Nov. 8, 2023

Dial M for Murder / 1792 Full Proof (ft. Daniel Joyaux)

Dial M for Murder / 1792 Full Proof (ft. Daniel Joyaux)
Dial M for Murder / 1792 Full Proof (ft. Daniel Joyaux)
Film & Whiskey
Dial M for Murder / 1792 Full Proof (ft. Daniel Joyaux)

In this gripping episode of Film & Whiskey, Bob and Brad, alongside film critic Daniel Joyaux, dissect Alfred Hitchcock's innovative 1954 3-D thriller, "Dial M for Murder." As we navigate through the intricacies of the film's plot and Hitchcock's directorial techniques, our hosts also conclude their ambitious five-sample flight of 1792 bourbons with the robust and high-proof, 1792 Full Proof bourbon.

Timestamps:

0:00 Introduction

05:15 Brad Explains

09:15 Performances and Themes

36:05 1792 Full Proof Bourbon Review

46:55 Two Facts and a Falsehood

54:15 Final Analysis of Dial M for Murder

1:06:25 Let's Make it a Double and Final Scores

This week's episode brings you the master of suspense, Alfred Hitchcock, through the lens of "Dial M for Murder," accompanied by the potent 1792 Full Proof bourbon.

Daniel Joyaux joins Bob and Brad in peeling back the layers of this 1954 cinematic thriller. They delve into the brilliant performances that bring the tension to a head, the thematic depth that goes beyond surface-level suspense, and the editing that set a precedent for thrillers to come.

But that's not all - we also savor the high-proof delight of 1792's boldest bourbon. It's a taste test that challenges our palates and a movie breakdown that challenges our perceptions. Will the strong notes of the bourbon align with the strong directorial notes of Hitchcock's classic? Listen in to find out.

And as always, we want to hear from you. What did you think of "Dial M for Murder"? Do you agree with our final scores? Let us know your thoughts and your favorite pairings of films and whiskeys.

Film & Whiskey Podcast. New episodes every Tuesday.

Theme music: "New Shoes" by Blue Wednesday

Film & Whiskey ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Film & Whiskey ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Facebook⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Film & Whiskey ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

⁠⁠⁠Email us⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠!⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

⁠⁠⁠Join our Discord server!⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

For more episodes and engaging content, visit Film & Whiskey's website at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠www.filmwhiskey.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.

--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/filmwhiskey/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/filmwhiskey/support

1
00:00:00,400 --> 00:00:04,640
In 1954, director Alfred
Hitchcock and star Grace Kelly

2
00:00:04,640 --> 00:00:07,680
gave the world an ingenious
crime thriller that kept you at

3
00:00:07,680 --> 00:00:12,600
the edge of your seat till the
final second in. 2023 We finish

4
00:00:12,600 --> 00:00:15,280
out a flight of up and down
bourbons.

5
00:00:15,840 --> 00:00:21,480
The film is Dial M for Murder.
The whiskey is 1792 foolproof,

6
00:00:22,320 --> 00:00:25,600
and we'll review them both.
This is the.

7
00:00:25,600 --> 00:00:46,960
Film and Whiskey Podcast.
Welcome to the Film and Whiskey

8
00:00:46,960 --> 00:00:49,800
Podcast, where each week we
review a classic movie and a

9
00:00:49,800 --> 00:00:51,400
glass of whiskey.
I'm Bob.

10
00:00:51,400 --> 00:00:53,040
Book.
I'm Brad G.

11
00:00:53,440 --> 00:00:56,720
And this week we are finishing
up Season 7.

12
00:00:56,840 --> 00:01:00,440
Brad wrapping it up, baby.
Man, it's been a long season,

13
00:01:00,440 --> 00:01:03,120
hasn't it?
Yeah, it's interesting.

14
00:01:03,120 --> 00:01:07,280
I've really enjoyed these two
seasons of, you know, director

15
00:01:07,280 --> 00:01:10,440
miniseries.
But it feels like it kind of

16
00:01:10,440 --> 00:01:15,840
drags certain segments of the
season along, right?

17
00:01:15,840 --> 00:01:18,560
Like there's a certain director
that you're not quite as hot on,

18
00:01:18,560 --> 00:01:20,760
like Kurosawa.
It felt like it took a while.

19
00:01:21,720 --> 00:01:23,600
Hitchcock felt like he's gone on
for a while.

20
00:01:23,600 --> 00:01:25,920
It's really just the ones that
you pick 5 movies for Bob.

21
00:01:26,040 --> 00:01:28,800
Well, you know, I it's I pick 5
movies for the ones that are

22
00:01:28,800 --> 00:01:31,480
like universally beloved as the
best directors ever.

23
00:01:31,640 --> 00:01:34,760
And I'm like, surely these five
films will go over great with

24
00:01:34,760 --> 00:01:38,000
Brad and then they never do.
So yeah, I mean that's, I would

25
00:01:38,000 --> 00:01:40,560
say that I I stand with the
common man.

26
00:01:40,920 --> 00:01:43,840
We'll say that for now, but
we're finishing out season seven

27
00:01:44,160 --> 00:01:48,680
with Dial M for Murder.
A film that you know, I believe

28
00:01:48,680 --> 00:01:52,920
Bosley Crowder referred to back
in the day as an absolute

29
00:01:52,920 --> 00:01:57,920
banger, Brad, that is the, you
know, hoity toity description of

30
00:01:57,920 --> 00:01:59,920
this film because that's what it
is, man.

31
00:02:00,120 --> 00:02:04,800
Like it works so well.
Bosley Crowther sounds like a

32
00:02:04,800 --> 00:02:07,560
stage name for John Cleese in
Monty Python.

33
00:02:09,400 --> 00:02:11,000
He was.
He's not a real he.

34
00:02:11,039 --> 00:02:13,680
Was not a real name.
Famous movie critic for probably

35
00:02:13,680 --> 00:02:16,320
30 years, Brad.
No, that's Roger Ebert, Bob.

36
00:02:16,880 --> 00:02:19,320
Before him, Prior to Ebert?
Really.

37
00:02:19,560 --> 00:02:21,480
Yeah, I've never heard of him.
I.

38
00:02:21,680 --> 00:02:27,440
We should clearly be about him.
Osley Crowther was the film

39
00:02:27,440 --> 00:02:32,280
critic for like the 40s, fifties
and 60s, and he walked Bob in

40
00:02:32,280 --> 00:02:35,520
the aftermath of giving Bonnie
and Clyde a scathing review.

41
00:02:36,320 --> 00:02:37,840
Bonnie and Clyde.
Oh, Yep.

42
00:02:38,160 --> 00:02:39,120
Yep.
How dare he?

43
00:02:39,760 --> 00:02:42,240
I know.
They basically said get out of

44
00:02:42,240 --> 00:02:44,480
here, old man.
And then the new film criticism

45
00:02:44,480 --> 00:02:46,520
was born.
Pauline Kael was waiting in the

46
00:02:46,520 --> 00:02:48,440
wings.
She was like, now's my time.

47
00:02:49,320 --> 00:02:51,840
All right, man, let's stop
talking about film criticism for

48
00:02:51,840 --> 00:02:54,000
now and let's actually do some
film criticism.

49
00:02:54,000 --> 00:02:57,360
And that voice you're hearing in
the back is a film critic friend

50
00:02:57,360 --> 00:03:00,000
of ours who's joining us for, I
believe, the third time.

51
00:03:00,200 --> 00:03:02,720
It's Daniel Zwyo.
Daniel, how you doing tonight,

52
00:03:02,720 --> 00:03:03,000
man?
I'm.

53
00:03:04,040 --> 00:03:04,920
Good.
How are you guys?

54
00:03:06,000 --> 00:03:08,400
Doing great.
I'm excited to talk Hitchcock.

55
00:03:09,400 --> 00:03:11,000
I was going to say we're doing
incredible, man.

56
00:03:11,000 --> 00:03:14,040
We've watched now five Hitchcock
films.

57
00:03:14,520 --> 00:03:16,480
I'm trying to think back through
all five of them.

58
00:03:16,480 --> 00:03:22,000
Bob, I feel like I was pretty
high on two, at least two, maybe

59
00:03:22,000 --> 00:03:24,320
three.
I I can't even remember what

60
00:03:24,320 --> 00:03:26,600
movies we watched.
So let's see.

61
00:03:26,600 --> 00:03:29,760
I thought you would be really
high last week on the 39 Steps

62
00:03:29,760 --> 00:03:33,600
and you were not.
We did rope.

63
00:03:33,720 --> 00:03:35,640
That's one of my favourites.
You were going to be met.

64
00:03:35,800 --> 00:03:37,320
Like rope.
Yeah, yeah.

65
00:03:38,040 --> 00:03:39,160
What else?
What else did we do?

66
00:03:40,280 --> 00:03:43,040
Oh Notorious.
We were both not huge fans of

67
00:03:43,040 --> 00:03:45,120
Notorious.
Notorious.

68
00:03:45,880 --> 00:03:47,120
Yeah.
So it's been up and down on

69
00:03:47,120 --> 00:03:49,320
Hitchcock.
Truly, Here's the Here's the

70
00:03:49,320 --> 00:03:53,720
deal, though.
Dial M for murder is Dial A for

71
00:03:53,720 --> 00:03:57,800
Awesome.
Well, I think maybe we should

72
00:03:57,800 --> 00:04:00,280
talk a little bit about why that
is, because we've said it

73
00:04:00,280 --> 00:04:03,000
multiple Times Now.
But I think the most important

74
00:04:03,000 --> 00:04:05,520
thing that I need to illustrate
to the film and Whiskey listener

75
00:04:05,520 --> 00:04:09,800
right now is.
I am joined today by two people

76
00:04:09,800 --> 00:04:12,240
who watched this film for the
first time.

77
00:04:13,240 --> 00:04:16,000
I'm absolutely shocked to hear
that Daniel had not seen this

78
00:04:16,000 --> 00:04:17,880
movie before.
Brad, it's like a given.

79
00:04:17,880 --> 00:04:20,160
But Daniel I was.
I was shocked.

80
00:04:21,040 --> 00:04:25,560
Join me in my shame, Daniel.
Fill us in a little bit, man.

81
00:04:25,560 --> 00:04:26,440
Like what?
What?

82
00:04:26,440 --> 00:04:28,200
What made this?
BE I'm a bad Hitchcock viewer

83
00:04:28,200 --> 00:04:30,600
because I've seen Vertigo and
Psycho and North by Northwest

84
00:04:30,600 --> 00:04:34,200
and Rear Window and N Notorious
all half a dozen times each, but

85
00:04:34,200 --> 00:04:36,040
I haven't done a deep dive on
his filmography.

86
00:04:36,520 --> 00:04:39,120
I mean, I feel like if you go 5
films deep, you're doing pretty

87
00:04:39,120 --> 00:04:41,200
good.
But like, you know, Brad and I

88
00:04:41,200 --> 00:04:43,680
had already done the four major
ones.

89
00:04:43,680 --> 00:04:47,120
And so we're coming back here
with Movies 5 through 9 right

90
00:04:47,120 --> 00:04:49,240
now just to kind of round things
out a little bit.

91
00:04:49,840 --> 00:04:54,400
Well, I have the famous
Hitchcock Trefo book and Trefo

92
00:04:54,400 --> 00:04:58,520
said in his introduction, Alfred
Hitchcock made 53 films and one

93
00:04:58,520 --> 00:05:01,160
daughter.
So but 53 films?

94
00:05:01,160 --> 00:05:03,640
I feel like I've got to go more
than more than the 10 deep I

95
00:05:03,640 --> 00:05:06,080
have.
That's a heck of a quote.

96
00:05:08,520 --> 00:05:11,080
All right, guys, let's dive into
talking about the movie itself a

97
00:05:11,080 --> 00:05:13,080
little bit.
And to do that, we need to throw

98
00:05:13,080 --> 00:05:16,160
over to our first segment of the
day, which we call, Brad

99
00:05:16,160 --> 00:05:18,160
Explains.
Brad's going to give us the

100
00:05:18,200 --> 00:05:21,800
movie plots with only 60 seconds
ticking on the clock, so let's

101
00:05:21,800 --> 00:05:25,080
go ahead and hear your take with
this little segment that we

102
00:05:25,080 --> 00:05:26,280
call.
Brad explains.

103
00:05:26,880 --> 00:05:29,920
Brad Explains is the part of the
podcast where Brad breaks down

104
00:05:29,920 --> 00:05:33,280
the plot of the film that he has
just seen, often for the first

105
00:05:33,280 --> 00:05:34,640
time.
We've established this.

106
00:05:34,760 --> 00:05:38,200
It is Brad's first time with
Dial M for Murder.

107
00:05:38,960 --> 00:05:41,240
Brad, I am so excited to hear
you talk about this movie

108
00:05:41,240 --> 00:05:45,000
because I feel like it's kind of
a spoiler proof film.

109
00:05:45,400 --> 00:05:49,560
Like there's not too much you
can tip your hand with here that

110
00:05:49,560 --> 00:05:52,200
Hitchcock doesn't give you in
the 1st 10 minutes of the movie.

111
00:05:52,520 --> 00:05:53,640
I'm trying to think what would I
mean.

112
00:05:53,640 --> 00:05:57,120
The spoilers would be like what
happens at the end of the film.

113
00:05:57,960 --> 00:06:00,600
That's that's true as as most
spoilers.

114
00:06:00,800 --> 00:06:03,360
But it's not really a mystery.
Like who did it?

115
00:06:03,520 --> 00:06:06,520
You know?
Yeah, yeah, no, it I I think

116
00:06:06,520 --> 00:06:09,000
that's what I love about
Hitchcock in general is that he

117
00:06:09,000 --> 00:06:11,040
often doesn't really care who
done it.

118
00:06:11,560 --> 00:06:16,920
He really is interested in how
done it and and like is and and

119
00:06:16,920 --> 00:06:22,120
essentially the question he
always asks is will the person

120
00:06:22,120 --> 00:06:26,080
get caught like that seems to be
the driving tension in a lot of

121
00:06:26,080 --> 00:06:29,440
his films and I think he does it
probably the best.

122
00:06:30,680 --> 00:06:34,120
Not quite the best, but one of
the best ways that he's ever

123
00:06:34,120 --> 00:06:35,760
done it.
I think he does here in Dial in

124
00:06:35,760 --> 00:06:37,280
for Murder.
All right, Brad.

125
00:06:37,280 --> 00:06:40,120
Well, you have 60 seconds on the
clock to break down the plot of

126
00:06:40,120 --> 00:06:44,720
this movie, spoil the whole
thing, and go dial in.

127
00:06:44,720 --> 00:06:50,080
For Murder is a film about a
former tennis pro named Tony

128
00:06:50,080 --> 00:06:54,040
Wendis who does not like the
fact that his wife is cheating

129
00:06:54,040 --> 00:06:56,360
on him.
He gets in contact with an old

130
00:06:56,360 --> 00:06:59,960
college buddy who spent some
time in jail, convinces him to

131
00:06:59,960 --> 00:07:03,440
take on a job for £1000 to
murder his wife.

132
00:07:04,000 --> 00:07:08,920
The job goes a a bit awry when
his wife escapes the murder and

133
00:07:08,920 --> 00:07:13,480
kills his college associate.
The rest of the film is about

134
00:07:13,480 --> 00:07:19,040
Tony Wendis trying to find his
way out of getting out of

135
00:07:19,040 --> 00:07:21,840
justice and pinning the murder
on his wife.

136
00:07:22,600 --> 00:07:25,840
The Chief Inspector spends the
the rest of the film following

137
00:07:25,840 --> 00:07:31,760
his way through all the clues
and eventually nabbing Tony

138
00:07:31,760 --> 00:07:33,600
Wendis for the murder.
Boom.

139
00:07:33,600 --> 00:07:35,480
Well, not really for the murder,
for the set up, for the.

140
00:07:35,720 --> 00:07:37,920
For the attempt, yeah, for the
attempt.

141
00:07:37,960 --> 00:07:39,040
For the attempt.
Good, good try.

142
00:07:40,840 --> 00:07:42,880
All right.
Man, I think it's time that we

143
00:07:42,880 --> 00:07:46,280
dive into the film itself.
And Brad, I don't know how much

144
00:07:46,280 --> 00:07:48,640
farther we can get talking about
this.

145
00:07:49,040 --> 00:07:52,080
Without comparing it to Rope,
which we just watched a couple

146
00:07:52,080 --> 00:07:55,640
weeks ago, I think Rope is
probably the closest thing in

147
00:07:55,720 --> 00:07:59,600
Hitchcock's catalogue that I've
seen to this.

148
00:07:59,920 --> 00:08:03,920
Especially in that, like the
entire premise of the film is

149
00:08:04,160 --> 00:08:07,160
you're following the bad guy all
the way through the movie.

150
00:08:07,440 --> 00:08:11,400
Hitchcock is trying to, in some
ways, make you complicit in what

151
00:08:11,400 --> 00:08:14,760
the bad guys doing.
So that you're the suspense is

152
00:08:14,760 --> 00:08:18,760
whether or not this truly evil
person will get caught doing

153
00:08:18,920 --> 00:08:22,960
what he's doing.
And not only that, but they give

154
00:08:22,960 --> 00:08:25,960
you all the information you need
about those characters in the

155
00:08:25,960 --> 00:08:29,640
first, you know, 10-15 minutes
of the movie.

156
00:08:30,000 --> 00:08:32,840
So it really does follow a
similar path to rope.

157
00:08:33,240 --> 00:08:35,960
Not to mention they're both
adapted from stage plays.

158
00:08:35,960 --> 00:08:38,960
And I think you can kind of tell
with both of them that they have

159
00:08:38,960 --> 00:08:42,600
this very confined theatrical
kind of feel to them.

160
00:08:43,120 --> 00:08:45,120
Can I?
I, I think I can actually

161
00:08:45,120 --> 00:08:49,960
compare and contrast rope and
dial M for murder in three

162
00:08:49,960 --> 00:08:51,640
words.
Bob, are you Are you ready?

163
00:08:52,560 --> 00:08:57,400
This could go a lot of ways.
Yeah, I'm ready, Rope, but

164
00:08:57,400 --> 00:08:59,640
better.
Oh, I don't know about that,

165
00:08:59,640 --> 00:09:00,480
Man.
I loved rope.

166
00:09:02,640 --> 00:09:05,920
Rope.
Also also rope. 85 minutes long.

167
00:09:06,720 --> 00:09:10,040
That is true.
I mean, this was only, oh, what,

168
00:09:10,040 --> 00:09:12,440
an hour and 45 minutes.
Yeah, it's only like, you know,

169
00:09:12,440 --> 00:09:14,840
20 minutes longer. 105 minutes,
Bob.

170
00:09:14,840 --> 00:09:17,080
But when you've done it
economically, why?

171
00:09:17,200 --> 00:09:21,280
Why drag it out?
You know, Daniel, this was your

172
00:09:21,280 --> 00:09:24,000
first time through the film,
just like myself.

173
00:09:24,440 --> 00:09:27,960
So where are you sitting at, you
know, at the end of your first

174
00:09:27,960 --> 00:09:29,160
viewing?
Are there are there any, like

175
00:09:29,160 --> 00:09:32,320
big performances you want to
point out?

176
00:09:32,320 --> 00:09:35,320
Anything that just resonated
with your soul?

177
00:09:35,320 --> 00:09:37,360
Where are you at?
I really liked it.

178
00:09:37,360 --> 00:09:40,560
I think the only reason I can
think of that it wouldn't be

179
00:09:40,560 --> 00:09:44,280
considered one of Hitchcock's
best is that I is it the opening

180
00:09:44,280 --> 00:09:48,840
conversation the main character
has with the man he's

181
00:09:48,840 --> 00:09:52,120
contracting to kill his wife?
I think that conversation drags

182
00:09:52,120 --> 00:09:54,680
too long.
That's like a like a 10 to 15

183
00:09:54,680 --> 00:09:57,520
minute long scene right at the
opening of the movie.

184
00:09:59,640 --> 00:10:03,000
It means you don't get into it
as fast as you otherwise would,

185
00:10:03,680 --> 00:10:07,120
but probably from the minute
that scene ends at like the 20

186
00:10:07,120 --> 00:10:12,240
minute mark, the rest of the
movie is just completely intense

187
00:10:12,240 --> 00:10:13,800
and you're totally in it the
whole time.

188
00:10:14,560 --> 00:10:17,280
Well, and I'll say too, I think
even towards the back part of

189
00:10:17,280 --> 00:10:20,680
that conversation, when it
becomes clear how meticulous

190
00:10:20,680 --> 00:10:23,000
he's been in his planning, it
all kind of makes sense.

191
00:10:23,480 --> 00:10:26,480
Because he even has like a
another phone call before that

192
00:10:26,480 --> 00:10:29,680
where he's calling like his boss
or his maid or somebody to kind

193
00:10:29,680 --> 00:10:33,360
of help set up his own alibi and
you don't realize that's what

194
00:10:33,360 --> 00:10:36,000
he's doing until he reveals it
15 minutes later.

195
00:10:36,360 --> 00:10:39,360
And yeah, you're right, man, the
1st 10 minutes of this movie

196
00:10:39,720 --> 00:10:43,680
excruciatingly slow.
Like, I I'm not typically the

197
00:10:43,680 --> 00:10:46,560
guy that pulls out my phone and
checks my e-mail or whatever.

198
00:10:46,760 --> 00:10:48,440
And you know, I've seen this
movie before, so I know where

199
00:10:48,440 --> 00:10:49,240
it's going.
But.

200
00:10:49,920 --> 00:10:53,360
The 1st 10 minutes of the movie
felt completely aimless until he

201
00:10:53,360 --> 00:10:56,360
gets his friend into the
apartment and slowly starts to

202
00:10:56,360 --> 00:11:00,120
reveal I know all about you, I
know you're a con man, you're

203
00:11:00,120 --> 00:11:02,280
gonna murder my wife, and here's
why.

204
00:11:02,360 --> 00:11:06,400
And here's all the things that
I've done to clear my own name.

205
00:11:06,840 --> 00:11:09,760
And it's a really brilliant web
that he weaves.

206
00:11:09,760 --> 00:11:11,800
And that's really, really great
writing too.

207
00:11:12,080 --> 00:11:15,680
But again, it's like you have to
have that kind of really long

208
00:11:15,680 --> 00:11:18,720
stretched out introduction to
give you that pay off.

209
00:11:19,200 --> 00:11:21,400
But I think it's really high
risk, high reward, Brad.

210
00:11:22,120 --> 00:11:27,880
Just like the murder he commits.
Yeah, I I'm with you guys.

211
00:11:27,880 --> 00:11:32,640
The opening scene before the
accomplices brought into the

212
00:11:32,640 --> 00:11:36,080
apartment where Grace Kelly is
like making out with her

213
00:11:36,080 --> 00:11:40,360
American lover and it it was
just confusing for a little

214
00:11:40,360 --> 00:11:42,760
while I I wasn't quite sure what
was going on.

215
00:11:43,240 --> 00:11:46,880
And then the, you know, Tony
comes in and, you know, gets rid

216
00:11:46,880 --> 00:11:50,360
of his wife and then he gets his
friend to come over and I'm

217
00:11:50,360 --> 00:11:52,240
like, what in the world is
happening?

218
00:11:52,240 --> 00:11:57,080
And like you guys said, as soon
as he makes it clear without

219
00:11:57,080 --> 00:12:00,360
saying it, I'm going to ask you
to murder my wife.

220
00:12:00,760 --> 00:12:04,960
From that moment till the end of
the film, I am at the edge of my

221
00:12:04,960 --> 00:12:08,160
seat.
So as long as we're all in

222
00:12:08,160 --> 00:12:11,920
agreement, we can put away the
1st 12, you know, 16 minutes of

223
00:12:11,920 --> 00:12:15,200
this film and just talk about
the rest of it now, because the

224
00:12:15,200 --> 00:12:18,480
rest of it is incredible.
Yeah.

225
00:12:18,480 --> 00:12:20,920
And something I really want to
stress is I think it's the third

226
00:12:20,920 --> 00:12:24,680
scene in the movie where after
he's so the main character's

227
00:12:24,680 --> 00:12:28,720
name is Tony.
After Tony has, you know, told

228
00:12:28,720 --> 00:12:31,600
his friend the plot, now it's
getting ready to be put into

229
00:12:31,600 --> 00:12:35,320
action.
And what it depends on is Tony

230
00:12:35,320 --> 00:12:39,320
and Mark going out to a club for
the evening while Margot, played

231
00:12:39,320 --> 00:12:42,200
by Grace Kelly, stays at home.
And right as they're getting

232
00:12:42,200 --> 00:12:44,960
ready to leave, Margot is
saying, oh, she'll go out and go

233
00:12:44,960 --> 00:12:48,760
to the movie too.
And that moment is so intense as

234
00:12:48,760 --> 00:12:51,720
you watch Tony's face drop in,
trying to figure out anything he

235
00:12:51,720 --> 00:12:54,120
can do to get Margot to stay in
the apartment.

236
00:12:54,120 --> 00:12:56,160
He keeps offering her
suggestions about, oh, what

237
00:12:56,160 --> 00:12:58,120
about this thing you meant to do
and this thing you meant to do?

238
00:12:58,640 --> 00:13:01,520
And the Hitchcock moves the
camera around the room as you

239
00:13:01,520 --> 00:13:05,400
watch sort of each object Tony
brings up as an idea to get her

240
00:13:05,400 --> 00:13:08,000
to stay.
And the placement of the keys.

241
00:13:08,160 --> 00:13:11,240
And Oh no, someone's standing in
the wrong place for a key to be

242
00:13:11,240 --> 00:13:12,600
put there.
And now they're scissors.

243
00:13:12,600 --> 00:13:16,520
And that whole scene is just so
dynamically staged and the

244
00:13:16,520 --> 00:13:19,960
moment where he gaslights her
and just it completely is like,

245
00:13:19,960 --> 00:13:23,560
well, you know, I'm, I'm not
going to go out if if you don't

246
00:13:23,560 --> 00:13:26,480
want me to go out, you clearly
don't want me to go and and I'm

247
00:13:26,480 --> 00:13:29,040
just like, oh snap, bro.
It's great.

248
00:13:29,120 --> 00:13:33,240
It's just it's really great.
So well written and Ray, I'm

249
00:13:33,240 --> 00:13:35,480
guessing Miland.
Miland is that it?

250
00:13:35,560 --> 00:13:39,720
Miland.
Ray Miland is terrifying in this

251
00:13:39,720 --> 00:13:43,480
movie.
He he plays everybody else in

252
00:13:43,480 --> 00:13:48,040
the film like a freaking fiddle.
Like from that scene to the way

253
00:13:48,040 --> 00:13:51,880
he interacts with the police.
I He just does a masterful job

254
00:13:51,880 --> 00:13:53,520
here.
Well, that was what I was going

255
00:13:53,520 --> 00:13:55,800
to say.
We can't go any further in this

256
00:13:55,800 --> 00:13:58,560
conversation without talking
about Ray Meland and the the

257
00:13:58,560 --> 00:14:00,120
note that I took on his
performance.

258
00:14:00,120 --> 00:14:03,280
Brad is just this is one of the
all time great Hitchcock

259
00:14:03,280 --> 00:14:05,600
performances.
You know, Hitchcock initially

260
00:14:05,600 --> 00:14:08,720
wanted Cary Grant for this role.
Warner Brothers said they didn't

261
00:14:08,720 --> 00:14:11,720
buy him as a villain, which is
really funny because I mentioned

262
00:14:11,720 --> 00:14:14,040
a couple weeks ago, this is the
same thing that Hitchcock went

263
00:14:14,040 --> 00:14:17,240
through in the early 40s with
the movie Suspicion and also

264
00:14:17,240 --> 00:14:19,400
with Notorious, like they're
playing on that a little bit in

265
00:14:19,400 --> 00:14:21,800
the early going.
So they wouldn't do Cary Grant.

266
00:14:21,800 --> 00:14:25,640
They hired Ray Meland instead.
We have never done a Ray Meland

267
00:14:25,640 --> 00:14:28,760
movie on this podcast.
When we were doing our Billy

268
00:14:28,760 --> 00:14:30,840
Wilder series.
Brad, I told you about a movie

269
00:14:30,840 --> 00:14:32,560
Wilder made called The Lost
Weekend.

270
00:14:33,120 --> 00:14:34,960
And Ray Meland is the star of
that movie.

271
00:14:34,960 --> 00:14:38,200
He won an Oscar for it.
He's a great actor and I feel

272
00:14:38,200 --> 00:14:41,040
like he's kind of become lost to
time a little bit because

273
00:14:41,040 --> 00:14:44,240
especially in the last half of
his career and he was just

274
00:14:44,240 --> 00:14:46,120
taking whatever paycheck he
could.

275
00:14:46,120 --> 00:14:48,800
He was making a lot of like
really low budget schlocky

276
00:14:48,800 --> 00:14:51,800
horror movies.
But when you go back and watch

277
00:14:51,800 --> 00:14:55,440
some of his great performances,
I mean he knocks it out of the

278
00:14:55,440 --> 00:14:58,120
park in this movie.
And I don't know that I've ever

279
00:14:58,120 --> 00:15:00,240
seen him in anything.
IMDb says.

280
00:15:00,240 --> 00:15:02,920
He was in Battlestar Galactic,
which I was I saw once as a kid.

281
00:15:03,960 --> 00:15:06,040
Beyond that, I'm not sure if
I've ever seen him before.

282
00:15:06,040 --> 00:15:08,400
And I know he won Best Actor for
the last weekend, which I've

283
00:15:08,400 --> 00:15:11,000
never seen.
I was going to say I I was

284
00:15:11,000 --> 00:15:14,440
looking through his filmography
and I saw The Sea Serpent in the

285
00:15:14,440 --> 00:15:18,920
80s, which has a 3.6 on IMDb
Classic film.

286
00:15:18,920 --> 00:15:20,360
We'll be reviewing that next
season.

287
00:15:20,360 --> 00:15:22,880
I was going to say, is that your
let's make it a double pick for

288
00:15:22,880 --> 00:15:28,240
today, Obviously.
I think what makes him so

289
00:15:28,240 --> 00:15:32,880
menacing and so terrifying is
not the moments where he has

290
00:15:32,880 --> 00:15:36,680
everything planned out like like
those established that there's a

291
00:15:36,680 --> 00:15:40,440
level of genius here that you
wouldn't necessarily expect from

292
00:15:40,440 --> 00:15:44,960
a former, you know, tennis star.
It's the moments where things go

293
00:15:44,960 --> 00:15:51,000
wrong, and he almost always has
the perfect on the spot ad

294
00:15:51,000 --> 00:15:55,960
libbed answer to to twist things
his way.

295
00:15:56,200 --> 00:15:59,680
I think that's what makes him
such a terrifying villain in

296
00:15:59,680 --> 00:16:01,480
this movie.
I totally agree.

297
00:16:01,480 --> 00:16:03,880
And I was going to say more or
less the same thing, that that

298
00:16:03,880 --> 00:16:07,760
they're probably four or five
times the movie where one of the

299
00:16:07,760 --> 00:16:10,400
other characters will ask him a
question that we as the audience

300
00:16:10,400 --> 00:16:13,160
know he doesn't have a good
answer to, and then suddenly he

301
00:16:13,160 --> 00:16:14,360
just produced with a good
answer.

302
00:16:16,000 --> 00:16:18,360
Yeah, I mean, he's, he's truly
slippery.

303
00:16:18,480 --> 00:16:21,520
And I wouldn't call him slimy
like some of the other villains

304
00:16:21,520 --> 00:16:23,680
we've had in this Hitchcock
miniseries, Brad.

305
00:16:24,120 --> 00:16:27,640
But what is so great about Ray
Mullan too, is that he's not

306
00:16:27,640 --> 00:16:31,080
Cary Grant.
Like, in terms of his looks, he

307
00:16:31,080 --> 00:16:35,200
looks like a guy who does, you
know, who can put on airs and

308
00:16:35,200 --> 00:16:38,120
pretend to be wealthy.
But there's something that rings

309
00:16:38,120 --> 00:16:40,640
me just he's British.
I I think that's a prerequisite

310
00:16:40,720 --> 00:16:43,960
of being British.
There's something that rings

311
00:16:43,960 --> 00:16:48,360
just slightly false about it,
like he can fool most people,

312
00:16:48,680 --> 00:16:52,480
but as the audience you're like
he he's not quite fooling me and

313
00:16:52,480 --> 00:16:54,440
it's probably because he
straight up told me he wants to

314
00:16:54,440 --> 00:16:57,400
kill his wife.
But I I think being able to walk

315
00:16:57,400 --> 00:17:01,480
that line between, yes, he's
dapper like Cary Grant, but

316
00:17:01,480 --> 00:17:04,440
there's an element to him that I
don't trust and it's something

317
00:17:04,440 --> 00:17:07,800
about his look too.
I think it's a really brilliant

318
00:17:07,800 --> 00:17:10,880
stroke of of casting here by
Hitchcock, Yeah.

319
00:17:10,880 --> 00:17:15,800
I mean he has that vibe of a
former athlete who's let himself

320
00:17:15,800 --> 00:17:20,000
go just a little bit but still
thinks that he controls the

321
00:17:20,000 --> 00:17:24,119
world around him.
And and the way he goes about

322
00:17:24,119 --> 00:17:27,760
controlling the world through
manipulation, through lies,

323
00:17:27,760 --> 00:17:33,320
through coercion just sets him
up as like you said, Bob, I'd

324
00:17:33,360 --> 00:17:35,760
I'd say not just one of the
greatest Hitchcock characters of

325
00:17:35,760 --> 00:17:38,560
all time, but like, I'd
probably, I'd probably think

326
00:17:38,560 --> 00:17:40,480
about him on a like a top ten
villain list.

327
00:17:40,600 --> 00:17:42,800
Oh yeah.
It's A and it's such a meaty

328
00:17:42,960 --> 00:17:46,880
role for a villain too because
you know from the get go that he

329
00:17:46,880 --> 00:17:49,440
is the villain.
It's not some twist ending where

330
00:17:49,440 --> 00:17:52,360
you find out at the very last
moment, Oh my gosh, he did try

331
00:17:52,360 --> 00:17:54,840
to kill his wife the whole time.
It's like, no, we're going to

332
00:17:54,840 --> 00:17:57,920
lay it all out there and you are
going to watch how slimy this

333
00:17:57,920 --> 00:18:01,760
guy can be and at the same time,
it's not a whodunit.

334
00:18:02,320 --> 00:18:05,600
It's it's a will.
Will he get away with it?

335
00:18:05,720 --> 00:18:09,360
Will he done it?
So I'm curious, do you guys know

336
00:18:09,360 --> 00:18:11,440
that this that there was a
remake of this movie from the

337
00:18:11,440 --> 00:18:12,600
90s?
Yes.

338
00:18:12,600 --> 00:18:17,400
So this movie was remade first
as ATV movie, as Dial M for

339
00:18:17,400 --> 00:18:20,600
Murder, and then as a theatrical
movie in the late 90s called A

340
00:18:20,600 --> 00:18:24,120
Perfect Murder, starring Michael
Douglas and Gwyneth Paltrow and

341
00:18:24,120 --> 00:18:27,240
Viggo Mortensen.
And it is currently streaming

342
00:18:27,240 --> 00:18:29,840
on.
Tubi and your boy tried to get

343
00:18:29,840 --> 00:18:32,280
the whole thing washed before we
press record and I got only

344
00:18:32,280 --> 00:18:34,160
halfway through.
It's not bad.

345
00:18:35,160 --> 00:18:37,280
And it's directed by the guy
that made The Fugitive.

346
00:18:37,280 --> 00:18:41,960
Like, it's a pretty good movie.
It's also the Made Under Siege.

347
00:18:42,480 --> 00:18:44,960
Yes, right.
That's what we need.

348
00:18:44,960 --> 00:18:48,120
Is Segal in in this movie?
That's what it's missing.

349
00:18:49,880 --> 00:18:52,960
I saw A Perfect Murder in
theaters in 1997, and I remember

350
00:18:52,960 --> 00:18:54,880
really liking, and that was
before I even, you know, knew

351
00:18:54,880 --> 00:18:57,240
much about Hitchcock.
But I haven't seen it again

352
00:18:57,240 --> 00:18:59,120
since then, so I don't know if
it holds up.

353
00:18:59,960 --> 00:19:03,040
I I feel like there's a there's
a great analogue for this.

354
00:19:03,880 --> 00:19:05,680
Bob.
You and I watched Charade a few

355
00:19:05,680 --> 00:19:09,000
seasons ago, one of my favorite
movies all, all time.

356
00:19:09,000 --> 00:19:15,600
There's like a 2002 or Three
remake called.

357
00:19:15,680 --> 00:19:21,840
The Truth about Charlie and
Charlie and Charlie's No Tandy.

358
00:19:21,840 --> 00:19:23,120
Tandy Newton.
Yep, Yep.

359
00:19:23,400 --> 00:19:27,360
Plays, plays the the female lead
and and once again it's like one

360
00:19:27,360 --> 00:19:29,160
of those movies I saw when I was
young, I was like oh, I really

361
00:19:29,160 --> 00:19:31,440
like that.
But I'm sure if I went back now,

362
00:19:32,160 --> 00:19:34,960
it might not hold up as well.
There was a whole sub genre of

363
00:19:34,960 --> 00:19:38,920
movies in the late 90s and early
2000s where it was like let's

364
00:19:38,920 --> 00:19:43,640
make a 6.5 out of 10 version of
a movie that was really good.

365
00:19:43,800 --> 00:19:45,960
Like they did it with The Thomas
Crown Affair.

366
00:19:46,120 --> 00:19:48,640
They did it with this movie The
Italian Job.

367
00:19:48,920 --> 00:19:51,760
Like it's it's just it's one of
my favorite sub genres because

368
00:19:51,880 --> 00:19:54,520
the remakes are fine.
You know what I mean, But that's

369
00:19:54,840 --> 00:19:57,640
about all they are.
But about it?

370
00:19:57,640 --> 00:20:00,720
But I will say, here's my
scorching hot take for the day

371
00:20:00,720 --> 00:20:03,440
and I'm going to set myself up
for you guys to attack me on

372
00:20:03,440 --> 00:20:06,880
this.
Gwyneth Paltrow plays the Grace

373
00:20:06,880 --> 00:20:11,960
Kelly role in the remake, and I
like Grace Kelly a lot.

374
00:20:13,240 --> 00:20:17,520
What I've been struck by in her
Hitchcock movies is that I don't

375
00:20:17,520 --> 00:20:19,160
think he gives her that much to
do.

376
00:20:20,040 --> 00:20:23,280
And I kind of preferred the
Gwyneth Paltrow role in the new

377
00:20:23,280 --> 00:20:28,600
version to the Grace Kelly role.
Did she try to sell you some

378
00:20:28,600 --> 00:20:31,120
goop products?
No, I was not offered goop at

379
00:20:31,120 --> 00:20:34,840
any point.
I was thinking about that

380
00:20:34,840 --> 00:20:37,840
watching the movie is that, you
know, so Grace Kelly's a star of

381
00:20:37,840 --> 00:20:40,560
both this and Rear Window, which
are both movies that essentially

382
00:20:40,560 --> 00:20:42,120
just take place in one
apartment.

383
00:20:43,320 --> 00:20:46,120
And so there's there's, like you
said, there's less for her to

384
00:20:46,120 --> 00:20:48,160
do.
It's a little different in her

385
00:20:48,160 --> 00:20:50,440
third Hitchcock movie, To Catch
a Thief, which is in the French

386
00:20:50,440 --> 00:20:52,560
Riviera.
And you know, she can be more

387
00:20:52,560 --> 00:20:55,480
like Grace Kelly.
But I agree that this dialogue

388
00:20:55,480 --> 00:20:58,240
for Murder didn't necessarily
need Grace Kelly to be the star.

389
00:20:58,720 --> 00:21:00,280
Yeah, and that.
And that's the hard part, right?

390
00:21:00,280 --> 00:21:04,760
Like Grace Kelly brings so much
to the table and like you said,

391
00:21:04,760 --> 00:21:08,360
Bob, her character, the the
script just doesn't ask a ton

392
00:21:08,360 --> 00:21:11,160
from her.
I I do think that by the end of

393
00:21:11,160 --> 00:21:16,200
the film, the descent from this
bright vivacious.

394
00:21:16,560 --> 00:21:20,800
Adulterous woman who's like
ready to leave her husband to

395
00:21:20,800 --> 00:21:26,440
this, like grief stricken
prison, like stupor that comes

396
00:21:26,440 --> 00:21:29,720
over her.
I think it's a really good arc

397
00:21:30,000 --> 00:21:33,360
and I think it kind of cements
the fact that this this isn't a

398
00:21:33,360 --> 00:21:36,120
happy ending.
Like at the end of the film,

399
00:21:36,120 --> 00:21:40,160
who's who's smiling and pouring
a glass of Brandy, right?

400
00:21:40,160 --> 00:21:43,360
Like this isn't a happy ending
even though.

401
00:21:44,160 --> 00:21:47,280
You know, justice is served, and
I think that's a fascinating

402
00:21:47,280 --> 00:21:50,960
piece of this film.
And you see that in in Grace

403
00:21:50,960 --> 00:21:53,600
Kelly's character.
Something that fascinates me

404
00:21:53,600 --> 00:21:57,680
about Grace Kelly's character in
the film is one of the major

405
00:21:57,680 --> 00:22:00,360
Hitchcock tropes we think of is,
you know, we think of

406
00:22:00,360 --> 00:22:03,000
Mcguffin's, we think of the icy
blondes, and we think of the

407
00:22:03,000 --> 00:22:05,840
wrong man accused for things.
And what's fascinating about

408
00:22:05,920 --> 00:22:08,840
Dial M for murder is it's not a
wrong man accused for things,

409
00:22:08,840 --> 00:22:10,240
but a wrong woman accused for
things.

410
00:22:10,640 --> 00:22:12,960
And I haven't gone deep enough
into Hitchcock's filmography to

411
00:22:12,960 --> 00:22:15,880
know whether that's unique to
this film or whether he did

412
00:22:15,880 --> 00:22:18,000
explored that before.
This is at least the first time

413
00:22:18,000 --> 00:22:21,200
I've ever encountered him doing
a film where the wrong woman is

414
00:22:21,200 --> 00:22:22,720
accused of something as opposed
to the wrong man.

415
00:22:23,080 --> 00:22:25,720
I think that's a great point,
and I think that's why, for me

416
00:22:25,720 --> 00:22:27,640
at least, this is the best of
the three.

417
00:22:27,640 --> 00:22:29,760
Hitchcock, Grace Kelly
performance.

418
00:22:29,760 --> 00:22:32,720
As we've seen Brad, she doesn't
get a lot to do.

419
00:22:33,160 --> 00:22:37,520
But in the moments where she is
really and truly breaking down

420
00:22:37,520 --> 00:22:41,120
at the emotional distress that
the situation is causing, I

421
00:22:41,120 --> 00:22:44,600
think she really does a great
job portraying a woman who feels

422
00:22:44,600 --> 00:22:48,160
trapped, who feels confused, and
who doesn't know who's in her

423
00:22:48,160 --> 00:22:50,000
corner and who's not.
Yeah.

424
00:22:50,000 --> 00:22:54,400
And she continually comes back
to her husband on this belief

425
00:22:54,400 --> 00:22:56,760
that he has changed, right.
Like that.

426
00:22:56,760 --> 00:22:58,840
Like that's one of the plot
points She was going to leave

427
00:22:58,840 --> 00:23:01,880
him, but then he quits tennis to
take care of her.

428
00:23:01,880 --> 00:23:05,600
And now?
She is is kind of like Pam.

429
00:23:05,600 --> 00:23:07,840
When she's trying to figure out
if she wants to be with Roy or

430
00:23:07,840 --> 00:23:11,360
with Jim, she's like, I don't
know who I actually want to be

431
00:23:11,360 --> 00:23:14,040
with because the guy I'm with is
treating me better than he used

432
00:23:14,120 --> 00:23:16,080
to.
And the guy that I want to be

433
00:23:16,080 --> 00:23:20,760
with lives in America.
And so she she plays that so

434
00:23:20,760 --> 00:23:23,960
incredibly well throughout the
film because she keeps coming

435
00:23:23,960 --> 00:23:27,400
back to Tony and she keeps
believing the stories that he

436
00:23:27,400 --> 00:23:30,800
tells and I and I think that
that gives a lot of depth to her

437
00:23:30,800 --> 00:23:34,360
character.
As she as she slowly figures out

438
00:23:34,360 --> 00:23:37,960
the truth, I want to talk a
little bit about the other two

439
00:23:37,960 --> 00:23:41,440
big roles in the movie.
And then before we go to break,

440
00:23:41,440 --> 00:23:43,440
talk a little bit about the way
the movie is structured.

441
00:23:43,840 --> 00:23:46,760
So the two remaining characters,
I guess that I would point out

442
00:23:46,760 --> 00:23:49,760
would be the Chief Inspector,
played by John Williams and

443
00:23:49,760 --> 00:23:52,960
Grace Kelly's lover, Mark, who's
played by Robert Cummings.

444
00:23:53,400 --> 00:23:56,080
I think that I guess let's start
with Robert Cummings.

445
00:23:56,480 --> 00:23:59,160
I found him really, really
charming in this movie.

446
00:23:59,160 --> 00:24:02,680
I thought that he his reactions
to things he's constantly like,

447
00:24:02,680 --> 00:24:05,680
you can see the wheels in his
head turning, and he plays an

448
00:24:05,680 --> 00:24:08,560
author of mystery novels or like
detective novels.

449
00:24:08,840 --> 00:24:12,720
And so he's he's constantly
inventing scenarios to try to

450
00:24:12,720 --> 00:24:16,840
figure out what happened with
this failed murder attempt that

451
00:24:16,840 --> 00:24:19,920
Grace Kelly then ends up getting
blamed for.

452
00:24:19,920 --> 00:24:22,880
They think that she basically,
you know, murdered this guy on

453
00:24:22,880 --> 00:24:24,400
purpose.
And there's a big convoluted

454
00:24:24,400 --> 00:24:26,600
reason why.
But she spends most of the

455
00:24:26,600 --> 00:24:29,440
second-half of the movie in
prison, and you don't see her.

456
00:24:29,800 --> 00:24:32,200
And so Robert Cummings keeps
coming back to the apartment

457
00:24:32,600 --> 00:24:36,840
with the stories he's concocting
to try to figure out what the

458
00:24:36,840 --> 00:24:40,760
timeline of events actually was.
I do love the showdown that he

459
00:24:40,760 --> 00:24:44,320
has with Tony.
I do love the fact that even,

460
00:24:44,520 --> 00:24:47,320
you know, every time Robert
Cummings thinks he has Tony

461
00:24:47,320 --> 00:24:51,360
cornered, Tony still finds a way
to outwit him all the way to the

462
00:24:51,360 --> 00:24:53,800
end of the movie.
Brad, I'm wondering what you

463
00:24:53,800 --> 00:24:55,760
thought of this Robert Cummings
performance.

464
00:24:57,520 --> 00:25:01,480
I think that it's decent.
I think he just doesn't have a

465
00:25:01,480 --> 00:25:07,760
lot to work with until like that
one scene where he's going in on

466
00:25:07,760 --> 00:25:13,520
how Tony should should concoct
this story just to save, you

467
00:25:13,520 --> 00:25:17,400
know, Margot's life and you know
as he goes through it and you

468
00:25:17,400 --> 00:25:21,000
see Tony like trying to poke
holes in it because it it's the

469
00:25:21,000 --> 00:25:23,360
story.
It's not just the story, it's

470
00:25:23,360 --> 00:25:28,800
reality of what happened.
I I love that interplay between

471
00:25:28,800 --> 00:25:32,080
Tony and Mark.
But other than that, he just

472
00:25:32,080 --> 00:25:35,880
kind of plays eye candy
throughout the film and he

473
00:25:35,880 --> 00:25:40,040
offers Tony the time when
they're at the club and then

474
00:25:40,040 --> 00:25:42,280
that's about it.
And I and I wanted more from him

475
00:25:42,280 --> 00:25:45,600
because that that one scene
where we got him really engaged,

476
00:25:45,880 --> 00:25:49,240
I was, I was drawn in by.
I really thought he was very

477
00:25:49,240 --> 00:25:51,880
charming.
Brad, the senior talking about,

478
00:25:51,880 --> 00:25:54,560
had, I think, my favorite line
in the film where Tony says

479
00:25:54,720 --> 00:25:57,840
killers don't work on credit.
Oh, it's so good.

480
00:25:58,280 --> 00:26:02,800
Dude, what a line.
So good Daniel, what do you

481
00:26:02,800 --> 00:26:05,560
think of the performance here?
I I agree with Brad.

482
00:26:05,560 --> 00:26:09,040
I think that Robert Cummings had
the least to do in the film.

483
00:26:10,120 --> 00:26:14,000
Whereas John Williams is the
Chief Inspector gets to end the

484
00:26:14,000 --> 00:26:16,280
film by combing his mustache,
which is just a the ultimate

485
00:26:17,000 --> 00:26:19,800
class.
Well, Speaking of John Cleese

486
00:26:19,800 --> 00:26:23,400
characters, I'm not entirely
convinced that this isn't just

487
00:26:23,400 --> 00:26:26,640
John Cleese playing John
Williams as the Chief.

488
00:26:26,640 --> 00:26:28,680
Thank you.
Thank you so much.

489
00:26:28,680 --> 00:26:31,280
I was like, gay.
I was like, oh, John Cleese.

490
00:26:31,280 --> 00:26:34,080
I was like, wait a second.
I know John Cleese is older, but

491
00:26:34,080 --> 00:26:36,560
this doesn't make sense.
There's no way he was this old

492
00:26:36,560 --> 00:26:40,880
in in like the mid 1950s.
And I looked it up and I was

493
00:26:40,880 --> 00:26:43,680
like John Williams.
And it clicked for me that he

494
00:26:43,680 --> 00:26:46,000
was in Bridge Over the River
Kwai.

495
00:26:47,200 --> 00:26:49,560
No, no, he wasn't.
I'm looking at his filmography

496
00:26:49,560 --> 00:26:51,960
right now.
Brad, we This is his third movie

497
00:26:51,960 --> 00:26:55,000
on our podcast, but not Bridge
on the River Kwai.

498
00:26:55,000 --> 00:26:59,000
He was in.
He was in Sabrina as Sabrina's

499
00:26:59,000 --> 00:27:04,720
dad.
Oh, and he Yes, and he was in to

500
00:27:04,720 --> 00:27:06,920
catch a Thief.
He played like the insurance

501
00:27:07,160 --> 00:27:09,400
agent salesman guy in To Catch
a.

502
00:27:09,400 --> 00:27:12,000
Thief Oh yeah, that.
That kept kind of going around

503
00:27:12,000 --> 00:27:13,360
helping him out.
Yep.

504
00:27:14,320 --> 00:27:16,560
You would like to.
You'd think that he would be in

505
00:27:16,560 --> 00:27:19,560
Bridge on the River Kwai because
he is possibly the most British

506
00:27:19,560 --> 00:27:23,400
man to ever exist.
Tell me he's not the perfect

507
00:27:23,400 --> 00:27:25,600
British officer in Bridge of the
River.

508
00:27:25,600 --> 00:27:28,880
Oh my gosh, absolutely, John
Cleese vibes.

509
00:27:29,160 --> 00:27:31,520
There was a line he had where he
was talking about doing his

510
00:27:31,520 --> 00:27:34,800
investigation that he had an
idea for a lead that he thought

511
00:27:34,880 --> 00:27:38,400
he could drop and he said but
but but but my blood was hot and

512
00:27:38,920 --> 00:27:42,600
it's it sounds almost like.
John Cleese would be saying that

513
00:27:42,600 --> 00:27:44,680
as parody, but no, it's not
parody.

514
00:27:44,680 --> 00:27:46,880
That's just who this British
inspector is.

515
00:27:47,400 --> 00:27:51,400
I just watched A Fish Called
Wanda for the first time last

516
00:27:51,400 --> 00:27:54,920
week and John Cleese plays a
barrister in that movie and like

517
00:27:54,920 --> 00:27:58,200
it is the exact same character.
So, you know, if you want to

518
00:27:58,200 --> 00:28:01,520
remake dial in for Murder Again,
I I suppose you could tap John

519
00:28:01,520 --> 00:28:06,120
Cleese for this role.
It is like a it is a hilariously

520
00:28:06,120 --> 00:28:09,520
over the top character.
Like, I don't necessarily know

521
00:28:09,520 --> 00:28:13,760
that the performance is over the
top, but it is such a hammy, you

522
00:28:13,760 --> 00:28:16,160
know, like it.
It's almost like he's, he's a

523
00:28:16,160 --> 00:28:21,800
caricature of Poirot coming in
with the mustache stuff and it's

524
00:28:21,800 --> 00:28:24,960
really well done.
But there were parts of this

525
00:28:24,960 --> 00:28:28,160
character that felt out of place
with the rest of the movie for

526
00:28:28,160 --> 00:28:30,280
me, if I'm being honest.
False.

527
00:28:30,280 --> 00:28:34,760
There's also a part where you
know his explaining the the his

528
00:28:34,760 --> 00:28:37,440
findings to Tony.
And, you know, you think Tony's

529
00:28:37,440 --> 00:28:39,480
gotten away with it and the
inspector's about to leave, but

530
00:28:39,480 --> 00:28:41,360
the infector stops that.
But there's just one other

531
00:28:41,360 --> 00:28:43,600
thing, and I got, you know, the
Columbo vibe?

532
00:28:43,880 --> 00:28:46,080
Yep, Yep.
And it was incredible.

533
00:28:46,160 --> 00:28:50,680
And I wanted him to be on screen
every minute of this movie.

534
00:28:50,680 --> 00:28:54,640
Like, I really, really loved Ray
Moland.

535
00:28:54,880 --> 00:28:57,760
I liked Grace Kelly.
Robert Cummings had a great

536
00:28:57,760 --> 00:29:00,120
scene.
I could not get enough John

537
00:29:00,120 --> 00:29:02,040
Williams in this movie, guys.
Not enough like.

538
00:29:03,080 --> 00:29:06,280
Not enough mustache combing.
I I think what it what it did

539
00:29:06,280 --> 00:29:11,320
for me was everything else was
so serious and and almost just a

540
00:29:11,320 --> 00:29:15,800
little bit melodramatic the way
everybody's going about it and I

541
00:29:15,800 --> 00:29:18,960
just felt like John Williams
character brought just enough

542
00:29:18,960 --> 00:29:23,000
levity even though he's taking
it just as seriously as everyone

543
00:29:23,000 --> 00:29:24,360
else.
There was something about the

544
00:29:24,360 --> 00:29:29,920
performance that I I don't know
if it lightened the load or or

545
00:29:29,920 --> 00:29:34,440
what, but it just.
Kept me entertained the entire

546
00:29:34,440 --> 00:29:37,360
film.
They kept it from being so dour

547
00:29:37,760 --> 00:29:41,040
that I, you know, I couldn't
feel engaged and I I thought

548
00:29:41,040 --> 00:29:44,920
that he just like knitted the
entire performance together or

549
00:29:44,920 --> 00:29:48,720
the entire film together for me.
One of the things about the

550
00:29:48,720 --> 00:29:52,680
script itself that I love so
much is that it serves all four

551
00:29:52,680 --> 00:29:56,080
of these characters because of
the fact that it's really a tale

552
00:29:56,080 --> 00:29:58,560
of two halves.
Like this movie has an

553
00:29:58,560 --> 00:30:01,280
intermission.
It's an hour and 45 minute movie

554
00:30:01,440 --> 00:30:04,480
with an intermission in the
middle, which is awesome first

555
00:30:04,480 --> 00:30:06,440
of all.
Yeah, I was going to say and

556
00:30:06,440 --> 00:30:09,800
it's also like a 12 second.
Unlike Killers of the Flower

557
00:30:09,800 --> 00:30:13,880
Moon, which does not have an
intermission and should listen,

558
00:30:13,880 --> 00:30:16,040
like, sometimes you have to pee
at the 50 minute mark.

559
00:30:16,040 --> 00:30:17,720
And Hitchcock is aware of this,
you know.

560
00:30:18,840 --> 00:30:21,240
But the reason that the
intermission works so well is

561
00:30:21,240 --> 00:30:24,680
that this really is a movie that
because of the way it's

562
00:30:24,680 --> 00:30:28,080
structured, you find out in the
early going, this guy's going to

563
00:30:28,080 --> 00:30:30,160
try to murder his wife.
And so it builds to this

564
00:30:30,160 --> 00:30:33,560
crescendo of the attempted
murder which happens at, like

565
00:30:33,560 --> 00:30:36,160
the, you know, 354045 minute
mark.

566
00:30:36,560 --> 00:30:40,240
When that falls apart and he has
to kind of regroup, there's an

567
00:30:40,240 --> 00:30:42,240
intermission.
And then the back half of the

568
00:30:42,240 --> 00:30:45,480
movie also builds to a
crescendo, but it's a crescendo

569
00:30:45,480 --> 00:30:50,240
of the police and Grace Kelly's
lover trying to figure out

570
00:30:50,240 --> 00:30:53,320
exactly what happened here.
And so you get this kind of

571
00:30:53,320 --> 00:30:56,000
like, you know, it's it's two
halves that you could kind of

572
00:30:56,000 --> 00:30:58,760
layer on top of each other and
they follow like the exact same

573
00:30:58,760 --> 00:31:01,920
trajectory.
But what that ends up doing is

574
00:31:01,920 --> 00:31:06,200
it gives Ray Meland and Grace
Kelly a bunch of great moments

575
00:31:06,200 --> 00:31:08,360
in the first half and then the
second-half.

576
00:31:08,400 --> 00:31:12,560
It really is kind of dominated
by the police chief and and

577
00:31:12,560 --> 00:31:15,360
Halladay as they try to figure
things out.

578
00:31:15,360 --> 00:31:18,280
And so I feel like everyone kind
of gets their chance to eat here

579
00:31:18,720 --> 00:31:20,240
and it works really, really
well.

580
00:31:20,240 --> 00:31:22,920
Brad.
Yeah, and and I I love the way

581
00:31:22,920 --> 00:31:26,760
the movie's structured there.
There is, you know, the time

582
00:31:26,760 --> 00:31:31,920
jump between act one and act two
that gives you something else to

583
00:31:31,920 --> 00:31:36,560
focus on and and like the entire
subplot is like the same.

584
00:31:36,560 --> 00:31:39,800
Is he going to get caught?
But just the change of scenery a

585
00:31:39,800 --> 00:31:42,120
little bit and and obviously
there's no scenery change.

586
00:31:42,120 --> 00:31:45,840
It's still in the apartment.
But the the change of who's

587
00:31:45,840 --> 00:31:49,360
doing the chasing, of who's
controlling the narrative, I

588
00:31:49,360 --> 00:31:52,640
think it keeps the movie fresh
and moving, so it doesn't feel

589
00:31:52,640 --> 00:31:57,920
like it's just 86 straight
minutes of one guy pretending

590
00:31:57,920 --> 00:31:59,320
like he's better than everyone
else.

591
00:32:00,480 --> 00:32:02,840
I'll slightly disagree with you
in the sense that I don't think

592
00:32:03,880 --> 00:32:06,040
the main gist is whether or not
he'll get caught.

593
00:32:06,040 --> 00:32:08,680
I think the main gist is we know
he's going to get caught and we

594
00:32:08,680 --> 00:32:10,200
as the audience are trying to
figure out.

595
00:32:10,840 --> 00:32:13,080
How he's going to get caught.
And Hitchcock is throwing us

596
00:32:13,120 --> 00:32:16,200
every step he goes through.
And we're the detectives trying

597
00:32:16,200 --> 00:32:19,600
to figure out which is the wrong
step and which is the one thing,

598
00:32:19,600 --> 00:32:23,640
the one detail he missed.
Well, and there's also, like,

599
00:32:24,160 --> 00:32:27,000
there's you think that someone's
got him cornered.

600
00:32:27,000 --> 00:32:29,320
So, like, as an audience member,
like when Holiday starts

601
00:32:29,320 --> 00:32:31,320
piercing it together, I'm like,
yes, yes, yes, yes.

602
00:32:31,640 --> 00:32:33,960
And even then the police chief
was like, no, that couldn't be.

603
00:32:34,080 --> 00:32:37,080
And I'm like, no, you almost had
it come back, come back.

604
00:32:37,520 --> 00:32:41,960
So you have this, you know,
you're reliving every step of

605
00:32:41,960 --> 00:32:44,640
the crime as they go through it
again.

606
00:32:44,920 --> 00:32:48,440
And it's like, it's so
infuriating to watch them almost

607
00:32:48,440 --> 00:32:51,960
get it, but it just continues to
add to the suspense because it

608
00:32:51,960 --> 00:32:55,400
seems like this guy's going to
get away with it every time they

609
00:32:55,400 --> 00:32:57,720
go down, You know, a different
rabbit trail.

610
00:32:58,360 --> 00:33:02,360
And at the end of the day,
there's moments where I kind of

611
00:33:02,360 --> 00:33:05,520
wanted him to get away with it.
You know what, if anyone ever

612
00:33:05,520 --> 00:33:08,680
deserved to?
My guy had some really like,

613
00:33:08,680 --> 00:33:12,640
truly great planning.
Yeah, dude, playing incredibly

614
00:33:12,640 --> 00:33:15,440
well and I I think that's.
I think that's the the

615
00:33:15,440 --> 00:33:19,920
difference as I think more about
rope, the mains.

616
00:33:19,920 --> 00:33:23,160
You know the main two students
who kill their fellow student.

617
00:33:23,720 --> 00:33:29,800
They just the the youthfulness
and the eagerness just is a

618
00:33:29,800 --> 00:33:32,360
little just like nails on a
chalkboard.

619
00:33:32,360 --> 00:33:35,680
For me, there's something about
the older.

620
00:33:36,040 --> 00:33:38,920
Like self assuredness.
I don't have to prove myself to

621
00:33:38,920 --> 00:33:42,040
anyone.
I'm just doing this that feels a

622
00:33:42,040 --> 00:33:46,640
lot more dastardly and and
villainous and and I don't know

623
00:33:46,640 --> 00:33:51,920
that that type of a villain
draws me in so much more well.

624
00:33:51,920 --> 00:33:54,760
And I think what makes the
villain role work so well too,

625
00:33:54,760 --> 00:33:58,880
is the extent to which he is
cool and calm and collected and

626
00:33:58,880 --> 00:34:02,200
detached.
Because, you know, it's

627
00:34:02,200 --> 00:34:05,000
understandable that, you know,
he finds out his wife is

628
00:34:05,120 --> 00:34:07,800
cheating on him, like for an
extended period of time, she's

629
00:34:07,800 --> 00:34:09,920
having this long standing
affair.

630
00:34:10,239 --> 00:34:14,000
And so you can understand the
impulse of a guy to say, like, I

631
00:34:14,000 --> 00:34:17,840
want to kill them, right?
But then to see the extent to

632
00:34:17,840 --> 00:34:21,159
which she has mapped this entire
thing out, and how he's been so

633
00:34:21,159 --> 00:34:26,000
patiently waiting for it, and
the complete lack of emotion

634
00:34:26,000 --> 00:34:30,520
that's tied to it.
It's really hard to make someone

635
00:34:30,520 --> 00:34:35,719
seem like the clear face of evil
when they're paired up against

636
00:34:35,719 --> 00:34:39,000
someone who's also doing a wrong
act, which is Grace Kelly.

637
00:34:39,320 --> 00:34:45,400
And yet, this guy is so
sociopathic that you are

638
00:34:45,400 --> 00:34:48,040
immediately back on Grace
Kelly's side, which is a really

639
00:34:48,040 --> 00:34:51,520
hard thing to do, especially in
a movie from the 1950s where you

640
00:34:51,520 --> 00:34:55,080
can't really show people
engaging in an extramarital

641
00:34:55,080 --> 00:34:58,480
affair, Like, I feel like.
People were already turned

642
00:34:58,480 --> 00:35:01,800
against Grace Kelly, and it took
someone as evil as this to turn

643
00:35:01,800 --> 00:35:04,120
them back toward her.
Yeah, no, I agree.

644
00:35:04,480 --> 00:35:08,280
He seems so dispassionate about
it, Like you never get the vibe

645
00:35:08,280 --> 00:35:10,760
that he's out for revenge, that
it's very much a financial

646
00:35:10,760 --> 00:35:14,160
proposition for him.
Yeah, but but it's also like,

647
00:35:14,400 --> 00:35:17,200
you know, he's he's certainly
opportunistic, like he's using

648
00:35:17,200 --> 00:35:21,080
the affair as the perfect timing
to pull it off.

649
00:35:21,080 --> 00:35:23,680
But you can tell how little he
truly cares about it.

650
00:35:23,680 --> 00:35:27,080
It's not as if he's acting out
of some place of woundedness.

651
00:35:27,560 --> 00:35:30,360
And I think that's what helps,
right?

652
00:35:30,360 --> 00:35:32,160
And that's what helps kind of
reframe the whole thing.

653
00:35:32,160 --> 00:35:35,800
Because, you know, while what
Grace Kelly is doing is wrong,

654
00:35:36,040 --> 00:35:39,200
there's at least emotion and
passion tied up in that whole

655
00:35:39,200 --> 00:35:41,360
affair.
And then you see this guy who

656
00:35:41,360 --> 00:35:44,280
just has ice in his veins and
would be at home in a David

657
00:35:44,280 --> 00:35:48,040
Fincher movie and it it makes a
whole lot more sense.

658
00:35:49,160 --> 00:35:51,400
All right guys, I think we are
in a good place to hit pause

659
00:35:51,400 --> 00:35:53,040
here.
Brad and I are going to sneak

660
00:35:53,040 --> 00:35:55,040
off and drink some barrel proof
whiskey.

661
00:35:55,560 --> 00:35:58,040
We're going to come back and
continue talking about Dial M

662
00:35:58,040 --> 00:35:59,960
for murder.
Brad, what do you say we get to

663
00:35:59,960 --> 00:36:04,760
this 1792 Foolproof?
After last week's 1792, I'm

664
00:36:04,800 --> 00:36:06,880
cautiously excited for this one,
Bob.

665
00:36:12,160 --> 00:36:16,320
OK, so today we are rounding out
Season 7 on the whiskey side of

666
00:36:16,320 --> 00:36:21,560
things with the last sample in
our 5 sample flight of 1792.

667
00:36:21,960 --> 00:36:26,320
This is 1792.
Foolproof Brad I am.

668
00:36:26,640 --> 00:36:29,200
I'm not going to lie, I'm a big
fan of this whiskey.

669
00:36:29,200 --> 00:36:30,920
I've got a bottle of it on my
shelf.

670
00:36:31,320 --> 00:36:33,040
I'm not drinking from that
bottle.

671
00:36:33,040 --> 00:36:35,640
I am drinking from a sample that
we are sharing that was sent to

672
00:36:35,640 --> 00:36:38,680
us by our friends, bourbon and
stuff on Instagram.

673
00:36:38,680 --> 00:36:42,480
Bourbon and stuff.
You're like, really getting into

674
00:36:42,480 --> 00:36:43,880
the singing the jingles today,
man.

675
00:36:44,360 --> 00:36:45,840
Yeah, I'm all about it.
I like it.

676
00:36:46,000 --> 00:36:47,400
It's a good time.
This one we really need is

677
00:36:47,400 --> 00:36:50,120
musical numbers introduced into
film and whiskey.

678
00:36:50,320 --> 00:36:53,360
Like in addition to the other
jingles we already have like

679
00:36:53,680 --> 00:36:56,920
just I was going to say.
You always know that you're

680
00:36:56,920 --> 00:37:00,080
getting into the later seasons
of a television show.

681
00:37:00,280 --> 00:37:04,720
When they have their musical
episode, that's like a sure sign

682
00:37:04,720 --> 00:37:06,680
that the quality of the show is
going downhill.

683
00:37:07,040 --> 00:37:09,000
Wow.
What are you implying here, man?

684
00:37:09,880 --> 00:37:12,800
I I'm just saying the the
writers for the film and Whiskey

685
00:37:12,800 --> 00:37:15,240
podcast.
I feel like we're on our third

686
00:37:15,240 --> 00:37:17,520
set at this point.
They're on strike right now,

687
00:37:17,520 --> 00:37:19,440
yeah.
They're on strike right now.

688
00:37:19,440 --> 00:37:22,600
We we got a few scabs.
It's not looking good, not

689
00:37:22,840 --> 00:37:26,080
looking good for us, man, but it
is kind of looking good for

690
00:37:26,080 --> 00:37:29,360
1792.
We had a a slight upturn last

691
00:37:29,360 --> 00:37:33,200
week with the single Barrel and
I'm hoping that we can kind of

692
00:37:33,200 --> 00:37:35,280
carry that goodwill into the
full proof.

693
00:37:35,400 --> 00:37:39,080
Now this is bottled at 125
proof, that's why it's not

694
00:37:39,080 --> 00:37:41,480
called barrel proof because the
proof does not fluctuate.

695
00:37:41,560 --> 00:37:45,440
So it is.
It could be barrel proof, but

696
00:37:45,440 --> 00:37:49,560
they regulate the proof to 125.
Which I think is a good idea.

697
00:37:50,080 --> 00:37:52,000
Like I I'm all about barrel
proof.

698
00:37:52,000 --> 00:37:56,360
But there is that essence of
irregularity when you're getting

699
00:37:56,360 --> 00:38:01,080
a bottle that you know, one's at
128 and 121 and 135 and there is

700
00:38:01,080 --> 00:38:04,560
something kind of nice about
saying, hey, these are all our

701
00:38:04,560 --> 00:38:07,920
high proof offerings.
But we're going to just barely

702
00:38:07,920 --> 00:38:10,760
take the rough edge off and
bring it down to 125 no matter

703
00:38:10,760 --> 00:38:12,880
what.
Now I believe in this instance

704
00:38:12,880 --> 00:38:16,000
the reason they call it
foolproof is because the legal

705
00:38:16,000 --> 00:38:20,040
limit of what bourbon can be
when it goes into the barrel is

706
00:38:20,040 --> 00:38:23,280
125 and so they they're
essentially saying this is like

707
00:38:23,360 --> 00:38:26,680
entry proof level, but they call
it foolproof.

708
00:38:27,040 --> 00:38:29,680
It's non age stated apparently.
At one time.

709
00:38:29,680 --> 00:38:32,800
There was a press release that
came out back in like 2016 when

710
00:38:32,800 --> 00:38:35,480
this was first released and it
said 8.5 years.

711
00:38:35,920 --> 00:38:37,040
But they don't put it on the
bottle.

712
00:38:37,040 --> 00:38:40,200
So I'm guessing this is at least
you know, 6-7 eight years old.

713
00:38:40,200 --> 00:38:42,760
I don't know how old the
youngest in the blend is.

714
00:38:43,400 --> 00:38:49,840
It appears to be a 75% corn, 15%
rye, 10% malted barley mashbill.

715
00:38:50,640 --> 00:38:52,360
Let's dive in.
Brad, what are you picking up on

716
00:38:52,360 --> 00:38:55,280
the nose here?
This is a a really pleasant

717
00:38:55,280 --> 00:38:58,640
nose.
I got toffee vanilla.

718
00:38:59,000 --> 00:39:02,480
There's some orange Creamsicle
creaminess going on.

719
00:39:03,000 --> 00:39:07,840
And I I got kind of the the
scent of like freshly watered

720
00:39:07,840 --> 00:39:10,680
coffee grounds.
Like like right after the water

721
00:39:10,680 --> 00:39:13,440
has gone through them, I have
the same note, Brad.

722
00:39:13,440 --> 00:39:16,800
I have coffee grounds.
Not just coffee coffee grounds

723
00:39:16,800 --> 00:39:19,560
are is in my notes.
Wow, look at us.

724
00:39:19,560 --> 00:39:22,160
I know.
Yeah, I I think it's a solid,

725
00:39:22,160 --> 00:39:24,480
pleasant nose.
I'll give it a 7 1/2 here.

726
00:39:24,480 --> 00:39:26,200
Yeah, I'm going to do about the
same here.

727
00:39:26,200 --> 00:39:29,720
The ethanol is very prominent on
the nose, and it definitely tips

728
00:39:29,720 --> 00:39:33,160
more into the oaky and kind of
dark side of things.

729
00:39:33,400 --> 00:39:36,240
It reminds me a lot of some
Buffalo Trace products.

730
00:39:36,280 --> 00:39:39,200
You know, we have that that
signature oakiness here, and

731
00:39:39,200 --> 00:39:41,640
it's a little bit more like a
toasted oak than even a charred

732
00:39:41,640 --> 00:39:43,840
oak.
I get a lot of coffee grounds.

733
00:39:44,120 --> 00:39:47,560
I get quite a bit of chocolate
on this as well, but it's not

734
00:39:47,560 --> 00:39:51,160
syrupy sweet as we've come to
expect with some well aged

735
00:39:51,160 --> 00:39:52,840
bourbons.
I like it.

736
00:39:52,840 --> 00:39:55,720
I'm a little worried that it's
not necessarily going to hit my

737
00:39:55,720 --> 00:39:59,240
palate exactly how I want it to
today, so I'm going to give it a

738
00:39:59,240 --> 00:40:02,520
7.5 here.
Yeah, and when I get into the

739
00:40:02,520 --> 00:40:08,440
palate, I think that this turns
into this rich, delectable

740
00:40:08,440 --> 00:40:10,320
whiskey that I was not
expecting.

741
00:40:10,640 --> 00:40:14,560
I got caramel cheesecake.
There's dark chocolate notes

742
00:40:14,560 --> 00:40:19,240
galore and it it really reminded
me of like a really nice kind of

743
00:40:19,240 --> 00:40:23,840
fruity light roast coffee.
There is a lot of really

744
00:40:23,840 --> 00:40:28,400
beautiful things happening here
easily, like far and away.

745
00:40:28,400 --> 00:40:33,240
The best 1792 I've had like,
like by an order of magnitude.

746
00:40:33,680 --> 00:40:36,360
So I'll, I'll give it a nine out
of 10 here on the pallet.

747
00:40:36,800 --> 00:40:40,000
One of my favorite things to try
to explain when when you and I

748
00:40:40,000 --> 00:40:45,120
are talking is like mapping out
how the flavour spread across my

749
00:40:45,120 --> 00:40:47,120
tongue.
And this is an interesting one.

750
00:40:47,120 --> 00:40:51,080
This is like the the Oppenheimer
Trinity test of flavor

751
00:40:51,080 --> 00:40:52,360
explosions.
It's like.

752
00:40:53,280 --> 00:40:54,880
It.
Literally nothing happened on

753
00:40:54,880 --> 00:40:57,080
the tip of my tongue.
It got to the mid palate and

754
00:40:57,080 --> 00:41:00,040
then detonated and then spread
in all directions like

755
00:41:00,040 --> 00:41:02,280
immediately and the ethanol
again.

756
00:41:02,280 --> 00:41:07,000
I think this is one of the more
aggressive, foolproof whiskeys

757
00:41:07,120 --> 00:41:08,480
that are out there on the
market.

758
00:41:08,480 --> 00:41:12,040
Like it's it's really, really
good, but it is incredibly

759
00:41:12,240 --> 00:41:15,400
prickly on the tongue.
The ethanol makes itself known.

760
00:41:15,720 --> 00:41:18,000
I wouldn't really call this a
spicy whiskey.

761
00:41:18,000 --> 00:41:21,080
I would call it prickly.
I think you understand what I'm

762
00:41:21,080 --> 00:41:23,360
trying to say there, what with
what it does on your palate.

763
00:41:24,280 --> 00:41:26,440
But I'm with you, man.
There's a lot of sweetness here.

764
00:41:26,440 --> 00:41:28,640
For me, it was much more fruity
than expected.

765
00:41:28,640 --> 00:41:32,200
I got some Peach notes on this
that I really wasn't expecting.

766
00:41:32,640 --> 00:41:34,680
I like it a lot.
I'm going to give it a second

767
00:41:34,760 --> 00:41:37,600
sip and maybe my score will come
up on finish, but right now I'm

768
00:41:37,600 --> 00:41:41,120
just sticking at an 8 out of 10.
So when I when I got to the

769
00:41:41,120 --> 00:41:44,480
finish it, it came down a little
bit from the the highs of the

770
00:41:44,480 --> 00:41:46,680
pallet.
I think it got into a really

771
00:41:46,680 --> 00:41:49,680
dark territory there.
There's coffee beans, there's

772
00:41:49,680 --> 00:41:54,120
dark chocolate and for for me it
really stuck in that range of

773
00:41:54,120 --> 00:41:57,960
like a really nice vanilla
Porter there.

774
00:41:57,960 --> 00:42:02,080
There's just so much really nice
dark flavors going on here,

775
00:42:02,080 --> 00:42:04,600
along with some, you know,
classic oakiness that you get on

776
00:42:04,600 --> 00:42:06,680
the finish.
I'm going to give it an 8 1/2

777
00:42:06,680 --> 00:42:09,080
here, Bob.
Man, I don't know if I've ever

778
00:42:09,080 --> 00:42:10,960
been more in agreement with your
tasting notes.

779
00:42:11,040 --> 00:42:14,080
Like a Porter or a stout is a
great comparison on this.

780
00:42:14,080 --> 00:42:15,840
There's a ton of coffee bean on
this.

781
00:42:16,360 --> 00:42:18,920
It gets a little bit creamier
for me on this second sip.

782
00:42:18,960 --> 00:42:22,400
The ethanol once again is very
prominent on the palate.

783
00:42:22,800 --> 00:42:25,720
On the finish though, not so
much like.

784
00:42:25,720 --> 00:42:28,320
I feel like It kind of like
fizzles out a little bit in

785
00:42:28,320 --> 00:42:30,760
terms of how much of A punch it
packs.

786
00:42:31,400 --> 00:42:34,120
It leaves a really nice finish
behind, a little bit of herbal,

787
00:42:34,360 --> 00:42:37,920
almost vegetal kind of notes.
And it warms your chest on the

788
00:42:37,920 --> 00:42:39,480
way down.
But I wouldn't call it super

789
00:42:39,480 --> 00:42:43,240
aggressive, so I actually like
the finish probably better than

790
00:42:43,240 --> 00:42:45,520
I like the taste.
I'm still going to stick in an 8

791
00:42:45,600 --> 00:42:47,920
out of 10 here.
And I think when you get to

792
00:42:47,920 --> 00:42:52,040
balance, I don't know about you
Bob, but for me, this is a

793
00:42:52,040 --> 00:42:56,080
really spectacular amount of
complexity and flavor going on

794
00:42:56,080 --> 00:42:58,640
here that I wasn't necessarily
expecting at the nose.

795
00:42:59,560 --> 00:43:02,120
I'm I'm not going to give it
like a perfect score because it

796
00:43:02,120 --> 00:43:06,280
definitely ramps up, but I am
going to give it a nine out of

797
00:43:06,280 --> 00:43:08,200
10 on balance.
I think they did something

798
00:43:08,200 --> 00:43:09,480
really interesting here.
I'm.

799
00:43:10,440 --> 00:43:13,640
Going to come down a little bit
and once again, I'm going to add

800
00:43:13,640 --> 00:43:16,440
the caveat that this sample of
whiskey has been sitting on our

801
00:43:16,440 --> 00:43:20,720
shelf for like 2 years now.
So it's probably, you know, it's

802
00:43:20,720 --> 00:43:22,920
probably gotten a little bit
oxidized at this point.

803
00:43:23,120 --> 00:43:25,920
I really prefer the bottle of
this that I have on my shelf,

804
00:43:25,920 --> 00:43:27,600
but I'm not going to score it
based on that.

805
00:43:27,600 --> 00:43:29,280
I want to score on exactly what
we're drinking.

806
00:43:29,840 --> 00:43:33,040
It gets a little bit bitter
towards the very, very end of

807
00:43:33,040 --> 00:43:34,320
it.
And I would say that the

808
00:43:34,320 --> 00:43:38,040
beginning, like the nose of it,
didn't indicate exactly what

809
00:43:38,040 --> 00:43:40,320
kind of flavors it was actually
going to have on the palate.

810
00:43:40,640 --> 00:43:43,480
So it was a little bit of a
each.

811
00:43:43,600 --> 00:43:47,760
Each part of the journey was a
surprise, but it wasn't super

812
00:43:47,760 --> 00:43:49,560
consistent for me.
So I'm just going to give it a

813
00:43:49,560 --> 00:43:53,600
7.5 here and you are.
I feel like you're coming in on

814
00:43:53,600 --> 00:43:56,120
pretty harsh for this one.
No, I think it's because for the

815
00:43:56,120 --> 00:43:58,240
last four weeks I've been saying
like wait till we get to

816
00:43:58,240 --> 00:43:59,720
foolproof.
Wait till we get to foolproof.

817
00:44:00,160 --> 00:44:04,600
I like let it be known I love
1792 Foolproof.

818
00:44:05,160 --> 00:44:08,200
I will once again say I think
that we probably should have

819
00:44:08,200 --> 00:44:10,200
gotten to these samples a little
quicker than we did.

820
00:44:11,520 --> 00:44:14,960
And I am very excited to bring
my bottle down to your house

821
00:44:14,960 --> 00:44:17,920
next time we hang out because I
think it's is significantly

822
00:44:17,920 --> 00:44:19,720
better than what we just poured
here.

823
00:44:20,760 --> 00:44:24,760
Yeah, I'm excited to try it.
I I I think that when we get to

824
00:44:24,760 --> 00:44:28,440
the value category, I'm curious
to hear your score because I'm

825
00:44:28,440 --> 00:44:33,640
seeing that you can get this
online in general for about $70.

826
00:44:34,240 --> 00:44:37,520
Yeah, Brad, the MSRP on this in
the state of Ohio at least it

827
00:44:37,520 --> 00:44:42,520
sells for $46 and I believe that
it is now allocated and you may

828
00:44:42,640 --> 00:44:44,480
may or may not have to enter a
lottery to get it.

829
00:44:44,520 --> 00:44:47,360
I remember buying a bottle of
this like straight off the shelf

830
00:44:47,360 --> 00:44:50,320
about a year ago in Ohio, and I
paid about 45 bucks.

831
00:44:50,960 --> 00:44:54,920
I imagine that that $70.00
markup is for areas where it is

832
00:44:54,920 --> 00:44:58,640
a little more allocated or less
seen, and so you're paying the

833
00:44:58,640 --> 00:45:01,880
$70.00 just to secure your
bottle of it.

834
00:45:02,800 --> 00:45:05,480
I don't know that $70.00 is
necessarily the price point we

835
00:45:05,480 --> 00:45:07,400
need to score this on.
I think maybe let's split the

836
00:45:07,400 --> 00:45:11,240
difference here and say, I don't
know, 5558.

837
00:45:11,240 --> 00:45:12,200
Sure.
Yeah.

838
00:45:12,600 --> 00:45:15,320
Yeah.
Let's say, let's say 5560 bucks.

839
00:45:15,800 --> 00:45:20,200
I think at that price point, I'm
going to give it an 8 out of 10.

840
00:45:21,040 --> 00:45:23,560
I think that's a pretty good
value for the poor that you're

841
00:45:23,560 --> 00:45:29,600
getting that like the the way
that it melds together coffee

842
00:45:29,600 --> 00:45:32,600
and caramel and it's creamy and
oaky.

843
00:45:32,600 --> 00:45:37,600
I I really think that this is a
great value at 5560 dollars.

844
00:45:37,920 --> 00:45:39,680
Yeah, I do too.
I think it's an even better

845
00:45:39,680 --> 00:45:43,440
value at 46, right?
So right there, it's in line

846
00:45:43,440 --> 00:45:45,840
with something like a Wild
Turkey rare breed and I think

847
00:45:45,840 --> 00:45:49,120
it's an absolute steal.
At $55 you're getting into the

848
00:45:49,120 --> 00:45:53,800
range of, I don't know, old
Forester 1920, which I think I

849
00:45:53,800 --> 00:45:58,960
probably prefer to this Noah's
Mill, which I personally prefer

850
00:45:58,960 --> 00:46:02,360
to this, but I think it's it's
still a value at that price

851
00:46:02,360 --> 00:46:04,960
range.
So I'm going to give it a 7.5

852
00:46:04,960 --> 00:46:08,160
out of 10 here.
And Brad, surprisingly, I think

853
00:46:08,160 --> 00:46:11,960
I'm finally going to be below
you in my final score 'cause I'm

854
00:46:11,960 --> 00:46:14,480
coming out to a 38 1/2 out of
50.

855
00:46:14,920 --> 00:46:16,760
Yeah, I'm at a 42 out of 50,
Bob.

856
00:46:16,880 --> 00:46:19,880
I really enjoyed this.
I think this is one of your

857
00:46:19,880 --> 00:46:21,920
higher rated whiskeys on the
season, Brad.

858
00:46:22,320 --> 00:46:24,560
Yeah, it is.
This is up there.

859
00:46:24,560 --> 00:46:28,200
I I think that for me it's like
I said earlier, it's that

860
00:46:28,200 --> 00:46:33,200
mixture of like creamy caramel
with all those nice dark coffee

861
00:46:33,200 --> 00:46:37,400
notes that I I was really
entranced with this this bottle.

862
00:46:37,840 --> 00:46:39,760
All right, Brad.
Well, I feel like.

863
00:46:40,480 --> 00:46:42,800
We have nothing snarky or mean
to say this week.

864
00:46:42,800 --> 00:46:44,800
This is like a really good place
to be in.

865
00:46:45,000 --> 00:46:49,280
Let's see if we can continue
having goodwill towards men with

866
00:46:49,280 --> 00:46:51,560
the rest of DI LM for murder.
What do you say?

867
00:46:52,040 --> 00:46:57,560
Let's get to it.
All right, everybody.

868
00:46:57,560 --> 00:47:00,160
That was 1792.
Full proof.

869
00:47:01,040 --> 00:47:04,000
A foolproof of a whiskey, Bob,
because that was delicious.

870
00:47:04,000 --> 00:47:06,480
That.
Whiskey is so good, man, it

871
00:47:06,480 --> 00:47:09,720
redeemed the whole brand.
Yeah, 100%.

872
00:47:09,720 --> 00:47:14,760
I I'm still a little bit amazed
with how strong I swung from one

873
00:47:14,760 --> 00:47:19,080
side of the enjoyment spectrum
to the other as we moved up in

874
00:47:19,080 --> 00:47:22,560
the proof points here.
A a true pendulum, Brad and and

875
00:47:22,640 --> 00:47:25,480
talking about swinging wildly
from failure to success.

876
00:47:26,360 --> 00:47:29,600
I have been absolutely
vacillating back and forth when

877
00:47:29,600 --> 00:47:33,000
it comes to our next segment,
which we call 2 facts and a

878
00:47:33,000 --> 00:47:36,080
Falsehood.
Brad is going to try to stump

879
00:47:36,080 --> 00:47:40,600
your ball.
Two all right and what is wrong?

880
00:47:42,160 --> 00:47:46,080
2 facts and a falsehood. 2 Facts
and a Falsehood is the part of

881
00:47:46,080 --> 00:47:49,680
the podcast where Brad presents
three items to me as fact about

882
00:47:49,680 --> 00:47:52,800
the making of this movie, and I
have to guess which one is

883
00:47:52,800 --> 00:47:55,840
actually a lie.
Brad, you get to play the Ray

884
00:47:55,840 --> 00:47:58,600
Meland character here.
We know that you have set out to

885
00:47:58,600 --> 00:48:01,680
do dastardly things and to try
to trim that up here.

886
00:48:02,640 --> 00:48:05,800
I think I have secured my have I
secured my winning season now?

887
00:48:06,800 --> 00:48:13,120
I think you are.
It's currently 14 and I'm 14 and

888
00:48:13,120 --> 00:48:16,880
17.
So yes, I've got my so I can

889
00:48:16,880 --> 00:48:19,360
just throw this one away and
wait for the playoffs, is what

890
00:48:19,360 --> 00:48:21,000
you're saying.
At this point, I can bench my

891
00:48:21,000 --> 00:48:22,440
starters.
Yeah, cool.

892
00:48:23,400 --> 00:48:26,360
Well, I've got some Somehow
it'll still screw the Browns

893
00:48:26,360 --> 00:48:28,200
over.
I've got an ace in the hole

894
00:48:28,200 --> 00:48:30,600
here.
I've got a ringer in Daniel

895
00:48:30,600 --> 00:48:32,240
who's going to help me out as my
phone.

896
00:48:32,240 --> 00:48:35,200
A friend for your three supposed
facts.

897
00:48:35,840 --> 00:48:37,800
So Brad, go ahead and hit me
with your two facts and a

898
00:48:37,800 --> 00:48:41,320
falsehood fact.
Number one, Hitchcock had chosen

899
00:48:41,320 --> 00:48:44,400
a very expensive robe for Grace
Kelly to wear when she answered

900
00:48:44,400 --> 00:48:46,720
the phone.
Kelly balked and said that no

901
00:48:46,720 --> 00:48:49,040
woman would put on such a robe
just to answer the ringing

902
00:48:49,040 --> 00:48:50,760
telephone while she was asleep
alone.

903
00:48:51,000 --> 00:48:53,000
She would answer it in her
simple nightgown.

904
00:48:53,280 --> 00:48:55,960
Hitchcock agreed to do it her
way and liked the way the rushes

905
00:48:55,960 --> 00:48:58,400
turned out.
And he allowed Grace to make all

906
00:48:58,400 --> 00:49:01,920
of her own costume decisions in
the in the subsequent movies

907
00:49:01,920 --> 00:49:06,440
they worked on together.
Fact #2, due to Hitchcock's

908
00:49:06,440 --> 00:49:10,280
complaining, Grace Kelly was
filmed for the very first and

909
00:49:10,280 --> 00:49:13,320
very last time in a movie
without any makeup on.

910
00:49:13,320 --> 00:49:16,480
At the end of the film, he felt
that any amount of makeup on her

911
00:49:16,480 --> 00:49:20,320
took away from the look of
spending months in jail that her

912
00:49:20,320 --> 00:49:25,960
character had just endured.
Fact #3, four more adaptations

913
00:49:25,960 --> 00:49:29,080
followed Hitchcock's 1954
version three made for

914
00:49:29,080 --> 00:49:31,520
television movies released in
1950.

915
00:49:32,360 --> 00:49:35,440
I think I copied the wrong
numbers.

916
00:49:38,080 --> 00:49:40,040
I'm.
I'm immediately suspicious.

917
00:49:40,080 --> 00:49:43,720
Yeah.
OK, so three made for television

918
00:49:43,720 --> 00:49:45,640
and then the one with Gwyneth
Paltrow, right?

919
00:49:46,320 --> 00:49:48,720
And then 1998's A Perfect Murder
All.

920
00:49:48,720 --> 00:49:54,320
Right.
I am immediately drawn to #2 as

921
00:49:54,320 --> 00:49:58,880
the falsehood because I read
quite a bit about Grace Kelly's

922
00:49:59,240 --> 00:50:03,200
costuming in this movie.
Apparently Hitchcock wanted the

923
00:50:03,240 --> 00:50:05,880
color palette of all her
costumes to get darker and

924
00:50:05,880 --> 00:50:10,000
darker and kind of more drab as
the movie went on to indicate

925
00:50:10,000 --> 00:50:11,960
how hopeless of a situation she
was in.

926
00:50:13,640 --> 00:50:18,120
I also I I understand why
Hitchcock would be on board with

927
00:50:18,120 --> 00:50:20,920
her wearing a sheer see through
nightgown.

928
00:50:21,200 --> 00:50:25,280
You know, Hitchcock famously a
dirty, dirty boy.

929
00:50:26,200 --> 00:50:28,640
So the second one, very, very
Hitchcockian.

930
00:50:29,280 --> 00:50:31,920
Very Hitchcockian.
The second one kind of sticks

931
00:50:31,920 --> 00:50:34,600
out like a sore thumb to me.
We've established the remakes of

932
00:50:34,600 --> 00:50:37,360
this movie.
I guess the only thing that Brad

933
00:50:37,360 --> 00:50:39,760
could have made-up is the number
of remakes.

934
00:50:41,280 --> 00:50:44,400
Yeah, I was wondering whether
four was the right number.

935
00:50:44,840 --> 00:50:49,880
I know of at least two, but like
you, I'm suspect of the of the

936
00:50:49,880 --> 00:50:52,440
Grace Kelly getting to pick out
her own wardrobes in films.

937
00:50:52,440 --> 00:50:56,200
That just doesn't seem like a
Hitchcock thing.

938
00:50:56,200 --> 00:50:58,520
He he seems like too controlling
for that.

939
00:50:59,200 --> 00:51:01,160
Well, the one, Daniel, you're
suspicious of #1.

940
00:51:01,160 --> 00:51:03,680
That's number one.
Yeah, #2 is the no makeup,

941
00:51:03,760 --> 00:51:06,000
which.
Oh wait, are we are we picking

942
00:51:06,000 --> 00:51:08,800
two false or two true?
Well, there's only one

943
00:51:08,800 --> 00:51:10,360
falsehood.
Two of them are true.

944
00:51:11,280 --> 00:51:12,440
Yes.
And one of them I I think

945
00:51:12,440 --> 00:51:14,520
number, I think #2 would be the
falsehood.

946
00:51:15,480 --> 00:51:21,080
OK, so the wardrobe thing was
the end of number. 10 What was

947
00:51:21,120 --> 00:51:23,280
number?
Two was Grace Kelly didn't wear

948
00:51:23,280 --> 00:51:25,240
any makeup at the end of the
movie, which?

949
00:51:25,680 --> 00:51:28,240
I don't think it's true, because
I don't think you get in a

950
00:51:28,240 --> 00:51:32,720
Hollywood movie in 1954 without
at least wearing a base layer of

951
00:51:32,720 --> 00:51:35,560
foundation.
See, I think that one is true

952
00:51:35,560 --> 00:51:37,960
because I do feel like she
looked different at the end of

953
00:51:37,960 --> 00:51:39,320
the film.
I mean, maybe it's just less

954
00:51:39,320 --> 00:51:43,160
make up, see that's.
What I think #1 is false, I'm

955
00:51:43,160 --> 00:51:45,400
not confident.
Man, this is not good.

956
00:51:45,960 --> 00:51:48,920
Because now I'm thinking maybe
#3 is the falsehood and Brad

957
00:51:48,920 --> 00:51:52,720
invented too many remakes of
this movie.

958
00:51:54,320 --> 00:51:56,880
'Cause even in the first half of
the episode, I said, like, oh, I

959
00:51:56,880 --> 00:51:58,680
think there was only two remakes
of this movie.

960
00:52:01,080 --> 00:52:04,880
Brad, I should not have benched
my starters today.

961
00:52:04,880 --> 00:52:09,120
This is not good.
All right?

962
00:52:11,120 --> 00:52:13,120
I was drawn to two to start
with.

963
00:52:14,520 --> 00:52:17,800
I'm just gonna go ahead and say
I'm going with my gut and saying

964
00:52:17,800 --> 00:52:22,880
#2, but I think I may have
screwed myself over with #3

965
00:52:22,880 --> 00:52:27,800
already.
Robert Yeah, this is your final

966
00:52:27,800 --> 00:52:30,440
chance to lock it in.
I mean, I've got my winnings.

967
00:52:30,520 --> 00:52:32,360
I don't care, man.
Tell me the tell me what

968
00:52:32,360 --> 00:52:39,080
happened, Bob.
Not only is #2 the falsehood, I

969
00:52:39,080 --> 00:52:41,520
have something to reveal to you.
Oh, what is that?

970
00:52:42,240 --> 00:52:45,520
I'm curious if you noticed
anything about this year's 2

971
00:52:45,520 --> 00:52:49,440
Facts and A Falsehood.
Were they all number two or

972
00:52:49,440 --> 00:52:52,360
something?
Fact number two was the

973
00:52:52,360 --> 00:52:54,360
falsehood every single week, was
it?

974
00:52:54,680 --> 00:53:00,160
Really.
I never noticed that.

975
00:53:01,680 --> 00:53:05,960
And the best part is you you
like edit these episodes 17

976
00:53:05,960 --> 00:53:10,600
times over, which means you
heard me say at least 80 times

977
00:53:10,600 --> 00:53:14,320
this this season.
That fact Noah Bob numbered #2

978
00:53:14,320 --> 00:53:17,120
was the falsehood.
I just want to point out that

979
00:53:17,120 --> 00:53:20,800
I'm looking at IMDb right now
and according to IMDb this movie

980
00:53:20,800 --> 00:53:24,680
has been remade 5 times not.
Wow, man.

981
00:53:24,680 --> 00:53:31,720
Oh well, as as always, I plead
the fact that at least one IMDb

982
00:53:31,720 --> 00:53:35,040
trivia fact on the dial in for
murder.

983
00:53:35,040 --> 00:53:38,600
Page said 4 remakes.
I believe you.

984
00:53:38,680 --> 00:53:41,120
And what what that might be
going on is that one of the

985
00:53:41,120 --> 00:53:45,080
remakes is German.
Oh, OK.

986
00:53:45,840 --> 00:53:54,000
Dre M for Mord, the film that we
will be watching next week, no

987
00:53:54,000 --> 00:53:56,440
doubt about it.
That's my Let's make it a double

988
00:53:56,440 --> 00:53:58,680
pick right there.
Bob, how do you feel right now?

989
00:53:58,680 --> 00:54:01,480
You finished the season 18 and
14.

990
00:54:02,040 --> 00:54:03,880
I feel great.
That's enough for like, you

991
00:54:03,880 --> 00:54:09,000
know, the five seed in the East.
Yeah, I'll take it easily. 100%

992
00:54:10,480 --> 00:54:13,880
The Browns would have taken that
record in 10 of the last. 11

993
00:54:13,880 --> 00:54:15,640
years?
Yeah, exactly.

994
00:54:16,360 --> 00:54:18,480
Brad, I am so happy that you
liked this movie.

995
00:54:18,480 --> 00:54:21,480
I'm glad that we get to ride out
the season on a high note.

996
00:54:21,800 --> 00:54:25,040
And I want to talk a little bit
about Hitchcock here.

997
00:54:25,040 --> 00:54:27,920
I feel like we haven't really
talked a lot about the

998
00:54:27,920 --> 00:54:30,800
filmmaking technique of
Hitchcock in these five movies,

999
00:54:31,120 --> 00:54:33,440
partially because we've already
done it with his four most

1000
00:54:33,440 --> 00:54:36,680
famous films.
But what really stuck out to me

1001
00:54:36,680 --> 00:54:41,440
this time during COVID.
I watched a ton of Hitchcock

1002
00:54:41,440 --> 00:54:43,000
movies.
I just kind of was like, I want

1003
00:54:43,000 --> 00:54:45,560
to start watching some movies
and fill in some blind spots.

1004
00:54:45,960 --> 00:54:48,280
And Hitchcock seemed like the
perfect film maker to do that

1005
00:54:48,280 --> 00:54:52,680
with because his movies, they're
not formulaic, but you know

1006
00:54:52,680 --> 00:54:55,080
you're going to get an
entertaining movie every single

1007
00:54:55,080 --> 00:54:56,600
time you throw out a Hitchcock
movie.

1008
00:54:56,720 --> 00:54:59,880
Some work better than others,
but I was shocked at how many of

1009
00:54:59,880 --> 00:55:02,520
his films from the 30s all the
way through to the early 70s

1010
00:55:02,920 --> 00:55:06,840
still work really well.
And yet you hit this period in

1011
00:55:06,840 --> 00:55:10,400
like the late 50s, early 60s,
where he is at the absolute top

1012
00:55:10,400 --> 00:55:15,640
of his game and he just decides,
I'm going to play around with

1013
00:55:15,640 --> 00:55:18,960
genre, I'm going to play around
with form, I'm going to do

1014
00:55:18,960 --> 00:55:23,200
things with the structure of my
movies that haven't ever been

1015
00:55:23,200 --> 00:55:25,280
done before and certainly
haven't been done by me.

1016
00:55:25,600 --> 00:55:28,360
And so you get movies like
Psycho where the protagonist is

1017
00:55:28,360 --> 00:55:30,160
murdered 1/3 of the way into the
movie.

1018
00:55:30,440 --> 00:55:33,560
You get films like Rope.
And dial in for Murder where the

1019
00:55:33,560 --> 00:55:36,200
bad guy is revealed in the 1st 5
minutes of the film.

1020
00:55:36,600 --> 00:55:39,800
He made a great movie with Henry
Fonda called The Wrong Man,

1021
00:55:39,960 --> 00:55:42,800
which is shot like a
documentary, like it's a crazy

1022
00:55:42,800 --> 00:55:44,160
movie.
It's really, really good.

1023
00:55:44,440 --> 00:55:50,120
But I can't think of many major
Hollywood film makers that this

1024
00:55:50,120 --> 00:55:54,240
late into their careers started
not only making masterpieces

1025
00:55:54,240 --> 00:55:58,000
again, but completely changing
up the type of movies they made.

1026
00:55:59,560 --> 00:56:01,880
Don't you feel like directors
get, like, get bored by the end

1027
00:56:01,880 --> 00:56:05,240
of their career, though?
That's what we can account.

1028
00:56:05,240 --> 00:56:06,840
Like that's what Scorsese's
doing now.

1029
00:56:06,840 --> 00:56:08,160
He's like, you know what?
I can't.

1030
00:56:08,160 --> 00:56:10,920
I can't go out without making
eight more masterpieces.

1031
00:56:11,320 --> 00:56:13,920
Yeah, and I'm just bored.
And I'm going to mess with, you

1032
00:56:13,920 --> 00:56:17,320
know, form and function and
genre, and we're just going to

1033
00:56:17,320 --> 00:56:21,080
have a good time with it.
Daniel, I actually decided to

1034
00:56:21,080 --> 00:56:23,960
include this as a segment in the
podcast because of something I

1035
00:56:23,960 --> 00:56:25,840
read on your Twitter page the
other day.

1036
00:56:26,600 --> 00:56:31,280
And you had said that you just
got done seeing the new Wes

1037
00:56:31,280 --> 00:56:35,840
Anderson shorts on Netflix and
that they have cemented for you

1038
00:56:35,840 --> 00:56:37,520
that you are a fan of Wes
Anderson.

1039
00:56:37,520 --> 00:56:39,680
But specifically early Wes
Anderson.

1040
00:56:40,800 --> 00:56:42,680
And I could not agree more
strongly.

1041
00:56:42,680 --> 00:56:46,120
I think that that his movies
have all been kind of colossal

1042
00:56:46,120 --> 00:56:50,400
failures in the last 5-6 years,
but it's because he is so

1043
00:56:50,720 --> 00:56:54,760
nakedly only interested in
playing with form at this point.

1044
00:56:54,760 --> 00:56:57,400
Like he.
He's more interested in the

1045
00:56:57,400 --> 00:57:00,680
experiment of the movie than the
movie itself.

1046
00:57:01,160 --> 00:57:05,360
And I think like, if I can kind
of, you know, shoehorn a

1047
00:57:05,360 --> 00:57:07,920
compliment in there.
He's the only filmmaker I can

1048
00:57:07,920 --> 00:57:10,800
think of that's doing the same
kind of thing Hitchcock did,

1049
00:57:10,800 --> 00:57:14,360
where 20 years in, he's deciding
I'm just going to make something

1050
00:57:14,360 --> 00:57:17,520
completely new.
But with Hitchcock, it produced

1051
00:57:17,520 --> 00:57:20,080
the best films of his career,
and I don't think that's the

1052
00:57:20,080 --> 00:57:23,680
case with Wes Anderson.
Asteroid City didn't didn't

1053
00:57:23,680 --> 00:57:28,440
quite land for you, Bob.
Did not do it for me, Brad, but

1054
00:57:28,440 --> 00:57:31,080
that but that our boy
Thanksgiving in it.

1055
00:57:32,200 --> 00:57:34,360
That's true.
Daniel, I'm wondering if you

1056
00:57:34,360 --> 00:57:37,400
could just like respond to the
Hitchcock thing, respond to the

1057
00:57:37,400 --> 00:57:39,200
Wes Anderson thing.
I just really love to hear your

1058
00:57:39,200 --> 00:57:41,280
thoughts on this.
Yeah.

1059
00:57:43,000 --> 00:57:44,400
Wow.
I mean, you're you.

1060
00:57:44,400 --> 00:57:46,120
Really.
Yeah.

1061
00:57:46,120 --> 00:57:48,880
So I mean, as you said, I I had
just watched the new Netflix Wes

1062
00:57:48,880 --> 00:57:50,680
Anderson shorts the other day
and was tweeting about them that

1063
00:57:50,680 --> 00:57:51,880
I was really disappointed by
them.

1064
00:57:52,600 --> 00:57:57,760
With Wes Anderson, I think it's
that his early films are all

1065
00:57:57,760 --> 00:58:03,560
about ocean and family trauma,
and his later films aren't

1066
00:58:03,560 --> 00:58:07,320
driven by emotion at all.
They're driven by his ideas of,

1067
00:58:07,760 --> 00:58:10,160
like you said, how he can push
for him and what new things he

1068
00:58:10,160 --> 00:58:13,560
can try.
And that's just far less

1069
00:58:13,560 --> 00:58:15,320
interesting to me, especially
because.

1070
00:58:15,840 --> 00:58:18,240
With Wes Anderson, you can
always tell how hard he's trying

1071
00:58:18,240 --> 00:58:22,760
anyway, and so you need that
emotional valve to sort of like

1072
00:58:24,240 --> 00:58:27,280
cut the intentionality of the
visuals.

1073
00:58:29,040 --> 00:58:33,160
With Hitchcock, you know, I
mean, obviously cinema, this

1074
00:58:33,160 --> 00:58:37,280
isn't, this isn't a grand idea,
but the cinema was obviously

1075
00:58:37,280 --> 00:58:39,480
very different in the mid 20th
century than it is now.

1076
00:58:39,880 --> 00:58:43,360
Fewer things have been tried, so
I think it was easier to say.

1077
00:58:43,880 --> 00:58:48,680
I'm going to try new things now
and actually have a path to go

1078
00:58:48,680 --> 00:58:51,600
where you don't have to
sacrifice what it is you've

1079
00:58:52,000 --> 00:58:54,160
you've always been good at.
I think that's good.

1080
00:58:54,720 --> 00:58:57,760
I really agree with that.
I think that what Hitchcock is

1081
00:58:57,760 --> 00:59:02,880
ultimately pushing with a movie
like this is how far can I take

1082
00:59:02,920 --> 00:59:05,840
my theories on what makes
suspense?

1083
00:59:06,600 --> 00:59:09,560
Like, you know, Brad, you've
talked about the Tarantino quote

1084
00:59:09,560 --> 00:59:11,760
of like, pulling the rubber band
to the point.

1085
00:59:12,120 --> 00:59:14,640
Where it's about to break, but
you still have the tension in it

1086
00:59:14,640 --> 00:59:19,160
and and when it snaps is when
chaos ensues and Hitchcock is

1087
00:59:19,200 --> 00:59:20,800
obviously the master of
suspense.

1088
00:59:20,800 --> 00:59:25,760
But a movie like this is a
sustained exercise in, you know,

1089
00:59:25,840 --> 00:59:29,080
all the information from
essentially minute one as the

1090
00:59:29,080 --> 00:59:32,440
audience.
And that's why I love Rope and

1091
00:59:32,440 --> 00:59:36,640
Dial Em for Murder, because the
guy manages to construct an

1092
00:59:36,640 --> 00:59:40,800
entire movie.
Around one big set up and draw

1093
00:59:40,800 --> 00:59:44,680
suspense from it for 90 minutes.
Tarantino has one film left

1094
00:59:44,680 --> 00:59:47,880
right in his.
In his ten that's that's what he

1095
00:59:47,880 --> 00:59:50,080
says.
Yeah, that's what he says.

1096
00:59:50,320 --> 00:59:55,080
I would love to see a Tarantino
remake of Dial M for Murder

1097
00:59:56,840 --> 01:00:00,760
'cause it would end in a
bloodbath, but it would still

1098
01:00:00,760 --> 01:00:04,880
end with John Cleese combing his
mustache.

1099
01:00:04,880 --> 01:00:07,760
But he'd be combing blood out of
his mustache, and it would be

1100
01:00:07,760 --> 01:00:09,680
incredible.
I can see it.

1101
01:00:10,320 --> 01:00:13,840
So I'm happy you brought up
Tarantino, because an idea about

1102
01:00:13,840 --> 01:00:17,480
Tarantino that I've always loved
is Chris Ryan of The Ringer once

1103
01:00:17,480 --> 01:00:20,520
said on a podcast.
I want to say it's when they

1104
01:00:20,520 --> 01:00:22,880
were reviewing The Hateful 8,
but I might be getting that

1105
01:00:22,880 --> 01:00:26,080
wrong.
But he said that his favorite

1106
01:00:26,080 --> 01:00:29,040
thing about Tarantino is the way
he can.

1107
01:00:29,760 --> 01:00:35,400
Dramatize the the transferral of
power within a conversation.

1108
01:00:36,400 --> 01:00:39,320
So you think of like the
basement bar scene in Inglorious

1109
01:00:39,320 --> 01:00:45,560
Basterds, or the conversations
in Reservoir Dogs, or The Bride

1110
01:00:45,560 --> 01:00:49,440
and Bill, you know, sitting at
his table talking as Bill is

1111
01:00:49,440 --> 01:00:51,720
telling the story about his
daughter squashing the fish.

1112
01:00:53,120 --> 01:00:56,040
And in a way, Dial In For Murder
does that same thing, is it's

1113
01:00:56,040 --> 01:00:59,560
about the changing of power
within a conversation that you

1114
01:00:59,880 --> 01:01:02,640
for the whole movie.
You think Tony has the power,

1115
01:01:02,640 --> 01:01:05,120
and even when he gets asked
these questions that he can't

1116
01:01:05,120 --> 01:01:07,480
possibly have a good answer to,
he does, and he retains the

1117
01:01:07,480 --> 01:01:09,840
power.
Until then, he doesn't.

1118
01:01:10,920 --> 01:01:14,240
I think the real question here
is would Christoph Waltz be

1119
01:01:14,240 --> 01:01:18,160
playing Tony or the Inspector?
Oh.

1120
01:01:19,280 --> 01:01:22,400
I think the inspector, because I
can't imagine Christoph Waltz

1121
01:01:22,480 --> 01:01:24,600
turning down the opportunity to
comb a moustache.

1122
01:01:25,000 --> 01:01:28,120
Exactly.
It's yeah, if Eddie would pull

1123
01:01:28,120 --> 01:01:32,320
out, it's like, yay big.
Yeah, the size of the pipe.

1124
01:01:32,560 --> 01:01:36,400
Glorious bastards, right?
If there's a character that can

1125
01:01:36,400 --> 01:01:40,960
be described as impish or
persnickety, like it's Christoph

1126
01:01:40,960 --> 01:01:43,120
Waltz is gravitating towards
that character.

1127
01:01:43,560 --> 01:01:45,560
Yeah.
Man Christoph Waltz.

1128
01:01:46,680 --> 01:01:49,880
We need to do it.
Tarantino, please remake this.

1129
01:01:49,880 --> 01:01:54,960
Even if it's like 10 B, like you
make like an 85 minute remake of

1130
01:01:54,960 --> 01:01:57,160
this and it and you just
consider it not even a full

1131
01:01:57,160 --> 01:01:59,320
movie.
Like, please give that to us,

1132
01:01:59,320 --> 01:02:00,720
because that would be
incredible.

1133
01:02:01,040 --> 01:02:02,640
All right.
Before we get to our last

1134
01:02:02,640 --> 01:02:04,880
segment of the day, which we're
kind of already dipping our toes

1135
01:02:04,880 --> 01:02:08,160
in, I do want to talk really
briefly about the fact that this

1136
01:02:08,160 --> 01:02:11,040
movie was an early experiment in
3D.

1137
01:02:11,280 --> 01:02:15,800
This was a 3D movie, one of the
first from what I can tell,

1138
01:02:15,800 --> 01:02:18,720
because, you know, television
had really taken over the

1139
01:02:18,720 --> 01:02:21,440
mainstream consciousness.
Theaters are trying to find ways

1140
01:02:21,440 --> 01:02:24,640
to get people back in, you know,
in their seats in the theater.

1141
01:02:24,920 --> 01:02:27,600
And so they introduced super
wide screen formats.

1142
01:02:27,600 --> 01:02:30,680
And, you know, they had all
these gimmicky things like smell

1143
01:02:30,680 --> 01:02:33,560
O Vision or smell O Rama, where
they would release different

1144
01:02:33,840 --> 01:02:36,280
gases into the theater that
you're supposed to smell at

1145
01:02:36,280 --> 01:02:39,600
different parts of a movie.
And one of the gimmicks was 3D.

1146
01:02:40,200 --> 01:02:43,120
And you can still see some
elements of the 3D in this

1147
01:02:43,120 --> 01:02:44,920
movie, Brad.
Like there are, there are

1148
01:02:44,920 --> 01:02:48,520
specific shots where it just
doesn't look right.

1149
01:02:48,520 --> 01:02:50,240
It looks like something's
misaligned.

1150
01:02:50,240 --> 01:02:52,240
There's like a lot of fuzziness
going on.

1151
01:02:52,600 --> 01:02:54,720
And I think those are kind of
clearly the moments where they

1152
01:02:54,720 --> 01:02:56,560
were experimenting with early
3D.

1153
01:02:56,760 --> 01:03:00,920
Yeah, when Tony has told his
wife to go along with his story

1154
01:03:00,920 --> 01:03:04,600
about why she didn't call the
police and you know, I'm just

1155
01:03:04,600 --> 01:03:07,880
going to call him John Cleese.
When when John Cleese is, like

1156
01:03:07,880 --> 01:03:11,720
asking her that question and
Tony's walking behind the the

1157
01:03:11,720 --> 01:03:16,200
Chief Inspector, like just the
way the camera focuses there,

1158
01:03:16,200 --> 01:03:19,120
you're like, something's not
quite right here.

1159
01:03:19,280 --> 01:03:22,160
I don't know what it is, but
something's a little off.

1160
01:03:22,840 --> 01:03:24,280
Well, I also read about the 3D
thing.

1161
01:03:24,280 --> 01:03:27,400
I was curious, I couldn't find
out is it even possible to see

1162
01:03:27,400 --> 01:03:29,720
the 3D version?
I assume it doesn't exist

1163
01:03:29,720 --> 01:03:33,520
anymore.
Warner's actually released a 3D

1164
01:03:33,520 --> 01:03:37,240
Blu-ray of it back in like 2012.
Like back when they remember

1165
01:03:37,240 --> 01:03:41,120
when they were making 3DT VS for
a hot second after Avatar you

1166
01:03:41,120 --> 01:03:44,240
can get a 3D Blu-ray of this
movie.

1167
01:03:46,040 --> 01:03:48,560
I've heard the 3D sucks because
like all they used it for was

1168
01:03:48,560 --> 01:03:51,960
like desk lamps and stuff.
I was going to say you can.

1169
01:03:52,120 --> 01:03:53,720
You can kind of see it in a few
shots.

1170
01:03:53,720 --> 01:03:55,600
Yeah.
It gets like, real fuzzy, right?

1171
01:03:55,600 --> 01:03:56,880
Like, it doesn't.
They just don't look.

1172
01:03:57,400 --> 01:04:01,760
I just wonder, like, why was
this the movie chosen to be the

1173
01:04:01,760 --> 01:04:04,760
3D movie?
There's so little in this film

1174
01:04:04,760 --> 01:04:09,160
that is improved by having like
a a table lamp jump out at you.

1175
01:04:09,200 --> 01:04:10,640
You know what I mean?
I just don't get it.

1176
01:04:11,440 --> 01:04:14,320
Yeah, I mean, it's the 50s, man.
I I, I don't think anybody knew

1177
01:04:14,320 --> 01:04:18,480
what they were doing like like a
stage play.

1178
01:04:18,560 --> 01:04:21,240
Essentially they're like, you
know what we're going to make

1179
01:04:21,240 --> 01:04:25,760
into three DA stage play where
guys walk around and talk.

1180
01:04:26,520 --> 01:04:30,520
It's going to be thrilling.
We couldn't get 3D on bridge on

1181
01:04:30,520 --> 01:04:32,920
the river Kwai when the bridge
blows up, but we could get it.

1182
01:04:32,920 --> 01:04:34,520
Here.
No, no, not at all.

1183
01:04:35,960 --> 01:04:38,600
Daniel, did you notice the 3D at
all in the movie?

1184
01:04:38,600 --> 01:04:40,520
Like I, I'm wondering what your
impressions were.

1185
01:04:40,680 --> 01:04:43,640
I didn't at all.
It wasn't until I was, you know,

1186
01:04:43,680 --> 01:04:47,960
after I watching, I read the on
a chapter in my Hitchcock the

1187
01:04:47,960 --> 01:04:51,960
Foe book to see a little bit
about the of a talk making a 3D

1188
01:04:52,880 --> 01:04:54,080
and that really took me by
surprise.

1189
01:04:54,080 --> 01:04:56,600
But then think about it.
It's a movie where?

1190
01:04:57,200 --> 01:05:00,840
Small objects in people's hands
are so important, and so I

1191
01:05:00,840 --> 01:05:04,680
wonder if three day if 3D was a
way to accentuate the audience's

1192
01:05:04,680 --> 01:05:08,440
visualization of what's objects
moving from place to place.

1193
01:05:09,280 --> 01:05:12,640
I think that's a great point.
Yeah, beautiful pair of nice

1194
01:05:12,640 --> 01:05:15,600
gleaming scissors being stabbed
into a man's back.

1195
01:05:16,080 --> 01:05:21,960
I will say once again, like for
as much violence as he was

1196
01:05:21,960 --> 01:05:25,640
allowed to show.
The scene of her being choked

1197
01:05:25,680 --> 01:05:31,160
and him getting stabbed is not
the easiest thing to watch.

1198
01:05:31,160 --> 01:05:32,680
It is.
It's quite violent.

1199
01:05:32,680 --> 01:05:36,440
He falls over backwards onto a
pair of scissors sticking out of

1200
01:05:36,440 --> 01:05:38,880
his back, and you see them push
in farther.

1201
01:05:39,400 --> 01:05:41,200
I like.
Not even like fast.

1202
01:05:41,200 --> 01:05:45,000
It's like a nice slow, like I
audibly went like that was that

1203
01:05:45,920 --> 01:05:49,240
was gnarly, man.
You know, it's funny that you

1204
01:05:49,240 --> 01:05:51,960
point out the gleaming scissors
too, because Hitchcock actually

1205
01:05:51,960 --> 01:05:56,400
had a quote about the use of 3D
in the movie, because he wanted

1206
01:05:56,400 --> 01:05:59,200
the 3D on the scissors more than
anything in the whole movie.

1207
01:05:59,200 --> 01:06:03,160
He was like, this is the scene
after the first take where they

1208
01:06:03,160 --> 01:06:05,480
were watching back the dailies
from the 3D camera.

1209
01:06:05,480 --> 01:06:09,280
He said this is nicely done, but
there wasn't enough gleam to the

1210
01:06:09,280 --> 01:06:12,760
scissors and a murder without
gleaming scissors is like

1211
01:06:12,760 --> 01:06:15,120
asparagus without the
hollandaise sauce.

1212
01:06:15,280 --> 01:06:19,080
Tasteless.
What a quote, man.

1213
01:06:19,840 --> 01:06:21,800
Love that.
All right, guys.

1214
01:06:21,800 --> 01:06:24,320
I think we're in a good spot to
move into our last segment of

1215
01:06:24,320 --> 01:06:27,040
the day, which we call, Let's
make it a double.

1216
01:06:27,320 --> 01:06:30,720
We're near the end of the
episode, so thanks listening to

1217
01:06:30,720 --> 01:06:33,520
the film and whiskey show.
Let's favor another film with

1218
01:06:33,520 --> 01:06:34,960
this one, even if it's
struggling.

1219
01:06:34,960 --> 01:06:37,520
It's a final segment of the day.
Now let's make it a double.

1220
01:06:37,720 --> 01:06:40,040
Let's make it a double Is the
part of the show where we pick a

1221
01:06:40,040 --> 01:06:43,440
movie to pair up with this one
to make the perfect double

1222
01:06:43,440 --> 01:06:46,240
feature?
Brad, would you like to go first

1223
01:06:46,240 --> 01:06:47,760
or should we offer it up to our
guests?

1224
01:06:48,680 --> 01:06:50,360
Yeah.
Daniel, why don't you go ahead?

1225
01:06:51,120 --> 01:06:54,320
So I know you guys said at the
beginning that you weren't that

1226
01:06:54,320 --> 01:06:56,520
big fans of it, but one of my
favorite Hitchcock films is

1227
01:06:56,520 --> 01:06:58,520
Notorious.
And that's what I'd pair with

1228
01:06:58,520 --> 01:07:03,400
this one, because the most
famous shot Notorious is a long

1229
01:07:03,440 --> 01:07:08,880
zoom from Upstairs Downstairs to
a key in Grace Kelly's hand that

1230
01:07:08,880 --> 01:07:12,000
she's holding behind her back.
And I was constantly reminded of

1231
01:07:12,000 --> 01:07:15,280
that shot while watching Dial on
for murder, because there are so

1232
01:07:15,280 --> 01:07:18,560
many moments of close-ups on
people holding keys, and

1233
01:07:18,560 --> 01:07:20,280
especially people holding keys
behind their back.

1234
01:07:20,840 --> 01:07:23,880
And so I feel like those two
movies are Hitchcock, you know,

1235
01:07:23,880 --> 01:07:25,280
experimenting with the same kind
of thing.

1236
01:07:25,520 --> 01:07:27,880
Yeah, yeah.
They dovetail together perfectly

1237
01:07:27,880 --> 01:07:31,920
with that emphasis and just the
general vibes of the films,

1238
01:07:31,920 --> 01:07:35,000
these kind of crime, spy,
thriller.

1239
01:07:35,400 --> 01:07:36,760
Yeah, I think that's a great
pick, Daniel.

1240
01:07:37,200 --> 01:07:38,280
And sorry, I have to correct
myself.

1241
01:07:38,280 --> 01:07:40,000
I think I said it was Grace
Kelly holding a key.

1242
01:07:40,000 --> 01:07:41,640
And notorious it's actually
Ingrid Berkman.

1243
01:07:41,680 --> 01:07:42,880
Holding a key?
Yeah.

1244
01:07:43,440 --> 01:07:45,360
Brad, you're up, man.
What do you think?

1245
01:07:46,480 --> 01:07:48,960
You, you just want to save the
final.

1246
01:07:49,080 --> 01:07:50,480
Let's make it a double for
yourself.

1247
01:07:50,760 --> 01:07:52,120
I'll go next.
You want me to go next?

1248
01:07:52,160 --> 01:07:53,960
I don't care.
All right.

1249
01:07:53,960 --> 01:07:58,040
So with my pick, I think I'm
going to go more like, stay with

1250
01:07:58,040 --> 01:08:02,760
me here.
This movie reminds me of what

1251
01:08:02,760 --> 01:08:06,720
Scorsese did with Shutter
Island, where like, I don't

1252
01:08:06,720 --> 01:08:10,200
think many people would peg
Shutter Island as Scorsese's

1253
01:08:10,200 --> 01:08:13,080
best movie.
And it's funny to hear Scorsese.

1254
01:08:13,080 --> 01:08:15,680
He just did an interview with GQ
where he talked about Shutter

1255
01:08:15,680 --> 01:08:17,840
Island and basically like
dismissed the whole thing.

1256
01:08:18,359 --> 01:08:21,000
And I'm like Scorsese, like, you
don't even realize how good

1257
01:08:21,000 --> 01:08:24,399
Shutter Island is.
It is a perfect genre movie.

1258
01:08:24,399 --> 01:08:26,560
Like it could not have been
better.

1259
01:08:27,080 --> 01:08:28,680
And I think that's exactly what
this is.

1260
01:08:28,680 --> 01:08:31,560
And it's like, it is Hitchcock's
Shutter Island.

1261
01:08:31,600 --> 01:08:35,200
It's a it's an incredible
exercise in genre film making.

1262
01:08:35,640 --> 01:08:39,120
It may not have the layers to it
of a movie like Vertigo, it may

1263
01:08:39,120 --> 01:08:41,960
not be as celebrated as
something like Psycho or Rear

1264
01:08:41,960 --> 01:08:46,439
Window, but every once in a
while you just need to be made

1265
01:08:47,960 --> 01:08:51,120
assured that you're in a really
good pair of hands.

1266
01:08:51,120 --> 01:08:52,760
And that's what Hitchcock is
doing here.

1267
01:08:53,040 --> 01:08:55,520
And I think the same thing
happens when you watch Scorsese

1268
01:08:55,520 --> 01:08:56,720
do something like Shutter
Island.

1269
01:08:56,720 --> 01:08:58,560
So that's my let's make it a
double.

1270
01:08:59,240 --> 01:09:02,000
I love that pairing.
Yeah, Bob, I actually was

1271
01:09:02,000 --> 01:09:05,840
thinking about Shutter Island as
I was thinking about pairings

1272
01:09:05,840 --> 01:09:07,760
for this.
I came up with a better movie,

1273
01:09:07,760 --> 01:09:13,040
though I think that this pairs
perfectly with Double Indemnity.

1274
01:09:13,720 --> 01:09:17,760
Oh, just some really gnarly
murders back to.

1275
01:09:17,760 --> 01:09:22,600
I just think, I think that those
two movies back-to-back is the

1276
01:09:22,600 --> 01:09:30,760
perfect like gritty dark.
Really fun crime.

1277
01:09:30,920 --> 01:09:32,279
I just.
I think that would be an

1278
01:09:32,279 --> 01:09:35,720
incredible movie tonight, Bob.
Yeah, I mean, like I said, I

1279
01:09:35,720 --> 01:09:39,040
think the obvious pairing here
is Rope, but I'm really glad

1280
01:09:39,040 --> 01:09:42,040
that we branched off a little
bit from there and picked three

1281
01:09:42,040 --> 01:09:45,040
really, really good movies.
I guess if you wanted to, you

1282
01:09:45,040 --> 01:09:48,399
could make a 2B night out of it
because 2B is also streaming

1283
01:09:48,399 --> 01:09:52,040
Dial in for Murder and it's
remake A Perfect Murder.

1284
01:09:52,920 --> 01:09:55,160
The only thing is you have to
watch like 40 minutes of

1285
01:09:55,160 --> 01:09:56,560
commercials with both of those
films.

1286
01:09:56,560 --> 01:10:01,080
So yes, I listen.
I'm still I I will plug 2B till

1287
01:10:01,080 --> 01:10:03,920
the day I die.
There's nothing like a good free

1288
01:10:03,920 --> 01:10:08,240
movie that replicates the, like
Saturday afternoon cable

1289
01:10:08,240 --> 01:10:10,200
watching experience.
It's wonderful.

1290
01:10:10,280 --> 01:10:13,320
Yeah, 2B is great and
commercials don't bother me as

1291
01:10:13,320 --> 01:10:15,800
long as you know you're not
getting an edited version of the

1292
01:10:15,800 --> 01:10:19,560
movie in the way you used to.
Yes, 100%.

1293
01:10:19,840 --> 01:10:22,600
Although it is weird when you're
watching like a like an explicit

1294
01:10:22,600 --> 01:10:26,320
R rated movie to then go into
like a Dawn power Wash

1295
01:10:26,320 --> 01:10:29,120
commercial like it's very
jarring.

1296
01:10:29,120 --> 01:10:32,400
Sometimes there's there's a
little duck covered in oil being

1297
01:10:32,480 --> 01:10:36,360
like, bathed.
All right guys, let's give this

1298
01:10:36,360 --> 01:10:39,200
movie some scores.
I'll go first here.

1299
01:10:39,200 --> 01:10:41,720
I've been kind of teetering
between a nine and a nine and a

1300
01:10:41,720 --> 01:10:44,040
half.
I do think that the 1st 20

1301
01:10:44,040 --> 01:10:47,880
minutes are very slow, but
ultimately they're really

1302
01:10:47,880 --> 01:10:49,920
necessary to make the rest of
the movie work.

1303
01:10:50,360 --> 01:10:54,080
This is not a perfect film, but
it's pretty darn close to

1304
01:10:54,080 --> 01:10:56,840
working perfectly.
I'm going to give it a 9.5 out

1305
01:10:56,840 --> 01:11:00,040
of 10, Brad.
Yeah, you are, Daniel.

1306
01:11:00,040 --> 01:11:02,040
Where are you sitting at with
dial in for murder?

1307
01:11:02,640 --> 01:11:05,000
I I now think of everything in
terms of letterbox scores.

1308
01:11:05,000 --> 01:11:08,920
So I'm dealing with the five
star metric.

1309
01:11:08,960 --> 01:11:10,440
I'll.
I'll probably do a four out of

1310
01:11:10,440 --> 01:11:12,640
five, yeah.
All right.

1311
01:11:12,640 --> 01:11:15,640
So an an 8 out of 10, What?
What is keeping it from being

1312
01:11:15,640 --> 01:11:18,440
any higher in your book?
It might just be Hitchcock

1313
01:11:18,440 --> 01:11:22,400
himself, just the feeling of
like a 4 1/2 or five star

1314
01:11:22,400 --> 01:11:25,360
Hitchcock movie.
Just like it feels like it ought

1315
01:11:25,360 --> 01:11:29,040
to be earth shattering.
And so I don't know that I can

1316
01:11:29,240 --> 01:11:31,400
say that Dylon for murder is
earth shattering, though I

1317
01:11:31,400 --> 01:11:34,920
didn't really like it.
Yeah, I I think I'm kind of in a

1318
01:11:34,920 --> 01:11:38,160
similar place with you.
It's not earth shattering, but

1319
01:11:38,160 --> 01:11:42,600
man oh man was that a fun movie.
You get in and out under two

1320
01:11:42,600 --> 01:11:45,280
hours and you have an absolute
blast.

1321
01:11:46,400 --> 01:11:49,200
Yeah, with an intermission.
It's incredible.

1322
01:11:49,520 --> 01:11:52,440
I think the intermission itself
deserves 1/2 a point.

1323
01:11:52,480 --> 01:11:56,120
They're like that alone.
I feel that.

1324
01:11:56,720 --> 01:12:00,040
Oh man, Bob, I'm going to come
to a nine out of 10 on this.

1325
01:12:00,240 --> 01:12:03,840
I think it's incredible.
It's so much fun.

1326
01:12:04,080 --> 01:12:07,440
It's my highest rated Hitchcock
of these five and I think for

1327
01:12:07,440 --> 01:12:10,320
good reason.
Brad, what a way to cap off the

1328
01:12:10,320 --> 01:12:14,920
season A a very positive movie
score, a very positive whiskey

1329
01:12:14,920 --> 01:12:17,320
score.
We could not have asked for, you

1330
01:12:17,320 --> 01:12:20,600
know, a better closer here and I
think part of that is due to our

1331
01:12:20,600 --> 01:12:23,840
guest for the day, Daniel Zwyo.
Daniel, before we sign off,

1332
01:12:24,040 --> 01:12:26,120
please plug yourself.
Where can we find you and what

1333
01:12:26,120 --> 01:12:29,080
are you working on right now?
I'm at 3rd Man Movies on

1334
01:12:29,080 --> 01:12:31,920
Twitter.
I rent for a lot of places.

1335
01:12:31,920 --> 01:12:33,440
You can occasionally find me on
The Ringer.

1336
01:12:33,440 --> 01:12:35,560
You can occasionally find me on
Rodger Ebert.

1337
01:12:36,160 --> 01:12:39,200
Daniel, it is always a pleasure
to have you here, Brad.

1338
01:12:39,200 --> 01:12:42,160
Let's give a little bit of info
as we cap off season seven.

1339
01:12:42,160 --> 01:12:45,360
We're going to be back on Friday
to do what we've been doing with

1340
01:12:45,360 --> 01:12:47,920
all these directors.
We're going to score Hitchcock

1341
01:12:48,080 --> 01:12:52,320
on his ability to direct movies
on a 5 point numerical metric.

1342
01:12:52,720 --> 01:12:55,200
And then next week is when the
fun really begins.

1343
01:12:55,200 --> 01:12:57,120
Brad, why don't you tell our
listeners what happens next

1344
01:12:57,120 --> 01:12:59,640
week?
Baby, we have.

1345
01:13:00,320 --> 01:13:02,680
The bracket challenge coming
your way.

1346
01:13:02,920 --> 01:13:05,760
We're going to throw all 32
movies that we watched this

1347
01:13:05,760 --> 01:13:11,000
season into a bracket upon which
Bob and I are just going to 1 by

1348
01:13:11,000 --> 01:13:14,800
1 go through eliminating films,
throwing them into the fiery

1349
01:13:14,800 --> 01:13:18,120
furnace, never to be seen again
by either Bob nor I.

1350
01:13:19,280 --> 01:13:20,640
It's it's quite an exciting
time.

1351
01:13:20,760 --> 01:13:23,360
I mean, we do need to specify
there is a winner at the end.

1352
01:13:23,360 --> 01:13:25,720
We don't just destroy everything
and walk away.

1353
01:13:25,760 --> 01:13:28,360
Yeah, it's it's not a Coen
Brothers film.

1354
01:13:28,360 --> 01:13:31,360
No, we're we're going to crown
the champion of season seven.

1355
01:13:31,360 --> 01:13:34,640
So join us for that next week.
You can also find the brackets

1356
01:13:34,640 --> 01:13:38,040
on our Twitter, on our Discord.
And Brad, I think it's about

1357
01:13:38,040 --> 01:13:41,200
time we plug this Discord,
because Discord is a really

1358
01:13:41,200 --> 01:13:44,320
great place that we have
cultivated a heck of a

1359
01:13:44,320 --> 01:13:46,720
community, including film and
whiskey pets.

1360
01:13:47,240 --> 01:13:50,120
Yes, yeah, there's all sorts of
stuff that we're talking about

1361
01:13:50,360 --> 01:13:52,480
over on the Discord.
So if you want to join a

1362
01:13:52,480 --> 01:13:56,280
conversation with people that
you know and trust, and there's

1363
01:13:56,280 --> 01:14:00,160
no outsiders coming on and it's
just us, you can find a link to

1364
01:14:00,160 --> 01:14:02,440
our Discord at the end of every
single one of our show notes.

1365
01:14:02,440 --> 01:14:05,360
You can also find us on social
media on Facebook, Twitter,

1366
01:14:05,440 --> 01:14:10,320
Instagram, Tiktok or YouTube at
Film Whiskey, folks.

1367
01:14:10,320 --> 01:14:13,240
That does it for season seven.
We want to say thanks again to

1368
01:14:13,240 --> 01:14:14,560
our guest Daniels.
YO.

1369
01:14:14,680 --> 01:14:17,600
We will see you Friday for
scoring Alfred Hitchcock and

1370
01:14:17,600 --> 01:14:20,480
then next week again for the
bracket challenge.

1371
01:14:20,480 --> 01:14:25,280
But until then, I'm Bob Book.
I'm Brad G and we'll see you

1372
01:14:25,280 --> 01:14:25,840
next time.

Film Critic, Oscar Whisperer, Vanity Fair Contributor

Daniel Joyaux writes about movies with the kind of precision usually reserved for costume design nominations. Based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, his bylines have appeared in Vanity Fair, The Ringer, RogerEbert.com, The Verge, and Rotten Tomatoes, where he breaks down awards seasons, auteur obsessions, and everything in between. On Film & Whiskey, Daniel is our go-to Oscars expert—whether he’s sipping Glenlivet through The Last of the Mohicans or tearing apart Argo with an exceptional pour in hand. You’ll find him on Letterboxd obsessing over noir, Hitchcock, and which movies truly deserved Best Picture.