Memento / Rabbit Hole Cavehill Bourbon
In this episode of Film & Whiskey, Bob and Brad dive into the mind-bending world of Christopher Nolan's 2000 film, Memento. As the first installment of their Christopher Nolan miniseries, they explore the intricate storytelling and memorable performances that have made this film a cult classic. Then, they venture into the realm of bourbon with a review of Rabbit Hole Cavehill, a four-grain Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey. Will the bourbon impress them as much as the mind-bending narrative of Memento?
Timestamps:
0:00 - Introduction
09:30 - Brad Explains Memento
12:15 - Performances and Themes
29:45 - Rabbit Hole Cavehill Bourbon Review
38:35 - Two Facts and a Falsehood
42:00 - Final Analysis
52:00 - Let's Make it a Double and Final Scores
In this captivating episode of Film & Whiskey, Bob and Brad embark on a journey into the intricate world of Christopher Nolan's Memento. Released in 2000, this mind-bending film follows the story of Leonard Shelby, played by the talented Guy Pearce, who suffers from short-term memory loss and navigates a non-linear narrative in his quest for revenge. As Bob revisits this film after 15 years and Brad experiences it for the first time, they delve into Nolan's direction and the thought-provoking themes explored throughout the story.
With its noir aesthetics, mystery, and thrilling plot twists, Memento solidified Christopher Nolan's reputation as a visionary filmmaker. Bob and Brad engage in a discussion about the film's unique narrative structure, its exploration of memory and identity, and the exceptional performances by the cast, including Carrie-Anne Moss as Natalie.
To complement their film analysis, the hosts also indulge in a tasting of Rabbit Hole Cavehill, a premium Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey. Bottled at 95 proof and aged in new American oak barrels, this four-grain, high-malt bourbon offers a smooth and flavorful drinking experience. As they savor the complex notes and discuss its craftsmanship, they ask whether this bourbon lives up to their expectations and adds to the enjoyment of the episode.
Film & Whiskey Podcast. New episodes every Tuesday.
Theme music: "New Shoes" by Blue Wednesday
Film & Whiskey Instagram
Film & Whiskey Facebook
Film & Whiskey Twitter
Email us!
Join our Discord server!
For more episodes and engaging content, visit Film & Whiskey's website at www.filmwhiskey.com.
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/filmwhiskey/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/filmwhiskey/support00:00:00,440 --> 00:00:04,760
In 2000, director Christopher
Nolan and star Guy Pierce gave
2
00:00:04,760 --> 00:00:08,119
the world a frenetic flick that
toyed with the ideas of memory,
3
00:00:08,200 --> 00:00:12,800
time and reality.
In 2023, we returned to Kentucky
4
00:00:12,800 --> 00:00:16,720
to try a four grain bourbon.
The film is Memento.
5
00:00:16,960 --> 00:00:20,360
The whiskey is rabbit hole.
Cave Hill and we'll review them
6
00:00:20,360 --> 00:00:23,280
both.
This is the film.
7
00:00:23,320 --> 00:00:44,850
And whiskey podcast.
Welcome to the Film and Whiskey
8
00:00:44,850 --> 00:00:47,970
Podcast, where each week we
review a classic movie and a
9
00:00:47,970 --> 00:00:50,050
glass of whiskey.
I'm Bob Book.
10
00:00:50,450 --> 00:00:53,290
I'm Brad Gee.
And this week, Brad.
11
00:00:53,650 --> 00:00:56,810
The mind effing begins on film
and whiskey.
12
00:00:56,890 --> 00:01:01,450
Bob, I I got a tattoo in
memoriam of this episode.
13
00:01:02,770 --> 00:01:08,210
It's just as Brad explains.
Fact #1, Brad always explains.
14
00:01:09,610 --> 00:01:12,370
This week we are starting a
miniseries of films by
15
00:01:12,370 --> 00:01:15,330
everyone's favorite time
traveling director, Christopher
16
00:01:15,330 --> 00:01:18,050
Nolan.
We've done a few Nolan films on
17
00:01:18,050 --> 00:01:20,810
the show before Brad, I know
we've done Interstellar.
18
00:01:21,310 --> 00:01:24,190
Let's see, Inception and The
Dark Knight, right?
19
00:01:24,190 --> 00:01:27,590
So this is, yeah, 4-5 and six
from Chris Nolan.
20
00:01:28,070 --> 00:01:31,990
Which will put him up there as
one of our higher, you know,
21
00:01:31,990 --> 00:01:35,910
amount of films reviewed.
Yeah, I mean, it really was kind
22
00:01:35,910 --> 00:01:38,550
of fortuitous, Brad, because
we're doing this miniseries of
23
00:01:38,550 --> 00:01:42,670
directors, and if you look at,
say, the IMDb Top 250, you see a
24
00:01:42,670 --> 00:01:46,190
lot of Nolan movies in there,
and it's because A, Nolan makes
25
00:01:46,190 --> 00:01:47,590
really good movies.
And B.
26
00:01:48,020 --> 00:01:51,420
He has amassed a following as a
director that is kind of
27
00:01:51,420 --> 00:01:55,300
unparalleled I would say, since
the early Tarantino days in
28
00:01:55,300 --> 00:01:58,940
terms of having fanboys.
So I kind of figured it would be
29
00:01:58,940 --> 00:02:02,740
necessary for us to talk about
these three movies at some point
30
00:02:03,100 --> 00:02:06,420
and what better time to do them
then leading up to the release
31
00:02:06,420 --> 00:02:10,139
of his movie Oppenheimer, which
I believe comes out on the 21st
32
00:02:10,139 --> 00:02:13,300
of July.
So yeah, it's, it's, it's great
33
00:02:13,300 --> 00:02:15,500
time for engagement and
downloads, Brad.
34
00:02:15,620 --> 00:02:17,100
That's daggone, right?
It is.
35
00:02:17,100 --> 00:02:19,780
I was going to say if there's
any time where we wanted to
36
00:02:19,780 --> 00:02:23,940
ingratiate ourselves to the
Nolan fanboys, this is it.
37
00:02:23,940 --> 00:02:26,660
This is the time.
Get ready for the butt kissing
38
00:02:26,660 --> 00:02:30,600
of all butt kissing.
Oh, and Speaking of which, not
39
00:02:30,600 --> 00:02:32,920
the butt kissing part, but the
fortuitous timing part.
40
00:02:34,240 --> 00:02:38,320
We don't always line up our
whiskeys in thematic ways, but I
41
00:02:38,320 --> 00:02:41,160
figured we had a whiskey sitting
on the shelf called Rabbit Hole
42
00:02:41,520 --> 00:02:44,000
and I was like, oh man, if we're
going to talk about going down
43
00:02:44,000 --> 00:02:47,000
the rabbit hole with any
director, Chris Nolan.
44
00:02:47,760 --> 00:02:48,880
Yeah.
Am I right?
45
00:02:49,480 --> 00:02:52,000
I mean, am I right?
Because I matched him up so?
46
00:02:52,480 --> 00:02:54,200
It would have been better with
the matrix.
47
00:02:54,360 --> 00:02:57,320
I think it would have been even
better with the Prestige, just
48
00:02:57,320 --> 00:02:59,640
because of pulling rabbits out
of hats and stuff like that.
49
00:02:59,960 --> 00:03:02,000
And you're going down the rabbit
hole that.
50
00:03:02,000 --> 00:03:03,400
Would have been better.
That's all right.
51
00:03:03,520 --> 00:03:04,520
We did pretty.
Good So.
52
00:03:05,360 --> 00:03:09,120
Well, by you take your own blame
for the failure of the show,
53
00:03:09,120 --> 00:03:10,280
Bob.
I mean, this could have been the
54
00:03:10,280 --> 00:03:12,240
week we did, like Basil Hayden's
or something, Brad.
55
00:03:12,240 --> 00:03:13,840
So just count your lucky stars,
man.
56
00:03:15,680 --> 00:03:18,640
Oh God, that whiskey sucks.
All right, well, let's steer
57
00:03:18,640 --> 00:03:21,160
away from Basil Hayden.
Let's steer back into Chris
58
00:03:21,160 --> 00:03:23,080
Nolan.
So it's been a while since we've
59
00:03:23,080 --> 00:03:24,960
done a Nolan film on the
podcast.
60
00:03:24,960 --> 00:03:28,240
Brad, you know, just, I'm sure
that you've watched a Nolan
61
00:03:28,240 --> 00:03:30,680
film, probably in the interim,
just because they're so popular.
62
00:03:30,760 --> 00:03:32,480
When you think about Christopher
Nolan.
63
00:03:33,060 --> 00:03:38,500
What kind of directorial or
writing or acting hallmarks come
64
00:03:38,500 --> 00:03:40,940
up in your mind?
Like who is he as a director?
65
00:03:41,580 --> 00:03:45,540
First off, I love that you
assume that I just watch movies
66
00:03:46,060 --> 00:03:48,460
like we've been friends for long
enough, Bob.
67
00:03:48,920 --> 00:03:51,760
That, you know, I don't watch
movies other than for the
68
00:03:51,760 --> 00:03:53,600
podcast.
I feel like it makes me feel
69
00:03:53,600 --> 00:03:57,480
like such a huge jerk, though,
to assume the other way to be
70
00:03:57,480 --> 00:04:01,000
like, well, Brad, I assume you
don't watch any movies, so let's
71
00:04:01,000 --> 00:04:03,520
just say that you haven't
watched a Chris Nolan movie in
72
00:04:03,520 --> 00:04:06,680
two years.
I I will clear the record for
73
00:04:06,680 --> 00:04:10,240
everyone listening here, Bob.
I have not watched a Christopher
74
00:04:10,240 --> 00:04:12,120
Nolan movie in the last.
Two years?
75
00:04:12,120 --> 00:04:15,200
Well, then, let me rephrase in
the two years it's been.
76
00:04:15,560 --> 00:04:18,880
What kind of things about Nolan
stick out to you when you think
77
00:04:18,880 --> 00:04:22,560
about him as a director, even
through two years of hazy, foggy
78
00:04:22,560 --> 00:04:26,560
memory?
I think that he always has
79
00:04:26,560 --> 00:04:30,080
really dynamic relationships
with the characters in his
80
00:04:30,080 --> 00:04:33,200
films.
I'll I'll spoil a tiny bit of
81
00:04:33,200 --> 00:04:36,280
momento here.
The moments where he has
82
00:04:36,280 --> 00:04:40,320
memories of his wife feel like
the most.
83
00:04:40,660 --> 00:04:44,820
Null in the version of himself
in this, you know, his earliest
84
00:04:44,820 --> 00:04:47,820
film.
Is this his first film?
85
00:04:48,020 --> 00:04:50,300
It's not technically his first
film, so he made a movie called
86
00:04:50,300 --> 00:04:53,260
Following a few years before
this, which was I think it's
87
00:04:53,260 --> 00:04:55,900
only about 65 or 70 minutes
long.
88
00:04:56,140 --> 00:04:58,580
Like it's just long enough to
count as a feature film.
89
00:04:58,970 --> 00:05:01,330
It played in a few film
festivals and kind of got him
90
00:05:01,330 --> 00:05:03,650
the recognition he needed to
make Memento.
91
00:05:03,930 --> 00:05:06,730
But Memento is the movie that
introduced him to the world.
92
00:05:06,930 --> 00:05:10,210
So yeah, it's his second movie,
but for all intensive burdens,
93
00:05:10,210 --> 00:05:14,290
it it's kind of his first movie.
Yeah, so there there's pieces of
94
00:05:14,290 --> 00:05:19,410
Memento that feel like, oh, you
can see where he will go as a
95
00:05:19,450 --> 00:05:22,530
blockbuster director.
But for now, what?
96
00:05:22,650 --> 00:05:27,370
What I think of when I think
about Nolan is convoluted plots.
97
00:05:27,840 --> 00:05:34,640
That have just wild endings.
And I think, I mean the only one
98
00:05:34,640 --> 00:05:37,560
I can think of that's not
necessarily that wild is like
99
00:05:37,560 --> 00:05:40,080
Batman Begins.
And even that one has a plot
100
00:05:40,080 --> 00:05:44,400
twist.
He is just a fascinating
101
00:05:44,400 --> 00:05:48,720
director who uses the camera
really well in memory sequences.
102
00:05:49,640 --> 00:05:52,640
I think that's what I I think
about and and I'll go back to
103
00:05:52,640 --> 00:05:57,440
what we said about Interstellar.
He just swings for the fences
104
00:05:57,440 --> 00:06:00,920
constantly and it doesn't mean
he always gets there, but I
105
00:06:00,920 --> 00:06:05,960
think the reason he has a fanboy
following is because he's always
106
00:06:05,960 --> 00:06:08,200
trying to like, hit a Grand
Slam.
107
00:06:09,400 --> 00:06:12,440
Yeah, I mean, totally agree.
I think that as a filmmaker,
108
00:06:12,440 --> 00:06:15,720
what he's most known for is
playing with time.
109
00:06:15,760 --> 00:06:17,720
He's obsessed with the concept
of time.
110
00:06:18,040 --> 00:06:20,520
Whether it's moving forward in
time or backward in time or
111
00:06:20,520 --> 00:06:24,040
across time in Interstellar,
it's always a theme throughout
112
00:06:24,040 --> 00:06:27,040
his movies.
And time and memory, I think,
113
00:06:27,040 --> 00:06:29,320
are the two things that you
could really call his hallmarks
114
00:06:29,320 --> 00:06:31,880
as a director.
Brad, you know, we, we just came
115
00:06:31,880 --> 00:06:34,800
off of a Chaplin series, and I
told you that I got 12 books out
116
00:06:34,800 --> 00:06:37,880
of the library about Chaplin.
I went to the library and I
117
00:06:37,880 --> 00:06:40,560
ordered some books about Chris
Nolan, and there's only three of
118
00:06:40,560 --> 00:06:44,040
them on my shelf now.
And I think it says a lot about,
119
00:06:44,400 --> 00:06:47,880
I don't know, the state of film
criticism that one of the most
120
00:06:47,880 --> 00:06:51,400
significant filmmakers of the
last 20 years has only had a few
121
00:06:51,400 --> 00:06:53,920
films written about him or a few
books written about him.
122
00:06:54,530 --> 00:06:58,330
And I can't decide if it's
because it it just doesn't seem
123
00:06:58,330 --> 00:07:01,450
like it's been long enough to
offer a career evaluation.
124
00:07:01,930 --> 00:07:06,210
Or if it's just that his themes
are so on the surface or, you
125
00:07:06,210 --> 00:07:09,410
know, so proudly displayed that
there's really not much of A
126
00:07:09,410 --> 00:07:12,090
need to do a book length dive
into them.
127
00:07:12,090 --> 00:07:15,450
Because I think everyone
recognizes this is what this guy
128
00:07:15,450 --> 00:07:17,810
deals with.
Like, even to your point,
129
00:07:17,810 --> 00:07:20,210
something like the Batman series
that he did, The Dark Knight
130
00:07:20,210 --> 00:07:22,250
series.
Those are all about time.
131
00:07:22,250 --> 00:07:24,810
There's always a ticking clock
at the end of those movies,
132
00:07:24,810 --> 00:07:27,570
whether it's the bomb at the end
of the third one or racing
133
00:07:27,570 --> 00:07:30,850
against time in the Joker in the
second one, then even in the
134
00:07:30,850 --> 00:07:32,970
first one.
When you're establishing the
135
00:07:32,970 --> 00:07:36,970
story of Bruce Wayne, like the
memory of his parents getting
136
00:07:36,970 --> 00:07:39,530
murdered is what drives the
character of Batman.
137
00:07:39,530 --> 00:07:42,810
And so it he's always been the
perfect filmmaker for that
138
00:07:42,810 --> 00:07:45,850
character because it's right in
line with what he likes to talk
139
00:07:45,850 --> 00:07:48,030
about.
I haven't seen Batman Begins in
140
00:07:48,030 --> 00:07:50,590
a really long time.
I think that one ends with a
141
00:07:50,590 --> 00:07:54,910
bomb racing for Wayne Tower at
the at the center of the city,
142
00:07:54,910 --> 00:07:55,510
right?
Yeah.
143
00:07:55,950 --> 00:07:58,230
It's him and Liam Neeson on The
Monorail, yeah.
144
00:07:58,750 --> 00:08:01,070
Yeah, so even that one, it's
it's a bomb race.
145
00:08:01,230 --> 00:08:05,030
Kind of like the third one.
Yeah, man.
146
00:08:05,030 --> 00:08:08,230
I'm excited to dive into Nolan,
and I don't mean to make it
147
00:08:08,230 --> 00:08:10,230
sound like he's a simplistic
filmmaker.
148
00:08:10,230 --> 00:08:13,470
Like you said, he's always
playing with the chronology of
149
00:08:13,470 --> 00:08:16,260
his movies.
And sometimes it seems like it's
150
00:08:16,260 --> 00:08:18,660
necessary for the movies to be
told.
151
00:08:19,020 --> 00:08:22,460
And sometimes it feels like it's
just Chris Nolan wanting to take
152
00:08:22,460 --> 00:08:25,500
a pretty straightforward story
and just make it convoluted for
153
00:08:25,500 --> 00:08:26,940
the sake of making it
convoluted.
154
00:08:27,460 --> 00:08:30,580
These three films we're going to
look at, I have wildly different
155
00:08:30,580 --> 00:08:32,100
opinions across the three of
them.
156
00:08:32,460 --> 00:08:34,460
And to get us back to Memento, I
will say this.
157
00:08:34,460 --> 00:08:37,059
I have not seen Memento in
probably 15 years.
158
00:08:37,059 --> 00:08:39,820
I watched it one time.
I wasn't a huge fan.
159
00:08:39,820 --> 00:08:41,620
I always felt like it was a
little forced.
160
00:08:41,620 --> 00:08:44,820
It was a little contrived.
A little too cute for its own
161
00:08:44,820 --> 00:08:50,100
good, you and I, Brad sat down
and watched this movie together.
162
00:08:50,700 --> 00:08:52,780
A first for the Film and Whiskey
podcast.
163
00:08:53,300 --> 00:08:56,820
An absolute first.
I I mean, we have never once sat
164
00:08:56,820 --> 00:08:59,900
down together and watched a
movie for the purpose of
165
00:08:59,900 --> 00:09:02,180
recording an episode for you
all.
166
00:09:02,670 --> 00:09:04,030
You are welcome.
That's crazy, man.
167
00:09:04,110 --> 00:09:06,790
Yeah, you're welcome.
I mean this is this is episode
168
00:09:06,790 --> 00:09:09,230
what like 209 or something for
us?
169
00:09:09,230 --> 00:09:11,470
And it's never ever happened
before.
170
00:09:11,790 --> 00:09:14,950
And not to spoil too much of my
thoughts on the movie, but I
171
00:09:14,950 --> 00:09:20,430
have changed my tune on Memento.
I I mean, I'm excited to talk
172
00:09:20,430 --> 00:09:22,910
about it then.
All right, man, I think that
173
00:09:23,510 --> 00:09:27,030
I've been delaying something,
the inevitable here for a couple
174
00:09:27,030 --> 00:09:30,830
minutes, and that's because I do
not envy your task today.
175
00:09:31,280 --> 00:09:34,640
In our first segment, which we
call, Brad explains.
176
00:09:34,760 --> 00:09:37,960
Brad's gonna give us the movie
plots with only 60 seconds
177
00:09:38,160 --> 00:09:41,680
ticking on the clock, so let's
go ahead and do your take with
178
00:09:41,680 --> 00:09:44,560
this little segment that we call
Brad explains.
179
00:09:44,640 --> 00:09:49,280
Would you say that doing a Brad
explains for Gone with the Wind
180
00:09:49,280 --> 00:09:52,800
or Memento would be harder?
I mean, God, the wind is just
181
00:09:52,800 --> 00:09:55,160
like this happens, and then this
happens, and then this happens.
182
00:09:55,160 --> 00:09:56,720
And, you know, like it's just a
long.
183
00:09:56,840 --> 00:09:58,800
Movie.
But God with the Wind is like
184
00:09:58,800 --> 00:10:03,380
this happens then this happens.
And then 397 other things
185
00:10:03,380 --> 00:10:05,940
happen.
That was more just like a list
186
00:10:05,940 --> 00:10:08,020
that you were reading.
This is going to be a real
187
00:10:08,020 --> 00:10:10,460
challenge.
So Brad explains is the part of
188
00:10:10,460 --> 00:10:13,340
the podcast where Brad breaks
down the plot of the movie that
189
00:10:13,340 --> 00:10:17,340
he has just seen often for the
first time Brad was this your
190
00:10:17,340 --> 00:10:20,300
first time watching Memento?
It sure was, Bob.
191
00:10:20,860 --> 00:10:22,300
Well then, I really don't envy
you.
192
00:10:22,740 --> 00:10:25,660
You have 60 seconds on the clock
to break down the plot of this
193
00:10:25,660 --> 00:10:27,350
movie.
Folks, we are going to get into
194
00:10:27,350 --> 00:10:30,430
spoilers on this review.
If you've not seen the 22 year
195
00:10:30,430 --> 00:10:34,310
old movie Memento, I need you to
just stop here, go listen to it
196
00:10:34,310 --> 00:10:38,110
and then come back because this
movie and the discussion of it
197
00:10:38,110 --> 00:10:40,830
is going to hinge on its
spoilers.
198
00:10:41,270 --> 00:10:44,950
So Brad, just a no holds bar.
Don't hold anything back.
199
00:10:45,190 --> 00:10:47,950
You've got one minute on the
clock to break down this movie
200
00:10:48,030 --> 00:10:51,590
and go.
Guy Pierce is an insurance agent
201
00:10:51,590 --> 00:10:54,710
whose big break came when he
proved that a man named Sammy
202
00:10:54,710 --> 00:10:57,230
Jankes.
Did not actually have shortterm
203
00:10:57,230 --> 00:11:02,110
memory loss, and he was faking
it, which led to the death of
204
00:11:02,110 --> 00:11:06,790
that man's wife and then he
himself.
205
00:11:07,110 --> 00:11:10,910
Guy Pierce's character receives
shortterm memory loss after his
206
00:11:10,910 --> 00:11:15,510
wife is brutally attacked and
murdered in their home.
207
00:11:15,950 --> 00:11:19,750
The rest of the film is about
him trying to put together the
208
00:11:19,750 --> 00:11:24,110
pieces of his wife's murder and
figure out who the killer is.
209
00:11:24,590 --> 00:11:28,190
By the end of the film he has
interacted with Trinity from the
210
00:11:28,190 --> 00:11:32,950
Matrix and she is helping him to
try and figure out the problem.
211
00:11:33,510 --> 00:11:39,940
Joe Pantoliani, Leoni Leoni.
Joe plays a guy named Teddy who
212
00:11:39,940 --> 00:11:42,900
is a police officer who's trying
to help him find the killer.
213
00:11:43,180 --> 00:11:45,580
But at the end of the film, it
turns out that they already
214
00:11:45,580 --> 00:11:48,860
found and killed the killer, but
the shortterm memory loss never
215
00:11:48,860 --> 00:11:52,100
allowed him to remember that.
And so Teddy has been using him
216
00:11:52,100 --> 00:11:57,380
to kill a bunch of different
people who are bad guys, and Guy
217
00:11:57,380 --> 00:12:01,700
Pearce turns the formula around
and uses his shortterm memory
218
00:12:01,700 --> 00:12:07,480
loss to seek out and kill Teddy.
OK, I'll let you go for a minute
219
00:12:07,480 --> 00:12:10,280
and 20 seconds because that's,
it's hard, man, you know?
220
00:12:10,320 --> 00:12:11,480
Thanks man.
It is what?
221
00:12:11,480 --> 00:12:13,880
It is.
I'm really interested, Brad, in
222
00:12:13,880 --> 00:12:19,720
the fact that you explained this
movie in the chronological order
223
00:12:19,720 --> 00:12:21,440
that the events happen in the
movie.
224
00:12:21,920 --> 00:12:23,360
That's the only way to do it,
man.
225
00:12:24,040 --> 00:12:27,800
And I'm wondering how important
it is that we say upfront that
226
00:12:27,960 --> 00:12:31,520
the central conceit of this
movie is that it is not told in
227
00:12:31,520 --> 00:12:34,560
chronological order.
It is told in a disorienting
228
00:12:34,560 --> 00:12:36,820
fashion.
And it really does take you
229
00:12:36,820 --> 00:12:39,300
until just about the last minute
of the movie to piece everything
230
00:12:39,300 --> 00:12:42,340
together, not only because
information is withheld from
231
00:12:42,340 --> 00:12:46,180
you, but just because you are
watching two different timelines
232
00:12:46,180 --> 00:12:49,660
being intercut.
Yeah, and and that's, that's
233
00:12:49,660 --> 00:12:52,460
kind of the whole, the whole
gimmick, Bob.
234
00:12:53,260 --> 00:12:57,780
It's it's, I hate to say it, but
this movie is a big gimmick.
235
00:12:57,900 --> 00:13:00,700
It is a big.
It mostly works.
236
00:13:01,100 --> 00:13:05,100
The thing that makes it not work
is what Nolan is constantly.
237
00:13:06,980 --> 00:13:11,900
Undermined for which is way too
much dialogue.
238
00:13:11,940 --> 00:13:15,380
And I I just don't know if he's
a great director of actors
239
00:13:15,540 --> 00:13:17,740
because there's a lot of bad
acting in this movie.
240
00:13:17,780 --> 00:13:20,420
Oh yeah, I disagree with that.
I think that he's a really good
241
00:13:20,420 --> 00:13:22,860
director of actors.
I will say that you and I were
242
00:13:22,860 --> 00:13:25,140
sitting next to each other on
the couch watching this movie
243
00:13:25,500 --> 00:13:27,900
and at multiple points, you
know, at, you know, in the
244
00:13:27,900 --> 00:13:30,900
middle of the movie, we were
stopping it and just laughing at
245
00:13:30,900 --> 00:13:32,340
some of the dialogue in this
movie.
246
00:13:32,780 --> 00:13:34,440
But.
And I think it's also really
247
00:13:34,440 --> 00:13:37,800
important to note that if you're
going to kind of categorize this
248
00:13:37,800 --> 00:13:40,400
movie into a genre, this is a
noir.
249
00:13:40,440 --> 00:13:44,720
This is 100% of film noir.
It has all of the elements of a
250
00:13:44,720 --> 00:13:47,640
noir.
It's an unreliable narrator who
251
00:13:47,640 --> 00:13:49,480
may or may not be doing sketchy
things.
252
00:13:49,480 --> 00:13:52,040
It's got corrupt cops.
It's got a femme fatale.
253
00:13:52,320 --> 00:13:54,880
It's got a mystery that needs to
be unraveled.
254
00:13:54,880 --> 00:13:57,720
People keep dying.
It has a really bleak outlook on
255
00:13:57,720 --> 00:14:00,960
the world, like it is 100% of
film noir.
256
00:14:01,320 --> 00:14:05,200
And I do wonder if.
Because of having that in mind,
257
00:14:05,200 --> 00:14:11,480
if Nolan makes these characters
speak in sort of almost 1940s
258
00:14:12,080 --> 00:14:16,440
hard boiled detective language,
I'm not saying it works, but I'm
259
00:14:16,440 --> 00:14:19,680
wondering now, Brad if the the
reason the dialogue feels so
260
00:14:19,680 --> 00:14:22,880
forced sometimes is because he's
trying to make the dialogue
261
00:14:22,880 --> 00:14:27,000
sound more like a noir.
Yeah, and and there's places
262
00:14:27,000 --> 00:14:29,120
where it works.
I mean, honestly, I think that
263
00:14:29,120 --> 00:14:30,840
some of the black and white
scenes.
264
00:14:31,330 --> 00:14:34,290
Work because they're black and
white and you're like yeah, this
265
00:14:34,290 --> 00:14:37,770
is this is a noir that is
totally makes sense.
266
00:14:37,970 --> 00:14:42,730
I think that the the big issue I
have is that not only is the
267
00:14:42,730 --> 00:14:48,610
dialogue rough, but it the
actors just often feel stilted
268
00:14:48,610 --> 00:14:51,970
throughout the movie.
I think that guy Pierce does a
269
00:14:51,970 --> 00:14:56,530
phenomenal job when he's not
talking like when he is silent.
270
00:14:56,610 --> 00:15:01,010
I I think that he has a talent
for looking blank.
271
00:15:01,450 --> 00:15:05,450
On the surface, while like
completely confused underneath
272
00:15:05,450 --> 00:15:08,490
and trying to figure out what's
going on, and he has a real
273
00:15:08,490 --> 00:15:11,570
talent for that.
But then he opens his mouth and
274
00:15:11,570 --> 00:15:17,410
it's not great, Bob.
I can feel you trying to jump
275
00:15:17,410 --> 00:15:19,530
into performances here, and I
want to.
276
00:15:19,610 --> 00:15:22,450
I just want to real quick, I
want to reestablish this whole
277
00:15:22,450 --> 00:15:25,530
thing about the timeline of the
movie, because I feel like we're
278
00:15:25,530 --> 00:15:27,930
going to be talking about the
different timelines of this
279
00:15:27,930 --> 00:15:29,690
movie and we need to at least
offer a little bit of an
280
00:15:29,690 --> 00:15:33,700
explanation, so.
The movie starts with the
281
00:15:33,700 --> 00:15:39,020
chronological ending of the
events, and you kind of get a
282
00:15:39,020 --> 00:15:42,500
hint very early on that
everything that you see in color
283
00:15:42,500 --> 00:15:44,940
is moving in reverse
chronological order.
284
00:15:45,220 --> 00:15:48,260
At the same time, these color
scenes are being intercut with
285
00:15:48,260 --> 00:15:51,500
black and white scenes and those
are moving forward in time the
286
00:15:51,500 --> 00:15:54,460
way time normally works.
And what you come to find out is
287
00:15:54,460 --> 00:15:58,780
basically like you have two
timelines being intercut 1.
288
00:15:59,260 --> 00:16:03,420
Going from the end towards a
middle point backwards in time
289
00:16:03,420 --> 00:16:05,940
and one going from the beginning
towards that same middle point,
290
00:16:06,220 --> 00:16:08,740
and they both arrive at the same
middle point at the end of the
291
00:16:08,740 --> 00:16:10,020
movie.
And you get this really cool
292
00:16:10,020 --> 00:16:13,260
transition from black and white
fading into color.
293
00:16:13,260 --> 00:16:15,340
And you can tell all right, this
is where these two timelines
294
00:16:15,340 --> 00:16:18,660
intersect.
But you're entirely right, Brad,
295
00:16:18,660 --> 00:16:23,060
in that the the stylizing of
those different timelines is
296
00:16:23,060 --> 00:16:25,700
almost completely different.
I mean, not just the fact that
297
00:16:25,700 --> 00:16:29,330
it's black and white, but.
The kind of dialogue that or I
298
00:16:29,330 --> 00:16:32,530
guess monologue that Guy Pierce
is giving in those black and
299
00:16:32,530 --> 00:16:35,170
white scenes where he's just
talking over the phone to an
300
00:16:35,170 --> 00:16:39,850
unseen person that feels very
much like your standard, you
301
00:16:39,850 --> 00:16:43,810
know, Double Indemnity or Sunset
Blvd. kind of narration where
302
00:16:43,810 --> 00:16:45,410
he's he's just talking about
okay.
303
00:16:45,410 --> 00:16:46,930
This is what happened with Sammy
Jenkas.
304
00:16:47,290 --> 00:16:49,690
And you could see that if this
was a movie from the 50s, they
305
00:16:49,690 --> 00:16:51,640
would have this.
Really nice.
306
00:16:51,640 --> 00:16:55,280
Like dissolve into the first
time I met Sandy Jenkins and you
307
00:16:55,280 --> 00:16:58,120
have this voice over, except
it's not played as voice over.
308
00:16:58,120 --> 00:17:02,040
It's played as like this
paranoid conversation that he's
309
00:17:02,040 --> 00:17:05,240
having inside a motel room.
I don't know, man.
310
00:17:05,280 --> 00:17:08,359
I I I can't say that the
dialogue or the way that it's
311
00:17:08,359 --> 00:17:12,359
written works for me as
believable dialogue.
312
00:17:13,240 --> 00:17:16,960
But I think for me it's more
that this is the early 2000s
313
00:17:16,960 --> 00:17:19,599
where it was really cool to
mumble everything.
314
00:17:20,240 --> 00:17:24,960
Like, it reminded me so much of,
like Jim Carrey in Eternal
315
00:17:24,960 --> 00:17:28,840
Sunshine how you can never he's
like, he's so morose that you
316
00:17:28,840 --> 00:17:30,920
can't really understand what
he's saying at any point.
317
00:17:31,040 --> 00:17:34,640
That's Guy Pearce in this movie.
And I know it's intentional, but
318
00:17:34,640 --> 00:17:37,880
we watched this movie with
subtitles on because it was the
319
00:17:37,880 --> 00:17:41,480
dialogue comes at you really
fast, but it's never enunciated
320
00:17:41,480 --> 00:17:45,480
well enough to understand.
And and that's that's like a
321
00:17:45,480 --> 00:17:49,040
problem, Bob, like if I'm
sitting here on this podcast.
322
00:17:49,510 --> 00:17:51,470
And I'm just talking like this.
And I think that it's really
323
00:17:51,470 --> 00:17:54,430
silly that I just, you know,
things like, like you would
324
00:17:54,470 --> 00:17:57,590
drive down to Delaware and slap
me across the face.
325
00:17:57,750 --> 00:18:01,230
Right with a microphone.
With a microphone, tell me to
326
00:18:01,950 --> 00:18:06,550
enunciate, sit closer.
And I I just don't understand
327
00:18:06,550 --> 00:18:12,070
how a Hollywood film director
can struggle to have his actors
328
00:18:12,070 --> 00:18:14,510
be understood.
And I know that he has a whole
329
00:18:14,510 --> 00:18:17,030
thing about how he wants his
sound design done.
330
00:18:17,030 --> 00:18:18,550
You don't need to understand
every word.
331
00:18:19,040 --> 00:18:22,520
And like, for the most part, I'm
fine with that.
332
00:18:22,600 --> 00:18:24,960
Like, I actually have come to a
point where I don't like
333
00:18:24,960 --> 00:18:28,400
subtitles because I want to
watch the movie as the director
334
00:18:28,400 --> 00:18:31,520
wants me to watch it.
But I'll just tell you this if I
335
00:18:31,520 --> 00:18:36,290
can't understand.
Even like 30% of what an actor
336
00:18:36,290 --> 00:18:38,730
says throughout the movie, you
know, especially if it's the
337
00:18:38,730 --> 00:18:41,410
main actor, I'm not going to
enjoy the movie.
338
00:18:41,450 --> 00:18:45,410
I want to know what's going on.
And and Momento was a struggle
339
00:18:45,410 --> 00:18:47,290
with that.
Especially in a movie like this,
340
00:18:47,290 --> 00:18:50,690
where so much of the information
is withheld from you until the
341
00:18:50,690 --> 00:18:54,490
very end that you need to be
able to rely on what you're
342
00:18:54,490 --> 00:18:57,410
seeing and hearing just to make
heads or tails of what's going
343
00:18:57,410 --> 00:18:59,170
on.
Even if it's supposed to be
344
00:18:59,170 --> 00:19:02,090
disorienting, Even if you're not
supposed to understand exactly
345
00:19:02,330 --> 00:19:04,810
who put those.
Cuts on his face or what's her
346
00:19:04,810 --> 00:19:07,010
motivation right now?
You at least need to be able to
347
00:19:07,010 --> 00:19:10,090
understand what they're saying
and what they're pretending is
348
00:19:10,090 --> 00:19:12,730
their alibi.
And when you can't understand
349
00:19:12,730 --> 00:19:16,410
that, it really does cause some
huge problems for this movie.
350
00:19:16,850 --> 00:19:19,570
And I think that it's kind of a
minor miracle, Brad, because
351
00:19:19,810 --> 00:19:22,530
like I said, at multiple points
in this movie, I was like, this
352
00:19:22,530 --> 00:19:24,530
is not working at all, Brad.
And you were like, no, I don't
353
00:19:24,530 --> 00:19:26,490
like this at all.
And I was about to come in here
354
00:19:26,490 --> 00:19:30,250
with the hottest hot takes ever
and say, oh man, it's even worse
355
00:19:30,250 --> 00:19:32,730
than I remembered.
And to its credit.
356
00:19:33,300 --> 00:19:38,500
The last 20 minutes of this
movie are pitch perfect to a
357
00:19:38,500 --> 00:19:42,460
point where I can't believe how
much it improved my final score.
358
00:19:43,220 --> 00:19:46,540
Yeah, no, I I mean the the last
20 minutes of this film,
359
00:19:47,180 --> 00:19:50,500
everything comes together.
The editing is nice and tight.
360
00:19:50,780 --> 00:19:54,900
The acting takes a jump up as
the action becomes more tense.
361
00:19:55,220 --> 00:19:59,740
Like everything about the last
15 to 25 minutes was great.
362
00:19:59,980 --> 00:20:03,630
Like impressive.
But the rest of it was a very,
363
00:20:03,630 --> 00:20:08,550
very average film that I wish
had been directed by, like, I
364
00:20:08,550 --> 00:20:12,310
don't know, Alfonso Cuaron.
Like, I feel like there's just
365
00:20:12,310 --> 00:20:16,390
other people who would have done
a much better job with like 80%
366
00:20:16,390 --> 00:20:18,950
of this movie.
I think that this movie relies
367
00:20:18,950 --> 00:20:22,430
on its editing, and we usually
don't talk about editing on this
368
00:20:22,430 --> 00:20:26,270
podcast in depth, but the way
it's edited together, it reminds
369
00:20:26,270 --> 00:20:29,800
me a lot of, like some of the.
Like like Oliver Stone movies
370
00:20:29,800 --> 00:20:32,880
from the early 90s, like JFK,
which Brad, I can't wait till we
371
00:20:32,880 --> 00:20:35,600
watch that on the show someday.
It is probably the best edited
372
00:20:35,600 --> 00:20:37,760
movie I've ever seen.
And there's this whole sequence
373
00:20:37,760 --> 00:20:40,520
towards the end of the movie
where Kevin Costner's character
374
00:20:40,520 --> 00:20:44,840
is giving his argument in court
for why Lee Harvey Oswald was
375
00:20:44,840 --> 00:20:48,240
not actually the killer.
And it's just this dizzying
376
00:20:48,240 --> 00:20:52,160
montage of, you know, the
Zapruder film with reenactment
377
00:20:52,160 --> 00:20:55,000
with courtroom footage and the
sound and the John Williams
378
00:20:55,000 --> 00:20:57,430
score is like.
It to me it's like the pinnacle
379
00:20:57,430 --> 00:21:00,750
of film editing and I think this
movie relies on that a lot.
380
00:21:00,750 --> 00:21:04,310
You see this all through the 90s
with the twist ending kind of
381
00:21:04,310 --> 00:21:08,230
movies like The Usual Suspects
and and I think this movie
382
00:21:08,230 --> 00:21:10,590
really, really does rely on that
editing.
383
00:21:10,830 --> 00:21:14,070
I don't know if a Cuaron
necessarily would have made this
384
00:21:14,070 --> 00:21:17,310
movie that much better because
it's about the way that the
385
00:21:17,310 --> 00:21:20,150
movie is cut.
And if you don't have what I
386
00:21:20,150 --> 00:21:22,710
think is some really great
editing, I don't think the movie
387
00:21:22,710 --> 00:21:24,510
works at all, no matter who's
behind the camera.
388
00:21:25,590 --> 00:21:27,670
I have a question for you about
the JFK assassination.
389
00:21:28,350 --> 00:21:30,950
Yes, this is exactly what I
wanted to talk about on our
390
00:21:30,950 --> 00:21:33,670
Momento episode.
Hey man, you brought it up, so
391
00:21:33,910 --> 00:21:37,590
it's all your fault.
So a conspiracy theory, by
392
00:21:37,590 --> 00:21:41,470
definition, is something that,
like, a small part of the
393
00:21:41,470 --> 00:21:44,830
population believes, right?
Like that's kind of like a basic
394
00:21:44,830 --> 00:21:47,110
thing is like, yeah, this little
group of people believe in
395
00:21:47,110 --> 00:21:48,870
Sasquatch.
Sure.
396
00:21:50,190 --> 00:21:53,310
Would you say it's more of a
conspiracy theory?
397
00:21:53,650 --> 00:21:58,890
To believe that, like Oswald was
the shooter, that like, he was
398
00:21:58,890 --> 00:22:01,530
the only one.
Like to believe the story that
399
00:22:01,530 --> 00:22:04,970
was told to us.
Or to, like believe the the
400
00:22:04,970 --> 00:22:07,770
gunman on the hill, the two
shooters, the whole thing.
401
00:22:07,770 --> 00:22:12,010
Like, do you think it's more of
a conspiracy theory now in 2023
402
00:22:12,010 --> 00:22:14,490
to be like, yeah, no, I just
think it happened the way the
403
00:22:14,490 --> 00:22:18,590
government said it did.
I feel like everybody believes
404
00:22:18,590 --> 00:22:20,670
in the conspiracy theory.
I think it's a good question.
405
00:22:20,670 --> 00:22:23,550
I think that you can't
necessarily equate the terms
406
00:22:23,550 --> 00:22:27,270
conspiracy theory and like
fringe belief, right?
407
00:22:27,270 --> 00:22:30,750
Like conspiracy theory is just
like the theory that someone was
408
00:22:30,750 --> 00:22:34,830
conspiring in a way that the
record doesn't reflect and at
409
00:22:34,830 --> 00:22:37,230
that could be something that is
believed by a small or a large
410
00:22:37,230 --> 00:22:39,870
part of the population.
I think you're right though in
411
00:22:39,870 --> 00:22:43,560
that it is a more.
Fringe belief.
412
00:22:43,560 --> 00:22:47,320
A more radical notion nowadays
to believe that it happened the
413
00:22:47,320 --> 00:22:49,880
way they said.
I think more of the population
414
00:22:49,880 --> 00:22:53,760
thinks JFK had some shady
business going on and the
415
00:22:53,760 --> 00:22:55,880
government and or someone else
took care of him.
416
00:22:56,920 --> 00:22:58,800
Some some bad actors, if you
will.
417
00:22:59,400 --> 00:23:02,280
Speaking of bad actors, let's
get back into talking about
418
00:23:02,280 --> 00:23:05,280
Memento.
I'm really excited together,
419
00:23:05,280 --> 00:23:07,000
baby.
I'm really excited to talk about
420
00:23:07,000 --> 00:23:09,760
Carrie Ann Moss in this movie
because she plays.
421
00:23:10,200 --> 00:23:13,800
One of the most villainous and
devious femme fatales I've ever
422
00:23:13,800 --> 00:23:16,280
seen in a noir.
And yet, the more I thought
423
00:23:16,280 --> 00:23:20,560
about this movie, Brad, the more
I'm not sure how devious she
424
00:23:20,560 --> 00:23:22,520
actually is.
We need to talk about it.
425
00:23:22,520 --> 00:23:24,560
But before we get into the
character, let's talk about the
426
00:23:24,560 --> 00:23:26,680
performance.
I think she's really good in
427
00:23:26,680 --> 00:23:29,400
this movie.
Like, her character's not
428
00:23:29,400 --> 00:23:32,280
fleshed out on purpose.
We only know who she is through
429
00:23:32,280 --> 00:23:36,200
Leonard, and she plays exactly
the role she needs to play in
430
00:23:36,200 --> 00:23:38,600
his story, and then she's out of
the movie.
431
00:23:38,980 --> 00:23:41,860
So you don't get these big
emotional scenes from her where
432
00:23:41,860 --> 00:23:44,660
she's talking about her
motivations, but you don't need
433
00:23:44,660 --> 00:23:47,380
that in a movie like this.
And I think for what she's asked
434
00:23:47,380 --> 00:23:49,260
to do, she's really, really
good.
435
00:23:49,980 --> 00:23:55,340
Yeah, overall, her performance
is like 7 out of 10, and then
436
00:23:55,460 --> 00:23:59,740
she has that scene where she's
screaming at him and just like
437
00:23:59,740 --> 00:24:03,230
basically calling him an idiot.
And like, you're not even going
438
00:24:03,230 --> 00:24:06,110
to remember this.
Like, I'm going to go back out
439
00:24:06,110 --> 00:24:07,630
and come back in.
You're going to forget the whole
440
00:24:07,630 --> 00:24:09,270
thing and I'm going to tell you
whatever I want.
441
00:24:09,630 --> 00:24:13,150
And then she does it.
And it like her performance in
442
00:24:13,150 --> 00:24:17,430
that scene where she's faking
how she got attacked is
443
00:24:18,030 --> 00:24:21,590
mindblowingly good, like 10 out
of 10 acting.
444
00:24:21,590 --> 00:24:26,190
And I was just like, oh man,
dude, she is like terrifying
445
00:24:26,190 --> 00:24:28,390
here.
All right, so here's The funny
446
00:24:28,390 --> 00:24:29,950
thing about this character and
Brad.
447
00:24:29,950 --> 00:24:32,230
I was reading and reading and
reading before we press record.
448
00:24:32,990 --> 00:24:35,270
I understand this movie pretty
easily.
449
00:24:35,310 --> 00:24:37,230
Like, once you understand the
gimmick of the movie, you go,
450
00:24:37,230 --> 00:24:40,110
OK, so I can lay these things
out in my mind chronologically.
451
00:24:40,430 --> 00:24:43,150
The only thing that I couldn't
wrap my mind around was her
452
00:24:43,150 --> 00:24:46,630
character.
And if she is truly evil or
453
00:24:46,630 --> 00:24:49,990
like, what is the the end point
of her character?
454
00:24:50,030 --> 00:24:52,070
Does she still, is she still
using Leonard?
455
00:24:52,070 --> 00:24:55,350
It does she still hate Leonard?
And we think about the character
456
00:24:55,350 --> 00:24:59,310
chronologically.
She is a bartender who is also
457
00:24:59,310 --> 00:25:02,190
kind of helping set up drug
deals for her boyfriend Jimmy.
458
00:25:03,110 --> 00:25:06,110
Jimmy is supposed to go meet
this guy named Teddy, who we we
459
00:25:06,110 --> 00:25:09,990
later learned who Teddy is, and
she sets up this deal and Jimmy
460
00:25:09,990 --> 00:25:13,710
never comes back.
And then a guy who we know is
461
00:25:13,710 --> 00:25:18,510
Leonard shows up in Jimmy's car
wearing Jimmy's clothes, and she
462
00:25:18,510 --> 00:25:21,110
figures out pretty easily that
it's this guy that Jimmy's been
463
00:25:21,110 --> 00:25:23,630
calling the memory guy from
seeing him around town.
464
00:25:24,160 --> 00:25:27,160
And so she starts using him to
try to get information on what
465
00:25:27,160 --> 00:25:29,120
the hell happened to her drug
dealer boyfriend.
466
00:25:29,280 --> 00:25:32,800
She has him go kind of kidnap
and get rid of this guy named
467
00:25:32,800 --> 00:25:37,360
Dodd at some point.
And once he does that, she seems
468
00:25:37,360 --> 00:25:41,000
to have like a change of heart.
Because the first times we see
469
00:25:41,000 --> 00:25:44,160
her in the movie is the end of
the story chronologically, and
470
00:25:44,160 --> 00:25:47,240
she's helping him find this
license plate that he wrote
471
00:25:47,240 --> 00:25:49,600
down.
And I kept thinking, like, oh,
472
00:25:49,600 --> 00:25:53,760
she was using Leonard to bump
off Teddy the cop.
473
00:25:54,180 --> 00:25:56,740
But I think at one point in the
movie, Teddy even tells Leonard,
474
00:25:56,740 --> 00:25:58,060
like, no, she doesn't know who I
am.
475
00:25:58,660 --> 00:26:02,980
So I don't really think she
actually is being devious beyond
476
00:26:02,980 --> 00:26:04,940
getting the information that she
wanted.
477
00:26:04,980 --> 00:26:07,620
And and she was like, hell yeah,
I'll use this guy, He's wearing
478
00:26:07,620 --> 00:26:09,820
my boyfriend's clothes.
He clearly knows something.
479
00:26:10,300 --> 00:26:13,460
And the more I think about it,
the more I'm like, the reveal is
480
00:26:13,460 --> 00:26:15,260
set up as if she's a femme
fatale.
481
00:26:16,020 --> 00:26:18,220
But when you lay it out
chronologically, it's actually
482
00:26:18,220 --> 00:26:20,180
kind of reasonable what she
does.
483
00:26:21,360 --> 00:26:25,560
Yeah, and and I'm curious if she
somehow knows that Teddy is a
484
00:26:25,560 --> 00:26:28,120
cop.
Like even if he says, oh, she
485
00:26:28,120 --> 00:26:32,320
doesn't know who I am, Like, I
wonder if she has figured out
486
00:26:32,320 --> 00:26:35,960
somehow that he's a cop and is
responsible for her boyfriend's
487
00:26:35,960 --> 00:26:37,920
murder.
And so it's like, well, you
488
00:26:37,920 --> 00:26:42,400
know, I can use this, this peers
to get Leonard to get back at
489
00:26:42,400 --> 00:26:44,800
him.
But even if that's not the case,
490
00:26:44,800 --> 00:26:47,640
like.
I like I like her character.
491
00:26:47,840 --> 00:26:53,000
I think that she's kind of smart
and witty and her ability to
492
00:26:53,960 --> 00:26:56,280
control the situation is really
impressive.
493
00:26:56,880 --> 00:27:00,320
And that takes us to Joe
Pantoliano as Teddy, who I
494
00:27:00,320 --> 00:27:04,320
think, I mean, he has this, the
kind of scene stealing
495
00:27:04,320 --> 00:27:08,480
performance of the movie, like
he's the wisecracking side
496
00:27:08,480 --> 00:27:11,620
character.
He is perfect for what this
497
00:27:11,620 --> 00:27:14,540
movie needs him to be.
It's the Edward Edward G
498
00:27:14,540 --> 00:27:16,900
Robinson character of this
movie.
499
00:27:17,540 --> 00:27:20,940
He's really, really good.
And I love that Nolan catches
500
00:27:20,940 --> 00:27:24,940
both of these people, Carrie Ann
Moss and Joe Panchaliano coming
501
00:27:24,940 --> 00:27:26,580
off The Matrix.
Like this is the first movie
502
00:27:26,580 --> 00:27:28,500
they make after The Matrix.
I think both of them.
503
00:27:29,260 --> 00:27:31,580
And they're both so good in this
movie.
504
00:27:32,220 --> 00:27:34,660
And I think that it's kind of
funny because in The Matrix you
505
00:27:34,660 --> 00:27:37,220
get the big reveal that Joe
Panchaliano is the bad guy.
506
00:27:37,680 --> 00:27:39,840
In this movie, you get the big
reveal that he's actually been
507
00:27:39,840 --> 00:27:43,440
helping our protagonist the
whole movie, and that the
508
00:27:43,440 --> 00:27:47,920
Trinity character is actually
kind of a Dick to him, you know
509
00:27:47,920 --> 00:27:49,200
what I mean?
Like it's a great little
510
00:27:49,200 --> 00:27:51,680
reversal of their roles from The
Matrix.
511
00:27:52,000 --> 00:27:57,040
I really loved his performance.
Yeah, Joe was hands down the
512
00:27:57,040 --> 00:28:00,600
best performer in the movie.
I really liked Mark Boone
513
00:28:00,600 --> 00:28:02,600
Junior.
I thought that he was good as
514
00:28:02,600 --> 00:28:05,810
the the receptionist.
At the motel.
515
00:28:06,370 --> 00:28:10,690
But I I think that Joe
Pantoliano definitely steals the
516
00:28:10,690 --> 00:28:14,170
show and I like.
At the end of the day though, I
517
00:28:14,170 --> 00:28:19,370
have to ask, is it like, was
what he was doing worth it?
518
00:28:20,250 --> 00:28:24,010
Like he like, he tells him like,
yeah, you killed the guy like 4
519
00:28:24,010 --> 00:28:28,450
guys ago and I've just been
using you to keep killing more
520
00:28:28,450 --> 00:28:29,970
guys.
Like do you think he has it down
521
00:28:29,970 --> 00:28:34,330
to a science of like?
All right, day one show him this
522
00:28:34,330 --> 00:28:39,170
picture this guy, and day two do
this and like like does he have
523
00:28:39,170 --> 00:28:42,290
it figured out down pat?
Like how to get him to kill
524
00:28:42,290 --> 00:28:44,770
people?
I just feel like there's easier
525
00:28:44,770 --> 00:28:47,770
way to kill people than have a
dude with short term memory
526
00:28:47,770 --> 00:28:50,390
loss.
Like go through the motions
527
00:28:50,390 --> 00:28:53,590
every day and figure it out.
Well, especially since you have
528
00:28:53,590 --> 00:28:56,150
to be with him for so much.
Like, it's one thing to just
529
00:28:56,150 --> 00:28:59,630
hire a hitman when you don't
have any other contact beyond,
530
00:28:59,630 --> 00:29:02,190
like, here's the guy, here's the
money, go kill him.
531
00:29:02,630 --> 00:29:04,950
You know, like they're going to
have video surveillance footage
532
00:29:04,990 --> 00:29:08,070
of him riding around in a car
with Leonard, like, for weeks
533
00:29:08,070 --> 00:29:11,830
and weeks on end.
Yeah, it it just feels very
534
00:29:13,190 --> 00:29:16,030
contrived.
I don't know out of out of all
535
00:29:16,030 --> 00:29:19,200
the plots.
That Christopher Nolan has sold
536
00:29:19,200 --> 00:29:21,400
us.
I feel like this one is kind of
537
00:29:21,400 --> 00:29:25,160
the silliest where this this
detectives like yeah, you know
538
00:29:25,160 --> 00:29:27,720
what I could do with this short
term member lost guy you know
539
00:29:27,720 --> 00:29:30,520
turn him into a psych hospital
or.
540
00:29:33,680 --> 00:29:35,960
All right, Brad, I think we're
in a good place to hit pause.
541
00:29:36,000 --> 00:29:38,400
Let's try this rabbit hole.
What do you say?
542
00:29:39,080 --> 00:29:47,680
Let's get to it.
All right, so today we are
543
00:29:47,680 --> 00:29:49,960
checking out Rabbit Hole Cave
Hill.
544
00:29:50,240 --> 00:29:53,080
This is the second Rabbit Hole
product we've tried on the show.
545
00:29:53,520 --> 00:29:55,880
And the thing about Rabbit Hole
Brad, is I know that at one
546
00:29:55,880 --> 00:29:58,640
point they weren't putting these
fancy little names on their
547
00:29:58,640 --> 00:30:00,880
bottles.
It was just like Rabbit Hole
548
00:30:00,880 --> 00:30:03,480
Black Label or Rabbit Hole Red
Label.
549
00:30:03,800 --> 00:30:06,120
And so when we were first sent
these samples by our friend
550
00:30:06,120 --> 00:30:09,640
Austin at the Bourbon Earring
Podcast, it was just like Rabbit
551
00:30:09,640 --> 00:30:12,300
Hole Bourbon.
And then Rabbit Hole Red or
552
00:30:12,300 --> 00:30:14,660
something, it's like what is the
because then I go look it up
553
00:30:14,660 --> 00:30:17,380
online and now they've added
these names like Cave Hill and
554
00:30:17,380 --> 00:30:20,740
High Gold and all these things.
So what we're trying today, you
555
00:30:20,740 --> 00:30:24,940
may know it as just Rabbit Hill,
Rabbit Hole Black Label.
556
00:30:25,220 --> 00:30:31,540
This is a four grain bourbon,
70% corn, 10% malted wheat, 10%
557
00:30:31,540 --> 00:30:34,820
honey, malted barley, 10% malted
barley.
558
00:30:35,260 --> 00:30:37,820
So I mean two of the grains are
barley but they're malted in
559
00:30:37,820 --> 00:30:39,380
different ways.
So they count them as separate
560
00:30:39,380 --> 00:30:41,570
things.
I'm pretty pumped to try this,
561
00:30:41,570 --> 00:30:44,450
Brad.
It's a high barley mash bill,
562
00:30:44,530 --> 00:30:47,450
much more barley than there is
wheat in this, and no rye.
563
00:30:48,330 --> 00:30:51,170
Yeah, it sounds absolutely
delicious.
564
00:30:51,170 --> 00:30:54,970
I will say, without it being an
age statement as a Kentucky
565
00:30:54,970 --> 00:30:56,890
straight bourbon whiskey,
doesn't that doesn't that mean
566
00:30:56,890 --> 00:30:58,330
it has to be at least four
years?
567
00:30:58,330 --> 00:31:00,810
At least four years old to not
carry an age statement.
568
00:31:00,810 --> 00:31:03,290
So that means that the youngest
whiskey in this blend is at
569
00:31:03,290 --> 00:31:05,930
least four years of age.
They have a big thing on their
570
00:31:05,930 --> 00:31:08,930
website that they say this is an
extreme small batch.
571
00:31:10,080 --> 00:31:14,400
Never, never more than 15
barrels in each batch, which I
572
00:31:14,400 --> 00:31:16,880
really like that, you know, that
does seem small enough that it
573
00:31:16,880 --> 00:31:20,520
seems like a legitimate small
batch and not whatever the hell,
574
00:31:20,520 --> 00:31:22,280
you know, wild turkeys trying to
sell us or.
575
00:31:22,280 --> 00:31:24,880
We have 200 and 5300 barrel
blend.
576
00:31:26,080 --> 00:31:31,320
All right, so this is coming in
at 95 proof, or 47.5% A/B V
577
00:31:32,000 --> 00:31:33,560
Let's dive in, man.
What are you picking up on the
578
00:31:33,560 --> 00:31:35,960
nose?
The nose is really beautiful.
579
00:31:36,000 --> 00:31:38,160
It's got some nice caramel and
vanilla.
580
00:31:38,540 --> 00:31:42,540
There's toasted marshmallow,
some strawberry, and almost at
581
00:31:42,540 --> 00:31:46,300
the end I found myself thinking
about like Cream of Wheat, but
582
00:31:46,300 --> 00:31:50,860
not bad.
Like like a really nice sugary
583
00:31:50,860 --> 00:31:54,860
Cream of Wheat.
I I liked it a lot, Bob.
584
00:31:54,860 --> 00:31:57,540
I gave it an 8 out of 10.
I like this a lot too.
585
00:31:57,540 --> 00:32:00,780
It's very bright on the nose.
I get a lot of like almond
586
00:32:00,780 --> 00:32:02,940
extract on this, almost like an
almond cake.
587
00:32:03,470 --> 00:32:06,470
But it goes along with all those
notes you were talking about,
588
00:32:06,470 --> 00:32:08,910
lots of vanilla on this.
And then I get quite a bit of
589
00:32:08,910 --> 00:32:11,030
blueberry, which is something I
don't usually get.
590
00:32:11,030 --> 00:32:14,110
And I'm not talking like
blueberry syrup or something.
591
00:32:14,110 --> 00:32:17,110
It's just fresh picked.
Like when you go to wash them
592
00:32:17,150 --> 00:32:19,670
before you eat them, like, it's
just, man, it's really, really
593
00:32:19,670 --> 00:32:22,030
nice.
And then I get just a slight,
594
00:32:22,110 --> 00:32:24,670
the slightest hint of like,
brininess on this.
595
00:32:24,670 --> 00:32:27,870
There's just a little bit of a
salty thing going on here too.
596
00:32:28,320 --> 00:32:31,040
I'm excited to see how that
translates to the taste, but the
597
00:32:31,120 --> 00:32:33,640
the nose is off the charts man,
really good.
598
00:32:33,640 --> 00:32:38,480
I'm going to give it an 8 1/2.
Yeah, the pallet is matches the
599
00:32:38,480 --> 00:32:42,280
nose perfectly for me.
It it turned into a little bit
600
00:32:42,280 --> 00:32:48,160
more of a floral honey agave
type of direction along with
601
00:32:48,160 --> 00:32:51,240
some caramel that you got on the
nose and then it almost got a
602
00:32:51,240 --> 00:32:55,480
little bit minty for me at the
end like a like a sweet mint and
603
00:32:55,480 --> 00:32:58,350
I.
Absolutely love this, Bob.
604
00:32:58,350 --> 00:33:02,350
I give it an 8 1/2 out of 10.
This is definitely not an
605
00:33:02,390 --> 00:33:06,270
unsweet whiskey, but the the
sweetness that we normally get
606
00:33:06,270 --> 00:33:10,270
on weeded bourbons is not the
dominant flavor here.
607
00:33:10,630 --> 00:33:12,950
It's really nice and I I think I
still am getting some of that
608
00:33:12,950 --> 00:33:14,630
blueberry.
It's like almost like a dark
609
00:33:14,630 --> 00:33:17,310
fruit underlying it.
You might be able to pick it up
610
00:33:17,310 --> 00:33:19,790
as black cherry.
You might pick it up as like a
611
00:33:19,790 --> 00:33:21,470
Raisin.
For me, it's coming across as
612
00:33:21,470 --> 00:33:25,460
blueberry right now.
There's a lot of vanilla on it
613
00:33:25,460 --> 00:33:29,260
as well and then it gets really
heavily like char flavor for me.
614
00:33:29,420 --> 00:33:31,620
I really like it and I think
that might be the barley coming
615
00:33:31,620 --> 00:33:34,900
through a little bit.
But the combo of that kind of
616
00:33:34,900 --> 00:33:40,060
really dark char with some
really nice dark fruit is super
617
00:33:40,060 --> 00:33:42,020
unique.
This is not a flavor profile we
618
00:33:42,020 --> 00:33:43,260
get on many bourbons.
Brad.
619
00:33:43,260 --> 00:33:44,700
I'm going to give it an 8 out of
10.
620
00:33:46,170 --> 00:33:47,570
Yeah.
And then as we get into the
621
00:33:47,570 --> 00:33:50,890
finish, I think that there's
like everything you want on a
622
00:33:50,890 --> 00:33:53,250
finish is here.
It's a little bit oaky.
623
00:33:53,250 --> 00:33:57,050
The mint keeps coming through
for me and then the the Cream of
624
00:33:57,050 --> 00:34:00,850
Wheat almost kind of blends with
some of the fruity notes and
625
00:34:01,130 --> 00:34:04,530
almost turns into like an orange
creamsicle flavor for me on the
626
00:34:04,530 --> 00:34:06,290
finish.
I really liked it.
627
00:34:06,650 --> 00:34:08,690
Again, I'll, I'll give it an 8
out of 10.
628
00:34:09,409 --> 00:34:11,850
Yeah, I think the finish is just
more of the same from the
629
00:34:11,850 --> 00:34:14,610
palette, which is really nice.
Like it's it's it's nice
630
00:34:14,610 --> 00:34:17,260
sometimes.
When you don't have to give a
631
00:34:17,260 --> 00:34:19,659
whole new set of notes on
something and it's just super
632
00:34:19,659 --> 00:34:23,460
consistent, it's the same notes
of like really dark blueberry,
633
00:34:23,460 --> 00:34:26,580
almost a blueberry compote, dark
cherry for me.
634
00:34:26,580 --> 00:34:31,260
And then that that barrel char
mixed with a little bit of that
635
00:34:31,260 --> 00:34:34,500
kind of light effervescence that
we get from weeded bourbons,
636
00:34:34,780 --> 00:34:38,179
lots of vanilla, that caramel
and brown sugar finally come out
637
00:34:38,179 --> 00:34:40,340
on the end.
This is really nice.
638
00:34:40,699 --> 00:34:42,900
I will say this Brad, I don't
know if this is like.
639
00:34:44,000 --> 00:34:45,920
An intro to bourbon.
Bourbon.
640
00:34:45,920 --> 00:34:48,360
You know what I mean?
This is like A, it's more
641
00:34:48,360 --> 00:34:50,920
complex than most bourbons.
I would offer someone who's just
642
00:34:50,920 --> 00:34:55,560
starting out.
But B, it seems outside the norm
643
00:34:55,880 --> 00:34:58,640
of weeded bourbon enough that I
wouldn't like.
644
00:34:58,960 --> 00:35:02,440
If you put this in the lineup
with like Rebel and Weller and
645
00:35:02,440 --> 00:35:05,680
Maker's Mark, I think this is
the one that would be like the
646
00:35:05,720 --> 00:35:08,640
outlier of the group.
Flavorwise, it's really, really
647
00:35:08,640 --> 00:35:11,040
good.
I just think that I'm glad we
648
00:35:11,040 --> 00:35:13,080
waited until now to try it,
because.
649
00:35:13,620 --> 00:35:16,580
It.
Defied my expectations so much.
650
00:35:16,580 --> 00:35:20,340
I'm going to give it an 8 on the
finish and I'm also going to
651
00:35:20,340 --> 00:35:24,780
give it an 8 1/2 on the balance.
See, I think balance is actually
652
00:35:24,780 --> 00:35:27,220
where this stands out.
I think that there's enough
653
00:35:27,220 --> 00:35:34,860
complexity here with really nice
balance of flavors that move
654
00:35:34,860 --> 00:35:38,260
through the nose to the taste to
the finish really, really well.
655
00:35:38,260 --> 00:35:40,100
I give it a nine and a half on
balance by.
656
00:35:41,570 --> 00:35:45,010
And then when we get to value in
the state of Ohio, you can get
657
00:35:45,010 --> 00:35:49,570
this 750 milliliter bottle for
$60.00.
658
00:35:51,250 --> 00:35:55,810
And honestly I think that that's
a pretty good value like this
659
00:35:55,810 --> 00:35:59,890
across the board is like a B
plus whiskey.
660
00:36:00,330 --> 00:36:04,330
And so I I think that $60.00 is
kind of right on par for where
661
00:36:04,330 --> 00:36:06,210
it should go.
As far as just the juice that's
662
00:36:06,210 --> 00:36:08,410
in the bottle, I give it an 8
out of 10.
663
00:36:08,410 --> 00:36:11,990
Yeah, I I will say that.
Again, we we always come back to
664
00:36:11,990 --> 00:36:15,070
this thing of like Brad scores
his value score based on like
665
00:36:15,710 --> 00:36:18,310
does the taste of the product
justify the price?
666
00:36:18,750 --> 00:36:21,310
And I always come at it a little
bit more from like man, it's a
667
00:36:21,310 --> 00:36:23,790
good thing this tastes good
because I think this is kind of
668
00:36:23,790 --> 00:36:26,350
pricey for a four year bourbon,
you know what I'm saying?
669
00:36:26,350 --> 00:36:30,030
Like Rabbit Hole always prices
their stuff kind of in that
670
00:36:30,030 --> 00:36:34,030
premium pricing range and the
last Rabbit hole we had we liked
671
00:36:34,070 --> 00:36:37,150
but we didn't love it and I
think at $60.00 that one was a
672
00:36:37,150 --> 00:36:40,310
pretty low value.
This is the same kind of
673
00:36:40,310 --> 00:36:42,190
principle.
It's a four year bourbon.
674
00:36:42,190 --> 00:36:46,510
You could get Rebel for $20 or
you get this for $60.00.
675
00:36:47,190 --> 00:36:50,950
I think that it's slightly
overpriced, but I am swayed to
676
00:36:50,950 --> 00:36:53,390
give it a better score because
the juice is really, really
677
00:36:53,390 --> 00:36:56,270
good.
I think I'll still give this a 7
678
00:36:56,270 --> 00:37:01,630
out of 10 on value, but that is
with the caveat that like I'm
679
00:37:01,630 --> 00:37:05,030
scoring at that high because the
product is good, not because the
680
00:37:05,030 --> 00:37:08,000
production.
Mandates that this needs to be
681
00:37:08,000 --> 00:37:09,520
$60.00.
Does that make sense?
682
00:37:10,040 --> 00:37:12,560
Yeah, 100%.
Yeah.
683
00:37:12,560 --> 00:37:15,840
So for me, at the end of the
day, I am coming out to a a
684
00:37:15,840 --> 00:37:19,000
pretty high score here, Bob.
I'm at a 42 out of 50.
685
00:37:19,440 --> 00:37:22,720
I am at a 40 out of 50, which
takes us to a very easy to
686
00:37:22,720 --> 00:37:27,200
average 41 out of 50 or an 82
out of 100.
687
00:37:27,440 --> 00:37:29,720
This is our highest scoring
whiskey in a little while, Brad.
688
00:37:29,760 --> 00:37:32,520
It's nice to have one that we
can pretty heartily recommend
689
00:37:32,520 --> 00:37:35,210
here.
Yeah, this is a very obvious
690
00:37:35,210 --> 00:37:38,850
whiskey that you should go try.
I think it's worth getting a
691
00:37:38,850 --> 00:37:41,050
sample at the bar.
I think it's worth getting a
692
00:37:41,050 --> 00:37:43,970
bottle.
So also, it's a really beautiful
693
00:37:43,970 --> 00:37:46,490
bottle.
So yeah, add it to add it to
694
00:37:46,490 --> 00:37:49,490
your liquor shelf.
This is an easy recommend from
695
00:37:49,490 --> 00:37:52,010
both Bob and I.
Now I am like the If you're the
696
00:37:52,010 --> 00:37:55,330
resident rye fan on this
podcast, I feel like I can
697
00:37:55,330 --> 00:37:59,010
pretty confidently say I'm the
resident weeded bourbon guy.
698
00:37:59,290 --> 00:38:01,410
Like this is just this is my
favorite kind of bourbon.
699
00:38:01,950 --> 00:38:05,470
Which would you agree with me
that this is probably the most
700
00:38:05,470 --> 00:38:09,710
unique tasting weeded bourbon
we've ever had, just in terms of
701
00:38:09,710 --> 00:38:12,910
being outside the norm?
Yeah, 100%.
702
00:38:12,950 --> 00:38:16,350
This one has some really
interesting flavors for me.
703
00:38:16,350 --> 00:38:20,310
It was that mintiness that like
really turned me on to this
704
00:38:20,310 --> 00:38:22,910
whiskey and I I just enjoyed it
a lot.
705
00:38:23,310 --> 00:38:25,470
Me too, man.
All right, so we're above the 40
706
00:38:25,470 --> 00:38:27,190
mark once again.
Go buy it.
707
00:38:27,190 --> 00:38:29,150
Go try it.
Brad, Let's get back into
708
00:38:29,150 --> 00:38:30,870
talking about Memento.
What do you say?
709
00:38:31,450 --> 00:38:38,290
Let's get to it.
All right, everybody.
710
00:38:38,290 --> 00:38:41,410
That was Rabbit Hole Cave Hill
Bourbon.
711
00:38:41,530 --> 00:38:44,530
A whiskey worth going down the
rabbit hole for Bob.
712
00:38:44,530 --> 00:38:47,450
I will say we have climbed back
out of the rabbit hole.
713
00:38:47,450 --> 00:38:50,050
Brad and I can't wait to dive
back in again.
714
00:38:51,810 --> 00:38:54,410
Nailed it.
You know what rabbit hole I like
715
00:38:54,410 --> 00:38:57,450
going down every week, Bob?
I think I do.
716
00:38:57,450 --> 00:38:59,370
Brad, Is it 2 facts in a
falsehood?
717
00:38:59,970 --> 00:39:02,730
Canada's favorite segment 2
facts and a falsehood.
718
00:39:03,170 --> 00:39:08,210
Brad.
Is gonna try to stumpy ball. 2
719
00:39:08,970 --> 00:39:14,490
are right and what is wrong?
2 facts and a falsehood. 2 Facts
720
00:39:14,490 --> 00:39:17,570
and a Falsehood is the part of
the podcast where Brad presents
721
00:39:17,570 --> 00:39:21,530
three items to me as fact about
the making of this movie, one of
722
00:39:21,530 --> 00:39:25,290
which is a lie, and I have to
figure out which one that is.
723
00:39:26,050 --> 00:39:28,210
Brad, I don't remember what I'm
sitting at on the season.
724
00:39:28,210 --> 00:39:31,760
I think I'm like.
A game under 500, like I'm still
725
00:39:31,760 --> 00:39:35,000
hanging around in the Division.
Yeah, but I'm.
726
00:39:35,080 --> 00:39:38,240
Like I'm like in 3rd or 4th
place in the Wild Card race, you
727
00:39:38,240 --> 00:39:39,880
know?
If I if I had to guess, I'm
728
00:39:39,880 --> 00:39:42,800
pretty sure you are six and
seven right now.
729
00:39:42,840 --> 00:39:44,440
We'll say six and seven.
That sounds good.
730
00:39:44,840 --> 00:39:46,560
Yeah, you're doing great, man.
I'm proud of you.
731
00:39:46,920 --> 00:39:48,680
You're giving it the old college
try.
732
00:39:49,880 --> 00:39:51,840
It's a little demeaning, but
that's fine, I'll take it.
733
00:39:52,400 --> 00:39:53,960
Hey, that's about the best
you'll get for me.
734
00:39:53,960 --> 00:39:57,690
Fact #1.
Initially, Brad Pitt showed
735
00:39:57,730 --> 00:40:01,170
interest in playing the role of
Leonard but was not able to do
736
00:40:01,170 --> 00:40:03,610
to other commitments once he
passed on the role.
737
00:40:03,610 --> 00:40:06,370
Christopher Nolan did not
consider any other Quote a List
738
00:40:06,370 --> 00:40:09,650
actors because he wanted to have
the ability to spread his budget
739
00:40:09,650 --> 00:40:14,130
more evenly among the cast.
Fact #2, Christopher and
740
00:40:14,130 --> 00:40:17,450
Jonathan Nolan were turned down
by 12 different studios before
741
00:40:17,450 --> 00:40:21,330
New Market Films picked them up.
Momento was their first film and
742
00:40:21,330 --> 00:40:24,210
it's critical success helped
them succeed as a film
743
00:40:24,210 --> 00:40:27,140
distribution company.
Fact #3.
744
00:40:27,140 --> 00:40:29,660
Christopher Nolan's screenplay
was based on his brother
745
00:40:29,660 --> 00:40:31,980
Jonathan Nolan's story Memento
Mori.
746
00:40:32,260 --> 00:40:35,340
However, the screenplay is still
considered original rather than
747
00:40:35,340 --> 00:40:39,020
adapted because Jonathan's story
was not published until after
748
00:40:39,020 --> 00:40:44,820
the film was completed.
I think #2 is the falsehood, but
749
00:40:45,460 --> 00:40:47,740
I'm going to, I'm going to vamp
a little bit so we get some
750
00:40:47,740 --> 00:40:51,380
quality content out of this.
Brent, I read earlier that I,
751
00:40:51,780 --> 00:40:54,060
Brad Pitt had been considered
for this role, that he had a
752
00:40:54,060 --> 00:40:56,640
really busy schedule.
And I found that very funny and
753
00:40:56,640 --> 00:40:58,840
I was going to bring it up at
some point on this episode
754
00:40:58,840 --> 00:41:01,800
because you and I had said at
multiple points this would have
755
00:41:01,800 --> 00:41:05,600
been a great Brad Pitt role.
And the stylings of of Guy
756
00:41:05,600 --> 00:41:08,880
Pierce look very similar to Brad
Pitt in Fight Club, from the
757
00:41:08,880 --> 00:41:13,320
bleached spiked hair to the the
kind of wiry frame.
758
00:41:13,920 --> 00:41:17,280
I think it's really funny that
the suit that Guy Pierce wears
759
00:41:17,280 --> 00:41:20,320
in this movie is really similar
to the suit that Brad Pitt then
760
00:41:20,320 --> 00:41:22,520
wears the next year in Ocean's
11.
761
00:41:22,980 --> 00:41:25,420
So I could very easily see Brad
Pitt in this.
762
00:41:25,900 --> 00:41:29,020
I think one's true.
I also think 3 is true because I
763
00:41:29,020 --> 00:41:31,940
know that this was based on on
Jonathan's short story.
764
00:41:32,220 --> 00:41:35,020
I know this movie was nominated
for a screenplay Oscar, but I
765
00:41:35,020 --> 00:41:37,700
don't remember if it was
original or adapted.
766
00:41:38,140 --> 00:41:41,260
So you might be able to get me
there, but that sounds very
767
00:41:41,260 --> 00:41:45,500
true, so I'm going to go ahead
and say two is the falsehood.
768
00:41:46,670 --> 00:41:49,750
Bob, you are now seven and seven
on the season.
769
00:41:50,190 --> 00:41:52,430
Congratulations.
Look at you coming back up to
770
00:41:52,430 --> 00:41:54,070
500.
Thank you, Brad Pitt.
771
00:41:56,030 --> 00:41:59,310
I'd like to thank Brad Pitt for
not being in this movie so that
772
00:41:59,310 --> 00:42:00,790
I could learn the trivia about
him.
773
00:42:01,430 --> 00:42:03,750
Dude, the other person I was
thinking about was Edward
774
00:42:03,750 --> 00:42:06,790
Norton, which, you know,
obviously like the Fight Club
775
00:42:06,790 --> 00:42:11,710
duo, but I I feel like Edward
Norton could have pulled this
776
00:42:11,710 --> 00:42:14,930
role off better than Guy Pearce.
I've thought about this because
777
00:42:14,930 --> 00:42:17,290
he told me this the other night,
and I don't think I agree
778
00:42:17,290 --> 00:42:18,890
anymore.
I think Ever Norton would have
779
00:42:18,890 --> 00:42:22,970
brought too much kind of nervous
energy to this movie, whereas
780
00:42:22,970 --> 00:42:27,290
the kind of like detached, cool,
calm, collected version of Guy
781
00:42:27,290 --> 00:42:29,530
Pearce.
You know, I was reading
782
00:42:29,530 --> 00:42:32,330
something Nolan said about him
and why he loved Guy Pearce so
783
00:42:32,330 --> 00:42:34,730
much in this movie.
And he talked about Leonard's
784
00:42:34,730 --> 00:42:38,450
optimism and how if this movie
was laid out chronologically, it
785
00:42:38,450 --> 00:42:41,570
would suck because it's just not
told that way, but also because.
786
00:42:42,050 --> 00:42:44,850
You have to keep buying into the
fact that this guy wakes up
787
00:42:44,850 --> 00:42:49,810
every day with this blank
expression on his face and and
788
00:42:49,810 --> 00:42:52,050
motivated by optimism like a
puppy dog.
789
00:42:52,450 --> 00:42:54,810
And I think you really do get
that in a lot of these scenes.
790
00:42:54,810 --> 00:42:57,330
I kind of commented that to you
as we were watching it that
791
00:42:57,610 --> 00:43:01,450
there is a sort of earnestness
to him as a character even
792
00:43:01,450 --> 00:43:03,970
before you find out some of the
shady stuff he did at the end of
793
00:43:03,970 --> 00:43:07,730
the movie that the version who
doesn't remember that, you know.
794
00:43:08,170 --> 00:43:11,170
He goes into the world very
naive, not too differently than
795
00:43:11,170 --> 00:43:13,530
the tramp that we've been
watching for the last four
796
00:43:13,530 --> 00:43:15,370
weeks, Brad.
Look at you.
797
00:43:15,570 --> 00:43:18,690
Bob I just.
I think the guy Pierce pulls
798
00:43:18,690 --> 00:43:21,570
that part of the role off better
than most people could,
799
00:43:21,610 --> 00:43:26,250
especially in the early 2000s.
Yeah, I I mean, I I think that
800
00:43:26,250 --> 00:43:29,530
there is an element of that's of
that that is true.
801
00:43:29,530 --> 00:43:33,530
I think my struggle is the idea
of him as a optimistic puppy dog
802
00:43:33,930 --> 00:43:37,170
who has tattoo a tattoo on his
body.
803
00:43:37,640 --> 00:43:41,280
That says John G raped and
killed my wife.
804
00:43:41,360 --> 00:43:45,080
OK, well I will say I I ad
libbed the puppy dog part of it.
805
00:43:45,080 --> 00:43:48,280
But I am with Chris Nolan on his
optimism comment.
806
00:43:48,560 --> 00:43:51,320
Yes I am.
I agree that most dogs would not
807
00:43:51,600 --> 00:43:55,320
tattoo that on themselves.
It's a very grim optimism at the
808
00:43:55,320 --> 00:43:59,680
very least, like I might not
have been able to save my wife.
809
00:44:00,140 --> 00:44:01,940
But I'll get the bastard who did
it.
810
00:44:02,180 --> 00:44:06,100
But I think the naivete and the
like, the trusting of people
811
00:44:06,100 --> 00:44:09,020
that he probably shouldn't be
trusting of and that as an
812
00:44:09,020 --> 00:44:13,420
audience member, we have a sort
of natural wariness towards.
813
00:44:14,100 --> 00:44:16,580
I think that Pierce pulls that
off really well.
814
00:44:16,580 --> 00:44:18,260
He puts himself in harm's way a
lot.
815
00:44:18,740 --> 00:44:21,660
And you as an audience member,
even though you're trying to
816
00:44:21,660 --> 00:44:23,820
figure out this mystery
alongside him, you don't want to
817
00:44:23,820 --> 00:44:25,620
see him get hurt.
And so it really does.
818
00:44:25,820 --> 00:44:28,780
It does a great job of making
him the protagonist of the
819
00:44:28,780 --> 00:44:33,900
movie.
And not simply the plot engine
820
00:44:33,900 --> 00:44:37,180
of the movie.
Yeah, I I think the other thing
821
00:44:37,180 --> 00:44:41,300
is that Nolan leans into kind of
the horror movie trope of like,
822
00:44:41,660 --> 00:44:44,700
why are they going into the
basement rather than the the
823
00:44:44,700 --> 00:44:48,780
running car outside in the sense
that like as an audience member,
824
00:44:48,780 --> 00:44:51,180
you just keep asking yourself,
why is he trusting her?
825
00:44:51,180 --> 00:44:52,820
Why is he trusting him?
Like what?
826
00:44:52,820 --> 00:44:55,420
Like why are you doing the
things that you're doing and
827
00:44:55,420 --> 00:44:57,710
yet?
It like works for the movie
828
00:44:57,710 --> 00:45:00,790
because it keeps you engaged as
a viewer where you keep asking
829
00:45:00,790 --> 00:45:04,430
yourself, like, why is he doing
the things that he's doing and
830
00:45:04,510 --> 00:45:07,630
and and you you're trying to
learn about him as a character
831
00:45:07,630 --> 00:45:10,270
and and you get to the point
where you realize he has this
832
00:45:10,270 --> 00:45:14,630
grim optimism of like, I'm going
to do whatever it takes to to
833
00:45:14,630 --> 00:45:18,350
solve the murder of my wife.
All right.
834
00:45:18,350 --> 00:45:21,150
Brad, is there anything else
about the movie itself you want
835
00:45:21,150 --> 00:45:24,110
to talk about?
I have like a fun closing
836
00:45:24,110 --> 00:45:27,500
segment for us, but.
Is there anything within the
837
00:45:27,500 --> 00:45:30,620
movie itself, the direction, the
cinematography, anything that
838
00:45:30,620 --> 00:45:32,180
you want to make sure we talk
about first?
839
00:45:33,740 --> 00:45:39,660
I really like Stephen Tobolowsky
and Harriet Harris as Mr. and
840
00:45:39,660 --> 00:45:41,220
Mrs. Jancus.
Yeah, they were excellent.
841
00:45:41,660 --> 00:45:44,700
Like the those were probably
some of my favorite parts of the
842
00:45:44,700 --> 00:45:48,780
film when he's like explaining
the story of of Sammy Jancus.
843
00:45:49,980 --> 00:45:52,460
Yeah, cool.
Good.
844
00:45:52,460 --> 00:45:54,690
Good observation, man.
Nailed it.
845
00:45:54,770 --> 00:45:58,770
Thanks for the great, great, you
know, little kick back there.
846
00:45:58,770 --> 00:46:00,850
I love the way we have dialogue,
Bob.
847
00:46:00,850 --> 00:46:02,330
It's a lot of fun.
Yeah, well, you've been
848
00:46:02,330 --> 00:46:04,890
criticizing dialogue this whole
episode, so I'm trying to
849
00:46:04,970 --> 00:46:08,330
eliminate any between us here.
I mean, if I wanted to do
850
00:46:08,330 --> 00:46:12,090
dialogue the way Guy Pierce
talks on the phone, I would go,
851
00:46:12,730 --> 00:46:15,250
well, First off, I would wait
like 3 seconds after you talk
852
00:46:15,250 --> 00:46:18,370
and then I would go, wow, yeah,
Bob.
853
00:46:19,150 --> 00:46:20,910
That's what I think about it
too.
854
00:46:21,070 --> 00:46:22,630
Shut up, dude.
It's not that bad.
855
00:46:24,510 --> 00:46:27,150
It's pretty rough, man.
OK, here's my question for you,
856
00:46:27,150 --> 00:46:28,390
Brad.
I don't know if this is a fun
857
00:46:28,390 --> 00:46:31,990
segment, but the more I think
about this movie, the more that
858
00:46:31,990 --> 00:46:36,870
it really puts an incriminating
light on another movie that I
859
00:46:36,870 --> 00:46:39,190
really, really love.
And that movie is Martin
860
00:46:39,190 --> 00:46:43,670
Scorsese's Shutter Island,
because they are the same movie,
861
00:46:43,910 --> 00:46:47,910
like, like every single thing
about the plot of both movies.
862
00:46:48,310 --> 00:46:52,110
Is the same, and I think that's
why Shutter Island received such
863
00:46:52,150 --> 00:46:54,710
kind of lukewarm reviews when it
was first released.
864
00:46:54,870 --> 00:46:57,310
I think critics are coming
around to it now more because of
865
00:46:57,310 --> 00:46:59,510
what Scorsese did than anything
in the script.
866
00:47:00,070 --> 00:47:03,990
But that was a book written by
Dennis Lehane, the guy that also
867
00:47:03,990 --> 00:47:09,190
wrote Gone Baby Gone and Mystic
River, and I love all of those
868
00:47:09,190 --> 00:47:12,470
movies.
But I got to say, the guy really
869
00:47:12,470 --> 00:47:15,070
just ripped off Memento.
I don't think that Shutter
870
00:47:15,070 --> 00:47:17,550
Island was written prior to
Memento coming out.
871
00:47:17,550 --> 00:47:21,190
I'll have to look at the release
date, but in any case, it is a
872
00:47:21,270 --> 00:47:24,910
huge coincidence that those
movies both end up being about a
873
00:47:24,910 --> 00:47:29,150
guy with a dead wife who is
trying to find her killer, who
874
00:47:29,150 --> 00:47:32,670
goes into these shady
environments and is then told
875
00:47:32,670 --> 00:47:35,990
that you know, he was the cause
of the whole thing.
876
00:47:36,270 --> 00:47:38,270
You find out at the end of both
movies.
877
00:47:38,270 --> 00:47:42,110
Spoiler alert, I guess.
That they are both the one that
878
00:47:42,110 --> 00:47:45,790
killed their own wife and they
could not live with the grief.
879
00:47:45,830 --> 00:47:49,430
And so they invented kind of
alter egos for themselves.
880
00:47:49,430 --> 00:47:53,870
And in this movie it's this, you
know, this John G character in
881
00:47:54,350 --> 00:47:56,710
Shutter Island.
It was what's the guy's name
882
00:47:56,710 --> 00:47:59,590
that they're searching for
latest?
883
00:48:00,150 --> 00:48:01,990
He's looking for a guy named
latest in that movie.
884
00:48:01,990 --> 00:48:04,750
And then he finds out that his
name is actually Edward latest,
885
00:48:04,750 --> 00:48:06,270
right?
His name's Teddy in the movie.
886
00:48:06,390 --> 00:48:09,670
There's a Teddy in this movie.
I don't know.
887
00:48:09,950 --> 00:48:13,110
If I should have less respect
for Shutter Island, and I'm
888
00:48:13,110 --> 00:48:16,390
wondering what your thoughts are
because I know that we both
889
00:48:16,390 --> 00:48:19,070
mentioned Shutter Island at one
point while we were watching
890
00:48:19,070 --> 00:48:22,470
Memento.
Yeah, I I don't know if I would
891
00:48:22,470 --> 00:48:25,950
say Shutter Island and Memento
are like as much of A Onetoone
892
00:48:25,950 --> 00:48:30,190
comparison for me.
Shutter Island feels much, much
893
00:48:30,190 --> 00:48:35,550
more like A Beautiful Mind in in
like the detective nature of it,
894
00:48:35,550 --> 00:48:38,650
like this one.
Doesn't really feel like a
895
00:48:38,650 --> 00:48:43,930
detective movie to me, which I I
know sounds weird, but it's so
896
00:48:45,170 --> 00:48:49,330
strange, the chronology of it,
that you quickly realize this
897
00:48:49,330 --> 00:48:52,570
isn't about him.
Like, figuring it out.
898
00:48:52,570 --> 00:48:56,490
It's about Nolan being cool as a
director and like, doing the
899
00:48:56,490 --> 00:48:58,730
movie backwards.
OK, so take wait.
900
00:48:58,730 --> 00:49:01,810
Take the genre out of it though,
and even to some extent the
901
00:49:01,810 --> 00:49:03,930
structure.
Like if you were doing a Brad
902
00:49:03,930 --> 00:49:07,200
explains.
On the plot of Shutter Island
903
00:49:07,200 --> 00:49:09,840
and a Brad explains on this
movie, which you just did.
904
00:49:09,840 --> 00:49:11,880
And you laid this movie out
chronologically when you did
905
00:49:11,880 --> 00:49:16,800
your Brad explains like you got
to at least admit that almost
906
00:49:16,800 --> 00:49:19,320
beat for beat.
These movies follow the exact
907
00:49:19,320 --> 00:49:24,360
same story.
I don't know if they do that.
908
00:49:24,360 --> 00:49:28,160
Like for me, I I don't know.
I don't think that Shutter
909
00:49:28,160 --> 00:49:32,680
Island and this film remind me
of them a lot at all.
910
00:49:34,120 --> 00:49:35,560
Yeah, I I don't feel like you're
not.
911
00:49:36,800 --> 00:49:37,880
To some extent.
I don't know that you're
912
00:49:37,880 --> 00:49:40,080
answering my question.
Like if you took the plot of
913
00:49:40,080 --> 00:49:43,040
Forrest Gump and made it a
horror movie, like they still
914
00:49:43,040 --> 00:49:44,960
have the same plot.
You know what I'm saying?
915
00:49:44,960 --> 00:49:48,000
Like it's.
It's memento if you turn Forrest
916
00:49:48,000 --> 00:49:49,680
Gump into a horror film.
Is that what you're saying?
917
00:49:49,800 --> 00:49:55,240
No, I'm saying that you can take
any movie and replicate the plot
918
00:49:55,240 --> 00:49:58,360
and make it a different genre,
but that doesn't negate the fact
919
00:49:58,360 --> 00:50:00,440
that they still follow the same
beats like.
920
00:50:01,050 --> 00:50:04,090
These movies follow the exact
same story beats, and there are,
921
00:50:04,290 --> 00:50:07,490
I think, too many similarities
between them to not at least
922
00:50:07,490 --> 00:50:10,250
confront that head on.
And I was going to, you know, I
923
00:50:10,250 --> 00:50:12,770
thought that you'd be more
cooperative with this segment.
924
00:50:12,770 --> 00:50:14,370
This has been a huge flop for
me, but.
925
00:50:14,730 --> 00:50:16,650
I'm going to.
I'm going to give you one last
926
00:50:16,650 --> 00:50:19,890
push back, Bob.
Any detective movie has the same
927
00:50:19,890 --> 00:50:21,730
beats.
He did it.
928
00:50:21,810 --> 00:50:24,210
Oh, wait, no, he didn't.
Oh, wait, it was her.
929
00:50:24,210 --> 00:50:25,570
Oh, wait, it wasn't.
Oh, wait.
930
00:50:25,570 --> 00:50:27,490
Now there's the twist.
This is who actually did it.
931
00:50:28,050 --> 00:50:31,490
You pissed me off so much, dude.
Like, literally, you're not even
932
00:50:31,490 --> 00:50:33,810
engaging with what I'm saying I
was going to be.
933
00:50:33,970 --> 00:50:36,890
With what you're saying, I
literally just, I'm like, yeah,
934
00:50:37,370 --> 00:50:39,370
almost all detective movies have
the same beats.
935
00:50:39,410 --> 00:50:40,450
OK, but it.
Doesn't make me.
936
00:50:40,490 --> 00:50:43,810
Like most detective movies, that
they're, most detective movies
937
00:50:43,810 --> 00:50:46,450
don't have anything to do with
the hero getting convenient
938
00:50:46,450 --> 00:50:50,130
amnesia after murdering his own
wife and the big reveal being
939
00:50:50,130 --> 00:50:51,610
that he murdered.
His own wife and then
940
00:50:51,610 --> 00:50:55,330
constructed an identity for
himself to not deal with the
941
00:50:55,330 --> 00:50:57,210
grief.
Like there are very few movies
942
00:50:57,490 --> 00:51:01,090
where that is the big reveal.
Maybe.
943
00:51:01,690 --> 00:51:02,770
Sure.
All right.
944
00:51:03,610 --> 00:51:05,410
God bless it.
I was going to come in at the
945
00:51:05,410 --> 00:51:08,370
end and be like, well, actually
I you know what I don't have?
946
00:51:08,450 --> 00:51:11,330
I haven't lost respect for
Shutter Island because at the
947
00:51:11,330 --> 00:51:15,210
end of the day, I think that if
you're going to blame anybody
948
00:51:15,210 --> 00:51:17,770
for Shutter Island being similar
to this movie, it would be
949
00:51:17,890 --> 00:51:19,570
Dennis Lehane for writing the
story.
950
00:51:20,180 --> 00:51:24,340
But Scorsese directs the hell
out of Shutter Island, and I
951
00:51:24,340 --> 00:51:27,500
think that Shutter Island is a
much better directed movie than
952
00:51:27,500 --> 00:51:29,940
Memento is.
And that was going to be my big
953
00:51:29,940 --> 00:51:32,860
segue into us doing let's make
it a double in our final scores.
954
00:51:33,220 --> 00:51:36,900
But I guess to try to redeem
this segment, I will say, Brad,
955
00:51:36,900 --> 00:51:40,860
do you agree with me that
Scorsese directing Shutter
956
00:51:40,860 --> 00:51:44,860
Island does a better job than
Nolan directing Memento?
957
00:51:45,530 --> 00:51:48,330
A million times yet.
OK, well there, that's the
958
00:51:48,770 --> 00:51:50,490
that's the easiest take in the
world.
959
00:51:50,850 --> 00:51:55,490
Shutter Island is way better
directed film, and just a better
960
00:51:55,490 --> 00:51:58,570
movie altogether than than
Memento is.
961
00:51:59,240 --> 00:52:01,200
Well then, let's get into.
Let's make it a double.
962
00:52:01,480 --> 00:52:04,680
We're near the end of the
episode, so thanks for listening
963
00:52:04,680 --> 00:52:07,680
to the film and whiskey show.
Let's ever know the film with
964
00:52:07,680 --> 00:52:09,080
this one, even if it's
struggling.
965
00:52:09,080 --> 00:52:11,560
It's a final segment of the day.
Now let's make it a double.
966
00:52:12,080 --> 00:52:14,360
Let's make it a double is the
part of the show where we pick a
967
00:52:14,360 --> 00:52:17,880
movie to pair up with this one
to make the perfect double
968
00:52:17,880 --> 00:52:20,120
feature.
Brad, I'll let you go first
969
00:52:20,120 --> 00:52:22,600
since Shutter Island apparently
is nothing like this movie.
970
00:52:22,720 --> 00:52:27,120
So I'll scramble to think of
something else while you give us
971
00:52:27,120 --> 00:52:29,680
your perfect pick.
I'll give you this, man.
972
00:52:29,680 --> 00:52:32,720
I I like Shutter Island way
better than Memento.
973
00:52:32,720 --> 00:52:34,200
They just don't remind me of
each other.
974
00:52:35,800 --> 00:52:39,200
I'm going to pick The Truman
Show 1998.
975
00:52:39,200 --> 00:52:42,560
Jim Carrey.
I think that that film has
976
00:52:42,560 --> 00:52:48,200
enough in common of a man whose
life isn't anything like what he
977
00:52:48,200 --> 00:52:50,880
thought it was.
And I I think that there's some
978
00:52:50,880 --> 00:52:54,000
good similarities there that
make it the same movie, and we
979
00:52:54,000 --> 00:52:56,000
should probably put down Memento
because of it.
980
00:52:56,480 --> 00:53:00,580
So The Truman Show.
I'm going to go noir with this
981
00:53:00,580 --> 00:53:01,740
one.
I'll go way back to like the
982
00:53:01,740 --> 00:53:03,340
1940s.
I'm going to pick a movie called
983
00:53:03,340 --> 00:53:06,180
DOA, which is a movie about a
guy.
984
00:53:06,180 --> 00:53:09,460
It's a really cool movie, Brad.
It's about a guy who gets
985
00:53:09,460 --> 00:53:12,900
poisoned somehow with some sort
of radioactive something, and he
986
00:53:12,900 --> 00:53:16,060
finds out that he has like 24
hours before he dies and he has
987
00:53:16,060 --> 00:53:19,060
to figure out who poisoned him
before he croaks.
988
00:53:19,340 --> 00:53:22,300
It's a really good movie.
You can't trust anybody.
989
00:53:23,060 --> 00:53:25,060
Motives are always called into
question.
990
00:53:25,100 --> 00:53:28,140
I just we don't do a lot of noir
on this podcast.
991
00:53:28,740 --> 00:53:32,340
And any chance that I get to
plug, like, Really Hard Boiled,
992
00:53:32,580 --> 00:53:35,580
Mean Spirited Noir movies, I
will do so.
993
00:53:35,580 --> 00:53:36,900
I'm going to pair it up with
DOA.
994
00:53:37,140 --> 00:53:39,660
Brad's going to pair it up with
The Truman Show.
995
00:53:40,140 --> 00:53:44,020
Now Bob, you have to be clear
here because DOA could be
996
00:53:44,020 --> 00:53:48,980
referring to 1980 Eight's Dennis
Quaid Meg Ryan starring film.
997
00:53:48,980 --> 00:53:53,710
That is the remake.
Of the 1949 verse, is it 49 the
998
00:53:53,710 --> 00:53:56,590
original?
49 Yes, Or you could be talking
999
00:53:56,590 --> 00:54:01,990
about 2006, dead or alive.
No, I'm referring to DOA, which
1000
00:54:02,230 --> 00:54:04,710
in most parlance refers to dead
on arrival.
1001
00:54:05,070 --> 00:54:11,870
So that's the one I want 49, not
the Dennis Quaid, not the 2649.
1002
00:54:12,530 --> 00:54:14,130
Just just making sure we're
clear here.
1003
00:54:14,130 --> 00:54:15,650
I know we've had some
miscommunication with.
1004
00:54:15,650 --> 00:54:18,650
My gosh, you are just full of
sass today Sir.
1005
00:54:19,290 --> 00:54:22,570
Let's get to final scores.
I'll let you go first so that I
1006
00:54:22,570 --> 00:54:24,530
can I can calm my nerves over
here.
1007
00:54:25,210 --> 00:54:31,610
I think that the idea of Memento
is way cooler than the actual
1008
00:54:31,610 --> 00:54:35,930
film Memento.
Like the the idea of it is
1009
00:54:35,930 --> 00:54:41,090
really fascinating and really,
really like draws you in.
1010
00:54:41,480 --> 00:54:45,600
And the final 20 minutes of the
film are like far and away the
1011
00:54:45,600 --> 00:54:47,560
peak that this film has to
offer.
1012
00:54:48,040 --> 00:54:53,200
The rest of it's just okay.
Like and like on the lower end
1013
00:54:53,200 --> 00:54:55,680
of just okay.
I'm going to give it a 7 out of
1014
00:54:55,680 --> 00:54:57,560
10 Bob.
But it was entertaining.
1015
00:54:57,720 --> 00:54:59,880
Like it was fine.
But it I don't think it's a
1016
00:54:59,880 --> 00:55:01,480
movie I would ever want to come
back to.
1017
00:55:02,710 --> 00:55:04,910
I'm way higher on this movie
than I thought that I would be.
1018
00:55:05,070 --> 00:55:07,470
I was thinking about giving it
an 8.5.
1019
00:55:07,470 --> 00:55:10,110
I don't think I'm going to go
that high because like I said,
1020
00:55:10,110 --> 00:55:13,030
for a good chunk of the movie I
was like, this is a four, what
1021
00:55:13,030 --> 00:55:15,390
the heck, man?
And it got to the ending, and
1022
00:55:15,390 --> 00:55:18,230
the ending was so good that I
have been left with this
1023
00:55:18,270 --> 00:55:21,910
existential question of like,
does a perfect ending cover a
1024
00:55:21,910 --> 00:55:26,350
multitude of sins, right?
Like how much does a perfect
1025
00:55:26,350 --> 00:55:30,170
ending improve?
A four out of 10 movie and I
1026
00:55:30,170 --> 00:55:32,210
think by the time the ending
came around, I was at least at
1027
00:55:32,210 --> 00:55:35,090
like a six out of 10.
But this movie has really
1028
00:55:35,090 --> 00:55:38,450
serious flaws with it.
But it is so brilliantly
1029
00:55:38,450 --> 00:55:41,890
constructed and the ending is so
good that I think people are
1030
00:55:41,890 --> 00:55:43,690
willing to forgive a lot with
this movie.
1031
00:55:44,370 --> 00:55:46,690
I'm willing to forgive most of
it, but I think you do have to
1032
00:55:46,690 --> 00:55:48,730
keep in mind that this is not a
perfect film.
1033
00:55:49,450 --> 00:55:52,610
And so I'm going to come out to
an 8 out of 10 way higher than I
1034
00:55:52,610 --> 00:55:55,130
thought that I would be.
And I will say to the film's
1035
00:55:55,130 --> 00:55:57,110
credit.
I've been thinking about it
1036
00:55:57,190 --> 00:55:58,990
almost nonstop since we watched
it.
1037
00:55:59,430 --> 00:56:02,390
The problem is that sometimes I
thought about it from the point
1038
00:56:02,390 --> 00:56:04,790
of view of, like, does that even
make sense?
1039
00:56:04,830 --> 00:56:09,470
Like, did they only do that one
thing because it's cool to not
1040
00:56:09,470 --> 00:56:12,590
tell the audience that?
Not every thought that I had
1041
00:56:12,590 --> 00:56:14,510
about this movie has been
positive, I guess is what I'll
1042
00:56:14,510 --> 00:56:16,510
say.
But at the end of the day, I've
1043
00:56:16,510 --> 00:56:19,350
been thinking about it, and that
is a largely positive thing to
1044
00:56:19,350 --> 00:56:21,110
say.
So I'm at an 8.
1045
00:56:21,460 --> 00:56:23,900
Brad's at A7.
We are coming out to once again
1046
00:56:23,900 --> 00:56:27,620
a very easy to average 7.5 out
of 10.
1047
00:56:28,220 --> 00:56:30,580
Bob, do you want to know what
movie I've been thinking about
1048
00:56:30,660 --> 00:56:33,620
that I watched like two or three
days after Memento?
1049
00:56:33,860 --> 00:56:36,460
What's that?
Bicycle Thieves?
1050
00:56:37,740 --> 00:56:39,860
Brad, look at you.
Do you like it?
1051
00:56:40,340 --> 00:56:45,260
Big fan, like 9 out of 10?
Absolutely love that movie.
1052
00:56:45,260 --> 00:56:47,780
I don't know if there's ever
been a better film.
1053
00:56:48,330 --> 00:56:51,610
That captures the, like,
hopelessness of being in
1054
00:56:51,610 --> 00:56:55,330
poverty.
So just beautiful.
1055
00:56:55,330 --> 00:57:00,490
Also, we've talked about Haley
Joel Osman in The Sixth Sense is
1056
00:57:00,490 --> 00:57:04,410
the best child performance ever.
Whoever the little kid is who
1057
00:57:04,410 --> 00:57:08,970
plays Bruno might be the cutest
child ever caught on film.
1058
00:57:09,310 --> 00:57:12,030
Brad, I you know, once again, I
don't mean to disparage or
1059
00:57:12,030 --> 00:57:14,950
demean you, but like, what led
to you watching The Bicycle
1060
00:57:14,950 --> 00:57:16,830
Thieves?
Because that seems like a movie
1061
00:57:16,830 --> 00:57:19,230
that I would have had to pull
teeth to get you to watch.
1062
00:57:19,430 --> 00:57:21,310
Like what?
What made you stumble upon that
1063
00:57:21,310 --> 00:57:24,070
one?
I was.
1064
00:57:24,070 --> 00:57:27,230
I had a week off.
I was up in the Akron area with
1065
00:57:27,550 --> 00:57:31,910
my wife and kiddos and I was
like just looking through HBO
1066
00:57:31,910 --> 00:57:34,670
Max.
And they have a Turner Classic
1067
00:57:34,670 --> 00:57:36,430
movie section.
And I was looking for something
1068
00:57:36,430 --> 00:57:38,190
to watch.
And I saw Bicycle Thieves and I
1069
00:57:38,190 --> 00:57:41,310
was like, you know, that like I
I looked back.
1070
00:57:41,310 --> 00:57:44,710
I think it's like #38 on the
most recent sight and sound
1071
00:57:44,710 --> 00:57:47,150
pole.
And a lot of people have it like
1072
00:57:47,150 --> 00:57:50,110
in their top ten.
And I was like, you know, I'm
1073
00:57:50,110 --> 00:57:52,110
going to give it a try.
It it is.
1074
00:57:52,390 --> 00:57:54,470
But, you know, it really tips me
into watching it, Bob.
1075
00:57:54,630 --> 00:58:00,230
What's that it's like?
83 minutes and I was like less
1076
00:58:00,230 --> 00:58:03,840
than less than 90 a man.
All right man.
1077
00:58:03,840 --> 00:58:07,040
So we are coming out to a 7.5 on
Memento.
1078
00:58:07,040 --> 00:58:09,120
I would really like to talk
about the bicycle teams with you
1079
00:58:09,200 --> 00:58:11,240
someday, but you got to save it
for the pod, man.
1080
00:58:11,440 --> 00:58:13,800
Can't give it all the way here.
I'm so sorry.
1081
00:58:14,040 --> 00:58:16,320
Let us know what you think about
Memento Brad.
1082
00:58:16,320 --> 00:58:19,240
We are definitely lower than
most people on this movie.
1083
00:58:19,240 --> 00:58:22,920
I think this has around an 8,
either an 8.3 or an 8.4 on IMDb.
1084
00:58:23,080 --> 00:58:25,120
It's definitely in their top
250.
1085
00:58:25,700 --> 00:58:27,740
It's dude.
I think it's in their top like
1086
00:58:27,740 --> 00:58:29,620
20-5 or third.
That's crazy.
1087
00:58:31,340 --> 00:58:37,860
It has an 8.4 on IMDb and is.
It's not that good guys.
1088
00:58:38,060 --> 00:58:42,060
I will say that in that group of
movies that are like they hit
1089
00:58:42,660 --> 00:58:44,500
late Gen.
X, early millennials at the
1090
00:58:44,500 --> 00:58:47,420
right time and they were like
cool guy movies, I think this
1091
00:58:47,420 --> 00:58:49,500
might be the best of the bunch.
Like, I think this is a better
1092
00:58:49,500 --> 00:58:52,220
movie than Fight Club, or at
least that it works better for
1093
00:58:52,220 --> 00:58:56,490
me than Fight Club did, but.
I still lump it in with those
1094
00:58:56,490 --> 00:59:00,770
movies the like Boondock,
Saints, Fight Club, Memento,
1095
00:59:01,250 --> 00:59:03,770
even The Matrix to some extent.
But The Matrix is just a way
1096
00:59:03,770 --> 00:59:07,690
better movie than any of these.
I I just, I've never understood
1097
00:59:07,690 --> 00:59:12,250
why we inflate that group of
movies in the cultural like
1098
00:59:12,250 --> 00:59:14,890
consciousness.
Because regardless of the fact
1099
00:59:14,890 --> 00:59:16,250
that I like it better than you
Brad.
1100
00:59:16,560 --> 00:59:19,320
This is not one of the 25 best
films ever made.
1101
00:59:19,320 --> 00:59:20,640
What are you people talking
about?
1102
00:59:20,800 --> 00:59:22,840
So I will say I will.
I was wrong.
1103
00:59:22,920 --> 00:59:24,840
I just looked it up.
But I'm going to make you angry
1104
00:59:24,840 --> 00:59:27,880
Bob.
This movie is number 55 on IMDb
1105
00:59:28,080 --> 00:59:34,280
at with an 8.4 is at #55 right
in front of In Order Django
1106
00:59:34,280 --> 00:59:38,360
Unchained, Indiana Jones and
Raiders of the Lost, Art and and
1107
00:59:38,360 --> 00:59:43,240
Wally all.
All three all better than this.
1108
00:59:43,240 --> 00:59:47,890
Way better films than Memento.
Well, film and Whiskey Nation, I
1109
00:59:47,890 --> 00:59:50,730
think we've given you some fuel.
Do you agree or disagree with us
1110
00:59:50,730 --> 00:59:52,890
about Memento?
You can find us on our social
1111
00:59:52,890 --> 00:59:56,650
media accounts, Facebook,
Twitter, Instagram, or TikTok
1112
00:59:56,890 --> 00:59:59,210
at.
Filmwhiskey or you can jump onto
1113
00:59:59,210 --> 01:00:01,530
a Discord.
We are on there every single day
1114
01:00:01,530 --> 01:00:04,810
talking to you guys, the fans of
the Film and Whiskey Podcast.
1115
01:00:05,050 --> 01:00:07,850
So if you want to join the
conversation on Discord, you can
1116
01:00:07,850 --> 01:00:10,250
find a link to it at the end of
every single one of our show
1117
01:00:10,250 --> 01:00:12,860
notes.
Next week we will be back with a
1118
01:00:12,860 --> 01:00:15,700
very special guest talking about
a movie that I have a
1119
01:00:15,740 --> 01:00:19,300
contentious relationship with
and that is one of Nolan's
1120
01:00:19,300 --> 01:00:21,620
highest regarded films, The
Prestige.
1121
01:00:22,260 --> 01:00:25,140
Join us next week for that, but
until then, I'm Bob Book.
1122
01:00:25,740 --> 01:00:28,180
I'm Brad G.
And we'll see you next time.