1917 (2019) / Hirsch The Departure American Single Malt Whiskey
Bob and Brad head to the front lines of World War I cinema as they dissect 1917 (2019), Sam Mendes’ immersive and technically daring war film. With its faux one-take presentation and gripping narrative, 1917 has become a modern benchmark for war storytelling. The guys examine whether it’s all style or if the film has the emotional weight to match. Then, they taste and review Hirsch The Departure Single Malt Whiskey, a bold release from a legendary whiskey name that’s setting out in a new direction.
Timestamps
(0:00) Intro
(7:03) Brad Explains
(9:43) Performances, Themes
(31:09) Hirsch The Departure Single Malt review
(41:49) Two Facts and a Falsehood
(47:16) Final Analysis
(59:51) Let's Make it a Double and Final Scores
Save on your bottle of Blackwood (use code FILMWHISKEY)
Film & Whiskey Instagram
Film & Whiskey Twitter
Email us!
For more episodes and engaging content, visit Film & Whiskey's website at www.filmwhiskey.com.
00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:05,120
In 2019, director Sam Mendes and
star George Mackay gave the
2
00:00:05,120 --> 00:00:08,000
world a singular take on the
Forgotten War.
3
00:00:08,520 --> 00:00:12,640
In 2025 we try an American
single malt from a new to US
4
00:00:12,640 --> 00:00:16,200
brand.
The film is 1917.
5
00:00:16,320 --> 00:00:18,720
The whiskey is Hirsch the
departure.
6
00:00:19,720 --> 00:00:23,360
And we'll review them both.
This is the.
7
00:00:23,360 --> 00:00:45,480
Film and Whiskey podcast.
Welcome to the Film and Whiskey
8
00:00:45,480 --> 00:00:48,640
podcast, where each week we
review a classic movie and a
9
00:00:48,640 --> 00:00:50,760
glass of whiskey.
I'm Bob Book.
10
00:00:51,160 --> 00:00:53,720
I'm Brad Gee.
And Brad Gee, we are starting to
11
00:00:53,720 --> 00:00:57,880
wind down Season 9 of this
podcast.
12
00:00:58,320 --> 00:01:00,800
You and I have been working
behind the scenes, working on
13
00:01:00,800 --> 00:01:03,920
Season 10.
And before we give away what
14
00:01:03,920 --> 00:01:07,480
Season 10 is about, Brad, we got
to get through these last four
15
00:01:07,480 --> 00:01:10,480
movies here.
And I am freaking pumped to talk
16
00:01:10,480 --> 00:01:14,560
about 1917, one of my very
favorite movies of the last
17
00:01:15,000 --> 00:01:18,360
decade or so.
A movie that I was significantly
18
00:01:18,360 --> 00:01:21,760
pumped for you to go see in the
theater and then super bummed
19
00:01:21,760 --> 00:01:23,960
that you didn't love it as much
as me.
20
00:01:24,520 --> 00:01:27,520
We'll, we'll revisit all of our
feelings on this movie here in a
21
00:01:27,520 --> 00:01:30,080
bit.
Brad, what are your general
22
00:01:30,080 --> 00:01:33,160
impressions of season #9 how's
this been for you?
23
00:01:33,760 --> 00:01:37,840
I think it's been a lot of fun.
You know, we obviously have
24
00:01:38,320 --> 00:01:42,160
traversed the decades in this
podcast.
25
00:01:42,160 --> 00:01:47,320
I think what gold Rush from 28
is our. 25 I think the gold
26
00:01:47,320 --> 00:01:50,280
rush.
Oh, that was 25 S Yeah, yeah.
27
00:01:50,640 --> 00:01:56,680
So from 1925, we have now come
up to 2024 as our most recent
28
00:01:56,680 --> 00:02:00,360
film.
So I, I was a very big fan of
29
00:02:00,360 --> 00:02:06,600
sticking to, you know, 2004 to
2024 for a whole season because
30
00:02:06,600 --> 00:02:12,440
I do think it helps us flesh out
what does it mean to be Classic
31
00:02:12,440 --> 00:02:16,840
Cinema in the modern era.
I I, I think it's been a really
32
00:02:16,840 --> 00:02:17,960
fun experiment.
Yeah.
33
00:02:17,960 --> 00:02:20,800
And folks, if this is your first
time joining us, welcome into
34
00:02:20,800 --> 00:02:22,960
Film and Whiskey.
We review movies.
35
00:02:22,960 --> 00:02:25,440
We review whiskey.
The premise of the show is that
36
00:02:25,440 --> 00:02:29,320
I grew up a huge movie nerd.
Brad is new to a lot of these
37
00:02:29,320 --> 00:02:34,080
movies, but the two of us met in
college and in grad school.
38
00:02:34,280 --> 00:02:36,760
We've done a ton of work on
textual criticism.
39
00:02:36,760 --> 00:02:39,960
We love diving deep into, you
know, for us, it was the books
40
00:02:39,960 --> 00:02:41,840
of the Bible.
Now we're applying that same
41
00:02:41,840 --> 00:02:44,800
logic to films.
So it's been fun ride going
42
00:02:44,800 --> 00:02:46,240
through these nine seasons with
you.
43
00:02:46,680 --> 00:02:49,880
This season we've been looking
at films from the last 20 years
44
00:02:50,040 --> 00:02:53,720
and asking the critical
question, is this movie a modern
45
00:02:53,800 --> 00:02:56,480
classic?
Now, in order to determine that,
46
00:02:56,480 --> 00:02:58,960
what we've been doing is going
through 4 criteria.
47
00:02:59,800 --> 00:03:02,040
Is this movie a Best picture
nominee?
48
00:03:02,400 --> 00:03:05,320
Did this movie make $100 million
at the US box office?
49
00:03:05,720 --> 00:03:07,800
Is it in the letterbox to top
250?
50
00:03:07,960 --> 00:03:11,960
Is it in the IMDb top 250?
Brad, I don't think this is a
51
00:03:11,960 --> 00:03:15,760
letter boxed movie, but I am
pretty sure the three other
52
00:03:15,760 --> 00:03:21,400
boxes are checked for 19/17.
Yeah, it made a lot of money at
53
00:03:21,400 --> 00:03:26,320
the box office for us, you know,
kind of a quiet esque drama
54
00:03:26,360 --> 00:03:31,920
military film.
It made 446,000,000 worldwide.
55
00:03:31,920 --> 00:03:36,840
159 of that was domestic.
Pretty good for a World War One
56
00:03:36,840 --> 00:03:41,600
movie that World War 1 is a very
slept on time in military
57
00:03:41,600 --> 00:03:44,120
history.
I feel like, you know, super
58
00:03:44,120 --> 00:03:47,640
overshadowed by World War 2.
And that's primarily because I
59
00:03:47,640 --> 00:03:51,120
think that like, I mean,
obviously World War Two more
60
00:03:51,120 --> 00:03:55,480
recent than World War One, but
the, the American involvement in
61
00:03:55,480 --> 00:03:59,440
World War 2 has become such a
part of like the American myth.
62
00:03:59,600 --> 00:04:04,200
Like we really hold on World War
2 and, and our involvement in
63
00:04:04,200 --> 00:04:06,680
that on a pedestal.
And I think World War One by
64
00:04:06,680 --> 00:04:10,760
comparison, it, it feels like a
much more European conflict,
65
00:04:10,880 --> 00:04:13,680
which is silly to say, But like
even this movie, it's about
66
00:04:13,680 --> 00:04:18,040
Brits fighting in World War 1.
And I, I just don't think that
67
00:04:18,040 --> 00:04:22,680
we have a lot of great World War
One examples in cinema,
68
00:04:22,680 --> 00:04:25,600
especially in the last, you
know, 50 years.
69
00:04:26,160 --> 00:04:31,960
Yeah, it feels like a yeah, a
forgotten war, but you're right,
70
00:04:31,960 --> 00:04:36,920
World War 2 at the end of the
day, I think one of the reasons
71
00:04:36,920 --> 00:04:41,120
is it's a lot cooler to.
It sounds like a power ranking
72
00:04:41,120 --> 00:04:45,080
wars here.
We are 100% Vietnam War is below
73
00:04:45,080 --> 00:04:48,320
these two, you know for sure
versus somewhere in the middle.
74
00:04:48,840 --> 00:04:52,200
Here's the thing.
World War 2 is cooler to depict.
75
00:04:52,960 --> 00:04:58,520
Like World War 1 is a bunch of
trenches and mud and barbed
76
00:04:58,520 --> 00:05:01,480
wire.
And like the technology
77
00:05:01,480 --> 00:05:05,600
difference between like the
biplanes of World War One and
78
00:05:05,600 --> 00:05:10,000
the fighters of World War 2 is
so vast that like dog fights are
79
00:05:10,000 --> 00:05:13,960
way cooler in World War 2 than
they would have been in World
80
00:05:13,960 --> 00:05:16,680
War One.
And so even from a media
81
00:05:16,680 --> 00:05:20,080
standpoint, it's like, yeah,
sure, it's it's a little easier
82
00:05:20,080 --> 00:05:24,000
to make a film or write a book
about World War 2 then it would
83
00:05:24,000 --> 00:05:26,760
be about World War One.
Well, I think you bring up a
84
00:05:26,760 --> 00:05:31,400
really great point that kind of
introduces to huger points we
85
00:05:31,400 --> 00:05:34,080
have to discuss today.
Anytime we talk about war films
86
00:05:34,080 --> 00:05:37,360
on this podcast we always bring
up the famous Truffaut quote
87
00:05:37,840 --> 00:05:40,960
where he talks about how it's
impossible to make an anti war
88
00:05:40,960 --> 00:05:44,000
film just because the medium of
film makes things so
89
00:05:44,000 --> 00:05:47,440
entertaining that by even
depicting the horrors of war
90
00:05:47,880 --> 00:05:52,240
you're so bought into it that in
some ways it is participatory
91
00:05:52,240 --> 00:05:54,160
and you become a champion of
war.
92
00:05:54,480 --> 00:05:57,560
I don't know if either of us
fully agrees with that, but I
93
00:05:57,560 --> 00:06:01,240
think that what we've seen in
the last, you know, 25 ish years
94
00:06:01,240 --> 00:06:05,360
is that in order to try to
mitigate that, film makers take
95
00:06:05,360 --> 00:06:09,840
a very neutral stance on the
politics of war and instead just
96
00:06:09,840 --> 00:06:13,000
try to depict the day-to-day
lives of the soldiers.
97
00:06:13,000 --> 00:06:16,000
This was a major point in our
Saving Private Ryan episode
98
00:06:16,320 --> 00:06:19,200
where we were trying to argue
against the read on that film
99
00:06:19,200 --> 00:06:20,760
that it's just kind of
jingoistic.
100
00:06:21,080 --> 00:06:24,560
And I think Sam Mendes does
something similar here and the
101
00:06:24,560 --> 00:06:28,600
way that he does that, the
second point is, you're right.
102
00:06:28,600 --> 00:06:32,280
World War One, super boring
conflict to portray on screen
103
00:06:32,280 --> 00:06:34,200
because you're just in a ditch
the whole time.
104
00:06:34,200 --> 00:06:38,160
Like it's trench warfare.
And so in order to fight against
105
00:06:38,160 --> 00:06:41,680
the boredom and the
repetitiveness and the visual
106
00:06:42,720 --> 00:06:46,400
lack of interest there, he does
this thing where he's like, I'm
107
00:06:46,400 --> 00:06:50,600
going to make a one shot movie.
And I think Brad, that kind of
108
00:06:50,600 --> 00:06:53,720
sets us up for, Brad explains.
Because I want to get to the Sam
109
00:06:53,720 --> 00:06:57,200
Mendes of it all after you kind
of cast the vision here.
110
00:06:57,200 --> 00:07:00,280
So let's throw over to our first
segment of the day, which we
111
00:07:00,280 --> 00:07:02,800
call, Brad Explains.
Brad's going to give us the
112
00:07:02,800 --> 00:07:06,400
movie plots with only 60 seconds
sticking on the clock, so let's
113
00:07:06,400 --> 00:07:09,720
go ahead and do your take with
this little segment that we
114
00:07:09,720 --> 00:07:12,920
call, Brad explains.
Brad Explains is the part of the
115
00:07:12,920 --> 00:07:16,000
show where Brad breaks down the
plot of the film that he has
116
00:07:16,000 --> 00:07:18,400
just seen, often for the first
time.
117
00:07:19,280 --> 00:07:21,160
I am pretty sure I'm remembering
this correctly.
118
00:07:21,160 --> 00:07:22,680
You saw this in the theater,
right?
119
00:07:23,360 --> 00:07:26,000
I sure did.
And and you have not seen it
120
00:07:26,000 --> 00:07:27,800
since.
I've not seen it since.
121
00:07:28,200 --> 00:07:33,600
This is my first time since 2019
I think of the best picture
122
00:07:33,600 --> 00:07:36,640
nominees.
I saw this and JoJo Rabbit in
123
00:07:36,640 --> 00:07:38,840
theaters.
We have really been knocking out
124
00:07:38,840 --> 00:07:41,960
the 2019 nominees across the
seasons here.
125
00:07:41,960 --> 00:07:43,800
It was a heck of a year.
Man, what a great year.
126
00:07:43,800 --> 00:07:49,240
Ford V Ferrari, yeah.
Parasite Marriage Story 1917
127
00:07:49,240 --> 00:07:51,840
Like it a darn good year for
film.
128
00:07:52,960 --> 00:07:54,960
Parasite was such a good movie
man.
129
00:07:55,440 --> 00:07:56,640
Oh, I love that.
Movie.
130
00:07:57,000 --> 00:08:00,360
I know you do, man.
I was pulling for 1917 and I
131
00:08:00,360 --> 00:08:05,160
know that I I am like persona
non grata by taking this movie
132
00:08:05,160 --> 00:08:08,320
over Parasite, A beloved classic
of world cinema.
133
00:08:08,880 --> 00:08:11,600
But I've said multiple times my
weird experience watching
134
00:08:11,600 --> 00:08:14,000
Parasite has kind of forever
tainted it for me.
135
00:08:14,000 --> 00:08:17,880
So this was a much purer
experience in the theater for
136
00:08:17,880 --> 00:08:21,520
me.
And I got to say, man, the world
137
00:08:21,520 --> 00:08:24,440
cinema, Correct.
British director, British
138
00:08:24,440 --> 00:08:26,520
director.
It's an it's an American movie,
139
00:08:26,520 --> 00:08:29,600
though, Like this is this is
very much backed by America.
140
00:08:30,360 --> 00:08:32,120
And so Brad, you've seen it
twice now.
141
00:08:32,200 --> 00:08:35,360
I don't really think this is a
movie that requires 60 full
142
00:08:35,360 --> 00:08:38,520
seconds.
But the minute is yours to spoil
143
00:08:38,520 --> 00:08:41,000
the events of this film.
Folks, if you have not seen
144
00:08:41,000 --> 00:08:44,360
1917, I would highly recommend
going and watching the film and
145
00:08:44,360 --> 00:08:46,960
then coming back and joining us
for the rest of the episode.
146
00:08:47,520 --> 00:08:52,720
Brad, one minute and go. 1917 is
a film that follows Lance
147
00:08:52,720 --> 00:08:57,320
Corporal's Blake and Schofield
as they travel through No Man's
148
00:08:57,320 --> 00:09:01,680
land during World War One in
order to try and stop Sherlock
149
00:09:01,680 --> 00:09:04,360
Holmes from sending his men to
certain death.
150
00:09:07,520 --> 00:09:11,520
I like how even on the subject
of war, you can find a way to be
151
00:09:11,640 --> 00:09:14,000
a little cheeky in the way that
you do things, Brad.
152
00:09:16,080 --> 00:09:17,000
Yeah, you're welcome.
Who?
153
00:09:17,080 --> 00:09:17,640
Who?
Me.
154
00:09:17,640 --> 00:09:21,760
I know in 1917 and another way
of explaining it is like two
155
00:09:21,760 --> 00:09:26,400
young British actors share the
screen momentarily with every
156
00:09:26,400 --> 00:09:28,280
major British actor.
You know what I mean?
157
00:09:28,400 --> 00:09:30,720
Like it's.
Every male.
158
00:09:30,720 --> 00:09:31,800
Every male, right?
Yeah.
159
00:09:31,800 --> 00:09:35,000
Then Tilda Swinton doesn't show
up in this one anywhere, but she
160
00:09:35,000 --> 00:09:36,880
probably could have if she
wanted to, you know?
161
00:09:37,120 --> 00:09:41,200
I it wouldn't surprise me, Bob.
All right, let's dive into
162
00:09:41,200 --> 00:09:44,200
talking about the film itself.
And I think that we kind of have
163
00:09:44,200 --> 00:09:47,680
to go out of order a little bit
today because it's necessitated
164
00:09:48,000 --> 00:09:51,320
by the type of movie this is.
I I said a little bit ago, the
165
00:09:51,320 --> 00:09:54,880
movie is filmed and presented as
if it is done in one shot.
166
00:09:55,080 --> 00:09:58,720
There are some cleverly designed
transitions between shots, but
167
00:09:58,920 --> 00:10:02,560
this is a repairing of Sam
Mendes and the cinematographer
168
00:10:02,560 --> 00:10:06,160
Rodger Deakins.
And I think when you present a
169
00:10:06,160 --> 00:10:10,280
movie as if it's done in one
shot, a la Birdman, and you're
170
00:10:10,280 --> 00:10:15,760
the director of a movie, you are
inviting any attention that you
171
00:10:15,760 --> 00:10:19,840
get as a result.
Like you're clearly asking for
172
00:10:19,840 --> 00:10:22,680
people's attention.
The camera becomes a character
173
00:10:22,680 --> 00:10:25,480
in the movie, and you as the
director are really putting
174
00:10:25,480 --> 00:10:27,840
yourself out there saying, look
at what I can do.
175
00:10:28,640 --> 00:10:31,760
And the interesting thing with
Sam Mendes is that a lot of
176
00:10:31,760 --> 00:10:35,240
critics do not like this guy.
I don't know a ton about his
177
00:10:35,240 --> 00:10:37,360
personal life.
So I don't know if there's, you
178
00:10:37,360 --> 00:10:39,720
know, maybe he's a terrible
person in real life.
179
00:10:39,720 --> 00:10:43,880
But I think kind of unfairly,
Sam Mendes gets shot on by the
180
00:10:43,880 --> 00:10:46,640
critical community because this
is a guy that's made a lot of
181
00:10:46,640 --> 00:10:50,360
really good movies.
And I've struggled for a long
182
00:10:50,360 --> 00:10:54,480
time to try to pin down exactly
what it is that critics hate
183
00:10:54,480 --> 00:10:57,080
about the guy.
And I think I'm like, I'm
184
00:10:57,080 --> 00:10:59,280
starting to have it click into
view.
185
00:10:59,600 --> 00:11:02,400
Brad, are you familiar at all
with the sort of critical
186
00:11:02,400 --> 00:11:05,440
campaign against Sam Mendes as a
director?
187
00:11:06,280 --> 00:11:09,720
The Mendezian angst that exists
within the film critic
188
00:11:09,920 --> 00:11:12,040
community.
Is it Mendesian?
189
00:11:12,800 --> 00:11:18,200
Mendesian perhaps?
No, I'm honestly not.
190
00:11:18,320 --> 00:11:21,920
I have.
I'm trying to think if I've seen
191
00:11:21,920 --> 00:11:25,880
any of his other films than
American Beauty, Skyfall in
192
00:11:25,880 --> 00:11:28,760
1917.
I mean, I is that a good
193
00:11:28,760 --> 00:11:30,920
representation of his
filmography, would you say?
194
00:11:30,920 --> 00:11:33,480
I think so too.
I mean like the only other two
195
00:11:33,480 --> 00:11:36,280
films that I would say we really
should watch at some point for
196
00:11:36,280 --> 00:11:39,960
the podcast would be Road to
Perdition with Tom Hanks and
197
00:11:40,360 --> 00:11:43,600
Jarhead with Jake Gyllenhaal.
Those are probably like his big
198
00:11:43,600 --> 00:11:49,080
5 movies I would say.
Now I will say Jarhead for being
199
00:11:49,520 --> 00:11:54,400
what I would imagine is a loss
to Time like just another war
200
00:11:54,400 --> 00:11:59,960
movie easily has one of the best
marketing campaigns of any film.
201
00:11:59,960 --> 00:12:04,280
Because I still remember the
previews for Jarhead.
202
00:12:04,280 --> 00:12:07,920
And the reason I bring that up
is I think one of the reasons
203
00:12:07,920 --> 00:12:11,880
1917 made so much daggone money
is because it had a killer.
204
00:12:12,240 --> 00:12:19,120
Just the the the trailers for
19/17 were so freaking cool
205
00:12:19,120 --> 00:12:21,840
dude.
And and I think that that kind
206
00:12:21,840 --> 00:12:24,520
of gets me back to the like,
what is it that people don't
207
00:12:24,520 --> 00:12:27,640
like about Mendez?
Because as I remember the 1917
208
00:12:27,640 --> 00:12:31,120
trailers, they had like a sort
of ticking clock effect going on
209
00:12:31,120 --> 00:12:33,840
in the background, very
reminiscent of like The Dark
210
00:12:33,840 --> 00:12:37,000
Knight and Inception.
And I kind of wonder, you know,
211
00:12:37,160 --> 00:12:39,520
I, I think they were trying to
position this movie as like
212
00:12:39,520 --> 00:12:43,040
Christopher Nolan esque coming
off the heels of Dunkirk, which
213
00:12:43,040 --> 00:12:46,240
people really didn't love.
And this is like, hey, this is a
214
00:12:46,240 --> 00:12:49,880
much more down the middle,
suspense driven race against the
215
00:12:49,880 --> 00:12:52,640
clock movie that you wish
Christopher Nolan made.
216
00:12:52,800 --> 00:12:55,840
And here is light beer version
of Christopher Nolan making it.
217
00:12:56,960 --> 00:12:59,960
And I think that's kind of what
I've come down on about why
218
00:12:59,960 --> 00:13:04,040
critics don't like Sam Mendes is
that he he came from theater.
219
00:13:04,040 --> 00:13:10,000
He was a really well regarded
director in London and I think
220
00:13:10,000 --> 00:13:13,640
that he knows how to like really
mount a very handsomely made
221
00:13:13,640 --> 00:13:15,640
production.
Like his movies always look
222
00:13:15,640 --> 00:13:18,200
impeccable.
He knows how to use the camera
223
00:13:18,200 --> 00:13:20,880
and they always have the air of
prestige.
224
00:13:21,320 --> 00:13:26,000
But even among the movies I just
named like this movie Skyfall,
225
00:13:26,000 --> 00:13:29,880
American Beauty, Jarhead and
then whatever the other one was
226
00:13:30,000 --> 00:13:31,440
that we were talking about.
Road to Perdition Rd.
227
00:13:31,440 --> 00:13:35,000
To Perdition.
Like, I don't know that I would
228
00:13:35,000 --> 00:13:37,840
call him an auteur in the same
way that we talk about like a
229
00:13:37,840 --> 00:13:41,520
Tarantino or a a Wes Anderson or
even a Scorsese, where it's
230
00:13:41,520 --> 00:13:45,720
like, oh, this is clearly a
movie made by a guy with a point
231
00:13:45,720 --> 00:13:47,160
of view.
You know what I mean?
232
00:13:48,120 --> 00:13:51,840
Totally.
I, I think that American Beauty,
233
00:13:52,080 --> 00:13:56,520
of the three that I've seen,
probably has the most distinct
234
00:13:56,520 --> 00:14:00,760
vibe to it that that makes it
feel like it stands out from
235
00:14:00,760 --> 00:14:05,040
other films.
I, I don't know if 1917 or
236
00:14:06,440 --> 00:14:10,880
Skyfall, like really shouts to
the heavens.
237
00:14:11,200 --> 00:14:16,760
This is a Mendesian picture.
There's Mendesian.
238
00:14:16,960 --> 00:14:19,560
It's the coolest term we've ever
come up with on this show.
239
00:14:19,680 --> 00:14:26,120
Brad, easily.
It's kind of similar to how Sam
240
00:14:26,120 --> 00:14:29,680
Mendes is is perceived.
It's like Mendesian sounds like
241
00:14:29,880 --> 00:14:32,320
the coolest, deepest, most
intricate thing you could
242
00:14:32,320 --> 00:14:33,720
discuss.
And then you're like, oh, it's
243
00:14:33,720 --> 00:14:35,480
just a Sam Mendes movie.
OK.
244
00:14:35,640 --> 00:14:36,840
Yeah.
You know.
245
00:14:37,720 --> 00:14:41,040
Well, the the fascinating thing
is you, you seem like you kind
246
00:14:41,040 --> 00:14:43,880
of agree with it when I know
that you in fact don't.
247
00:14:44,720 --> 00:14:48,080
I I think it's a compelling
argument and I do agree with it.
248
00:14:48,080 --> 00:14:51,520
I just don't know if it matters
like at the end of the day, if a
249
00:14:51,520 --> 00:14:54,680
guy is like a really good, I
wouldn't even call him like a
250
00:14:54,680 --> 00:14:58,800
journeyman director because he's
not just like a hired gun.
251
00:14:59,240 --> 00:15:02,720
He he really puts care and
attention into his movies.
252
00:15:03,120 --> 00:15:05,360
I don't think they have a
personal touch.
253
00:15:05,640 --> 00:15:08,560
But I'm also like, he comes out
with a movie and I'm like, oh, a
254
00:15:08,560 --> 00:15:11,080
new Sam Mendes movie.
I'm going to see that like
255
00:15:11,080 --> 00:15:14,720
because I know that it's just
going to be a well crafted movie
256
00:15:14,840 --> 00:15:16,440
that had a lot of care put into
it.
257
00:15:16,440 --> 00:15:18,880
And I think that's an
increasingly rare thing these
258
00:15:18,880 --> 00:15:21,440
days.
It's interesting the the way
259
00:15:21,440 --> 00:15:26,920
that we are talking about him
reminds me of how we talk about
260
00:15:26,920 --> 00:15:32,240
Rob Reiner.
Like I although I would say Rob
261
00:15:32,240 --> 00:15:35,640
Reiner was much more of a like,
we need a guy who's like a
262
00:15:35,640 --> 00:15:39,800
competent director, right?
With like, that's no visual
263
00:15:39,800 --> 00:15:41,280
flair.
You know, yeah.
264
00:15:41,600 --> 00:15:45,440
That's the thing though is like
Rob Reiner was the hired gun,
265
00:15:45,840 --> 00:15:49,440
Sam Mendes isn't.
But the way we describe the the
266
00:15:49,440 --> 00:15:51,680
output, I feel like it's kind of
similar.
267
00:15:51,680 --> 00:15:56,640
Like super well competent, knows
how to make a great movie.
268
00:15:57,000 --> 00:16:01,240
It just doesn't quite reach the
heights or have the depth
269
00:16:01,240 --> 00:16:05,520
necessarily.
That would make them a A tier
270
00:16:05,520 --> 00:16:06,840
director.
Yeah.
271
00:16:07,240 --> 00:16:11,600
And yet with Mendez, he has that
added prestige of like, I have
272
00:16:11,600 --> 00:16:13,960
won best picture, I have won
best director.
273
00:16:13,960 --> 00:16:16,760
My films are constantly
nominated for Academy Awards.
274
00:16:17,280 --> 00:16:19,560
So I think the.
Push is annoyed that that he
275
00:16:19,560 --> 00:16:22,320
like won with American Beauty
early in his career.
276
00:16:22,320 --> 00:16:24,560
Yeah, people really hate that
movie, which I still think is.
277
00:16:24,560 --> 00:16:28,560
I like that movie a lot.
I don't get it, But yeah, I
278
00:16:28,560 --> 00:16:31,240
think he's perceived as like the
Oscar bait guy now, which is
279
00:16:31,240 --> 00:16:33,800
just hilarious to me 'cause you
know, and isn't.
280
00:16:34,000 --> 00:16:39,520
Everybody like that would be
like calling an NFL team Super
281
00:16:39,520 --> 00:16:43,240
Bowl bait worthy like.
They're just setting themselves
282
00:16:43,240 --> 00:16:45,480
up to win a championship.
This is ridiculous.
283
00:16:45,880 --> 00:16:47,200
Yeah.
Why can't they be more like the
284
00:16:47,200 --> 00:16:49,480
Browns?
Yeah, exactly.
285
00:16:49,480 --> 00:16:55,920
I I really don't understand the
Oscar bait like how dare you
286
00:16:55,920 --> 00:17:00,640
play to the things you know will
win you the best like most
287
00:17:00,640 --> 00:17:04,440
important award in our industry.
Yeah, I don't know, man.
288
00:17:04,440 --> 00:17:06,440
And I think that's a good
jumping off point to actually
289
00:17:06,440 --> 00:17:11,240
talk about the movie, which
exists for me outside of this
290
00:17:11,240 --> 00:17:13,640
conversation.
This is just a really well made,
291
00:17:14,200 --> 00:17:17,800
almost real time race against
the clock movie where you've got
292
00:17:17,800 --> 00:17:20,960
maybe the best cinematographer
of all time flexing his muscles.
293
00:17:21,400 --> 00:17:24,520
And the reason I brought up the
Mendez thing is that it's really
294
00:17:24,520 --> 00:17:29,520
funny to go through reviews for
this movie where the praise is
295
00:17:29,520 --> 00:17:33,840
always filtered around Mendez
because it's like the critics
296
00:17:33,840 --> 00:17:35,640
don't want to give him credit
for anything.
297
00:17:35,640 --> 00:17:38,120
And they're like, well, this is
actually a Rodger Deakins
298
00:17:38,120 --> 00:17:39,920
showcase.
And the fact that Rodger Deakins
299
00:17:39,920 --> 00:17:41,800
figured out how to do all this
is insane.
300
00:17:42,320 --> 00:17:45,720
And like, maybe that's true.
Maybe behind the scenes Rodger
301
00:17:45,720 --> 00:17:48,080
Deakins was just like shadow
directing this movie.
302
00:17:48,120 --> 00:17:51,960
I don't freaking know.
But like, it's just hilarious to
303
00:17:51,960 --> 00:17:55,360
me that we want to give credit
to deacons.
304
00:17:55,440 --> 00:17:59,440
And it is, you know, let's be
clear, a huge accomplishment
305
00:17:59,440 --> 00:18:01,200
technically this movie.
Totally.
306
00:18:01,320 --> 00:18:07,200
But like the fact that Sam
Mendes was able to orchestrate
307
00:18:07,600 --> 00:18:11,360
every piece, every instrument in
the orchestra here, right, and
308
00:18:11,360 --> 00:18:14,640
and not get any credit for it.
I don't know that there's a lot
309
00:18:14,640 --> 00:18:18,480
of directors who are kind of
shafted that way the way that
310
00:18:18,480 --> 00:18:20,840
Mendez is.
Absolutely.
311
00:18:20,920 --> 00:18:25,760
Yeah, it's it feels like one of
those confirmation bias type of
312
00:18:25,760 --> 00:18:29,200
things where it's like, oh,
well, you know, I expect
313
00:18:29,200 --> 00:18:33,440
Scorsese to make an incredible,
deep, beautiful movie, so the DP
314
00:18:33,440 --> 00:18:36,360
doesn't get any real credit for
what they do.
315
00:18:36,360 --> 00:18:40,960
But Sam Mendes, Meh.
Deacons did the whole thing.
316
00:18:42,800 --> 00:18:46,000
Yeah, when it comes to the movie
itself, what I love about the
317
00:18:46,000 --> 00:18:48,560
gimmick, and we should just
start talking about the gimmick
318
00:18:48,560 --> 00:18:51,400
here, it's a one shot movie.
What I love about the gimmick is
319
00:18:51,400 --> 00:18:54,480
that it really only works if
you're not trying to do a ton of
320
00:18:54,480 --> 00:18:56,840
exposition.
And so from the get go it's like
321
00:18:57,480 --> 00:18:59,240
there will be dialogue in this
movie.
322
00:18:59,720 --> 00:19:03,040
A lot of the dialogue is going
to be like banal day-to-day
323
00:19:03,040 --> 00:19:06,000
conversation between these two
guys walking across a field.
324
00:19:06,760 --> 00:19:11,120
And it that that makes it work
because it really elongates like
325
00:19:11,520 --> 00:19:14,760
the boredom of walking across a
field and then a shot rings out
326
00:19:14,760 --> 00:19:16,080
and now we're running across a
field.
327
00:19:17,080 --> 00:19:21,280
And and I think that plopping us
into the middle of both of their
328
00:19:21,760 --> 00:19:23,560
tours, if you want to call it
that, too.
329
00:19:23,560 --> 00:19:25,880
It's not like they're these are
privates who were showing up for
330
00:19:25,880 --> 00:19:29,320
their first day of combat.
Like the movie opens on George
331
00:19:29,320 --> 00:19:31,640
Mckay's face.
He's sleeping against a tree.
332
00:19:32,040 --> 00:19:34,080
And immediately the camera pulls
back.
333
00:19:34,080 --> 00:19:37,200
Both these guys are revealed.
And it's like, boom, we've got a
334
00:19:37,200 --> 00:19:40,920
job for you.
And so like literally 45 seconds
335
00:19:40,920 --> 00:19:44,640
into the movie, the plot is in
motion and now you're just
336
00:19:44,640 --> 00:19:47,680
watching the trip to execute
this mission.
337
00:19:47,680 --> 00:19:51,720
It is such a bare bones plot and
it's the only thing to me that
338
00:19:51,720 --> 00:19:53,280
makes the gimmick of the movie
work.
339
00:19:54,920 --> 00:20:02,720
See, I I found myself kind of in
the opposite place where the
340
00:20:02,720 --> 00:20:07,760
gimmick of a one shot take.
Is that it allows you to really
341
00:20:07,760 --> 00:20:12,320
just like sit with people.
And I think that it works way
342
00:20:12,320 --> 00:20:16,840
better when you're in like a
deep, tense, dramatic
343
00:20:16,840 --> 00:20:21,480
conversation between two people
and you just never get that in
344
00:20:21,480 --> 00:20:24,400
this.
And I'm not disagreeing that
345
00:20:24,400 --> 00:20:28,320
like those moments where he's
talking about cherry trees and
346
00:20:28,320 --> 00:20:31,520
the different types.
And like, there's plenty of
347
00:20:31,520 --> 00:20:34,560
small moments that you help you
fall in love with the
348
00:20:34,560 --> 00:20:42,080
characters, but I I think A1
shot movie is best utilized when
349
00:20:42,080 --> 00:20:46,520
you have just a really super
compelling character who's
350
00:20:46,520 --> 00:20:51,680
really deeply wrestling with
like wild internal realities.
351
00:20:52,080 --> 00:20:54,640
And and I think that that's why
it works for something like
352
00:20:54,640 --> 00:20:59,200
Birdman versus something like
1917.
353
00:20:59,200 --> 00:21:03,440
To me, this kind of felt like
watching a video game.
354
00:21:03,520 --> 00:21:06,800
Oh, interesting.
Where it's like every once in a
355
00:21:06,800 --> 00:21:11,120
while you have, you know, a, a
quick cut scene with like
356
00:21:11,120 --> 00:21:14,760
Benedict Cumberbatch or Mark
Strong.
357
00:21:15,400 --> 00:21:18,240
And then the rest of it, you're
following a no name character
358
00:21:18,240 --> 00:21:22,080
that you're playing as and
you're trying to do your mission
359
00:21:22,080 --> 00:21:26,200
and, and, and it, it, it feels
like a ton of cutscenes with
360
00:21:26,200 --> 00:21:29,280
like player engagement stuff in
the middle.
361
00:21:31,000 --> 00:21:33,160
Yeah, I think that's a really
good criticism of the movie.
362
00:21:33,160 --> 00:21:35,720
I don't necessarily agree with
it, but that's also because I'm
363
00:21:35,720 --> 00:21:37,760
not a video game player.
And you're right.
364
00:21:37,760 --> 00:21:43,560
Like, there's definitely a first
person shooter kind of thing
365
00:21:43,560 --> 00:21:45,560
going on in this movie,
especially in the way that the
366
00:21:45,560 --> 00:21:48,960
camera kind of floats sometimes.
It'll look elsewhere, you know,
367
00:21:48,960 --> 00:21:52,120
as it makes its transitions and
then it'll kind of drift back to
368
00:21:52,120 --> 00:21:55,400
our heroes.
I think it's really like a a
369
00:21:55,400 --> 00:21:59,240
pretty astute criticism, Brad.
And it kind of begs the question
370
00:21:59,240 --> 00:22:04,400
of like, if we wanted to do a
real time movie, which this like
371
00:22:04,680 --> 00:22:08,640
is close enough to being a real
time movie, we don't have to do
372
00:22:08,640 --> 00:22:10,800
a real time movie and A1 take
movie.
373
00:22:10,800 --> 00:22:14,320
So it begs the question of like,
why are we doing the one shot
374
00:22:14,320 --> 00:22:18,360
thing?
And I I think if I was Sam
375
00:22:18,360 --> 00:22:19,960
Mendes, the way I would answer
that.
376
00:22:19,960 --> 00:22:25,840
It's like I'm trying to
replicate the, I don't know,
377
00:22:25,840 --> 00:22:30,120
like the, the rhythms of the day
in the life of a soldier where
378
00:22:30,120 --> 00:22:33,400
it's like nothing's happening
and then everything's happening.
379
00:22:33,760 --> 00:22:37,480
And I don't want to introduce
cuts to kind of speed up that
380
00:22:37,480 --> 00:22:39,600
timeline.
I want to give a sense of like,
381
00:22:40,080 --> 00:22:43,160
we are always on edge.
There is danger lurking around
382
00:22:43,160 --> 00:22:45,360
every corner.
Even as I walk across this
383
00:22:45,360 --> 00:22:47,640
field, a shot could ring out and
I could be dead.
384
00:22:47,920 --> 00:22:51,960
And I want to keep the audience
on their toes by giving them so
385
00:22:51,960 --> 00:22:54,560
much visual information to
process all the time that they
386
00:22:54,560 --> 00:22:56,640
have to keep looking in the
corners of the frame or
387
00:22:56,640 --> 00:23:00,400
whatever.
I just wonder, like, does the
388
00:23:00,400 --> 00:23:04,120
gimmick get in the way of the
story they're trying to tell?
389
00:23:04,840 --> 00:23:09,080
Or on the other hand, is there
not enough story to tell in this
390
00:23:09,080 --> 00:23:11,040
movie?
And so you noticed the gimmick
391
00:23:11,040 --> 00:23:15,720
more.
All I know is as you were
392
00:23:15,720 --> 00:23:18,760
talking, something you said made
me think about like, yeah,
393
00:23:18,760 --> 00:23:20,720
though I walk through the valley
of the shadow of death.
394
00:23:21,160 --> 00:23:24,160
Can you imagine the trailer for
this where one of the characters
395
00:23:24,160 --> 00:23:30,960
is like is overdubbing the
reading Psalm 23 and like just
396
00:23:31,160 --> 00:23:37,000
slowly backs out from like a
nice white flowery field to show
397
00:23:37,000 --> 00:23:40,400
like the trenches and the no
man's land.
398
00:23:40,760 --> 00:23:42,960
And it's like right as AH dude,
what a trailer.
399
00:23:42,960 --> 00:23:45,000
No, but it would have to be one
of those trailers they do now
400
00:23:45,000 --> 00:23:48,480
where there's like a sad piano
version of a song and it's just
401
00:23:48,480 --> 00:23:53,960
like one piano note that's going
like, and it's got the guy
402
00:23:53,960 --> 00:23:57,520
singing like, I'm going there to
see my.
403
00:23:58,800 --> 00:24:03,280
And then he's just like Benedict
Cumberbatch reciting Psalm 23.
404
00:24:03,280 --> 00:24:04,680
And that's the trailer for the
movie.
405
00:24:05,400 --> 00:24:08,200
Dude, and it would be epic and I
don't know how we don't work in
406
00:24:08,200 --> 00:24:10,920
the industry.
I Yes, we have solved every
407
00:24:10,920 --> 00:24:13,160
problem with this film already.
Oh.
408
00:24:13,160 --> 00:24:16,560
Man, the gimmick, the gimmick
like works.
409
00:24:16,560 --> 00:24:19,360
That's I think that's the weird
thing is I don't think he should
410
00:24:19,360 --> 00:24:25,160
have made this A1 shot movie and
yet I think it works like to
411
00:24:25,160 --> 00:24:27,480
capture the story that they
wrote.
412
00:24:27,520 --> 00:24:31,200
I do think that this was an
effective use of the camera
413
00:24:31,920 --> 00:24:37,120
because it allows you to feel
the totality of what he goes
414
00:24:37,120 --> 00:24:41,880
through.
It allows you to feel the weight
415
00:24:42,040 --> 00:24:45,280
of what he has seen by the end
of the film.
416
00:24:45,280 --> 00:24:49,840
Man, when he meets Blake's
brother, which you know, the
417
00:24:49,880 --> 00:24:52,200
Lance Corporal.
Blake dies about halfway through
418
00:24:52,200 --> 00:24:55,160
the film when he meets his
brother and tells him that he
419
00:24:55,160 --> 00:24:57,800
was a good man and that he told
funny stories.
420
00:24:58,360 --> 00:25:01,920
Like, you feel that impact
because you've spent time with
421
00:25:01,920 --> 00:25:04,440
Blake, you've heard him tell a
few funny stories.
422
00:25:04,840 --> 00:25:07,880
You you have an understanding of
his character and how
423
00:25:07,880 --> 00:25:10,680
devastating it would be to hear
about his laws.
424
00:25:10,960 --> 00:25:13,880
Well, and I think that again,
that's it's one of the benefits
425
00:25:13,880 --> 00:25:17,520
of the not ever cutting away
thing that like the actor who
426
00:25:17,520 --> 00:25:20,280
plays his older brother is
always in the shot there after
427
00:25:20,280 --> 00:25:23,480
the news is delivered and and
Scofield kind of starts walking
428
00:25:23,480 --> 00:25:27,000
away and you watch the guy kind
of receded into the background,
429
00:25:27,000 --> 00:25:28,880
but he's still grappling with
the news.
430
00:25:29,120 --> 00:25:31,680
And then he comes back and and
tells him he was a good man.
431
00:25:31,680 --> 00:25:34,880
He saved my life.
Watching the emotions get
432
00:25:34,880 --> 00:25:39,360
processed in real time and and
being forced to sit with them I
433
00:25:39,360 --> 00:25:43,160
think really does make this a a
much more emotionally impactful
434
00:25:43,160 --> 00:25:47,200
movie than it got credit for.
I found myself really overcome
435
00:25:47,200 --> 00:25:48,720
with emotion at the end of this
film.
436
00:25:49,400 --> 00:25:52,480
And Brad, you know, before we go
to break, we haven't, we haven't
437
00:25:52,480 --> 00:25:55,040
really talked about anything
except Sam Mendes and the
438
00:25:55,040 --> 00:25:58,720
gimmick yet.
But like, I have found lately
439
00:25:59,200 --> 00:26:02,720
that it's harder and harder for
me to watch war movies.
440
00:26:03,520 --> 00:26:06,040
There's a movie that just came
out this past weekend from the
441
00:26:06,120 --> 00:26:08,240
film maker Alex Garland called
Warfare.
442
00:26:08,640 --> 00:26:11,800
And it is based on a true story.
And it is, it's not a one shot
443
00:26:11,800 --> 00:26:14,040
movie, but from my
understanding, it's a near real
444
00:26:14,040 --> 00:26:19,160
time movie that is a true story
about these American soldiers
445
00:26:19,160 --> 00:26:21,920
and I believe Iraq trying to get
out of being pinned down.
446
00:26:21,960 --> 00:26:23,520
And that's it.
That's the whole movie.
447
00:26:23,880 --> 00:26:25,520
It's supposed to be absolutely
brutal.
448
00:26:25,800 --> 00:26:28,840
And it is being hailed as one of
the best war movies of the last,
449
00:26:28,880 --> 00:26:33,800
you know, 10-15 years.
And I have tried to get myself
450
00:26:34,000 --> 00:26:37,160
up to seeing it the last four
nights in a row.
451
00:26:37,760 --> 00:26:40,600
And I just can't do it, man.
I just for some reason, I can't
452
00:26:40,600 --> 00:26:45,320
bring myself to get motivated to
watch something as heavy as a
453
00:26:45,320 --> 00:26:48,040
war movie.
And I think to this movie's
454
00:26:48,040 --> 00:26:52,160
credit, yes, there's a gimmick.
Yes, there's a video game kind
455
00:26:52,160 --> 00:26:58,000
of element to it, but it never
shies away from how emotionally
456
00:26:58,640 --> 00:27:02,240
distressing all of this is.
This was a this was quite a
457
00:27:02,440 --> 00:27:05,000
challenging experience to sit
through for me, Brad.
458
00:27:06,280 --> 00:27:10,640
For me, it's those moments where
he, like, puts his hand inside
459
00:27:10,640 --> 00:27:14,960
of a corpse or he's crawling
over the bloated corpses of
460
00:27:14,960 --> 00:27:20,560
peasants who are in the river,
that when he's like, weeping as
461
00:27:20,560 --> 00:27:23,400
he crawls out of the river.
Or at the end of the film, when
462
00:27:23,400 --> 00:27:26,720
he sits against the tree and
like you just see him completely
463
00:27:26,720 --> 00:27:31,520
drained of life.
You understand why he gave away
464
00:27:31,520 --> 00:27:37,400
his medal for a bottle of wine.
You get the angst that he has
465
00:27:37,640 --> 00:27:42,360
with Blake and I this time
through the first time I saw it,
466
00:27:42,360 --> 00:27:48,000
I I don't think I appreciated
the relational element of this
467
00:27:48,000 --> 00:27:53,800
movie as much this time through
it, it felt way more relational
468
00:27:53,800 --> 00:27:58,080
than it had there.
There's that piece of youth with
469
00:27:58,080 --> 00:28:01,640
Blake that you don't have with
Schofield, even though they both
470
00:28:01,640 --> 00:28:05,840
look to be the exact same age.
And, and, and that was wild to
471
00:28:05,840 --> 00:28:09,600
me how young they looked.
And you know, that there's all
472
00:28:09,600 --> 00:28:12,280
sorts of things that, you know,
talk about sending off our young
473
00:28:12,280 --> 00:28:15,240
men to war.
Like, I don't know if I'm just
474
00:28:15,240 --> 00:28:17,200
getting older.
You know, I'm 34 now.
475
00:28:17,960 --> 00:28:22,320
These they look like children,
like maybe 20 years old.
476
00:28:22,760 --> 00:28:26,040
Yeah, well, and, and we can talk
about the performances when we
477
00:28:26,040 --> 00:28:28,520
get back from break.
I will say right up front
478
00:28:28,520 --> 00:28:32,840
though, George Mackay I think is
a perfect leading man for this
479
00:28:32,840 --> 00:28:35,440
movie.
And how do I say this about
480
00:28:35,440 --> 00:28:38,480
someone's looks?
He looks like pictures I've seen
481
00:28:38,480 --> 00:28:40,280
of World War One veterans like
you.
482
00:28:40,400 --> 00:28:41,760
You know what?
There's a famous one that's
483
00:28:41,760 --> 00:28:44,840
floated around of like what a
guy looked like before he went
484
00:28:44,840 --> 00:28:46,760
in the trenches.
And the picture they took of him
485
00:28:46,760 --> 00:28:50,560
like 4 years later and he just
has like these hollowed out eyes
486
00:28:50,560 --> 00:28:54,440
with that 1000 yard stare.
It's a combination of just his
487
00:28:54,440 --> 00:28:56,600
facial structure and the make up
in the movie.
488
00:28:56,840 --> 00:29:00,720
But like he has that.
And when they show him at the
489
00:29:00,720 --> 00:29:03,640
beginning of the movie, you can
already tell just by the way
490
00:29:03,640 --> 00:29:07,520
he's presented to us looks wise.
This is a guy who has seen some
491
00:29:07,520 --> 00:29:09,400
shit.
And I think that there's like
492
00:29:09,440 --> 00:29:13,760
there's a real authenticity
there that, you know, his his
493
00:29:13,760 --> 00:29:16,800
partner doesn't have because
he's like a much more fresh
494
00:29:16,800 --> 00:29:19,640
faced, you know, and the and
Scofield even tells him like,
495
00:29:19,640 --> 00:29:23,160
you weren't there when we went
through this horrific battle.
496
00:29:23,280 --> 00:29:26,200
I'm telling you, dude, it's not
fun, right?
497
00:29:26,200 --> 00:29:29,000
And and I think that the
character design really helps
498
00:29:29,000 --> 00:29:31,120
that.
Absolutely.
499
00:29:31,200 --> 00:29:35,280
I, I couldn't get over the fact
that I thought I felt like
500
00:29:35,280 --> 00:29:41,000
George McKay looked so much like
Alan Ruck from Ferris Bueller's
501
00:29:41,000 --> 00:29:44,160
Day Off.
Like, there was something about
502
00:29:44,160 --> 00:29:48,040
his facial shape that I was just
like, Oh, yeah, this is like if,
503
00:29:48,560 --> 00:29:51,280
you know, Cameron got stuck in
World War 1.
504
00:29:52,880 --> 00:29:55,360
There's an actor who's come up
the past couple years who's
505
00:29:55,360 --> 00:30:00,400
gotten like moderately famous
working in like indie movies
506
00:30:00,400 --> 00:30:03,080
that have made a big splash.
His name's Harris Dickinson and
507
00:30:03,080 --> 00:30:06,440
he's like 6 foot two in a
supermodel basically.
508
00:30:06,720 --> 00:30:10,000
But he is like, I, I think he's
trying to market correct George
509
00:30:10,000 --> 00:30:12,840
McKay in real time.
And George McKay is also been
510
00:30:12,840 --> 00:30:15,080
trying to like make a name for
himself in indie movies.
511
00:30:15,400 --> 00:30:18,800
And it's really fascinating to
watch the two of those guys get
512
00:30:18,800 --> 00:30:23,120
put in movies since 1917.
I really liked George McKay in
513
00:30:23,120 --> 00:30:24,960
this movie.
I'm wishing good things for his
514
00:30:24,960 --> 00:30:27,520
career.
Like I said, Brad, let's dive
515
00:30:27,520 --> 00:30:30,200
into the specifics of the
performances after the break.
516
00:30:30,680 --> 00:30:33,760
But talking about war movies and
how stressful they are has
517
00:30:33,760 --> 00:30:35,240
really made me want to take a
drink.
518
00:30:35,240 --> 00:30:38,600
What do you say if we tried this
Hirsch departure single ball?
519
00:30:39,680 --> 00:30:43,080
Oh, I found a few facts about
the amount of alcohol that was
520
00:30:43,080 --> 00:30:47,760
like prescribed to soldiers and
like, dude, if you were about to
521
00:30:47,760 --> 00:30:52,520
go over the line, it was like a
double ration per day for like
522
00:30:52,520 --> 00:30:55,040
the three days leading up to it.
As it should be.
523
00:30:56,280 --> 00:30:58,080
Oh man, let's drink some
whiskey, dude.
524
00:31:04,240 --> 00:31:06,680
All right, so today we're
looking at Hirsch Selected
525
00:31:06,680 --> 00:31:10,240
Whiskey's The Departure.
This is an American single malt
526
00:31:10,240 --> 00:31:12,600
whiskey.
It is the first single malt
527
00:31:12,600 --> 00:31:16,200
released by the Hirsch Company,
which is owned by Hotelling and
528
00:31:16,200 --> 00:31:18,840
Company, an importer and
distiller based out of San
529
00:31:18,840 --> 00:31:21,200
Francisco.
They are very popular in the
530
00:31:21,200 --> 00:31:25,160
American craft whiskey scene.
They were known for a long time
531
00:31:25,360 --> 00:31:29,080
for their old Potrero line.
There's a there's a ton of back
532
00:31:29,080 --> 00:31:31,160
story on Hodling if you want to
read about it.
533
00:31:31,160 --> 00:31:35,000
I found a very long article that
was super enlightening to me,
534
00:31:35,000 --> 00:31:37,800
but probably not necessary to
share the entire history of this
535
00:31:37,800 --> 00:31:41,560
company on our podcast, except
to say, Brad, this is the first
536
00:31:41,560 --> 00:31:44,880
Hirsch product we've had.
Like I said, they're known for
537
00:31:44,880 --> 00:31:49,120
their rye whiskey.
So we're we're joining them as
538
00:31:49,120 --> 00:31:50,920
they start to branch out into
other things.
539
00:31:50,920 --> 00:31:54,200
So it's it's kind of cool
because I don't know how much of
540
00:31:54,280 --> 00:31:57,240
A departure this actually is for
them because I'm not even
541
00:31:57,240 --> 00:32:01,880
familiar with their rise.
The real question is, could you
542
00:32:02,240 --> 00:32:06,560
tell the entire history of their
brand in one take?
543
00:32:07,400 --> 00:32:09,760
No, I could get close though.
Oh.
544
00:32:09,920 --> 00:32:11,800
It's very interesting, yeah,
yeah.
545
00:32:11,800 --> 00:32:14,760
There's a there's breweries in
their past, there's name
546
00:32:14,760 --> 00:32:17,480
changes, there's different
labels, they've moved locations,
547
00:32:17,640 --> 00:32:19,280
lots going on over there.
So it.
548
00:32:19,320 --> 00:32:22,240
Sounds like half the new
distilleries.
549
00:32:22,760 --> 00:32:25,520
Yeah, pretty much man.
It says in their press release
550
00:32:25,520 --> 00:32:28,360
that they started working on
this product back in 2015
551
00:32:28,360 --> 00:32:31,480
because they'd wanting to been,
they have been wanting to work
552
00:32:31,480 --> 00:32:34,360
with barley for a long time.
So this is 10 years in the
553
00:32:34,360 --> 00:32:36,920
making.
It's obviously not a 10 year age
554
00:32:36,920 --> 00:32:39,480
stated product, Brad.
It's non age stated.
555
00:32:39,760 --> 00:32:43,840
It is 100% malted barley though.
I'm excited to dive in man.
556
00:32:43,840 --> 00:32:47,240
American single malt is really
growing these last few years and
557
00:32:47,240 --> 00:32:49,040
this is just another welcome
addition for me.
558
00:32:49,200 --> 00:32:52,640
Absolutely.
I I love seeing American
559
00:32:52,640 --> 00:32:57,480
distilleries dive into new areas
like American single malt.
560
00:32:57,640 --> 00:32:59,760
I think it's a brand worth
pursuing.
561
00:33:00,440 --> 00:33:02,920
And I'm, I'm excited to go over
this Hirsch with you, Bob.
562
00:33:02,920 --> 00:33:07,160
I've already tried it and I
would I'm pretty impressed
563
00:33:07,160 --> 00:33:09,160
overall.
That's my initial impression.
564
00:33:09,640 --> 00:33:12,080
All right, so here's what I'm
seeing about it, Brad, and this
565
00:33:12,080 --> 00:33:14,240
is the last thing I'll say
before we actually dive in.
566
00:33:14,440 --> 00:33:17,360
I see two different quotes.
One of them say it says that the
567
00:33:17,360 --> 00:33:23,680
departure was aged for 6 plus
years in 24 month air dried 53
568
00:33:23,680 --> 00:33:27,080
gallon American oak barrels.
And then it also says that it's
569
00:33:27,080 --> 00:33:31,720
double distilled in copper pot
stills and aged for six years
570
00:33:31,720 --> 00:33:36,080
and nine months in new char #3
and toasted American oak
571
00:33:36,080 --> 00:33:37,800
barrels.
So there we go.
572
00:33:37,800 --> 00:33:40,320
Six years, nine months, two
kinds of barrels.
573
00:33:40,320 --> 00:33:44,040
Let's freaking dive in, Brad.
It definitely smells like
574
00:33:44,040 --> 00:33:45,960
American craft whiskey on the
nose.
575
00:33:45,960 --> 00:33:48,640
And if you've been a fan of
craft whiskey, you know exactly
576
00:33:48,640 --> 00:33:52,040
what I mean.
Even at six years old, there's
577
00:33:52,040 --> 00:33:53,680
quite a bit of graininess to
this.
578
00:33:53,680 --> 00:33:56,160
There's quite a bit of raw
grain, and it smells a bit
579
00:33:56,160 --> 00:33:57,920
young.
I get a bit of yeast on this.
580
00:33:58,160 --> 00:34:01,040
But other than that, this is
right in line with what we've
581
00:34:01,040 --> 00:34:03,920
come to expect from American
craft whiskey, I would say.
582
00:34:04,440 --> 00:34:08,880
Absolutely.
I think the nose has a lot of
583
00:34:08,880 --> 00:34:13,040
barley It it reminds me of like
Cheerios there.
584
00:34:13,040 --> 00:34:17,159
There's a little bit of like a
cherry stone fruit cordial kind
585
00:34:17,159 --> 00:34:19,719
of vibe.
There's it gets a little bit
586
00:34:19,719 --> 00:34:22,480
nutty for me.
There's some almonds going on
587
00:34:22,480 --> 00:34:24,560
here.
I really like this.
588
00:34:24,560 --> 00:34:29,880
For me, it's not especially
crafty, if you will.
589
00:34:30,600 --> 00:34:33,880
It like it has a little bit of
that craft whiskey vibe, but not
590
00:34:33,880 --> 00:34:36,480
nearly enough to derail it.
I'm going to give it an 8 out of
591
00:34:36,480 --> 00:34:39,199
10 on the nose.
Yeah, I think I'm in a 7 1/2,
592
00:34:39,199 --> 00:34:42,000
but this is very positive
because, and I don't know if
593
00:34:42,000 --> 00:34:44,560
it's just because they're used
to working with rye, which is a
594
00:34:44,560 --> 00:34:48,920
very tricky grain to work with,
but this, this has that sort of
595
00:34:48,920 --> 00:34:51,239
youthful note on the nose.
But underlying it, they've
596
00:34:51,239 --> 00:34:53,679
gotten some really nice baking
spices.
597
00:34:53,920 --> 00:34:57,800
There's a lot of caramel here.
It smells like a a sweeter rye
598
00:34:57,800 --> 00:35:00,560
whiskey on like what's
underlying that grain.
599
00:35:00,680 --> 00:35:03,200
I get a little bit of like, oat
as well, which is the grain that
600
00:35:03,200 --> 00:35:05,040
we don't often get in our mash
bills.
601
00:35:05,040 --> 00:35:07,880
But yeah, Cheerios was a really
good note here, Brad.
602
00:35:07,880 --> 00:35:11,640
It's both like a little bit
yeasty bready, but also like a
603
00:35:11,640 --> 00:35:15,200
sweetened breakfast cereal. 7
1/2 I think is a good baseline
604
00:35:15,200 --> 00:35:18,200
for this.
When I got into the palate, all
605
00:35:18,200 --> 00:35:19,880
the things we talked about were
there.
606
00:35:19,880 --> 00:35:23,240
It turned the fruitiness turned
into like an apricot vibe.
607
00:35:24,120 --> 00:35:28,360
There's a little bit of cocoa.
The overwhelming note I got on
608
00:35:28,360 --> 00:35:33,480
the palate was green tea.
There's like this, this thing
609
00:35:33,480 --> 00:35:40,440
was like a green tea bomb with
like a little bit of a glaze of
610
00:35:40,440 --> 00:35:47,280
kind of like a caramelized
apricot like jam almost a really
611
00:35:47,280 --> 00:35:50,920
interesting combination of like
a fruity green tea.
612
00:35:51,280 --> 00:35:52,840
I thought it was very
fascinating.
613
00:35:52,840 --> 00:35:56,280
Not necessarily like my favorite
flavor.
614
00:35:56,280 --> 00:36:01,920
Wheelhouse Green tea is not my
go to but I I I do still like
615
00:36:01,920 --> 00:36:03,840
it, I'll give it a 7 1/2 out of
10.
616
00:36:04,200 --> 00:36:06,520
I really like this man.
I, I'm not getting the green
617
00:36:06,520 --> 00:36:08,200
tea.
And let me ask you this because,
618
00:36:08,520 --> 00:36:11,320
you know, tea is often used to
explain to people like what
619
00:36:11,320 --> 00:36:15,720
tannins are and how a a wine or
a whiskey can have that tannic
620
00:36:15,720 --> 00:36:18,200
effect where it kind of sucks
the moisture out of your mouth.
621
00:36:18,840 --> 00:36:21,120
Did you have that effect
drinking it or was it more just
622
00:36:21,120 --> 00:36:23,680
flavour?
No, it was just the flavour.
623
00:36:23,680 --> 00:36:26,720
OK, OK, like it.
It really reminded me back when
624
00:36:26,720 --> 00:36:29,640
I lived in Philly, I would
occasionally drink green tea
625
00:36:29,640 --> 00:36:31,360
because that's the only thing we
had in the house.
626
00:36:32,720 --> 00:36:35,520
And I just, it's I didn't
dislike it.
627
00:36:35,520 --> 00:36:37,880
Like it was good enough that,
you know, you had a little honey
628
00:36:37,880 --> 00:36:41,720
in there and it's a nice winter
drink.
629
00:36:42,360 --> 00:36:45,200
It's just not my favorite.
It's not, it's not in my
630
00:36:45,200 --> 00:36:49,120
wheelhouse preferred.
So the flavor was there.
631
00:36:49,400 --> 00:36:52,760
Not my favorite, but it was
definitely noticeable for me.
632
00:36:53,280 --> 00:36:55,720
I really like this man.
And I'm not quite getting the
633
00:36:55,720 --> 00:36:57,640
same notes you are.
I'm not getting as much stone
634
00:36:57,640 --> 00:36:59,520
fruit and I'm definitely not
getting green tea.
635
00:36:59,720 --> 00:37:02,400
Your note of Coco, I think is
like the predominant thing for
636
00:37:02,400 --> 00:37:05,880
me.
I want to say, oh man, four or
637
00:37:05,880 --> 00:37:10,160
five seasons ago we tried a
specialty bourbon from Woodford
638
00:37:10,160 --> 00:37:12,800
Reserve that was made with what
they called like chocolate malt.
639
00:37:13,440 --> 00:37:16,080
And I, I don't remember getting
a lot of chocolate on that, but
640
00:37:16,080 --> 00:37:17,520
that's kind of what this is for
me.
641
00:37:17,520 --> 00:37:20,680
It's chocolate malt.
It's it's lots of interesting
642
00:37:20,680 --> 00:37:22,960
grains coming out.
I'm getting that oat again.
643
00:37:22,960 --> 00:37:27,800
I'm getting like when we first
tried watershed distillery and
644
00:37:27,800 --> 00:37:30,720
they were using spelt like it
just tastes like a bunch of
645
00:37:30,720 --> 00:37:33,600
funky grains went into this.
I know they obviously didn't,
646
00:37:33,960 --> 00:37:36,920
but it it has that sort of vibe
where it's like this is
647
00:37:36,920 --> 00:37:39,160
something completely different
flavor wise.
648
00:37:39,400 --> 00:37:44,040
And we've layered over that
really dark cacao nibs and then
649
00:37:44,040 --> 00:37:47,320
like a ton of cinnamon and like
cayenne pepper.
650
00:37:47,320 --> 00:37:50,600
It's almost like a Mexican hot
chocolate, but unsweetened and
651
00:37:50,600 --> 00:37:52,840
then like layered over raw
grains.
652
00:37:53,000 --> 00:37:54,800
Super good.
I'm going to give it an 8 out of
653
00:37:54,800 --> 00:37:57,920
10 on the palate, Brad.
And then on the finish, I think
654
00:37:57,920 --> 00:38:00,200
it's more of the same.
It's a really mouth watering
655
00:38:00,200 --> 00:38:03,280
finish.
There's a ton of tingle on the
656
00:38:03,280 --> 00:38:06,520
tongue with this, like it's real
spicy and at coming.
657
00:38:06,560 --> 00:38:08,640
Jingle, don't you, Bob?
Yeah, I do, man.
658
00:38:08,840 --> 00:38:11,640
It comes in at 98 proof, and I
think a drink's actually a
659
00:38:11,640 --> 00:38:14,640
little bit hotter than that.
Not in a bad way, but you could
660
00:38:14,640 --> 00:38:17,600
have convinced me this was like
100 and five 107 proof.
661
00:38:18,320 --> 00:38:21,440
I'm a huge fan of this, Brad.
I'm going to give it an 8 out of
662
00:38:21,440 --> 00:38:24,400
10 again on the finish.
I'm with you on the finish.
663
00:38:24,400 --> 00:38:27,960
Eight out of 10 for me.
The barley really like sits
664
00:38:27,960 --> 00:38:31,080
there and just lingers for a
long time.
665
00:38:31,400 --> 00:38:35,320
The apricot sticks around, the
green tea sticks around, the the
666
00:38:35,320 --> 00:38:40,480
cacao almost turns into like a
creamy dark chocolate the longer
667
00:38:40,480 --> 00:38:42,560
it sits on my palate, which I
really like.
668
00:38:43,280 --> 00:38:46,680
So like I said, I'm an 8 out of
10 there balance wise.
669
00:38:46,680 --> 00:38:50,960
I think I'll give it a 7 1/2.
I think that they this takes you
670
00:38:51,000 --> 00:38:55,280
on a very interesting journey.
I don't know if it all works
671
00:38:55,280 --> 00:38:59,240
perfectly together, but I do
like where it takes me overall.
672
00:38:59,280 --> 00:39:02,560
So 7 1/2 for me on balance.
Yeah, I'm going to give it a 7
673
00:39:02,560 --> 00:39:04,720
1/2 as well.
I and I don't think that it's an
674
00:39:04,720 --> 00:39:06,640
indicator that like anything's
off here.
675
00:39:07,000 --> 00:39:09,600
And what I really love about
American Single Malt Brat is
676
00:39:09,600 --> 00:39:13,560
that from distillery to
distillery it, it's almost like,
677
00:39:14,600 --> 00:39:16,400
I don't know, like when you go
to a winery and you're like,
678
00:39:16,400 --> 00:39:18,840
what's your house wine, right?
Like what do you make here?
679
00:39:18,840 --> 00:39:20,720
What, what like what's your
specialty?
680
00:39:21,560 --> 00:39:24,000
There's a distinct flavor and
taste.
681
00:39:24,000 --> 00:39:27,040
And I don't know if it's a
terroir thing, but like from the
682
00:39:27,040 --> 00:39:31,080
ones we've tried from up in like
Oregon, Washington, to this one
683
00:39:31,080 --> 00:39:35,200
in San Francisco, to some on the
East Coast, they're just very
684
00:39:35,200 --> 00:39:38,360
different flavor profiles.
And I like that a lot.
685
00:39:38,360 --> 00:39:40,800
And this is carving out its own
unique niche.
686
00:39:40,800 --> 00:39:45,640
So I'm giving it a 7 1/2 here.
Now on the value, the MSRP on
687
00:39:45,640 --> 00:39:50,320
this is 7499, which is a little
bit pricey for a six year
688
00:39:50,320 --> 00:39:52,760
whiskey.
But again, single mold is tricky
689
00:39:52,760 --> 00:39:56,520
to work with.
It's a new entry in America, you
690
00:39:56,520 --> 00:39:59,520
know, relatively new.
Obviously, I don't think this is
691
00:39:59,520 --> 00:40:02,200
exorbitant.
I think I'll give it a 7 out of
692
00:40:02,200 --> 00:40:05,440
10 on value.
I'm right there with you 7 out
693
00:40:05,440 --> 00:40:08,000
of 10.
This is a really interesting
694
00:40:08,000 --> 00:40:13,800
whiskey that like, I love being
curious about whiskeys, Bob.
695
00:40:14,320 --> 00:40:17,880
Like we it's been a while since
we had a whiskey that really
696
00:40:17,880 --> 00:40:22,840
piqued my curiosity.
I'm coming to a 38 out of 50.
697
00:40:22,920 --> 00:40:26,200
I'm in the same spot, 38.
I think that if I have to give a
698
00:40:26,200 --> 00:40:29,920
caveat on this, this is the kind
of whiskey that you and I pull
699
00:40:29,920 --> 00:40:32,720
off the shelf because it's like
a fascinating whiskey.
700
00:40:32,880 --> 00:40:36,840
Like we've tried 5 or 600
whiskeys over the course of this
701
00:40:36,840 --> 00:40:39,160
podcast.
This one I'm going to remember,
702
00:40:39,440 --> 00:40:41,160
right?
Not because it's bad, but it's
703
00:40:41,160 --> 00:40:43,480
just different.
And I don't know that I would
704
00:40:43,480 --> 00:40:46,120
give this to somebody who's
getting into like single malt of
705
00:40:46,120 --> 00:40:49,960
any variety for the first time.
It's not like it's just not a
706
00:40:49,960 --> 00:40:53,000
good entry point because it's so
far outside the wheelhouse of
707
00:40:53,000 --> 00:40:57,720
what you typically expect.
All that said, I'm nearing a 40
708
00:40:57,720 --> 00:40:59,360
on this.
This is like a no brainer.
709
00:40:59,360 --> 00:41:01,360
Thumbs up for me.
If you get a chance to try this
710
00:41:01,640 --> 00:41:05,920
and you're feeling adventurous,
go all the way in on this man.
711
00:41:06,680 --> 00:41:10,160
Yeah, I'm with you 100%.
This is a really interesting
712
00:41:10,160 --> 00:41:12,800
whiskey.
Hirsch, I think has departed
713
00:41:12,800 --> 00:41:15,480
well.
At the very least, the beginning
714
00:41:15,480 --> 00:41:17,160
of their adventure is going
well.
715
00:41:17,160 --> 00:41:21,280
So well done, Hirsch.
The departure American Single
716
00:41:21,280 --> 00:41:22,880
Wall is a product to be proud
of.
717
00:41:23,240 --> 00:41:26,440
The fact that this wasn't
available when we reviewed the
718
00:41:26,440 --> 00:41:29,960
departed is criminal, honestly.
It is.
719
00:41:29,960 --> 00:41:32,680
It is very unfortunate.
Making up for it, though, is the
720
00:41:32,680 --> 00:41:35,560
fact that we have a pretty good
movie today in 1917.
721
00:41:35,760 --> 00:41:37,240
Let's get back to talking about
that, Brad.
722
00:41:37,720 --> 00:41:42,920
Let's do it.
All right, everybody.
723
00:41:42,920 --> 00:41:47,720
That was Hirsch, the departure
American single malt, a whiskey
724
00:41:47,720 --> 00:41:51,680
that makes me want to drink more
American single malts, Bob.
725
00:41:51,680 --> 00:41:54,920
Not that my desire could have
already gotten much higher, but
726
00:41:54,920 --> 00:41:57,520
man, I'm excited.
Yeah, I like that a lot, man.
727
00:41:58,200 --> 00:42:01,120
I do wish we had found something
a little more European to pair
728
00:42:01,120 --> 00:42:02,640
it with.
This is like the second week in
729
00:42:02,640 --> 00:42:04,600
a row that I've said something
like that.
730
00:42:04,960 --> 00:42:06,920
It's also the second week in a
row, Brad, that we've had a
731
00:42:06,920 --> 00:42:11,160
movie shot by Roger Deakins.
I didn't even think about that
732
00:42:11,160 --> 00:42:13,000
till just now.
Prisoners and then this.
733
00:42:13,840 --> 00:42:16,680
The Deeks.
The Deeks, am I right?
734
00:42:19,360 --> 00:42:22,840
What a just what a great
cinematographer.
735
00:42:23,080 --> 00:42:26,200
Yeah, he really does just create
beautiful movies.
736
00:42:27,400 --> 00:42:30,680
You know what I create that is
things of beauty is my record at
737
00:42:30,680 --> 00:42:34,080
the end of every season at our
next game Brad, which we call 2
738
00:42:34,080 --> 00:42:36,800
facts every season, 2 facts and
a falsehood.
739
00:42:36,800 --> 00:42:43,680
Brad is going to try to stump
your ball. 2 are right and what
740
00:42:43,680 --> 00:42:47,960
is wrong?
2 facts and a falsehood. 2 Facts
741
00:42:47,960 --> 00:42:51,320
and a Falsehood is the part of
the show where Brad presents me
742
00:42:51,320 --> 00:42:55,200
with three items as fact about
the making of this movie, one of
743
00:42:55,200 --> 00:42:58,880
which is a complete lie.
Now I am coming off of a win
744
00:42:58,880 --> 00:43:03,040
last week, but I'm still trying
to balance out the two losses I
745
00:43:03,040 --> 00:43:06,560
got the week prior due to our
friend Patrick Williams
746
00:43:06,720 --> 00:43:11,640
absolutely leading me astray.
On one of the greatest, most
747
00:43:11,640 --> 00:43:14,800
well written falsehood in the
history of the podcast.
748
00:43:14,840 --> 00:43:17,680
I know, man, we actually had
somebody write into us to tell
749
00:43:17,680 --> 00:43:20,320
us what a good job you did.
And I was like, don't stroke his
750
00:43:20,320 --> 00:43:22,440
ego.
Then he's going to start putting
751
00:43:22,440 --> 00:43:24,600
effort into this, and I don't
want him to do that.
752
00:43:24,600 --> 00:43:26,960
I want my record to be
unblemished.
753
00:43:27,680 --> 00:43:29,600
I'm excited to blemish your
record again, Bob.
754
00:43:30,480 --> 00:43:32,800
All right man, hit me with those
two facts and a falsehood.
755
00:43:34,040 --> 00:43:39,040
Fact #1 in order to hide the
small edits throughout the film.
756
00:43:39,080 --> 00:43:42,800
Director Sir Sam Mendes.
We haven't mentioned that yet,
757
00:43:42,800 --> 00:43:44,160
Bob.
Oh, is there, Sir?
758
00:43:44,880 --> 00:43:47,760
He is.
But how can you argue with the
759
00:43:47,760 --> 00:43:49,600
Queen of England knighting this
man?
760
00:43:50,360 --> 00:43:51,800
That's right, you can't say he's
a bad.
761
00:43:51,800 --> 00:43:53,360
Director once he's been
knighted.
762
00:43:54,240 --> 00:43:57,320
He might have been knighted by
the king, you know, that's true,
763
00:43:57,560 --> 00:44:01,080
That's true.
Maybe it's a recent titular
764
00:44:01,080 --> 00:44:05,120
edition.
In order to hide the the edits
765
00:44:05,120 --> 00:44:10,040
throughout the film, director
Sir Sam Mendez chose to use only
766
00:44:10,040 --> 00:44:15,680
two lenses throughout the movie,
The 35mm for close-ups and some
767
00:44:15,680 --> 00:44:20,600
dialogue and the 24mm for the
majority of the wide angle
768
00:44:20,720 --> 00:44:24,720
arrays.
Fact #2 Throughout the shoot,
769
00:44:25,000 --> 00:44:28,120
the production had four basic
rigs that were always at the
770
00:44:28,120 --> 00:44:30,800
ready to be able to take
advantage of the changeable
771
00:44:30,800 --> 00:44:37,120
weather conditions as well as
having a chief meteorologist on
772
00:44:37,120 --> 00:44:43,120
location the entire film.
Fact #3 This was the first
773
00:44:43,120 --> 00:44:46,800
prestige war film to be
nominated for the Academy Award
774
00:44:47,480 --> 00:44:50,400
for Best Visual Effects in
nearly 50 years.
775
00:44:50,400 --> 00:44:54,000
The last Prestige War films to
be nominated were Patton from
776
00:44:54,000 --> 00:44:58,720
1970 and Tora Tora Tora from
1970, with the latter film
777
00:44:58,720 --> 00:45:02,600
taking the prize.
While you were reading fact
778
00:45:02,600 --> 00:45:05,600
number one, I was looking up
when Sam Mendes got knighted,
779
00:45:06,720 --> 00:45:10,560
2019.
So it was the queen, it was Her
780
00:45:10,560 --> 00:45:13,120
Majesty.
A very astute woman.
781
00:45:13,160 --> 00:45:16,960
Yeah, so I need you to re read
the back half of fact number one
782
00:45:16,960 --> 00:45:19,360
for me real quick.
Something about millimeters is
783
00:45:19,360 --> 00:45:23,680
all I heard.
He he used the only used 2
784
00:45:23,680 --> 00:45:26,160
lenses throughout the film to
keep continuity.
785
00:45:26,520 --> 00:45:29,760
Oh nice, the 35 for close-ups
and dialogue.
786
00:45:29,760 --> 00:45:31,920
The 24 for like wide angle
stuff.
787
00:45:34,840 --> 00:45:41,960
OK, let's see.
I think #2 sounds true enough #3
788
00:45:41,960 --> 00:45:47,280
sounds a little bit dicey to me.
I I can't remember much of the
789
00:45:47,280 --> 00:45:49,400
movie Patton.
I don't think they had very many
790
00:45:49,400 --> 00:45:51,680
visual effects in it.
Maybe it did, Maybe it.
791
00:45:51,800 --> 00:45:53,640
Was just the opening speech and
patent.
792
00:45:53,760 --> 00:45:58,400
Yeah, then you come to find out
that that flag entirely CGI,
793
00:45:58,480 --> 00:46:01,000
that's what got it nominated.
That that was it.
794
00:46:02,840 --> 00:46:05,280
Was Saving Private Ryan
nominated for visual effects?
795
00:46:05,280 --> 00:46:10,360
I don't think so.
I think it's either one or
796
00:46:10,360 --> 00:46:14,760
three.
I'm leaning towards 3, but I'm
797
00:46:14,760 --> 00:46:18,480
also wondering how how Rodger
Deakins could have switched
798
00:46:18,480 --> 00:46:22,360
lenses during long takes even if
he is floating into a close up
799
00:46:22,360 --> 00:46:24,360
or or panning back out.
You know what?
800
00:46:24,360 --> 00:46:26,280
No, I'm going to say #1 is the
falsehood.
801
00:46:27,040 --> 00:46:30,320
I have no idea if that's true or
not, but I'm going to stick with
802
00:46:30,320 --> 00:46:34,560
#1 Brad.
Bob, you are 100% correct.
803
00:46:34,600 --> 00:46:41,520
Yes, deacons used 1 lens for the
entire film being a 40mm.
804
00:46:41,720 --> 00:46:44,120
Lens that makes sense because
like you, otherwise you'd just
805
00:46:44,120 --> 00:46:46,360
see a hand to come in front of
the camera from time to time.
806
00:46:47,160 --> 00:46:51,560
Pop the lens off.
It's the hand of God just
807
00:46:51,560 --> 00:46:55,520
floating in to reorient us here.
All right, cool.
808
00:46:55,560 --> 00:46:58,360
So I I am back in the win
column.
809
00:46:58,360 --> 00:47:01,200
I've balanced out Patrick's
mistakes once again.
810
00:47:01,200 --> 00:47:03,960
Patrick Williams, you are on the
thinnest device, Sir.
811
00:47:04,960 --> 00:47:07,600
Brad, let's get back into
talking about 1917.
812
00:47:08,080 --> 00:47:12,280
And it seems weird to talk about
performances because this is
813
00:47:12,280 --> 00:47:16,400
just such a like, let's follow
some guys walking across a field
814
00:47:16,440 --> 00:47:18,600
kind of movie.
Yeah, they could have put you
815
00:47:18,600 --> 00:47:21,040
and I in there and it would have
been just as good of a movie.
816
00:47:21,760 --> 00:47:25,040
I mean, George McKay is in every
second of this movie, so like
817
00:47:25,040 --> 00:47:29,200
it, it's worth talking about.
I think he gives a really,
818
00:47:29,200 --> 00:47:33,520
really good performance because
at no point was I ever like this
819
00:47:33,520 --> 00:47:37,720
guy Seems like he's acting or he
didn't nail that emotional note.
820
00:47:38,120 --> 00:47:42,120
And I think for somebody to play
the spectrum of all the emotions
821
00:47:42,120 --> 00:47:45,320
he has to go through, that's
that's a pretty big feat of
822
00:47:45,320 --> 00:47:48,040
acting.
Dude, he nails it.
823
00:47:48,640 --> 00:47:53,320
Like I, I think Dean Charles
Chapman is like pretty good at
824
00:47:53,320 --> 00:47:55,840
like I don't really have any
complaints with him, but he
825
00:47:55,840 --> 00:48:01,600
didn't blow me away.
I think Makai has a, you said it
826
00:48:01,600 --> 00:48:04,040
earlier, man.
His face is haunted.
827
00:48:04,680 --> 00:48:13,160
And it's not just he's not just
experiencing like, oh, he, he
828
00:48:13,160 --> 00:48:16,040
hasn't become cynical.
It's not just like it's
829
00:48:16,040 --> 00:48:20,120
ingrained in his face, but you
see the the terrible things that
830
00:48:20,120 --> 00:48:25,720
happened to him on this specific
mission and journey, like deep
831
00:48:25,720 --> 00:48:30,960
in the horror, they take what
he's already experienced and
832
00:48:30,960 --> 00:48:33,440
make it worse.
And by the end of the film, you
833
00:48:33,440 --> 00:48:38,000
feel that in every inch of his
body language, his eyes, his
834
00:48:38,000 --> 00:48:42,480
face.
And yet, like the youth of
835
00:48:42,480 --> 00:48:45,680
Blake, seems to give him a
little bit of hope as well.
836
00:48:45,840 --> 00:48:50,000
And he plays all of that just
incredibly well.
837
00:48:50,240 --> 00:48:53,480
Yeah, no, I totally agree.
And I think that the film is at
838
00:48:53,480 --> 00:48:57,360
its weakest when it gives anyone
else a line of dialogue beside
839
00:48:57,600 --> 00:49:00,440
those two people.
Like especially the decision to
840
00:49:00,440 --> 00:49:04,760
put prominent British actors in
kind of four of the main roles
841
00:49:04,760 --> 00:49:08,720
of authority in the movie.
So you've got Colin Firth shows
842
00:49:08,720 --> 00:49:12,000
up at the very beginning to give
the orders, then he runs into
843
00:49:12,000 --> 00:49:15,240
Andrew Scott right before they
go up into No Man's Land.
844
00:49:15,560 --> 00:49:17,960
And then halfway through the
movie they run across Mark
845
00:49:17,960 --> 00:49:19,640
Strong.
And then at the end of the movie
846
00:49:19,640 --> 00:49:23,040
you get Benedict Cumberbatch.
And I think that having those
847
00:49:23,040 --> 00:49:26,880
four people who are extremely
recognizable people at this
848
00:49:26,880 --> 00:49:31,800
point show up throughout the
film really took me out of it.
849
00:49:31,960 --> 00:49:34,480
I think the, the only one that
didn't was Colin Firth, because
850
00:49:34,480 --> 00:49:36,160
it's the very beginning of the
movie.
851
00:49:36,160 --> 00:49:38,360
So you, you know, you're just
like, oh, there's Colin Firth,
852
00:49:38,360 --> 00:49:40,800
and now he's gone.
You don't have the Matt Damon
853
00:49:40,800 --> 00:49:42,680
effect.
No, you don't, man.
854
00:49:42,800 --> 00:49:46,560
And like especially I think
Andrew Scott as the guy who's
855
00:49:46,560 --> 00:49:50,480
like F this like going to no
man's land if you want to.
856
00:49:50,920 --> 00:49:56,680
He was just a little bit outside
of like the comfort zone of like
857
00:49:57,240 --> 00:50:00,680
what Sam Mendes was directing.
He he went a little too Moriarty
858
00:50:00,680 --> 00:50:03,160
for me.
And it really pulled me out of
859
00:50:03,160 --> 00:50:05,560
that scene.
And I just kind of wish that
860
00:50:05,560 --> 00:50:08,440
Mendez had gone with like
everyone in this movie is an
861
00:50:08,440 --> 00:50:12,960
unknown or at best like a that
guy and not a person that I know
862
00:50:12,960 --> 00:50:14,360
their full name.
Yeah.
863
00:50:14,560 --> 00:50:19,520
And, and honestly, Mark Strong
was that for me where I like,
864
00:50:19,720 --> 00:50:23,440
he's not a famous enough movie
actor for me to be like, oh of
865
00:50:23,440 --> 00:50:27,240
course Mark Strong from these 7
movies.
866
00:50:27,600 --> 00:50:33,040
His voice was familiar and like
powerful enough that I thought
867
00:50:33,040 --> 00:50:39,800
he was the best of the four
known actors because he has so
868
00:50:39,800 --> 00:50:42,680
much compassion even as he is
leading.
869
00:50:43,000 --> 00:50:46,640
I I thought he knocked it out of
the park.
870
00:50:47,360 --> 00:50:51,960
Other than that, I felt like all
of them overacted and we're like
871
00:50:51,960 --> 00:50:54,720
doing too much.
Colin Firth was fine.
872
00:50:54,720 --> 00:50:58,480
I I agree that he benefits from
being so early on that you
873
00:50:58,480 --> 00:51:00,320
don't.
It's like, Oh yeah, a movie star
874
00:51:00,320 --> 00:51:01,160
in a movie.
Wow.
875
00:51:02,200 --> 00:51:05,920
It's when you get to Benedict
Cumberbatch that I'm like, OK,
876
00:51:06,000 --> 00:51:10,480
like there's a million no name
actors that you could have put
877
00:51:10,480 --> 00:51:13,760
here saved a bunch of money and
they could have gotten a little
878
00:51:13,760 --> 00:51:16,040
notoriety.
Like like Benedict Cumbrash
879
00:51:16,040 --> 00:51:18,720
didn't need this role and the
movie didn't need him in the
880
00:51:18,720 --> 00:51:21,440
role.
OK, here's I was not intending
881
00:51:21,440 --> 00:51:23,280
to ask a question this spicy
today.
882
00:51:24,720 --> 00:51:27,320
Are we entirely sure that
Benedict Cumberbatch is like a
883
00:51:27,320 --> 00:51:31,120
great actor?
And here's why I asked that the.
884
00:51:31,720 --> 00:51:36,520
Between 2 Ferns.
Well, he didn't have a British
885
00:51:36,520 --> 00:51:38,600
accent.
Would everybody realize that
886
00:51:38,600 --> 00:51:41,680
you're a terrible actor?
He's so good in Sherlock, but I
887
00:51:41,680 --> 00:51:45,760
think that he has to be in a
very outsized theatrical
888
00:51:45,760 --> 00:51:47,760
performance that calls attention
to himself.
889
00:51:47,760 --> 00:51:53,640
Not that he has a an oversized
acting style, but I just never
890
00:51:53,640 --> 00:51:57,160
feel like he's playing a
believable human being.
891
00:51:57,440 --> 00:52:00,880
I think he'd be really good
doing like Shakespeare, you know
892
00:52:00,880 --> 00:52:01,760
what I mean?
But like.
893
00:52:02,280 --> 00:52:04,640
Yeah.
Where you where where when you
894
00:52:04,640 --> 00:52:08,440
do like Hamlet or Macbeth
nowadays, you're not just trying
895
00:52:08,440 --> 00:52:10,600
to embody the character of Halen
or Macbeth.
896
00:52:10,600 --> 00:52:14,360
You're also like entering into
this meta conversation of like
897
00:52:15,760 --> 00:52:18,400
actors doing Macbeth.
And so you're like, wow, I'm
898
00:52:18,400 --> 00:52:19,800
watching something big right
now.
899
00:52:20,000 --> 00:52:22,400
I think he'd be good at that.
But when you put him in a role
900
00:52:22,400 --> 00:52:25,600
like this, it's like he's just
kind of trying to do like the
901
00:52:25,600 --> 00:52:28,760
Benedict Cumberbatch a little
bit too theatrical type
902
00:52:28,760 --> 00:52:31,440
performance.
And I don't know that I've ever
903
00:52:31,440 --> 00:52:35,240
seen him in a movie where I've
been like, wow, that is an
904
00:52:35,480 --> 00:52:37,880
incredible performance from
Benedict Cumberbatch.
905
00:52:38,840 --> 00:52:42,080
Here's the thing though.
I will come to Benedict's
906
00:52:42,360 --> 00:52:45,760
defense for this film
specifically, Let's just, let's
907
00:52:45,760 --> 00:52:48,120
just imagine something.
Bob, will you go with me
908
00:52:48,120 --> 00:52:50,120
somewhere in your imagination?
Sure.
909
00:52:50,840 --> 00:52:54,680
Just imagine.
Benedict is sitting down in the
910
00:52:54,680 --> 00:52:57,120
in the chair, getting his makeup
put on.
911
00:52:57,120 --> 00:53:01,520
Costume design, all the things.
And Sam is standing between him
912
00:53:01,520 --> 00:53:04,680
in the mirror and he's like, you
know, all right, all right,
913
00:53:04,680 --> 00:53:06,800
Benedict, we're, we're going to
take it easy.
914
00:53:06,840 --> 00:53:10,600
We're not going over the top.
You're just going to be a a firm
915
00:53:10,600 --> 00:53:12,600
commander who wants to end the
war.
916
00:53:12,600 --> 00:53:14,120
You really believe in what
you're doing.
917
00:53:14,120 --> 00:53:17,920
You're disappointed by what you
know Makai brings.
918
00:53:17,920 --> 00:53:20,200
You sound good, Ben.
Just like, yeah, you got it,
919
00:53:20,200 --> 00:53:22,760
man.
And then he walks away from the
920
00:53:22,760 --> 00:53:27,080
mirror and Benedict sees the
final product and he has that
921
00:53:27,080 --> 00:53:30,200
giant, stupid scar across his
eye.
922
00:53:32,160 --> 00:53:36,120
Tell me that you're not going to
overact if they put the most
923
00:53:36,120 --> 00:53:39,520
obvious scar I've ever seen in a
movie on your.
924
00:53:39,520 --> 00:53:40,800
Face.
That's true.
925
00:53:41,200 --> 00:53:43,680
That's true.
As soon as I saw that in the
926
00:53:43,680 --> 00:53:46,200
mirror, I'd be like, all right,
I'm ready for this.
927
00:53:46,200 --> 00:53:49,080
Yeah, you can't put a scar on my
face like that and expect me not
928
00:53:49,080 --> 00:53:51,920
to be like, just.
Shoe scenery.
929
00:53:51,920 --> 00:53:56,960
Yeah, exactly.
Thank you for joining me in
930
00:53:57,080 --> 00:53:59,760
Imagination Station.
I appreciate that, man.
931
00:54:00,320 --> 00:54:02,600
Is there anybody else from the
cast that you think is worth
932
00:54:02,600 --> 00:54:04,040
mentioning?
I I feel like we've kind of
933
00:54:04,040 --> 00:54:06,400
knocked it out talking about the
two leads here.
934
00:54:07,440 --> 00:54:10,560
Yeah, I mean, I don't know if
anybody else has enough time,
935
00:54:11,200 --> 00:54:15,120
whoever they chose to sing that
song in the middle of it.
936
00:54:15,880 --> 00:54:19,520
No idea who it is, but man, that
dude could belt it.
937
00:54:19,520 --> 00:54:23,400
And that was like, truly, I
think that's where this movie
938
00:54:23,400 --> 00:54:27,440
succeeds, Bob.
It's in those a few small quiet
939
00:54:27,440 --> 00:54:31,560
moments where you just get to
see Makai be broken and
940
00:54:31,560 --> 00:54:38,360
horrified and like the the
juxtaposition of the horrors
941
00:54:38,360 --> 00:54:44,040
that he has seen humans do to
each other with the beauty that
942
00:54:44,040 --> 00:54:47,040
humans can bring into the world
with music like that.
943
00:54:47,400 --> 00:54:51,560
It's like moments like that is
where this movie just is
944
00:54:51,560 --> 00:54:55,640
incredible.
Yeah, I also love the idea of,
945
00:54:55,640 --> 00:54:57,960
you know, you don't find out
anything about George Mckay's
946
00:54:57,960 --> 00:54:59,840
character.
And there's a moment where he
947
00:54:59,840 --> 00:55:03,640
has to escape some Germans in
this shelled out town.
948
00:55:03,640 --> 00:55:07,320
And he ducks into this, like,
underground apartment basically
949
00:55:07,320 --> 00:55:09,040
that's been hollowed out as
well.
950
00:55:09,560 --> 00:55:12,040
Runs into this French lady who's
nursing a baby.
951
00:55:12,440 --> 00:55:15,360
And she asks him, like, do you
have children?
952
00:55:15,360 --> 00:55:18,000
And he just doesn't answer her.
And he continues babbling with
953
00:55:18,000 --> 00:55:21,440
the baby.
At the very end of the movie, he
954
00:55:21,440 --> 00:55:25,240
finally is like in safety for a
moment, finds himself another
955
00:55:25,240 --> 00:55:28,960
tree to sit down at, pulls out
the picture of his children and
956
00:55:28,960 --> 00:55:31,880
his wife that just says like,
come back to us on the back.
957
00:55:32,440 --> 00:55:34,560
And I'm your boy was overwhelmed
with emotion.
958
00:55:35,200 --> 00:55:39,520
But I love the narrative
decision to make this kind of
959
00:55:39,520 --> 00:55:41,120
like a closed loop circuit,
right?
960
00:55:41,120 --> 00:55:45,320
Like it ends exactly where it
started, implying that like 5
961
00:55:45,320 --> 00:55:48,440
minutes from now, after this
guy's wakes up from his nap,
962
00:55:48,440 --> 00:55:51,920
he's right back into it again.
And I think that's again, that's
963
00:55:51,920 --> 00:55:55,040
where the movie succeeds.
Does it get a little bit on the
964
00:55:55,040 --> 00:55:58,800
nose sometimes with the like I'm
going to tell the French baby
965
00:55:58,800 --> 00:56:02,120
the nursery rhyme about they
went to see in a sieve, Like,
966
00:56:02,120 --> 00:56:05,120
Yep, does it get a little bit on
the nose and singing the hymn
967
00:56:05,120 --> 00:56:07,280
about going over Jordan?
Sure, why not?
968
00:56:07,280 --> 00:56:10,400
But like, I think at the end of
the day, man, gimmick or no
969
00:56:10,400 --> 00:56:13,840
gimmick, this is a really
powerful and affecting movie.
970
00:56:14,920 --> 00:56:19,480
It absolutely is.
There is so many moments
971
00:56:19,480 --> 00:56:23,160
throughout this film that you
just feel your emotions rise
972
00:56:23,440 --> 00:56:26,560
from the quiet moments that we
just talked about to the
973
00:56:26,560 --> 00:56:32,120
trailer, him running down the
front line as thousands of
974
00:56:32,120 --> 00:56:37,960
British troops are going across.
What a stunning piece of
975
00:56:37,960 --> 00:56:40,840
filmmaking.
Like, Makai is just getting
976
00:56:41,280 --> 00:56:45,160
trucked by these other dudes and
he just keeps getting up and
977
00:56:45,160 --> 00:56:48,040
running.
And the music has swollen and
978
00:56:48,040 --> 00:56:50,920
it's beautiful and there's
explosions everywhere.
979
00:56:51,120 --> 00:56:54,520
Like how can you not watch that
and not feel moved?
980
00:56:55,000 --> 00:56:59,840
100% there are two key moments
for me in this movie that I just
981
00:56:59,840 --> 00:57:02,200
feel like our absolute knockout
sequences.
982
00:57:02,520 --> 00:57:05,920
And that the one is that ending
sequence because, you know,
983
00:57:05,920 --> 00:57:09,640
because of the suspense that's
built throughout the movie.
984
00:57:10,120 --> 00:57:13,600
It really feels like almost like
a four quarter game of football
985
00:57:13,600 --> 00:57:17,280
or basketball or whatever where
it's like we just need one final
986
00:57:17,280 --> 00:57:20,120
push here and you're really on
the edge of your seat waiting
987
00:57:20,120 --> 00:57:23,600
for that final moment.
But the other one for me is, you
988
00:57:23,600 --> 00:57:27,840
know, he's gone to this shelled
out French town and got grazed
989
00:57:27,840 --> 00:57:30,440
by a bullet, fell down a flight
of stairs and blacks out.
990
00:57:30,440 --> 00:57:32,480
And it's the only time in the
movie where there's an extended,
991
00:57:32,640 --> 00:57:34,760
you know, sequence of black or,
or a cut.
992
00:57:35,360 --> 00:57:37,800
And then he wakes up.
And as soon as he wakes up, that
993
00:57:37,800 --> 00:57:40,680
Thomas Newman score kicks in
with almost like a xylophone, I
994
00:57:40,680 --> 00:57:43,360
think.
And it's the score that follows
995
00:57:43,360 --> 00:57:47,440
him all through this escape from
this town as the flares are
996
00:57:47,440 --> 00:57:50,640
going off.
And that piece of music is just
997
00:57:51,320 --> 00:57:53,800
unbelievable, dude.
It's so.
998
00:57:53,800 --> 00:57:56,120
Gorgeous.
You know, this lost the Oscar
999
00:57:56,120 --> 00:58:00,000
for best score to the score from
Joker, which is, you know, to
1000
00:58:00,000 --> 00:58:05,040
me, an OK score, certainly
distinct, but I thought this was
1001
00:58:05,040 --> 00:58:07,360
like one of the best Thomas
Newman scores I've ever heard.
1002
00:58:07,360 --> 00:58:10,520
And I freaking love that
centerpiece piece of music as
1003
00:58:10,520 --> 00:58:12,360
well.
Yeah, if you're just making it a
1004
00:58:12,360 --> 00:58:16,640
competition between this and
Joker, that's a joke, like.
1005
00:58:16,840 --> 00:58:18,920
I, I mean, I feel like that's.
Chance.
1006
00:58:18,920 --> 00:58:21,840
That's what I say when anybody
compares any movie to Joker.
1007
00:58:21,840 --> 00:58:25,200
So, you know, it's not much of A
competition to me, man.
1008
00:58:26,080 --> 00:58:29,400
Oh, totally, dude.
Yeah, the the music in this
1009
00:58:29,400 --> 00:58:33,600
movie, Yeah, the composition is
just beautiful.
1010
00:58:33,600 --> 00:58:38,360
And it feels like a movie movie.
Like the costuming is unreal and
1011
00:58:38,360 --> 00:58:42,120
the cinematography is amazing.
And the set design, like there's
1012
00:58:42,120 --> 00:58:44,200
a combination of when they're
first walking through the
1013
00:58:44,200 --> 00:58:47,360
trenches and even when they get
into like the empty German
1014
00:58:47,360 --> 00:58:50,640
frontline and you can see like
the wood that they've used to
1015
00:58:50,640 --> 00:58:52,120
shore up the side of the
trenches.
1016
00:58:52,120 --> 00:58:55,320
And it's kind of like mildewy
and wet.
1017
00:58:55,400 --> 00:58:58,440
And like, the color of it is so
incredible, the way Deacons has
1018
00:58:58,440 --> 00:59:01,520
captured it.
But then just like the way that
1019
00:59:01,520 --> 00:59:05,480
they erected this French town
that is half shelled out, it's
1020
00:59:05,480 --> 00:59:09,240
just like this feels like a big
production.
1021
00:59:09,240 --> 00:59:12,520
And I think that's where a guy
like Mendez doesn't get enough
1022
00:59:12,520 --> 00:59:15,360
credit is, especially between
this and Skyfall.
1023
00:59:15,360 --> 00:59:20,400
Like you can see every dollar of
the budget on screen.
1024
00:59:21,160 --> 00:59:26,240
Easily it's a beautiful movie
that like there are some issues
1025
00:59:26,240 --> 00:59:31,000
with storytelling and some of
the characters, but overall man,
1026
00:59:31,000 --> 00:59:37,360
I like 1917 is easily one of the
best movies of 2019 and that's
1027
00:59:37,360 --> 00:59:40,360
in a stacked cast.
All right, man, let's get into
1028
00:59:40,360 --> 00:59:42,160
our last segment of the day,
which we call.
1029
00:59:42,160 --> 00:59:45,200
Let's make it a double.
We're near the end of the
1030
00:59:45,200 --> 00:59:48,680
episode, so thanks listening to
the film and Whiskey show.
1031
00:59:48,840 --> 00:59:51,000
Let's have another film with
this one, even if it's
1032
00:59:51,000 --> 00:59:52,680
struggling.
It's the final segment of the
1033
00:59:52,680 --> 00:59:54,080
day.
Now let's make it a double.
1034
00:59:54,240 --> 00:59:56,560
Let's Make It a Double is
presented by Blackwood
1035
00:59:56,560 --> 00:59:58,720
Distilling Company.
It's the part of the show where
1036
00:59:58,720 --> 01:00:01,960
we pick a movie to pair up with
this one to make the perfect
1037
01:00:01,960 --> 01:00:05,640
double feature.
I think today, Brad, like what?
1038
01:00:05,640 --> 01:00:08,600
I love to pair this with another
one shot movie, sure, or another
1039
01:00:08,600 --> 01:00:11,800
war movie.
But the the one that stuck out
1040
01:00:11,800 --> 01:00:15,680
to me went back to that scene
with the cherry blossoms as a,
1041
01:00:15,760 --> 01:00:19,680
you know, a metaphor for the
grace and peace that is lost in
1042
01:00:19,680 --> 01:00:21,760
the fog of war.
And there's another movie that
1043
01:00:21,760 --> 01:00:25,960
features cherry blossoms quite
prominently, especially from the
1044
01:00:25,960 --> 01:00:28,880
great Japanese actor Ken
Watanabe, and that is the film
1045
01:00:28,960 --> 01:00:31,480
The Last Samurai.
I don't know if it's a movie
1046
01:00:31,480 --> 01:00:35,640
that you've ever seen.
I freaking loved that movie when
1047
01:00:35,640 --> 01:00:37,880
I was growing up.
How have we not watched that?
1048
01:00:37,960 --> 01:00:38,680
I don't know.
I love.
1049
01:00:38,680 --> 01:00:41,840
I love that movie too.
When, when he just says like,
1050
01:00:42,120 --> 01:00:45,880
they're all perfect, like, oh,
dude, so good.
1051
01:00:46,440 --> 01:00:49,800
So yeah, I I'm gonna use the
cherry blossom analogy and pair
1052
01:00:49,800 --> 01:00:55,280
this up with The Last Samurai.
I think that's a a great pick
1053
01:00:55,280 --> 01:00:58,760
for our double feature.
We should watch Last Samurai
1054
01:00:58,760 --> 01:01:00,280
sometime dude.
Yeah, we really should.
1055
01:01:01,080 --> 01:01:04,560
Oh man, although I do do I
remember correctly it's like 3
1056
01:01:04,560 --> 01:01:06,400
hours long.
Yeah, but it's three hours of
1057
01:01:06,400 --> 01:01:08,280
Tom Cruise, your favorite human
being.
1058
01:01:09,160 --> 01:01:12,360
No, I, I yeah, I'm, I'm in.
I'm already bought it.
1059
01:01:12,680 --> 01:01:14,440
Don't oversell.
I'm already bought it.
1060
01:01:15,760 --> 01:01:18,360
I think I'm going to pair this
with Paths of Glory.
1061
01:01:19,240 --> 01:01:21,840
Oh good one, I.
I, I think that both of them
1062
01:01:21,840 --> 01:01:30,000
kind of highlight the human cost
of war, the futility of the
1063
01:01:30,400 --> 01:01:34,200
military brass thinking they
know everything, that there just
1064
01:01:34,200 --> 01:01:36,440
seems like there's a lot of good
comparisons here.
1065
01:01:36,440 --> 01:01:43,480
I know that Mendez used Paths of
Glory in some of his, you know,
1066
01:01:43,480 --> 01:01:46,120
lead up preparation to make
1917.
1067
01:01:46,560 --> 01:01:48,680
So yeah, that that that's my
pick.
1068
01:01:49,520 --> 01:01:53,480
I mentioned this movie before on
one podcast or another, Brad,
1069
01:01:53,480 --> 01:01:57,040
but there's a great documentary
that Peter Jackson did in the 20
1070
01:01:57,040 --> 01:02:00,960
tens around this time called
They Shall Not Grow Old, where
1071
01:02:00,960 --> 01:02:03,440
he and his team took a bunch of
old footage.
1072
01:02:03,840 --> 01:02:08,680
And I think through AI, you
know, restored it, upscaled it
1073
01:02:08,680 --> 01:02:12,680
to 4K, colorized it, read the
lips of the people in the
1074
01:02:12,680 --> 01:02:16,560
footage, found people from the
same areas of England to like
1075
01:02:16,560 --> 01:02:19,400
over dub what they were saying.
And it just becomes this
1076
01:02:19,400 --> 01:02:23,840
historical document of like
taking this old conflict of war
1077
01:02:24,240 --> 01:02:26,640
and really bringing those people
into the present.
1078
01:02:27,040 --> 01:02:29,520
And I I was blown away by that
documentary.
1079
01:02:29,960 --> 01:02:33,840
Like I said, there's not enough
World War One content anyway, so
1080
01:02:34,080 --> 01:02:36,600
if you're curious to watch more
World War One stuff, you could
1081
01:02:36,600 --> 01:02:39,480
do a lot worse than checking out
Paths of Glory and the
1082
01:02:39,480 --> 01:02:41,200
documentary They Shall Not Grow
Old.
1083
01:02:42,280 --> 01:02:47,920
I have not gotten around to the
those documentaries, it's like
1084
01:02:47,920 --> 01:02:50,480
been on my list for a long time
that I really want to watch
1085
01:02:50,480 --> 01:02:51,640
them.
Yeah, it's super good.
1086
01:02:51,640 --> 01:02:54,880
You should check it out, man.
Well, OK, those are our pairings
1087
01:02:54,880 --> 01:02:57,960
for Let's Make It a Double like
we said, presented by Blackwood
1088
01:02:57,960 --> 01:03:00,600
Distilling Company.
No matter what you choose to
1089
01:03:00,600 --> 01:03:04,120
pair this movie up with, you can
always make it a double with
1090
01:03:04,120 --> 01:03:05,880
Blackwood.
And if you go to
1091
01:03:05,880 --> 01:03:10,880
bourbonoutfitter.com/film
Whiskey and use our code Film
1092
01:03:10,880 --> 01:03:14,360
Whiskey at checkout, you can
save on your bottle of Blackwood
1093
01:03:14,440 --> 01:03:16,720
as well.
Brad, it's time to get into
1094
01:03:16,720 --> 01:03:20,320
final scores here.
For most of this film, I was at
1095
01:03:20,320 --> 01:03:25,640
like an 8 1/2, maybe a nine.
I do think that like, it is a
1096
01:03:25,640 --> 01:03:28,920
handsomely mounted film that
feels like it just falls short
1097
01:03:28,920 --> 01:03:30,840
of greatness for most of the
runtime.
1098
01:03:31,400 --> 01:03:35,240
And then the ending happened and
I was like, this solved every
1099
01:03:35,240 --> 01:03:38,200
issue I had with this movie.
I think I'm going to come all
1100
01:03:38,200 --> 01:03:41,080
the way up to a 9.5 out of 10 on
this one, Brad.
1101
01:03:41,880 --> 01:03:46,480
Wow.
Yeah, I, I'm kind of between an
1102
01:03:46,480 --> 01:03:50,360
8 1/2 and a nine.
I I think originally I was at
1103
01:03:50,360 --> 01:03:53,040
like an 8 out of 10 when I first
saw it.
1104
01:03:53,640 --> 01:03:55,840
I think I'll come up to a nine
out of 10.
1105
01:03:57,280 --> 01:04:03,560
I don't know if this is quite
Yeah, it's it's just not quite
1106
01:04:03,560 --> 01:04:09,160
at that level of perfection that
you need to be at to hit that
1107
01:04:09,160 --> 01:04:12,520
nine and a half 10 range.
But there is so much to love
1108
01:04:12,520 --> 01:04:14,920
about this movie.
And I, I would agree with you.
1109
01:04:14,920 --> 01:04:22,120
I I think it's a little bit
ridiculous that the critics just
1110
01:04:22,120 --> 01:04:25,160
don't like Sam Mendez.
Like at the end of the day, sure
1111
01:04:25,160 --> 01:04:28,480
some of their complaints might
be accurate, but he makes
1112
01:04:28,680 --> 01:04:37,000
incredible movies and in an era
where it seems like the quality
1113
01:04:37,120 --> 01:04:43,040
of filmmaking is going down, I
can't see how they are not self
1114
01:04:43,040 --> 01:04:46,880
defeating and destroying their
own industry when they nitpick
1115
01:04:46,880 --> 01:04:51,240
about movies like 1917.
Yeah, man, I think you've
1116
01:04:51,240 --> 01:04:55,520
summarized it perfectly.
So it's a 9.25 out of 10 for us
1117
01:04:55,520 --> 01:04:57,760
on average, but we'd like to
know what you think.
1118
01:04:58,080 --> 01:05:01,800
Did 1917 accomplish everything
you thought it should?
1119
01:05:02,040 --> 01:05:05,880
Are you with us on the over 9
scale or did it not quite click
1120
01:05:05,880 --> 01:05:07,840
for you?
You can let us know on any of
1121
01:05:07,840 --> 01:05:11,640
our social media accounts,
Facebook, Twitter, Instagram,
1122
01:05:11,800 --> 01:05:17,160
Tiktok or YouTube Film Whiskey.
Or if you'd like to, you can
1123
01:05:17,160 --> 01:05:20,440
join the conversation on our
Discord server where we are
1124
01:05:20,440 --> 01:05:23,680
there every day talking about
movies and whiskey and all sorts
1125
01:05:23,680 --> 01:05:25,720
of other things.
O If you'd like to join the
1126
01:05:25,720 --> 01:05:28,440
conversation, you can find a
link at the end of every single
1127
01:05:28,440 --> 01:05:31,560
one of our show notes.
We have but three episodes
1128
01:05:31,560 --> 01:05:34,480
remaining on the season, Brad,
and we're going to shift into
1129
01:05:34,480 --> 01:05:38,600
animated film next week to check
out one of my very favorites
1130
01:05:38,600 --> 01:05:42,160
from this century, it's
DreamWorks 2010 film How to
1131
01:05:42,160 --> 01:05:45,360
Train Your Dragon.
I'm excited to dive into that
1132
01:05:45,360 --> 01:05:47,280
one with you, man.
Yeah, super pumped, dude.
1133
01:05:47,280 --> 01:05:49,840
It's going to be fun.
All right, join us next week for
1134
01:05:49,840 --> 01:05:51,760
that.
But until then, I'm Bob Book.
1135
01:05:52,120 --> 01:05:54,760
I'm Brad G.
And we'll see you next time.
1136
01:06:18,960 --> 01:06:19,200
Music.