56:18,760
enlist that guest's help, which
spoiler alert, I'm going to do

982
00:56:18,760 --> 00:56:23,840
because Bilga is an encyclopedia
of Oppenheimer at this point, if

983
00:56:23,840 --> 00:56:27,560
we get the question correct, if
we pinpoint Brad's falsehood, I

984
00:56:27,560 --> 00:56:32,120
get one win in the win column.
But if we get it incorrect, I am

985
00:56:32,120 --> 00:56:37,120
served with two losses, so I am
doubly punished like an American

986
00:56:37,120 --> 00:56:40,400
Prometheus.
So Bilga, please just be

987
00:56:40,400 --> 00:56:43,400
prepared to to help tank my
record here if we get this

988
00:56:43,400 --> 00:56:45,640
wrong.
Dude starting off O and two

989
00:56:45,640 --> 00:56:47,800
would be tough it.
Really would, man.

990
00:56:48,320 --> 00:56:50,720
All right, hit me with those two
facts and a falsehood, Brad.

991
00:56:51,040 --> 00:56:55,120
Fact #1 Richard Feynman, played
by Jack Quaid, is shown playing

992
00:56:55,120 --> 00:56:57,320
bongos multiple times throughout
the film.

993
00:56:57,600 --> 00:57:00,400
In addition to his skill in
physics, Feynman was known as a

994
00:57:00,400 --> 00:57:06,440
prolific bongo player.
Fact #2 Edward Teller, played by

995
00:57:06,560 --> 00:57:09,880
Benny Safdie, went on to become
not just the father of the

996
00:57:09,880 --> 00:57:13,320
hydrogen bomb, but also an
accomplished pianist and

997
00:57:13,320 --> 00:57:16,920
composer, creating a well
regarded Piano Concerto in C

998
00:57:16,920 --> 00:57:21,200
minor.
Fact #3 Killian Murphy, already

999
00:57:21,200 --> 00:57:24,160
quite slender, had to lose a
significant amount of weight to

1000
00:57:24,160 --> 00:57:28,120
better approximate the real J
Robert Oppenheimer's appearance.

1001
00:57:28,360 --> 00:57:31,160
He also trained in horseback
riding to look more comfortable

1002
00:57:31,160 --> 00:57:38,480
in the saddle while galloping.
OK, Bill, go, here's where I'm

1003
00:57:38,480 --> 00:57:44,320
at #3 sounds the most plausible.
I mean, the the history of

1004
00:57:44,920 --> 00:57:47,120
Killian Murphy's weight loss has
been well documented.

1005
00:57:48,080 --> 00:57:52,320
I can assume that like the
horseback riding thing sounds

1006
00:57:52,320 --> 00:57:56,360
like it's a feasible thing.
So that leaves one and two, and

1007
00:57:56,360 --> 00:57:59,840
it just depends on how much I
know about physicists and their

1008
00:57:59,840 --> 00:58:05,120
random hobbies.
I have no idea, man.

1009
00:58:05,120 --> 00:58:09,840
If he had said like, hey, Jack
Quaid has a cool bongo fetish,

1010
00:58:09,840 --> 00:58:12,320
I'd be like, yeah, man, that
sounds great, let's do that.

1011
00:58:12,720 --> 00:58:15,080
But I don't know anything.
I mean, you know what I mean?

1012
00:58:15,200 --> 00:58:19,600
Like, sure, Feynman being into
the bongos.

1013
00:58:19,600 --> 00:58:23,440
I don't know, man.
I, I just, I have no guidance to

1014
00:58:23,440 --> 00:58:25,280
give you.
You are really on your own here.

1015
00:58:26,000 --> 00:58:28,960
I can tell you that the Feynman
bongo thing is correct.

1016
00:58:30,320 --> 00:58:32,240
Yeah, the Feynman bongo thing is
correct.

1017
00:58:33,560 --> 00:58:37,920
And the Killian Murphy, we heard
about his weight loss.

1018
00:58:38,560 --> 00:58:43,680
I, I, I know that he was deadly
terrified of riding the horses

1019
00:58:43,680 --> 00:58:47,320
in like the, the wide shots of
the movie.

1020
00:58:47,400 --> 00:58:50,240
Emily Blunt told me that like
when they did the scenes on the

1021
00:58:50,240 --> 00:58:53,200
horses, that he was just like,
really, really scared.

1022
00:58:54,480 --> 00:58:57,440
So I'm assuming that he did take
some riding lessons.

1023
00:58:58,120 --> 00:59:00,560
It's funny because I think I
mentioned this at some point,

1024
00:59:01,000 --> 00:59:06,040
maybe on Twitter or something
and, and, and people were like,

1025
00:59:06,040 --> 00:59:08,280
oh, but he rode horses on the TV
show.

1026
00:59:08,280 --> 00:59:10,440
And I was like, I, I don't know,
I don't, I don't watch the TV

1027
00:59:10,440 --> 00:59:16,760
show, but so I think the second
one, the second one, the thing,

1028
00:59:16,760 --> 00:59:17,720
here's the thing about the
second one.

1029
00:59:17,800 --> 00:59:21,280
It, it sounds good to me.
Like it sounds like it's a good

1030
00:59:21,280 --> 00:59:24,320
one, Brad, If it is in fact the
second one, that's the the

1031
00:59:24,320 --> 00:59:27,640
falsehood.
You did well with that one.

1032
00:59:27,640 --> 00:59:31,600
Although I wonder if maybe you
just took something from one of

1033
00:59:31,600 --> 00:59:34,880
the other physicists and, and,
and added it there.

1034
00:59:35,000 --> 00:59:39,600
But it was well done.
If that is what in fact the

1035
00:59:39,600 --> 00:59:40,960
right one because it sounds
right.

1036
00:59:41,000 --> 00:59:44,360
It does actually sound right
because Teller was into a whole

1037
00:59:44,360 --> 00:59:48,960
bunch of stuff.
So I get to be in the position

1038
00:59:48,960 --> 00:59:52,520
today of being the kid in the
group project that did no work

1039
00:59:52,520 --> 00:59:54,440
and hopefully gets a passing
grade.

1040
00:59:55,000 --> 01:00:00,560
It sounds like Bilga and by
proxy, me, right?

1041
01:00:00,960 --> 01:00:04,080
Well, it sounds like we're
locking in #2 as our falsehood.

1042
01:00:04,240 --> 01:00:08,240
So Brad, I will go ahead and put
all my eggs in that basket #2 is

1043
01:00:08,240 --> 01:00:11,920
the falsehood.
Bob and Bilga, you guys are

1044
01:00:11,920 --> 01:00:15,440
absolutely correct and the sting
of my loss doesn't even hurt

1045
01:00:15,440 --> 01:00:18,680
that bad because I I'm with you.
I thought that was a well

1046
01:00:18,680 --> 01:00:22,560
written falsehood.
I honestly, I was looking

1047
01:00:22,560 --> 01:00:26,840
through the scientists and I, I
was, I was telling Bob before we

1048
01:00:26,840 --> 01:00:30,840
started that I think this
viewing I was most fascinated by

1049
01:00:30,840 --> 01:00:34,760
Edward Teller, like his
character, his relationship with

1050
01:00:34,760 --> 01:00:36,400
Oppenheimer.
I was like, I want to see a

1051
01:00:36,400 --> 01:00:39,560
whole nother movie about him.
And so I started looking him up

1052
01:00:39,560 --> 01:00:43,720
and I saw that he was Hungarian.
And if I if I remember

1053
01:00:43,720 --> 01:00:47,480
correctly, I could be completely
wrong, but for some reason I was

1054
01:00:47,480 --> 01:00:51,320
thinking about the movie The
Pianist and I couldn't remember

1055
01:00:51,320 --> 01:00:55,280
if the main character in that I,
I believe Adrian Brody plays

1056
01:00:55,280 --> 01:00:57,120
him.
I couldn't remember if he's

1057
01:00:57,120 --> 01:01:00,160
Hungarian or not, but it
something clicked in my brain

1058
01:01:00,160 --> 01:01:02,600
and it made me think about piano
and that's where I was.

1059
01:01:03,240 --> 01:01:05,600
Well, there you go.
Also, Chopin was Hungarian,

1060
01:01:05,600 --> 01:01:07,600
right?
Yeah, exactly.

1061
01:01:07,640 --> 01:01:11,240
Yep.
Well, Brad, nice job on the

1062
01:01:11,240 --> 01:01:13,200
falsehood.
And and Brad, if I remember

1063
01:01:13,200 --> 01:01:16,800
correctly, the my last two
times, I, I, I found ways to

1064
01:01:16,800 --> 01:01:20,840
subtly insult your, your
questions, right, your

1065
01:01:20,840 --> 01:01:23,560
falsehood.
Bill guy, I do not blame you at

1066
01:01:23,560 --> 01:01:26,520
all.
If like when Bob insults me, I I

1067
01:01:26,520 --> 01:01:31,280
take it personally, but you have
such a knowledge of film history

1068
01:01:31,280 --> 01:01:35,200
and I like it's, it's fine.
I I'm just an average Joe making

1069
01:01:35,200 --> 01:01:38,520
up lies about movies.
Yeah, he's gone from insulting

1070
01:01:38,520 --> 01:01:41,680
you, Brad, to just kind of
patronizingly saying like, oh,

1071
01:01:41,680 --> 01:01:43,760
you did a good job.
Yeah, and I'm, I'll, I'll.

1072
01:01:43,760 --> 01:01:46,920
Turn that on the head.
Yeah, I'll, I'll gladly take

1073
01:01:46,920 --> 01:01:49,040
that.
Now, before we get too far

1074
01:01:49,040 --> 01:01:51,440
afield here, I just want to say
how cool is it, Brad, that we

1075
01:01:51,440 --> 01:01:56,320
have someone on the show saying
Emily Blunt told me that Killian

1076
01:01:56,320 --> 01:01:58,200
Murphy like, yeah, that's pretty
wild.

1077
01:01:58,200 --> 01:02:00,200
First hand knowledge.
That's incredible.

1078
01:02:00,480 --> 01:02:03,800
Dude, Emily Blunt, you said that
we were going to get into

1079
01:02:03,800 --> 01:02:09,360
performances here.
Sure, the look of Venom that she

1080
01:02:09,360 --> 01:02:14,120
gives Benny Safdie at the end of
this movie Oh yeah is freaking

1081
01:02:14,120 --> 01:02:17,200
priceless.
And they do such a great job

1082
01:02:17,440 --> 01:02:21,640
with the sort of like garish old
woman make up, you know, like a

1083
01:02:21,640 --> 01:02:24,520
woman who's been dyeing her hair
well past the point where she

1084
01:02:24,520 --> 01:02:26,440
should be dyeing it and the the
lip color.

1085
01:02:26,920 --> 01:02:30,200
And oh man, it is.
It's everything about that look

1086
01:02:30,200 --> 01:02:33,240
is perfect, guys.
Let's let this be the segue into

1087
01:02:33,240 --> 01:02:35,960
talking about the cast here.
And let's start at the top with

1088
01:02:35,960 --> 01:02:39,480
Killian Murphy, right?
He wins his Oscar in a manner

1089
01:02:39,480 --> 01:02:43,360
that broke my heart a little bit
because I really wanted to see

1090
01:02:43,920 --> 01:02:48,120
the like Katharine Hepburn,
Barbra Streisand tie with him

1091
01:02:48,120 --> 01:02:50,360
and Giamatti this year.
I thought Giamatti was just

1092
01:02:50,360 --> 01:02:53,320
freaking fantastic in the
holdovers, but it's an

1093
01:02:53,320 --> 01:02:56,920
undeniable performance and
obviously the physical

1094
01:02:56,920 --> 01:03:02,000
transformation is there, but his
ability to play the tortured

1095
01:03:02,000 --> 01:03:06,440
interior character, it is not an
easy part to play.

1096
01:03:06,800 --> 01:03:10,080
And obviously Nolan had him in
mind from the beginning, and I

1097
01:03:10,080 --> 01:03:13,800
think you can see why.
Yeah, I, I was just going to

1098
01:03:13,800 --> 01:03:16,000
say, I think for me it's his
eyes.

1099
01:03:16,640 --> 01:03:20,840
Like like it reminds me of like
an Ian McKellen like type of

1100
01:03:20,840 --> 01:03:25,720
talent to show so much with the
cameras like shoved up into your

1101
01:03:25,720 --> 01:03:31,520
face and to to allow you into
the soul of the character.

1102
01:03:31,960 --> 01:03:34,280
Oh my gosh, dude, what?
Like what?

1103
01:03:34,280 --> 01:03:37,320
A performance?
Yeah, I mean it.

1104
01:03:37,320 --> 01:03:41,040
It is a phenomenal performance.
I will say I did not think he

1105
01:03:41,040 --> 01:03:44,200
would win an Oscar for this.
I figured if the film was

1106
01:03:44,200 --> 01:03:46,080
successful, he would be
nominated.

1107
01:03:46,320 --> 01:03:50,400
It it felt in some ways almost
too subtle for kind of the

1108
01:03:50,400 --> 01:03:53,640
broader Academy to to you know,
they give awards for most

1109
01:03:53,640 --> 01:03:56,720
acting, not best acting, right?
That's the common knock against

1110
01:03:56,720 --> 01:03:59,800
them.
So I thought he'll be nominated,

1111
01:03:59,800 --> 01:04:03,960
but but I, I can't see a
consensus forming around a

1112
01:04:03,960 --> 01:04:07,200
performance like this because
it's so good, you know, like,

1113
01:04:07,360 --> 01:04:12,960
because it's so layered and, and
so much of it is just about like

1114
01:04:12,960 --> 01:04:15,280
just just what's behind his
eyes.

1115
01:04:15,680 --> 01:04:17,160
So I was very delighted that he
won.

1116
01:04:17,160 --> 01:04:20,760
But I also, I mean, look, these,
these, these people have not

1117
01:04:20,760 --> 01:04:23,600
given Paul Giamatti.
These people did not nominate

1118
01:04:23,600 --> 01:04:26,960
Paul Giamatti for sideways.
Like what is happening here?

1119
01:04:27,160 --> 01:04:28,840
I mean, and that's not a movie
that was like somehow

1120
01:04:28,840 --> 01:04:30,240
overlooked.
It was like a best picture

1121
01:04:30,240 --> 01:04:33,200
nominee.
Like what are you going to?

1122
01:04:34,200 --> 01:04:35,720
What?
What How?

1123
01:04:37,880 --> 01:04:40,280
What, what?
What is Paul Giamatti's Revenant

1124
01:04:40,280 --> 01:04:42,560
going to be?
How is he going to drag himself

1125
01:04:42,560 --> 01:04:44,600
to an Oscar?
I know it's going to, it's going

1126
01:04:44,600 --> 01:04:46,480
to be terrible.
It's going to, it's going to be

1127
01:04:46,480 --> 01:04:49,640
terrible.
I mean, because Giamatti's been

1128
01:04:49,640 --> 01:04:51,280
nominated for Cinderella Man,
right?

1129
01:04:51,680 --> 01:04:54,440
And is that it?
Is that?

1130
01:04:54,560 --> 01:04:56,280
I think that's it, I.
Think that's it?

1131
01:04:56,520 --> 01:04:59,240
Right, it certainly wasn't a
lady in the water.

1132
01:04:59,240 --> 01:05:00,800
I don't think he got a nod for
that one.

1133
01:05:00,840 --> 01:05:02,760
Which I think is one of his
greatest performances.

1134
01:05:02,760 --> 01:05:07,320
So you know, this is a, this is
a, this is a very pro lady in

1135
01:05:07,320 --> 01:05:11,680
the water household.
But I, no, and I, I loved the

1136
01:05:11,680 --> 01:05:14,600
holdovers was my #2 movie, like
Oppenheimer was my number one

1137
01:05:14,600 --> 01:05:16,520
movie of the year.
Holdovers was my #2 movie.

1138
01:05:16,560 --> 01:05:18,360
It was it was even ahead of
Ferrari.

1139
01:05:19,720 --> 01:05:22,040
Loved Ferrari?
Although, you know, my choice

1140
01:05:22,040 --> 01:05:24,400
for best the performance of the
year would have gone to Adam

1141
01:05:24,720 --> 01:05:30,560
Driver and Ferrari.
But but Killian Murphy is, is

1142
01:05:30,960 --> 01:05:33,720
fantastic.
The other thing though is you

1143
01:05:33,720 --> 01:05:36,320
know, we, we, you talked about
it a little bit with, with

1144
01:05:36,480 --> 01:05:41,680
Robert Downey previously.
No one has surrounded Killian

1145
01:05:41,680 --> 01:05:44,000
Murphy with hams.
Yes.

1146
01:05:44,520 --> 01:05:46,680
I mean, not just hams, not, not
not people who are just always

1147
01:05:46,680 --> 01:05:49,880
hams, but like people giving
kind of very broad performances.

1148
01:05:49,880 --> 01:05:55,000
I mean, Downey in the last act
of this movie is just, I mean,

1149
01:05:55,520 --> 01:05:57,040
playing to the rafters.
Oh my.

1150
01:05:57,680 --> 01:06:00,720
Gosh, and he's doing a great job
and he's and he, I mean, the

1151
01:06:00,720 --> 01:06:02,840
film is built up to that point,
so it works.

1152
01:06:03,080 --> 01:06:05,600
But also so is Emily Blunt.
I mean, Emily, But I remember a

1153
01:06:05,600 --> 01:06:08,080
friend of mine or colleague
referred to her performance as

1154
01:06:08,080 --> 01:06:10,640
camp.
And I was like, I'm not sure

1155
01:06:10,640 --> 01:06:12,960
this counts as camp.
Like she's, she's going big,

1156
01:06:12,960 --> 01:06:18,720
she's going broad, but she's
one, I mean, she's she doesn't

1157
01:06:18,720 --> 01:06:21,440
have that much screen time.
So she's actually like making a

1158
01:06:21,440 --> 01:06:25,080
meal of what she's got.
But also so many of these

1159
01:06:25,080 --> 01:06:29,840
performances are going big
because Oppenheimer in some ways

1160
01:06:29,840 --> 01:06:32,960
is so small.
Not small in a bad way, but like

1161
01:06:32,960 --> 01:06:38,000
he's so understated and
submerged that everyone else

1162
01:06:38,000 --> 01:06:42,200
around him is like constantly
just sort of bearing down on him

1163
01:06:43,040 --> 01:06:45,400
all the time.
I mean, even Straws, who, you

1164
01:06:45,400 --> 01:06:47,720
know, his interactions with
Oppenheimer aren't particularly

1165
01:06:47,720 --> 01:06:50,520
dramatic.
But you know, when Straws is

1166
01:06:50,520 --> 01:06:54,360
like doing that monologue in the
backroom, like he doesn't get

1167
01:06:54,360 --> 01:07:00,960
his, doesn't get the nomination.
He he's really talking to

1168
01:07:00,960 --> 01:07:02,920
Oppenheimer, right?
Oppenheimer's not there, but

1169
01:07:02,920 --> 01:07:05,600
he's really talking to
Oppenheimer almost through US.

1170
01:07:06,960 --> 01:07:08,920
It's a it's a soliloquy at that
point.

1171
01:07:09,080 --> 01:07:10,920
It's it's Shakespearean 100.
Percent.

1172
01:07:10,920 --> 01:07:13,640
It absolutely is.
And and this this constant like

1173
01:07:13,640 --> 01:07:17,360
everybody's bearing down on
Oppenheimer and in some ways

1174
01:07:17,360 --> 01:07:20,160
like it, it mimics what happens
in real life, right?

1175
01:07:20,160 --> 01:07:22,880
I mean, I, I have friends, I
have family members who kind of

1176
01:07:22,880 --> 01:07:27,480
can be very cool and understated
sometimes and very calm in

1177
01:07:27,480 --> 01:07:31,400
situations where I'm freaking
out and I freak out more because

1178
01:07:31,400 --> 01:07:34,320
they're not freaking out, right?
Like that's kind of just a very

1179
01:07:34,320 --> 01:07:37,040
human dynamic.
And the film sort of replicates

1180
01:07:37,040 --> 01:07:39,640
that, especially with stuff like
Kitty, like Kitty's going crazy

1181
01:07:39,640 --> 01:07:42,880
and in some ways is like an
alcoholic because her husband is

1182
01:07:42,880 --> 01:07:46,280
completely unresponsive, even
though he's like just created

1183
01:07:46,480 --> 01:07:50,160
the, you know, the, the machine
that will blow up the world.

1184
01:07:50,160 --> 01:07:58,360
And he's like, I thought they'd
call, you know, So, yeah,

1185
01:07:58,360 --> 01:08:01,360
anyway, but I think I, I think
like there is a strange little

1186
01:08:01,360 --> 01:08:04,840
alchemy that's that's happening
with these performances and how

1187
01:08:05,120 --> 01:08:08,000
no one is bouncing everybody off
the central character.

1188
01:08:08,320 --> 01:08:12,320
And also, you know, you know,
when I, when I hear because

1189
01:08:12,320 --> 01:08:15,560
people, some people will
criticize Downie's performance

1190
01:08:15,560 --> 01:08:17,920
and they think it's, you know,
too, too over the top or

1191
01:08:17,920 --> 01:08:22,319
whatever.
But I'm like, imagine if he

1192
01:08:22,319 --> 01:08:25,279
didn't give that performance,
like, imagine it just like this

1193
01:08:25,279 --> 01:08:28,279
calm, collected, understated
guy.

1194
01:08:29,720 --> 01:08:32,279
I feel like an entire dimension
of the film would be would be

1195
01:08:32,279 --> 01:08:35,479
lost because suddenly it would
just be like, you know, a bunch

1196
01:08:35,479 --> 01:08:38,160
of people with stone faces just
like talking to each other, you

1197
01:08:38,160 --> 01:08:39,960
know?
Like, I think it's really

1198
01:08:39,960 --> 01:08:43,840
important that those characters
kind of make up for the almost

1199
01:08:43,840 --> 01:08:47,000
the lack of kind of outward
emotion that we're getting from

1200
01:08:47,000 --> 01:08:50,560
Oppenheimer.
Yeah, And I, I think that Downey

1201
01:08:50,560 --> 01:08:55,240
Junior's character taps into
something that it doesn't

1202
01:08:55,240 --> 01:08:57,880
necessarily matter if it's true
or not.

1203
01:08:57,880 --> 01:09:02,640
What matters is does it
represent something that people

1204
01:09:02,640 --> 01:09:05,640
feel like is true.
And I think that that

1205
01:09:05,640 --> 01:09:10,840
performance of like this CD guy
who's only interested in

1206
01:09:10,840 --> 01:09:14,319
himself, it taps into what we
already think about politicians.

1207
01:09:14,880 --> 01:09:19,560
And so like, I in my mind, the
the over the top nature of the

1208
01:09:19,560 --> 01:09:24,399
performance just fits with the
cultural psyche on what actually

1209
01:09:24,399 --> 01:09:27,840
happens in back rooms.
So I like I, I think Nolan's

1210
01:09:27,840 --> 01:09:33,680
just absolutely has Downey
Junior in the perfect spot to be

1211
01:09:33,680 --> 01:09:36,880
a believable politician.
Well, and not only that, but

1212
01:09:36,880 --> 01:09:38,800
like, This is why you hire
Downey.

1213
01:09:38,840 --> 01:09:42,160
Like, Christopher Nolan is a
smart guy and he knows that what

1214
01:09:42,160 --> 01:09:45,040
he's doing by hiring Downey is
he's bringing the Robert Downey

1215
01:09:45,040 --> 01:09:47,279
narrative into the character
too.

1216
01:09:47,800 --> 01:09:51,120
And I've always like, there is
such a huge part of me that's

1217
01:09:51,120 --> 01:09:54,600
always like, man, I wish
somebody would just some some

1218
01:09:54,840 --> 01:09:58,280
critic would just blow their
access to ever interviewing

1219
01:09:58,280 --> 01:10:00,600
Downy again.
And just like come straight out

1220
01:10:00,600 --> 01:10:03,240
and ask him like, wait, what did
you think?

1221
01:10:03,360 --> 01:10:04,840
Why did Christopher Nolan hire
you?

1222
01:10:04,880 --> 01:10:07,560
Are you aware that he's like
playing with your public persona

1223
01:10:07,560 --> 01:10:10,440
in doing this?
Because you have to imagine that

1224
01:10:10,440 --> 01:10:12,200
this is transactional in some
way.

1225
01:10:12,200 --> 01:10:14,960
He knows what's going on.
And it kind of reminds me of

1226
01:10:14,960 --> 01:10:18,800
like when Fincher hires Ben
Affleck for Gone Girl.

1227
01:10:19,040 --> 01:10:22,760
Like there's a reason why Ben
Affleck is the husband in Gone

1228
01:10:22,760 --> 01:10:27,360
Girl and not anybody else.
And I think Downey's fantastic.

1229
01:10:27,360 --> 01:10:30,200
And part of the reason that we
want to see Downey in this role

1230
01:10:30,200 --> 01:10:34,600
is in that third act when he
gets going, Brad, it's kind of

1231
01:10:34,600 --> 01:10:36,720
like that thing we just talked
about with Forrest Gump where

1232
01:10:36,720 --> 01:10:40,000
Tom Hanks accidentally forgets
to do the Forrest Gump accent

1233
01:10:40,000 --> 01:10:41,880
every now and then.
He just is Tom Hanks for a

1234
01:10:41,880 --> 01:10:44,680
minute and then recovers down.
He does the same thing.

1235
01:10:44,680 --> 01:10:48,080
He loses that sort of
affectation of straws, and he

1236
01:10:48,080 --> 01:10:52,080
gets into that line reading
where his mouth is stretched

1237
01:10:52,080 --> 01:10:55,960
like all the way horizontal, and
he's just saying, not Hiroshima,

1238
01:10:56,160 --> 01:10:59,040
not Nagasaki.
It's the best line reading of

1239
01:10:59,040 --> 01:11:02,040
anything in the entire movie.
And I'm like that I'm here for

1240
01:11:02,040 --> 01:11:06,600
that, that you have to have a
villain who is as big as he is

1241
01:11:06,600 --> 01:11:09,960
to counterbalance what Killian
Murphy's doing.

1242
01:11:10,440 --> 01:11:13,360
Now, I will say to go back to
the Lawrence of Arabia thing we

1243
01:11:13,360 --> 01:11:17,240
were talking about earlier.
If I can try to draw comparisons

1244
01:11:17,240 --> 01:11:22,080
here, Downey is the Anthony
Quinn of Lords of Arabia.

1245
01:11:22,080 --> 01:11:23,760
Like, he's big, he's over the
top.

1246
01:11:24,360 --> 01:11:28,200
And this is where I'm going to
get on my soapbox and say, when

1247
01:11:28,320 --> 01:11:31,600
are we going to get justice for
Matt Damon in a movie?

1248
01:11:31,800 --> 01:11:36,560
Because Matt Damon is the Alec
Guinness of this movie in that

1249
01:11:36,560 --> 01:11:40,960
he is playing understated.
And Matt Damon is so good in

1250
01:11:40,960 --> 01:11:45,520
everything he does in such a way
that doesn't draw any attention

1251
01:11:45,520 --> 01:11:47,920
to himself.
I I really cannot think of an

1252
01:11:47,920 --> 01:11:52,240
analog for him among A list
actors in the last 50 years.

1253
01:11:52,640 --> 01:11:55,080
Yeah, I thought about Duvall,
but he like, he doesn't have the

1254
01:11:55,120 --> 01:11:57,800
anger that Duvall could bring.
He's not like a hackman or a

1255
01:11:57,800 --> 01:12:02,800
Hoffman, but you watch him in a
movie like Air last year and I'm

1256
01:12:02,800 --> 01:12:05,080
like, this is this might be one
of the five best performances

1257
01:12:05,080 --> 01:12:07,320
I've seen this year.
And it's so quiet and

1258
01:12:07,320 --> 01:12:09,480
understated.
He does the same thing here.

1259
01:12:09,480 --> 01:12:13,200
He brings this effortless charm
and he's most of the Comic

1260
01:12:13,200 --> 01:12:16,040
Relief in the movie.
And I just feel like he does so

1261
01:12:16,040 --> 01:12:19,640
much heavy lifting here and got
absolutely no recognition for

1262
01:12:19,640 --> 01:12:26,320
it.
He is fantastic and, and he you,

1263
01:12:26,400 --> 01:12:29,720
you forget, I mean, we
absolutely forget what a good

1264
01:12:29,720 --> 01:12:32,720
actor he is and, and we take him
for granted.

1265
01:12:33,120 --> 01:12:36,440
I mean, he's been in so many
great.

1266
01:12:36,440 --> 01:12:41,760
I mean, he had, I mean, he had a
great 2023, you know, and he's

1267
01:12:41,760 --> 01:12:46,440
the the scene where he first
meets Oppenheimer.

1268
01:12:47,160 --> 01:12:52,960
That scene is one of the best
pieces of just like movie

1269
01:12:52,960 --> 01:12:56,920
writing I've ever come across.
You know, I mean, it's and like,

1270
01:12:56,920 --> 01:13:01,920
and I say movie writing, like,
you know, if I was ever teaching

1271
01:13:01,920 --> 01:13:04,360
a class on how to write a
screenplay, I'd I'd point to

1272
01:13:04,360 --> 01:13:06,360
that scene.
I was like, this is this is how

1273
01:13:06,360 --> 01:13:07,520
you do it.
I mean, this is just like

1274
01:13:07,760 --> 01:13:11,920
sparkling back and forth, zippy.
It's really funny.

1275
01:13:11,920 --> 01:13:15,640
Like when people say Oppenheimer
is humorless, I'm like, I don't

1276
01:13:15,640 --> 01:13:17,640
know what to say.
Like you just didn't watch the

1277
01:13:17,640 --> 01:13:21,120
movie, you know, Like, there's
no way you watch this movie.

1278
01:13:21,120 --> 01:13:24,800
And I mean, obviously the the
story is not a funny story.

1279
01:13:24,800 --> 01:13:30,880
Like it's not a comedy.
But you know, Damon brings such

1280
01:13:30,880 --> 01:13:33,600
great deadpan energy to
everything.

1281
01:13:33,600 --> 01:13:37,400
And every time he's on screen,
it's it's kind of delightful.

1282
01:13:38,440 --> 01:13:44,040
And then later it's very moving
that, you know, when he kind of

1283
01:13:44,040 --> 01:13:46,840
sticks up for Oppenheimer during
the hearing, even after

1284
01:13:46,840 --> 01:13:50,840
everything.
So, yeah, I mean, it's a, it's

1285
01:13:50,840 --> 01:13:52,720
a, it's a, it's a, it's a he's
great.

1286
01:13:52,720 --> 01:13:57,160
He's a fantastic performance.
I think in some ways I got the

1287
01:13:57,160 --> 01:14:00,160
sense because I was kind of
following this film and sort of

1288
01:14:00,360 --> 01:14:03,960
the the the PR around it from
such an early point.

1289
01:14:04,520 --> 01:14:08,840
I got the sense that initially
there was a kind of activity

1290
01:14:08,840 --> 01:14:13,480
around Damon, but Eyre had just
come out and I think there was

1291
01:14:13,480 --> 01:14:17,360
the sense that they they were
going to just be like, we're not

1292
01:14:17,360 --> 01:14:20,360
going to end up in a situation
where we've got like 3 best

1293
01:14:20,360 --> 01:14:23,000
supporting actor nominees and
they all cancel each other out.

1294
01:14:23,440 --> 01:14:27,440
It became very clear early on
that this was Downey's show and

1295
01:14:27,440 --> 01:14:29,720
they weren't going to try and
like push for other people.

1296
01:14:31,320 --> 01:14:34,640
And it was probably the right
decision obviously, since he

1297
01:14:34,640 --> 01:14:38,320
won.
And I think also because of Air

1298
01:14:38,560 --> 01:14:42,720
Damon just was kind of like, you
know, I don't need to, I don't

1299
01:14:42,720 --> 01:14:44,680
need to do do a run for this
one.

1300
01:14:45,080 --> 01:14:47,200
I mean, I don't know how many.
Like obviously because of the

1301
01:14:47,280 --> 01:14:50,360
the because of the strikes, I
don't know how much, you know,

1302
01:14:50,360 --> 01:14:53,320
strategizing there was actually
happening because that would

1303
01:14:53,320 --> 01:14:57,520
have been illegal but or against
union rules.

1304
01:14:57,520 --> 01:15:01,880
But but I did get the sense that
pretty early on that that they

1305
01:15:01,880 --> 01:15:05,200
decided that that they were just
going to go with Downey and sort

1306
01:15:05,200 --> 01:15:08,160
of maybe not promote a lot of
the others.

1307
01:15:08,720 --> 01:15:11,760
Yeah.
Brad, I'm curious, this cast

1308
01:15:11,760 --> 01:15:15,600
list goes 150 people deep.
Like we we could really spend

1309
01:15:15,600 --> 01:15:18,360
another two hours talking about
all the performances here.

1310
01:15:18,960 --> 01:15:21,520
I'm curious, like who else
sticks out to you in a way

1311
01:15:21,520 --> 01:15:25,000
that's not just, oh, great job,
but this is worthy of a little

1312
01:15:25,000 --> 01:15:31,880
bit of conversation as well.
Oh man, there's way too many

1313
01:15:31,880 --> 01:15:35,320
people in this cast, Bob.
I mean, you have like freaking

1314
01:15:35,320 --> 01:15:40,720
Kenneth Branagh just showed up
as Neil's Neil's bore for like 4

1315
01:15:40,720 --> 01:15:43,000
minutes of screen time and
killing it.

1316
01:15:43,160 --> 01:15:48,400
You have Gary Oldman just doing
an incredible Truman.

1317
01:15:49,760 --> 01:15:52,520
I I I honestly don't know how to
answer the question.

1318
01:15:52,520 --> 01:15:56,760
About Hartnett Josh fucking
Hartnett.

1319
01:15:57,200 --> 01:15:59,440
He's incredible.
He's incredible.

1320
01:15:59,680 --> 01:16:03,840
He's great.
Grumholtz Grumholtz steals every

1321
01:16:03,840 --> 01:16:06,280
scene he's in in this movie.
Grumholtz is fantastic.

1322
01:16:06,480 --> 01:16:07,560
Yeah.
I mean, they're all, they're all

1323
01:16:07,560 --> 01:16:08,360
great.
They're all great.

1324
01:16:08,560 --> 01:16:11,880
And I think there was something,
I believe they said this on the

1325
01:16:11,920 --> 01:16:14,400
Blank Check pod.
I think Griffin Newman said this

1326
01:16:14,400 --> 01:16:17,360
on Blank Check episode on
Oppenheimer, which I thought was

1327
01:16:17,360 --> 01:16:21,640
really, really like a great
observation and the perfect kind

1328
01:16:21,640 --> 01:16:24,600
of observation from someone who
is like an actor and like a

1329
01:16:24,600 --> 01:16:29,360
veteran sort of indie actor.
He said everybody in this movie

1330
01:16:29,360 --> 01:16:33,360
has at some point been number
one on a call sheet, you know,

1331
01:16:33,400 --> 01:16:35,280
and it's true.
Like it really is like when you

1332
01:16:35,280 --> 01:16:37,880
look at this list of, you know,
there's like every single one of

1333
01:16:37,880 --> 01:16:39,400
these people has been the star
of something.

1334
01:16:39,400 --> 01:16:41,520
Maybe it was like an Indies or
something like that, but they're

1335
01:16:41,520 --> 01:16:45,840
like all of them, you know?
And obviously, I mean, they have

1336
01:16:46,200 --> 01:16:48,680
like Oscars.
So many of them have already

1337
01:16:48,680 --> 01:16:50,720
have Oscars.
But but that gets to your point

1338
01:16:50,720 --> 01:16:54,520
too, about like you surround the
character of Oppenheimer with

1339
01:16:54,520 --> 01:16:57,160
people who are used to being
number one on a call sheet

1340
01:16:57,160 --> 01:16:59,040
because there's an energy that
they bring to those

1341
01:16:59,040 --> 01:17:01,600
performances.
We can call it hamminess if we

1342
01:17:01,600 --> 01:17:04,600
want to, and I'm sure Nolan
directed them that way, but

1343
01:17:05,040 --> 01:17:08,080
that's why you fill the movie
with characters like that.

1344
01:17:08,080 --> 01:17:11,080
You don't get, you know, the
lifelong character actor who's

1345
01:17:11,080 --> 01:17:14,800
used to playing #4 on the call
sheet, you get Rami Malek to

1346
01:17:14,800 --> 01:17:17,800
come play the most nothing
burger of a part.

1347
01:17:18,040 --> 01:17:21,560
And it's because Nolan, I, I
like listen, we have said many

1348
01:17:21,560 --> 01:17:23,640
things about Rami Malek on this
podcast, Brad.

1349
01:17:23,640 --> 01:17:27,320
But Nolan perhaps more than
anybody else knows how to

1350
01:17:27,320 --> 01:17:31,640
utilize again, the public
perception and the persona of

1351
01:17:31,640 --> 01:17:35,960
Rami Malek because he's inserted
into the movie immediately after

1352
01:17:35,960 --> 01:17:39,360
Oppenheimer is questioned about
the spy at Los Alamos.

1353
01:17:39,720 --> 01:17:41,640
And he's like, there's there
wasn't a spy, there wasn't a

1354
01:17:41,640 --> 01:17:45,520
spy.
They cut to Chicago and the

1355
01:17:45,560 --> 01:17:50,920
under the football field lab and
you're just like, what is that

1356
01:17:50,920 --> 01:17:53,480
Rami Malek in the background?
What?

1357
01:17:53,840 --> 01:17:56,520
And then he shows up again at at
at the hotel with his little

1358
01:17:56,520 --> 01:17:59,080
clipboard and you're like, oh,
this dude is definitely the spy.

1359
01:17:59,080 --> 01:18:02,240
Like this is look at him.
And the big reveal with his

1360
01:18:02,240 --> 01:18:05,280
character is that he's the one
that actually turns everything

1361
01:18:05,280 --> 01:18:07,920
against straws and in favor of
Oppenheimer.

1362
01:18:08,160 --> 01:18:12,080
It's a brilliant use of an actor
that we all have perceptions of.

1363
01:18:13,040 --> 01:18:16,480
I would say, Bob, I just want
you to spend 5 minutes comparing

1364
01:18:16,480 --> 01:18:24,480
and contrasting the 2019 Oscar
Best Actor winner versus Killian

1365
01:18:24,480 --> 01:18:27,600
Murphy here.
I really want to hear that that

1366
01:18:27,600 --> 01:18:30,800
diatribe.
Listen, I have been on record

1367
01:18:30,800 --> 01:18:34,400
saying that what Killian Murphy
was missing was prosthetic

1368
01:18:34,400 --> 01:18:38,160
teeth, and that if he had them,
this performance would have gone

1369
01:18:38,160 --> 01:18:40,120
into the stratosphere.
Skyrocketed.

1370
01:18:40,360 --> 01:18:42,040
It might have.
It might have ignited the

1371
01:18:42,040 --> 01:18:48,280
stratosphere.
Now I'm imagining, you know, in

1372
01:18:48,920 --> 01:18:53,240
in the final line of the movie,
if he just had prosthetic teeth

1373
01:18:53,240 --> 01:18:54,880
for that.
Just that line.

1374
01:19:00,360 --> 01:19:01,960
Yeah.
And, and the other thing is,

1375
01:19:01,960 --> 01:19:04,920
like, I mean, Nolan is also just
a very practical filmmaker.

1376
01:19:04,920 --> 01:19:09,200
And I think obviously casting
all these not just established

1377
01:19:09,800 --> 01:19:14,080
actors, but like recognizable
faces, like people who've like

1378
01:19:14,760 --> 01:19:17,880
been in box office hits or, or
just been like, like people we

1379
01:19:17,880 --> 01:19:21,400
just know helps distinguish like
who's who, you know, like,

1380
01:19:21,400 --> 01:19:23,360
because there's this huge cast.
I mean, he could have cast it

1381
01:19:23,360 --> 01:19:25,320
with just the character actors.
You know, he could have just

1382
01:19:25,320 --> 01:19:29,320
cast it with just like a bunch
of like, not very big faces.

1383
01:19:29,320 --> 01:19:32,560
And we would be completely lost
no matter how good those

1384
01:19:32,560 --> 01:19:34,680
performances were.
We would spend half the movie

1385
01:19:34,680 --> 01:19:37,240
trying to remember who was who
and who had said what.

1386
01:19:37,680 --> 01:19:41,320
But because these people are
all, I mean, it's like it's

1387
01:19:41,400 --> 01:19:45,840
Robert Downey Junior, you know,
or Rami Malek or Casey Affleck,

1388
01:19:45,880 --> 01:19:49,440
you know, like all these people
who show up or Matthew Modine,

1389
01:19:49,440 --> 01:19:55,520
you know, we know who they are.
We, we have some sense of

1390
01:19:55,520 --> 01:19:57,920
following them over the course
of the film.

1391
01:19:59,800 --> 01:20:02,280
You know, and, and, and I mean,
with Rami Malek, it's perfect

1392
01:20:02,280 --> 01:20:06,680
because it's like he shows up in
two brief scenes.

1393
01:20:06,680 --> 01:20:09,280
It's almost like he's like
pushed out off frame, right?

1394
01:20:09,320 --> 01:20:11,240
I mean, it's like he shows up
and they just kind of push him

1395
01:20:11,240 --> 01:20:13,680
off.
Like, I mean, the first time we

1396
01:20:13,680 --> 01:20:15,440
do see him in Chicago, but
really the first time it

1397
01:20:15,440 --> 01:20:19,200
registers that it's Rami Malek,
he like he actually drops a pen

1398
01:20:19,200 --> 01:20:21,920
and he falls out of frame.
You know, it's like, it's like.

1399
01:20:22,680 --> 01:20:24,880
Was he even there?
They just they just use a blown

1400
01:20:24,920 --> 01:20:27,360
cake and it's kind of like, and
I remember when I first saw it,

1401
01:20:27,360 --> 01:20:29,760
I was like, Oh my God, did they
did they like cut Rami Malek out

1402
01:20:29,760 --> 01:20:32,680
of this movie?
Like I I remember thinking, holy

1403
01:20:32,680 --> 01:20:38,520
shit, did he get Adrian brodied?
You know, and and and of course

1404
01:20:38,520 --> 01:20:40,720
it pays off so well right at the
end.

1405
01:20:40,720 --> 01:20:41,920
You're like, oh, right, that
guy.

1406
01:20:41,920 --> 01:20:45,000
I remember that guy.
He was there thing.

1407
01:20:46,240 --> 01:20:51,400
So, so it's, you know, Nolan is
really sharp about how a movie

1408
01:20:51,400 --> 01:20:56,520
works on an audience and how to,
I mean, so much of directing

1409
01:20:57,040 --> 01:21:00,160
screen writing as well, but so
much of directing is really just

1410
01:21:00,160 --> 01:21:05,480
this central question of how to
convey information and not just

1411
01:21:05,480 --> 01:21:12,040
like how to convey plot and and
exposition, but like when to do

1412
01:21:12,040 --> 01:21:17,240
it, how to do it, how to, you
know, how much can you give

1413
01:21:17,240 --> 01:21:20,640
without seeming like you're
giving too much or delivering

1414
01:21:20,640 --> 01:21:22,560
too much exposition?
And this is, I mean, this has

1415
01:21:22,560 --> 01:21:25,160
been a theme throughout Nolan's
career where, you know, in a

1416
01:21:25,160 --> 01:21:28,160
film like inception, people
complained that there was too

1417
01:21:28,160 --> 01:21:31,000
much exposition, right?
And then and then, you know,

1418
01:21:31,040 --> 01:21:34,280
almost as a response, he makes
tenant where it's like what is

1419
01:21:34,280 --> 01:21:39,480
happening, you know, so, so I
think this is a thing that he

1420
01:21:39,480 --> 01:21:46,920
thinks about a lot.
And I mean, I, I love almost all

1421
01:21:46,920 --> 01:21:50,480
his movies, so I think he's he's
mastered it in pretty much all

1422
01:21:50,480 --> 01:21:52,520
of them.
But Oppenheimer is one of those

1423
01:21:52,520 --> 01:21:57,360
movies where it's just like if
the person making this movie

1424
01:21:57,360 --> 01:22:00,680
doesn't really understand how to
convey information that we are

1425
01:22:00,680 --> 01:22:04,760
fucked.
Like we are completely fucked.

1426
01:22:06,240 --> 01:22:09,240
And I think that represents the
two poles of Nolan for me, even

1427
01:22:09,240 --> 01:22:10,960
more than like The Dark Knight
versus this.

1428
01:22:10,960 --> 01:22:14,480
I think it's it's Inception,
which is kind of like clockwork

1429
01:22:14,480 --> 01:22:16,440
filmmaking.
And this one, which is much

1430
01:22:16,440 --> 01:22:19,120
more, I don't know what's the
word I want to use, Brad.

1431
01:22:19,120 --> 01:22:21,600
It's like spiky, you know, I
keep saying you can't get your

1432
01:22:21,600 --> 01:22:23,480
arms around it, but there's a
little bit more prickliness to

1433
01:22:23,480 --> 01:22:25,920
this one.
And it's edited in such a way

1434
01:22:25,920 --> 01:22:29,040
that even the emotional moments,
it's, it's like he and the

1435
01:22:29,040 --> 01:22:32,800
editor, Jennifer Lane, they,
they cut things just slightly

1436
01:22:32,800 --> 01:22:36,520
short after every scene and
every line so that you're not

1437
01:22:36,520 --> 01:22:39,560
allowed to linger on things.
And it kind of keeps you at a

1438
01:22:39,560 --> 01:22:41,960
distance until that final gut
punch.

1439
01:22:41,960 --> 01:22:43,880
And that's why it works so well
for me.

1440
01:22:44,600 --> 01:22:47,600
Brad, I'd like I tried to get
you to watch this movie for a

1441
01:22:47,600 --> 01:22:49,840
long, long time.
I've been waiting to talk about

1442
01:22:49,840 --> 01:22:51,520
this with you for a long, long
time.

1443
01:22:51,920 --> 01:22:54,720
And I think we will throw over
to you first for our last

1444
01:22:54,720 --> 01:22:57,680
segment of the day, which we
call Let's Make it a double.

1445
01:22:58,040 --> 01:23:01,240
We're near the end of the
episode, so thanks for listening

1446
01:23:01,240 --> 01:23:04,240
to the film and Whiskey Show.
Let's have another film with

1447
01:23:04,240 --> 01:23:05,680
this one, even if it's
struggling.

1448
01:23:05,680 --> 01:23:07,040
It's the final segment of the
day.

1449
01:23:07,040 --> 01:23:09,880
Now let's make it a double.
Let's Make It a Double is the

1450
01:23:09,880 --> 01:23:13,120
part of the show where we pick a
movie to pair up with this one

1451
01:23:13,120 --> 01:23:14,760
to make the perfect double
feature?

1452
01:23:15,280 --> 01:23:17,520
Brad, you go ahead and go first,
man.

1453
01:23:18,800 --> 01:23:23,560
Dude, the the more I think about
this movie, The more I think

1454
01:23:23,560 --> 01:23:28,920
about the less I think about it
as a what I said earlier, an

1455
01:23:28,920 --> 01:23:33,120
exploration of the atomic bomb.
And it does feel more of a

1456
01:23:33,120 --> 01:23:38,840
conversation between Nolan and
the audience about what it means

1457
01:23:38,840 --> 01:23:43,840
to have big ideas about what it
means to live a long life in the

1458
01:23:43,840 --> 01:23:47,680
public spotlight that like there
are so many conversations

1459
01:23:47,680 --> 01:23:50,640
happening here.
I mean, you could even look at

1460
01:23:50,640 --> 01:23:55,360
this the the moment when Emily
Blunt Bob, you mentioned it

1461
01:23:55,360 --> 01:23:59,040
earlier, the final dialogue that
they have where she's asking

1462
01:23:59,040 --> 01:24:01,480
him, like, why are you letting
them tar and feather you?

1463
01:24:01,480 --> 01:24:05,440
Like, is that actually going to
lead to any sort of redemption?

1464
01:24:05,440 --> 01:24:11,520
And he says maybe like there's
an element of looking at our

1465
01:24:11,520 --> 01:24:18,080
current Internet world and
saying, you know, we all do a

1466
01:24:18,080 --> 01:24:21,680
wide variety of things
throughout our life and, and we

1467
01:24:21,680 --> 01:24:26,240
are going to have to represent
our actions to the world at some

1468
01:24:26,240 --> 01:24:28,200
point.
And so that there's this

1469
01:24:28,200 --> 01:24:33,360
commentary on what does it mean
to be a persona, a, a person

1470
01:24:33,360 --> 01:24:38,320
when every little minute detail
of your life will come under the

1471
01:24:38,320 --> 01:24:42,600
microscope, You know, and as, as
Emily Blunt puts it, like 16

1472
01:24:42,600 --> 01:24:46,240
years ago, that that there's so
many things happening here.

1473
01:24:46,240 --> 01:24:50,880
So I, I think that this film is
a commentary on America as a

1474
01:24:50,880 --> 01:24:53,360
whole.
And so I think that's why I want

1475
01:24:53,360 --> 01:24:55,440
to pair it with There Will Be
Blood.

1476
01:24:56,360 --> 01:24:57,520
Oh yeah, I think it's a great
pairing.

1477
01:24:57,920 --> 01:25:00,080
Yeah.
Like, just even the iconography

1478
01:25:00,080 --> 01:25:03,680
is so similar in the movies
from, you know, the the kind of

1479
01:25:03,880 --> 01:25:07,880
shoddy construction of Los
Alamos and the hastily built

1480
01:25:07,880 --> 01:25:10,560
town in There Will Be Blood.
Yeah.

1481
01:25:10,560 --> 01:25:12,720
It's a great pairing.
All right.

1482
01:25:13,560 --> 01:25:15,000
Yeah.
I think Brad's just shocked that

1483
01:25:15,000 --> 01:25:17,200
I gave him a compliment.
He's just sitting there basking.

1484
01:25:17,360 --> 01:25:19,880
On Thanks Bob.
Bill has given me compliments.

1485
01:25:19,880 --> 01:25:22,360
Bob's giving me compliments.
What a great to start to.

1486
01:25:22,360 --> 01:25:24,520
Season, I hope, man.
Well, it's going to be short

1487
01:25:24,520 --> 01:25:25,360
lived.
Don't worry, man.

1488
01:25:26,360 --> 01:25:28,080
Bill, go.
Where are you at with a double

1489
01:25:28,080 --> 01:25:32,760
feature for Oppenheimer?
I have so many movies that I

1490
01:25:32,760 --> 01:25:35,240
feel like I'd want to double
feature with Oppenheimer.

1491
01:25:35,240 --> 01:25:37,960
And I go back and forth on these
and at at one point you, you

1492
01:25:37,960 --> 01:25:43,040
mentioned JFK earlier.
I actually, there's a part of me

1493
01:25:43,040 --> 01:25:46,160
that wants to do a triple
feature with JFK, Albert Stone's

1494
01:25:46,160 --> 01:25:48,680
JFK, Oliver Stone's Nixon and
Oppenheimer.

1495
01:25:49,760 --> 01:25:53,800
Nixon is kind of the follow up
to JFK in a weird way for me.

1496
01:25:53,800 --> 01:25:57,520
And, and I love Nixon as well.
And they both kind of utilize

1497
01:25:57,520 --> 01:26:00,640
that similar style as
Oppenheimer, which I mean, Nolan

1498
01:26:00,640 --> 01:26:03,480
is a huge film fiend.
Like he would obviously be very

1499
01:26:03,480 --> 01:26:06,400
familiar with those movies and I
wouldn't be surprised if he

1500
01:26:06,400 --> 01:26:10,000
borrowed a page from them.
And then, you know, there's

1501
01:26:10,000 --> 01:26:12,680
another part of me that wants to
pair it with Fat Man and Little

1502
01:26:12,680 --> 01:26:14,880
Boy, Roland Joe Face, Fat Man
and Little Boy, which I think is

1503
01:26:14,880 --> 01:26:17,400
actually an underrated movie.
I mean, when it came out, I

1504
01:26:17,400 --> 01:26:19,520
remember everybody said it was
just like the worst piece of

1505
01:26:19,520 --> 01:26:22,520
shit ever.
And I remember watching it and

1506
01:26:22,560 --> 01:26:25,760
being really moved by it.
It's obviously the same story,

1507
01:26:26,120 --> 01:26:28,880
but that one takes many, many
liberties.

1508
01:26:28,880 --> 01:26:31,440
I mean, Nolan is actually
ruthlessly faithful to the

1509
01:26:31,440 --> 01:26:34,160
historical record and Fat Man
and Little Boy, I mean, just

1510
01:26:34,280 --> 01:26:37,600
makes up all sorts of stuff.
But I think it's still actually

1511
01:26:37,600 --> 01:26:41,000
a surprisingly moving film.
And then there's like there's

1512
01:26:41,000 --> 01:26:44,960
another part of me that wants to
pair it with Amadeus because I

1513
01:26:44,960 --> 01:26:47,800
know Nolan specifically thought
of the Salvieri Mozart

1514
01:26:47,800 --> 01:26:50,720
relationship when thinking about
Oppenheimer and Strauss.

1515
01:26:51,200 --> 01:26:53,160
Bilga that that was on my list
as well.

1516
01:26:53,280 --> 01:26:55,480
I I was thinking about Amadeus.
Yeah.

1517
01:26:55,800 --> 01:26:59,280
And there's also this other
question, which is I also would

1518
01:26:59,280 --> 01:27:02,200
kind of want to pair it with a
movie that did show what

1519
01:27:02,200 --> 01:27:05,920
happened in Japan.
You know, a film like Black

1520
01:27:05,920 --> 01:27:10,480
Rain, for example, not the
Ridley Scott Black Rain, but

1521
01:27:10,480 --> 01:27:12,960
like, you know, there are films
about that or something like

1522
01:27:12,960 --> 01:27:16,680
Akira Kurosawa's Rhapsody in
August, you know, that really

1523
01:27:16,680 --> 01:27:21,480
shows kind of the consequences
of, you know, the the legacy of

1524
01:27:21,520 --> 01:27:25,000
of the bomb.
But the movie I'm going to go

1525
01:27:25,000 --> 01:27:30,200
with is like probably almost
predictable for me, but I kind

1526
01:27:30,200 --> 01:27:33,080
of have to do it.
I had to do it to him.

1527
01:27:34,240 --> 01:27:37,400
And it's a movie by another one
of my favorite film makers,

1528
01:27:37,400 --> 01:27:46,280
someone that Nolan also admires
greatly about 222 men who are

1529
01:27:46,680 --> 01:27:50,680
not at odds with each other, but
kind of are in sort of this

1530
01:27:50,680 --> 01:27:52,720
interesting dialectic with each
other.

1531
01:27:53,800 --> 01:27:57,440
And they personality wise,
they're they're very different

1532
01:27:57,800 --> 01:28:02,520
and they kind of come together
and they work together and then

1533
01:28:02,520 --> 01:28:05,560
they're sort of at odds.
But then something happens to

1534
01:28:05,560 --> 01:28:08,520
the film, sort of like what
happens to Oppenheimer, where

1535
01:28:08,520 --> 01:28:11,440
halfway through the movie you
realize, oh, I'm not watching a

1536
01:28:11,440 --> 01:28:13,680
movie about the thing I thought
I was watching a movie about.

1537
01:28:13,680 --> 01:28:16,080
I'm watching a movie about
something else that actually is

1538
01:28:16,080 --> 01:28:21,280
more consequential to the way
life is today.

1539
01:28:22,280 --> 01:28:29,080
That movie is Michael Mann's The
Insider, with Al Pacino as the

1540
01:28:29,080 --> 01:28:32,600
60 Minutes journalist and
Russell Crowe as the tobacco

1541
01:28:32,600 --> 01:28:36,280
industry whistleblower.
Where first half of the movie,

1542
01:28:37,040 --> 01:28:39,960
it feels like this is a movie
about a tobacco industry

1543
01:28:39,960 --> 01:28:43,840
whistleblower and how the 60
minutes producer got him to go

1544
01:28:43,840 --> 01:28:47,000
on the record and sort of the
death threats he was getting and

1545
01:28:47,000 --> 01:28:48,880
all this stuff.
And, and all, you know, all all

1546
01:28:48,880 --> 01:28:52,320
the stuff that went into and
the, you know, the, the, the

1547
01:28:52,320 --> 01:28:55,320
court cases that went into all
this, right.

1548
01:28:56,360 --> 01:29:00,880
And then like halfway through
the movie, you know, CBS mixes

1549
01:29:00,880 --> 01:29:04,440
the segment and suddenly it
becomes a movie about, oh, wait,

1550
01:29:04,640 --> 01:29:06,400
it's about the corporate
takeover of journalism.

1551
01:29:06,880 --> 01:29:09,920
You know, like in some ways a
completely different subject

1552
01:29:11,320 --> 01:29:14,920
obviously related to that.
But but but suddenly in in its

1553
01:29:14,920 --> 01:29:18,440
own way, kind of a, a, a
scarier, more sinister and more

1554
01:29:18,440 --> 01:29:21,400
thorny subject that is more
open-ended.

1555
01:29:22,800 --> 01:29:26,120
And it stops being like a screed
about the tobacco companies and

1556
01:29:26,120 --> 01:29:30,240
becomes actually about a
situation that only got worse

1557
01:29:30,240 --> 01:29:33,280
after 1999.
It turns into network.

1558
01:29:33,680 --> 01:29:38,200
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
So yeah, so I was like Insider

1559
01:29:38,200 --> 01:29:40,160
and Oppenheimer.
I think that'd actually be kind

1560
01:29:40,160 --> 01:29:45,000
of a kick ass, albeit long
double feature, but you know.

1561
01:29:45,080 --> 01:29:47,480
Yeah, that's great, man.
Yeah, mine was JFK.

1562
01:29:47,480 --> 01:29:49,840
I'm going to stick with it.
I know it's like the lame boring

1563
01:29:49,840 --> 01:29:51,640
answer here, but oh.
It's a great answer.

1564
01:29:51,760 --> 01:29:53,480
I mean.
Probably the right answer.

1565
01:29:53,560 --> 01:29:58,160
JFK to this day might still be
the best edited film of all

1566
01:29:58,160 --> 01:30:00,880
time.
Like it truly when you go back

1567
01:30:00,880 --> 01:30:03,160
and watch Brad.
We just did this last year.

1568
01:30:03,160 --> 01:30:05,640
We were immersed in early 90s
movies.

1569
01:30:06,520 --> 01:30:09,720
That movie is 30 years ahead of
its time in the way it's put

1570
01:30:09,720 --> 01:30:11,760
together it.
It's unbelievable.

1571
01:30:12,680 --> 01:30:14,640
Well, the other thing about JFK
is it does the thing, I mean,

1572
01:30:14,640 --> 01:30:17,920
which lots of big movies did,
like war movies would do.

1573
01:30:17,920 --> 01:30:20,760
But JFK does it in the way that
Oppenheimer does it, which is

1574
01:30:20,880 --> 01:30:23,400
they're going to be a lot of
characters you have to take keep

1575
01:30:23,400 --> 01:30:25,040
track of.
So they're going to be played by

1576
01:30:25,040 --> 01:30:27,760
people like Kevin Bacon and Joe
Beschi and you.

1577
01:30:27,760 --> 01:30:29,120
Know John Candy?
Yeah, exactly.

1578
01:30:29,120 --> 01:30:30,560
They're.
Going to be played by people you

1579
01:30:30,600 --> 01:30:34,080
recognize, like we're going to
help you out because we actually

1580
01:30:35,360 --> 01:30:37,440
like, we actually care about the
audience.

1581
01:30:38,240 --> 01:30:40,960
And, and it was a huge hit, you
know, like it was actually an

1582
01:30:40,960 --> 01:30:43,880
enormous hit.
I mean, you know, it's, it turns

1583
01:30:43,880 --> 01:30:46,680
out the, the, you know, I
remember, I mean, I was a kid

1584
01:30:46,680 --> 01:30:49,040
when it came out.
I, I saw it in theaters and I

1585
01:30:49,040 --> 01:30:52,960
totally bought into this
conspiracy theory about the JFK

1586
01:30:52,960 --> 01:30:57,240
assassination.
And, and I was like, why, why

1587
01:30:57,240 --> 01:30:58,440
aren't people talking about
this?

1588
01:30:58,440 --> 01:31:01,280
And I remember I mean.
Really just, it's just one of

1589
01:31:01,280 --> 01:31:04,480
the most effective pieces of
filmmaking I've ever seen it.

1590
01:31:04,480 --> 01:31:07,000
Like every time I watch it, I'm
like, Oliver Stone knows.

1591
01:31:07,000 --> 01:31:08,960
He knows what's up, man.
He does.

1592
01:31:08,960 --> 01:31:12,640
And and I remember at the time,
I mean, JFK was, was such a

1593
01:31:12,640 --> 01:31:15,720
phenomenon.
It was controversial, but it was

1594
01:31:16,080 --> 01:31:18,360
like controversial only in the
extent that there were like

1595
01:31:19,120 --> 01:31:22,520
people in officialdom who were
upset about the movie.

1596
01:31:22,720 --> 01:31:25,760
Like audiences loved that movie.
Like people saw that movie.

1597
01:31:25,760 --> 01:31:30,240
And I remember George Herbert
Walker Bush almost got cancelled

1598
01:31:31,200 --> 01:31:35,440
because at one point he said or,
or his spokesman said that he

1599
01:31:35,440 --> 01:31:38,760
had no reason to doubt the
Warren Commission findings on

1600
01:31:38,800 --> 01:31:42,040
the the JFK assassination.
And everybody was just like, get

1601
01:31:42,040 --> 01:31:44,280
a load of this guy.
Can you believe it?

1602
01:31:44,320 --> 01:31:47,160
You know, he didn't see the
movie.

1603
01:31:47,160 --> 01:31:53,120
He doesn't know he's covering it
up, you know, and and yeah, we

1604
01:31:53,120 --> 01:31:55,960
were all conspiracy theorists
for a for a hot second there

1605
01:31:55,960 --> 01:31:57,440
because that movie was so
effective.

1606
01:31:57,440 --> 01:32:02,200
And then and then years later,
you kind of, you know, do your

1607
01:32:02,200 --> 01:32:06,960
own research and maybe, maybe.
Maybe he made a little bit of

1608
01:32:06,960 --> 01:32:07,360
this.
Maybe.

1609
01:32:07,520 --> 01:32:10,080
Jim Gadison was full of crap.
That's what I that's what I

1610
01:32:10,080 --> 01:32:13,560
talked about earlier, though.
Like a good storyteller will tap

1611
01:32:13,560 --> 01:32:17,400
into things that people didn't
realize they already kind of

1612
01:32:17,400 --> 01:32:19,200
believed were true.
Right.

1613
01:32:19,200 --> 01:32:22,000
Right.
Like, and the JFK stuff is a

1614
01:32:22,000 --> 01:32:24,000
perfect example of that.
Yeah.

1615
01:32:24,280 --> 01:32:28,160
Yeah, also because I, I think
JFKI mean I JFK still works, you

1616
01:32:28,160 --> 01:32:31,320
know, and it still works as a,
it's still a beautiful and very

1617
01:32:31,320 --> 01:32:34,480
moving movie, but not because
now I'm like when I watch AFK

1618
01:32:34,480 --> 01:32:37,080
now I don't, I'm not like
suddenly a conspiracy theorist

1619
01:32:37,080 --> 01:32:39,320
again.
What it really works as, and it

1620
01:32:39,320 --> 01:32:42,320
totally fits like this isn't
like I'm not, I don't think I'm

1621
01:32:42,320 --> 01:32:45,040
imagining this, this angle on
the movie.

1622
01:32:45,040 --> 01:32:47,280
I think it very much works with
this angle.

1623
01:32:47,680 --> 01:32:51,920
It's a very personal expression
of Oliver Stone's complete

1624
01:32:51,920 --> 01:32:56,160
disillusionment with American
Society and with American

1625
01:32:56,160 --> 01:33:00,200
institutions.
That is very much a resonant and

1626
01:33:00,200 --> 01:33:04,200
and powerful and sincere theme.
You know, like where he goes

1627
01:33:04,200 --> 01:33:08,080
with it is is is cracked.
But, but, but that comes through

1628
01:33:08,080 --> 01:33:09,680
in the film.
It feels very personal.

1629
01:33:09,680 --> 01:33:13,160
I mean, that scene at the end
when Kevin Costner is basically

1630
01:33:13,160 --> 01:33:16,280
addressing the camera, I mean,
it becomes like Brechtian

1631
01:33:16,280 --> 01:33:18,080
almost.
But but at that point, you think

1632
01:33:18,080 --> 01:33:21,880
to yourself, this isn't
ultimately about JFK.

1633
01:33:22,160 --> 01:33:25,480
It's about Oliver Stone's
disillusionment and to a certain

1634
01:33:25,480 --> 01:33:28,480
extent, our disillusionment with
with American institutions, you

1635
01:33:28,480 --> 01:33:32,080
know?
All right, guys, I got my JFK

1636
01:33:32,080 --> 01:33:35,840
shot in the arm for today.
Let's give Oppenheimer some

1637
01:33:35,840 --> 01:33:38,440
final scores.
I'll, I'll get mine out of the

1638
01:33:38,440 --> 01:33:41,600
way first, Brad, I am going to
give this a 10 out of 10, but

1639
01:33:41,600 --> 01:33:44,200
it's the kind of 10 out of 10
where it's like, I don't think

1640
01:33:44,200 --> 01:33:47,120
this is a flawless movie.
I think that the decision to

1641
01:33:47,120 --> 01:33:52,280
keep the viewer at arm's length
is sometimes a legitimate flaw

1642
01:33:52,280 --> 01:33:56,200
of the film.
But in total, the the

1643
01:33:56,200 --> 01:34:00,720
overwhelming effect of the
movie, it just, no one's been

1644
01:34:00,720 --> 01:34:03,640
accused of bludgeoning you to
death in many of the films

1645
01:34:03,640 --> 01:34:05,200
before.
This might be the first time

1646
01:34:05,200 --> 01:34:09,240
that I really think he, he truly
just does beat you down until

1647
01:34:09,240 --> 01:34:12,640
you accept what he's doing.
And once you let it kind of wash

1648
01:34:12,640 --> 01:34:15,560
over you, it's it is a singular
piece of filmmaking.

1649
01:34:15,560 --> 01:34:17,080
It's got to be a 10 out of 10
for me.

1650
01:34:18,480 --> 01:34:22,600
Yeah, there there were many
parts throughout the film where

1651
01:34:22,600 --> 01:34:28,640
I thought to myself, like this
individual piece isn't perfect,

1652
01:34:29,440 --> 01:34:35,680
but exactly what you said, Bob,
at the end of the day, this film

1653
01:34:35,680 --> 01:34:41,280
is absolutely wild in the scope
it is trying to accomplish,

1654
01:34:41,640 --> 01:34:44,080
which is exactly what we talked
about with every single

1655
01:34:44,080 --> 01:34:47,960
Christopher Nolan film.
I think this time, though, he

1656
01:34:47,960 --> 01:34:52,440
did it in a way that
simultaneously is entertaining

1657
01:34:52,440 --> 01:34:56,800
and fun and enjoyable to watch,
which all of his movies have

1658
01:34:56,800 --> 01:35:01,720
those qualities.
But he also taps into the

1659
01:35:01,920 --> 01:35:08,000
artistic, a little more art
housey side of cinema.

1660
01:35:08,240 --> 01:35:11,560
And he just like marries those
two in such a beautiful way.

1661
01:35:12,280 --> 01:35:15,640
And then like the cherry on the
top of all that is that there's

1662
01:35:15,640 --> 01:35:20,320
really deep, meaningful
conversations you can have about

1663
01:35:20,320 --> 01:35:22,080
what this movie is trying to
say.

1664
01:35:22,080 --> 01:35:26,440
So like I he, he takes
everything you want out of

1665
01:35:26,440 --> 01:35:31,440
cinema, out of movies, out of a
blockbuster and, and, and gives

1666
01:35:31,440 --> 01:35:34,640
it.
He just delivers so well.

1667
01:35:34,640 --> 01:35:36,600
So I'm I'm with you, man, 10 out
of 10.

1668
01:35:38,360 --> 01:35:43,000
It's 11.
If any movie goes to 11, this

1669
01:35:43,040 --> 01:35:47,800
movie goes.
To 11, 100%, man.

1670
01:35:48,360 --> 01:35:51,160
Well, Belga, I like, I can't
thank you enough for joining us

1671
01:35:51,160 --> 01:35:54,720
for movie #3 and now that we've
hit an 11, I don't know what

1672
01:35:54,720 --> 01:35:55,880
we're going to talk about next
time.

1673
01:35:55,880 --> 01:35:58,960
We'll have to bring back Citizen
Kane for our next conversation.

1674
01:35:59,560 --> 01:36:00,880
Just talking.
You can just come on and read

1675
01:36:00,880 --> 01:36:04,400
your essay, it'll be perfect.
Always happy to do it, guys.

1676
01:36:04,400 --> 01:36:08,400
And yeah, next time, you know,
when you when you do a season

1677
01:36:08,400 --> 01:36:12,440
devoted to like the the stinky
films of the last 10 years, you

1678
01:36:12,480 --> 01:36:14,880
know.
We'll do a revisit of

1679
01:36:15,080 --> 01:36:17,680
Elizabethtown and you can help
me defend that movie against

1680
01:36:17,680 --> 01:36:19,960
Brad.
I don't know if I've ever seen

1681
01:36:19,960 --> 01:36:21,320
Elizabethtown.
Let's do it.

1682
01:36:21,840 --> 01:36:24,240
Let's do it, Brad.
I, I, I feel like I must have

1683
01:36:24,240 --> 01:36:27,680
because you know, it was a thing
and I would have seen it, but

1684
01:36:27,680 --> 01:36:31,560
like, like were the reviews so
bad that I just, it's possible I

1685
01:36:31,560 --> 01:36:34,000
did watch it later on video and
just have forgotten about it.

1686
01:36:34,000 --> 01:36:36,240
But yeah, I've never, I don't
think I've seen it.

1687
01:36:36,240 --> 01:36:40,720
I certainly don't remember it.
Well, Bill, go where can

1688
01:36:40,720 --> 01:36:42,920
everybody find you and, and
maybe let's plug something that

1689
01:36:42,920 --> 01:36:46,320
you're currently working on.
Oh, well, you know, I'm always

1690
01:36:46,320 --> 01:36:51,080
at Vulture, which is, you know,
my, my, my, my outlet.

1691
01:36:52,160 --> 01:36:55,120
And, you know, New York
Magazine, Vulture, basically

1692
01:36:55,120 --> 01:36:58,000
same outlet, but you know, my
stuff is on Vulture most of the

1693
01:36:58,000 --> 01:37:01,560
time.
And you know, when does this go

1694
01:37:01,560 --> 01:37:04,600
up?
This goes up on October 1st, so

1695
01:37:04,680 --> 01:37:06,080
a week from tomorrow.
So next week, yeah.

1696
01:37:06,080 --> 01:37:09,400
I mean, so you know, I will at
this by this point, hopefully I

1697
01:37:09,400 --> 01:37:11,640
will have published an interview
with Brian De Palma.

1698
01:37:12,840 --> 01:37:15,960
And also, I will probably
written a little bit about the

1699
01:37:15,960 --> 01:37:20,120
movie Nickel Boys, which is the
opening night film of the New

1700
01:37:20,120 --> 01:37:23,360
York Film Festival, directed by
Romel Ross, which is a film I

1701
01:37:23,400 --> 01:37:28,280
really love and I think does
some amazing, fascinating things

1702
01:37:28,640 --> 01:37:32,800
formally.
And I, I, I hope people respond

1703
01:37:32,800 --> 01:37:34,120
to it.
I saw it at the Telluride Film

1704
01:37:34,120 --> 01:37:39,360
Festival where, you know, I
mean, people loved it there too.

1705
01:37:39,360 --> 01:37:42,000
But I'd be curious to see how
people respond to it.

1706
01:37:42,000 --> 01:37:44,960
It's adaptation of Coleson
Whitehead's novel.

1707
01:37:46,040 --> 01:37:49,800
And Ramelle Ross did a
documentary called Hale County

1708
01:37:49,800 --> 01:37:53,600
This Morning this evening a few
years ago that I had loved.

1709
01:37:54,560 --> 01:37:56,720
And this is his first narrative
feature.

1710
01:37:58,680 --> 01:38:00,800
Anyway, I haven't written my
review yet, but by the time this

1711
01:38:00,800 --> 01:38:03,120
podcast comes out I will
probably have written my review.

1712
01:38:04,200 --> 01:38:06,320
All right, folks, that is Bilga
Ebiri.

1713
01:38:06,360 --> 01:38:09,320
We'll be back next week talking
about a movie that is not as

1714
01:38:09,320 --> 01:38:12,320
critically revered as
Oppenheimer, but surprisingly

1715
01:38:12,320 --> 01:38:16,760
beloved Question mark.
It's 2011's The Help, Brad.

1716
01:38:16,760 --> 01:38:20,240
Are you looking forward to that?
One, it is a movie that I've

1717
01:38:20,240 --> 01:38:26,240
seen before and just based on
memory, if it if it serves me

1718
01:38:26,240 --> 01:38:30,640
right, I just don't know if I
could call that a modern

1719
01:38:30,640 --> 01:38:32,200
classic.
I don't know, man, we're going.

1720
01:38:32,200 --> 01:38:34,440
To We'll see where we go with.
It we're going to see what all

1721
01:38:34,440 --> 01:38:37,120
the fuss is about and it's an 11
for sure.

1722
01:38:38,120 --> 01:38:41,400
Join us next week for the help,
but until then, I'm Bob Book.

1723
01:38:41,600 --> 01:38:43,960
I'm Brad G.
And we'll see you next time.

Film Critic, Editor at Vulture, Director of New Guy

Bilge Ebiri is one of the most respected voices in American film criticism. As a writer and editor for New York Magazine and Vulture, he brings both a scholar’s eye and a filmmaker’s soul to his reviews. A Yale-trained director whose feature film New Guy earned praise from The New York Times and Variety, Bilge has contributed essays to the Criterion Collection and written for The Village Voice, Rolling Stone, The Hollywood Reporter, and more. On Film & Whiskey, he’s helped decode Nolan’s prestige and Bond’s post-Cold War pivot—always with a pour of Bottled-in-Bond or a thoughtfully chosen rye.